Kel’s answer to “Will there be a future edition of the books where there might be more editing done to show that we …” > Likes and Comments

The various ways to refer to Rezkin while in his POV were a bit hard to get used to, but not a big deal, I thought. Just a little different and quirky.

I had no problem distinguishing between POVs.

Thank goodness there will be more books! I am positively GREEDY for them! Thanks for writing. I have thoroughly enjoyed Books 1 and 2.

Oh... you did have a few typos in the text... Again, not a big deal. Those should be cleaned up, though, if you do future editions. :)

Love the writing style! Please don't change it!! Yes sometimes confusing but it just has such a good rhythm, changing it to be more obvious would just ruin it.
I also find it annoying when writers assume you're to dumb and explain to much to make things more 'clear' for the reader. Very glad to see your reply indicating that you will not be making me feel dumb while reading/listening to your books.

It's not really a factor of having to be overly clear for clueless readers... There IS a problem many people have with "head-jumping" handling of the POV. I'm not a POV purist, but I do think there were a few instances of head-jumping that could have been handled slightly differently, but the overall style of the books was more positive than disrupting the flow of the story.

Being so much in Rez's POV and then having the 3rd person references to "the young warrior" did tend to pop me out of the narrative... but as the OP mentioned, I got used to it after a while and it wasn't a problem.