Simo’s answer to “Why should I read this book?” > Likes and Comments

Nietzsche one quote has more wisdom than all religious books (Quran, Bible, Geeta etc) put together

I call this an anti-Bible. I didn't enjoy reading the Bible. I liked this book a lot more.

Nietzsche's book is more inspiring than religious books.

don't compare philosophy to the Bible.

You guys are obviously lost and swalling this piece of rubbish, whose style mimics the bible. This is nothing in comparison to the bible or any other religious texts. This text is filled with heaped nonsense, and unclear allegories that make no sense whatsoever in an attempt to be a 'religious text' and gain a cult following. It baffles me how people buy into this without even giving some thought as to the way its written, and how he's religisising his own ideas to his readers - follow me and you will be saved .i.e. the idol of the superman.

DONT COMPARE THIS TO THE BIBLE OR THE QURAN - IT IS NO WAY NEAR OR EVEN CLOSE TO ITS NATURE. YOU GUYS HAVE OBVIOUSLY MADE THIS INTO YOUR BIBLE AND BOUGHT INTO THIS RUBBISH. THERE'S NOTHING PROFOUND IN THIS JUST A VERY MISGUIDED MAN WHO WANTED TO BE ENLIGHTENED, WHO HAD TO WRITE A FICTIONAL BOOK ABOUT A REAL PERSIAN PROPHET (ZARATHUSTRA), WHO REPRESENTS HIS IDEAS IN A FORM OF A RELIGIOUS PROOPHET OR TEACHER - AND HE BORROWS A LOT OF IDEAS AND LANGUAGE STYLE FROM THE BIBLE AND INCORPORATES IT INTO THIS HEAP OF BOLLOCKS IN THE HOPE TO MISLEAD YOU FROM THE TRUTH. TRUTH IS TRUTH AND THERES AN ATOMS WEIGHT OF TRUTH TO BE FOUND IN THIS BOOK, AND THAT TRUTH HAS BEEN KNOWN FOR CENTURIES THAT OF THE NATURAL ABILITY OF MAN TO OVERCOME HARDSHIPS AND STRUGGLES TO BECOME STONGER- ITS AN IDEA BORROWED AND STOLEN FROM RELIGIOUS TEXTS AND DOCTRINES THAT IS INHERENT AND IMPLICIT IN ALL RELIGIONS- IT IS NOT SOMETHING NEW OR PROFOUND FROM A MAN, WHO WAS HEAVILY INFLUENCD BY PERSIAN AND ISLAMIC WORKS WHO ALSO MISUNDERSTOOD THEM AND MISREPRESENTS THEM IN HIS WORKS, BUT ALAS, DECIDES TO STEAL AND APPRO[ROIATE THESE IDEAS AND DOCTRINES AND MIX IT INTO HIS OWN WORKS AND PRESENTS THE CLAIM TO HAVE ARRIVED AT THIS TRUTH INDEPENDENTLY FROM THEM. CLEARLY THIS MAN IS A FOOL, FRAUDSTER, MISOGYNIST, NARCISIT, WEAK, IGNORANT, AND A OUTWARD LIER AND OUGHT NOT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY. THERES NOTHING PROFOUND IN HIS BOOK WHEN YOU SEE THAT MOST OF THE IDEAS ARE STOLEN FROM BUDDHIST, CHRISTIAN, ISLAMIC, AND ZORASTRIANISM, AND ARE JUST MIXED IN WITH HIS OTHER IDEAS TO MAKE THEM SEEM LIKE THEY ARE ACTUAL TRUTHS DISCOVERED BY HIM, AND PRESENTS THEM IN A VERY RELIGIOUS WAY. BUT GIVEN THE AUDIENCE OF HIS WHO WOULD NOT HAVE A CLUE ABOUT THESE GREAT RELIGIONS, THEY WOULD SWALLOW HIS IDEAS, HOOK LINE AND SINKER, AND WOULD BEGIN TO PRAISE IT AS BEING PROFOUND ETC.. BUT NOTHING IS FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH THAT IT'S JUST A FORMULATED PIECE OF THEFT AND INOVATION FROM ACTUAL SACRED TEXTS, IN THE HOPE TO SANCTIFY THIS IDEA OF AN SUPERMAN OR WHAT NOT. NOTICE THAT THIS IS NOT AN ACTUAL IDEAL TO BE ATTAINED, BUT AN ETHICAL MAXIM WHICH ONE OUGHT TO PRACTICE IN HIS LIFE IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE HIS/HER GOALS. THIS DOCTRINE IS IMPLICITLY FOUND IN ALL RELIGIONS AS A VIRTUE AND ACT TO BE PRACTICED IN ORDER TO STRIVE AND OVERCOME THE STRUGGLES AND SUFFERING IN LIFE TO BECOME MORE STRONGER INDIVIDUALS AND TO COME CLOSER TO THE CAUSE OF GOD, AND ALSO TO LIVE A GOOD LIFE - THEY ARE INEXTRICABLY TIED TOGETHER AS A ETHICAL VIRTUE AND A SPIRTUAL PATH TO GAIN NEARNESS TO GOD AND KNOWING THYSELF- AN ACTUAL IDEAL THAT CAN BE ACTUALLY REALISED AS OPPOSED TO A FICTIONAL IDEAL THAT CAN NEVER BE REALISED. MAN BY NATURE CAN NEVER ATTAIN AN ABSOLUTE WILL (WHICH IS THE GIST OF THIS DOCTRINE) BECAUSE THE WILL IN WHICH WE SPEAK OF IS STRUCTURALLY COMPRISED OF POWER, AND THE ONLY WAY POWER CAN BE POWERED IS THROUGH THE POWER OF GOD, SO WITH OVERCOMING MAN NATURALLY IS BEING SUBSISTED WITH POWER FROM A FORCE OF POWER WHOSE SOURCE IS OBVIOUSLY THROUGH THE ULTIMATE REALITY WHO IS POWER AND WILL, SO THROUGH WHOSE WILL AND POWER IS THE HUMAN WILL AND SELF BEING SUSTAINED AND NOURISHED BY, THE POWER FROM THE ONLY REAL BEING WHOSE POWER IS MANIFESTED TO EVERY BEING AND THING IN THIS UNIVERSE - THE SOURCE OF THE POWER IS FROM THE ULTIMATE BEING WHO POSESSES THIS ATTRIBUTE IN HIS ESSENCE, AND THE ONLY WAY SUCH POWER - SUCH A DOCTRTINE EXISTS IN ISLAM, AND ISLAM ALSO TEACHES THAT LIFE IS SUFFERING AND THAT IT IS A VIRTUE TO OVERCOME WHICH IS WHY GOD HAS CREATED US IN THIS FORM AND GUIDED IT (SOUL/WILL) WITH INSPIRATION AS TO WHAT IS GOOD AND BAD FOR IT ( ITS PURIFICATION AND DEVELOPEMENT AND ITS CORRUPTION).SO YOU CAN SEE WHAT HE HAS DONE AND WHERE HE HAS GONE IN ERROR. HE HAS ACTUALLY PRODUCED A WORK IMBUED WITH RELIGIOUS IDEAS AND TEACHINGS AND HAS MADE IT APPEAR AS A NEW WORK. BY THE VERY NATURE OF VALUES THIS VALUES WILL DE-VALUE ITSELF BECAUSE IT INSTRINCALLY IS NOT A VALUE OR IDEAL IN THE TRUEST SENSE OF THE WORD DUE TO THE FACT THAT IT WILL NOT IMBUE MAN WITH SANCTITY AND SUBLIMITY BUT THAT IT IS ONLY A MEANS BY WHICH MAN CAN BECOME MORE STRONGER THROUGH OVERCOMING HIS OBSTACLES AND SUFFERING IN LIFE TO REACH CERTAIN ENDS THAT HE HAS SET FOR HIMSELF. HE DID NOT COME UP WITH THIS IDEA BUT STOLE THIS FROM RELIGION AND MIXED IT WITH HIS OWN VIEW ON LIFE AFFIRMATION (WHICH IS ALSO A VERY IMPLICIT RELIGIOUS IDEA).

@Zohaib typing furiously in caps makes your whole approach apprehensive and weak. maybe reconsider your way of communicating with others if you are targeting a civil discord. I am certainly not reading that wall of fury you just typed!

But fr @simo some people are sensitive with topics like comparing someone else's religious books, or religions in general, to something else and saying that 'something else' is better than the religious book, or religion in general, that you are comparing it with, so please be careful with your words.

@Jeszter Yes - @Simo is clearly the one we need to educate about communication in this thread ........