Michelle’s review of Doppelganger: A Trip into the Mirror World > Likes and Comments
113 likes · Like
Great review!
There are so many conspiracies surrounding his death, there is no way to debunk what you are claiming. That being said, my husband's uncle was one of the people slandered by Kennedy conspiracy theorists. People make a lot of claims for attention and for the fleeting excitement of fame but there are real victims who have to deal with the fallout.
Did you not like the book? Or did you not like that it differed from and challenged your very specific worldview (the validity of which you are already extremely convinced)?
Did you mean Nomi Prins? Also, doppelganger is not a term used to refer to someone of the same name as you but rather of the same appearance or seeming. I would like to know if you read the book or only object to what is mentioned in the summary or promotional material.
"How is a person with a completely different name to Ms Klien her doppelganger exactly?"
Maybe you should ACTUALLY read the book to find out.
Bro she doesn't defend anyone and she does some real gritty work to self-criticise how she conformed to the status quo during the pandemic? Also I don't get how you complain they have different names and then.... confess to having also confused her with a different Naomi? It's ok if you don't like this book lol but your reasons are b iting their own tail. I recommend actually reading the book
Question, meet answer:
"How is a person with a completely different name to Ms Klien her doppelganger exactly?
Ironically I think I first heard about Klein by confusing her with the superior author Naomi Prins."
I take it that you are a scientist and have read the relevant peer-reviewed books on vaccines and studies on the Covid vaccine?
This is not what the book is about. Fauci's name is mentioned 8 times in the book, the text of which is nearly 350 pages (plus references). It isn't a book about Fauci, defending him or otherwise.
Toby Rogers review - the one that ends with "Prayers for everyone fighting to stop the iatrogenocide" and "Please support our warrior-friend Dr. Naomi Wolf by pre-ordering her book (...) That’s the handbook we need and the antidote to the betrayal of Doppelganger". Yeah, ok, surely unbiased.
It's one thing to read something and another, to understand it. Not to agree or disagree - just understand the words on the paper. What a time to be alive when reading comprehension is in full decline.
Klein does in fact criticize the vaccine roll out quite severely, but not for the reasons you do. Her criticism was that it was not made more widely available.
That's a lot of words for someone who clearly didn't read a book which is vocally critical of both conspiracy theorists AND the pharma industry.
fiver wrote: "The book is about how attitudes like yours are formed, what would happen if you read it?" AMEN!!!
I’m not sure you have read this book. Klein criticises the way the vaccine was rolled out and big pharma. She also has all her work fact checked and triple corroborates sources…which is not something I’m sure you do with your alternative facts
David wrote: "I take it that you are a scientist and have read the relevant peer-reviewed books on vaccines and studies on the Covid vaccine?"applause!
Amy wrote: "I’m not sure you have read this book. Klein criticises the way the vaccine was rolled out and big pharma. She also has all her work fact checked and triple corroborates sources…which is not somethi..."
applause, yes, agree!
nothing in her book is a lie, but fully vetted by editors and a publishing company known for integrity. sadly it is you and other misguided non-provable-facts people (searching the internet for the lies you want to see isn't research btw) that are on the wrong side of history.. again. ffs
Please go and actually read this book. Then come back and revise your review. This is no place for your wackadoodle tinfoil bunkum.
Wow! Maybe it's time for Goodreads to include a laugh reaction—or at least let us add clown emojis when we're using the desktop browser version.
interesting review, kind of. but PLEASE cease and desist using the term "wrong side of history". it's meaningless and renders any potential impact you might have. there is simply no such thing, and anyone who cares about the world like you do would be well-served to find another simple phrase to use when an individual or group or government seems to be making the wrong choice.
It appears that you grabbed hold of this platform to announce your own belief in discredited ideas while lacking social media literacy to fact check, nor do you understand the scientific method. It is also clear that you did not hear when Fauci took responsibility for misinforming the public about the efficacy of cloth masks.
A book review this is not.
It’s no surprise that Klein’s husband and father are vaccine shills. It really should be disclosed that her husband makes money pushing the vaccine.
SIGH. More Disinformation. ALWAYS disclose YOUR source for assertions such as this. SIGH. Richelle wrote: "It’s no surprise that Klein’s husband and father are vaccine shills. It really should be disclosed that her husband makes money pushing the vaccine.
Did you even read the book? Naomi “Prins” isn’t the doppelgänger. It’s Naomi Wolf and it’s mentioned a thousand times in the book. You could have looked up a review or even the back of the book to get an idea of what the book was about.
I might go down your whole review and ask a laundry list of questions. If you can sufficiently answer them I would genuinely be impressed. I'm willing to give you a very small level of consideration because I do agree Klein has distortions (as well all do) as her book pretty much implies that by virtue. All that being said, I don't think it comes as a surprise that I quite firmly disagree with your review.
so you didn't read the book and you just went off because of an ad you watched and because you have fallen victim to anti-vaccine rhetoric. that's about all I got from this review.
back to top
message 1:
by
Brooks
(new)
Sep 04, 2023 09:18PM
Great review!
reply
|
flag
There are so many conspiracies surrounding his death, there is no way to debunk what you are claiming. That being said, my husband's uncle was one of the people slandered by Kennedy conspiracy theorists. People make a lot of claims for attention and for the fleeting excitement of fame but there are real victims who have to deal with the fallout.
Did you not like the book? Or did you not like that it differed from and challenged your very specific worldview (the validity of which you are already extremely convinced)?
Did you mean Nomi Prins? Also, doppelganger is not a term used to refer to someone of the same name as you but rather of the same appearance or seeming. I would like to know if you read the book or only object to what is mentioned in the summary or promotional material.
"How is a person with a completely different name to Ms Klien her doppelganger exactly?" Maybe you should ACTUALLY read the book to find out.
Bro she doesn't defend anyone and she does some real gritty work to self-criticise how she conformed to the status quo during the pandemic? Also I don't get how you complain they have different names and then.... confess to having also confused her with a different Naomi? It's ok if you don't like this book lol but your reasons are b iting their own tail. I recommend actually reading the book
Question, meet answer:"How is a person with a completely different name to Ms Klien her doppelganger exactly?
Ironically I think I first heard about Klein by confusing her with the superior author Naomi Prins."
I take it that you are a scientist and have read the relevant peer-reviewed books on vaccines and studies on the Covid vaccine?
This is not what the book is about. Fauci's name is mentioned 8 times in the book, the text of which is nearly 350 pages (plus references). It isn't a book about Fauci, defending him or otherwise.
Toby Rogers review - the one that ends with "Prayers for everyone fighting to stop the iatrogenocide" and "Please support our warrior-friend Dr. Naomi Wolf by pre-ordering her book (...) That’s the handbook we need and the antidote to the betrayal of Doppelganger". Yeah, ok, surely unbiased. It's one thing to read something and another, to understand it. Not to agree or disagree - just understand the words on the paper. What a time to be alive when reading comprehension is in full decline.
Klein does in fact criticize the vaccine roll out quite severely, but not for the reasons you do. Her criticism was that it was not made more widely available.
That's a lot of words for someone who clearly didn't read a book which is vocally critical of both conspiracy theorists AND the pharma industry.
fiver wrote: "The book is about how attitudes like yours are formed, what would happen if you read it?" AMEN!!!
I’m not sure you have read this book. Klein criticises the way the vaccine was rolled out and big pharma. She also has all her work fact checked and triple corroborates sources…which is not something I’m sure you do with your alternative facts
David wrote: "I take it that you are a scientist and have read the relevant peer-reviewed books on vaccines and studies on the Covid vaccine?"applause!
Amy wrote: "I’m not sure you have read this book. Klein criticises the way the vaccine was rolled out and big pharma. She also has all her work fact checked and triple corroborates sources…which is not somethi..."applause, yes, agree!
nothing in her book is a lie, but fully vetted by editors and a publishing company known for integrity. sadly it is you and other misguided non-provable-facts people (searching the internet for the lies you want to see isn't research btw) that are on the wrong side of history.. again. ffs
Please go and actually read this book. Then come back and revise your review. This is no place for your wackadoodle tinfoil bunkum.
Wow! Maybe it's time for Goodreads to include a laugh reaction—or at least let us add clown emojis when we're using the desktop browser version.
interesting review, kind of. but PLEASE cease and desist using the term "wrong side of history". it's meaningless and renders any potential impact you might have. there is simply no such thing, and anyone who cares about the world like you do would be well-served to find another simple phrase to use when an individual or group or government seems to be making the wrong choice.
It appears that you grabbed hold of this platform to announce your own belief in discredited ideas while lacking social media literacy to fact check, nor do you understand the scientific method. It is also clear that you did not hear when Fauci took responsibility for misinforming the public about the efficacy of cloth masks. A book review this is not.
It’s no surprise that Klein’s husband and father are vaccine shills. It really should be disclosed that her husband makes money pushing the vaccine.
SIGH. More Disinformation. ALWAYS disclose YOUR source for assertions such as this. SIGH. Richelle wrote: "It’s no surprise that Klein’s husband and father are vaccine shills. It really should be disclosed that her husband makes money pushing the vaccine.
Did you even read the book? Naomi “Prins” isn’t the doppelgänger. It’s Naomi Wolf and it’s mentioned a thousand times in the book. You could have looked up a review or even the back of the book to get an idea of what the book was about.
I might go down your whole review and ask a laundry list of questions. If you can sufficiently answer them I would genuinely be impressed. I'm willing to give you a very small level of consideration because I do agree Klein has distortions (as well all do) as her book pretty much implies that by virtue. All that being said, I don't think it comes as a surprise that I quite firmly disagree with your review.
so you didn't read the book and you just went off because of an ad you watched and because you have fallen victim to anti-vaccine rhetoric. that's about all I got from this review.






















