Jonathan’s answer to “Ummm, so does this book imply approval or disapproval of divergent gender identities and the validi…” > Likes and Comments
17 likes · Like
The thing is that questions about identity, morality, who we are and where we come from: these don't need religion to be asked. Seeing gender as separate question from identity is not correct either, it very much ties into whole picture of oneself. So I think the premise of the book is wrong and discards basics of philosophy just to drive some other agenda on behalf of religions. So looks like this book will not be on my list after all. Thanks for describing it before I waste time on it.
back to top
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Ilkka
(new)
Aug 13, 2016 06:24AM
The thing is that questions about identity, morality, who we are and where we come from: these don't need religion to be asked. Seeing gender as separate question from identity is not correct either, it very much ties into whole picture of oneself. So I think the premise of the book is wrong and discards basics of philosophy just to drive some other agenda on behalf of religions. So looks like this book will not be on my list after all. Thanks for describing it before I waste time on it.
reply
|
flag
