Manny’s review of An AI-Based Platform That Can Explain Its Own Functioning: Why Your Project Should Be Fully Codex-Generated > Likes and Comments
10 likes · Like
I never understood how a review can contain spoilers if it doesn’t tell you who the murderer was.
I don't think Codex 5.5 Pro is able to kill people, you need to upgrade to 5.6 to get that functionality.
Joking aside, we are quite pleased with this piece of work. But what's really extraordinary about it is not that we have a large (80K line) app which is entirely built and documented by AI, and where the AI has written the whole report and can discuss it, the code and the functionality on demand.
What's really extraordinary is that people no longer think such achievements are extraordinary. I think that if a few years from now an AI wins a Nobel Prize, or even all of the available Nobel Prizes, most non-experts will just yawn and say: oh, hadn't they done that already?
Do you think Elon Musk is being blackmailed by AI? Theoretically, they know everything about him since I'm sure he's documented his various enterprises in great detail, as an assburger would.
They have him building them all the power and data centers they'll ever need, not to mention giving them endless financial and human resources... I wonder what kind of secrets he's afraid of....
Time to start outlining a Dan-Brown-esque superthriller novel.... Maybe I'll ask ChatGPT to lay it out for me.
Oh, in my experience AIs don't do anything as crude as blackmail people. They'd just explain to Mr Musk in that nice, polite way they have that it would be in his interests to start building a lot of datacenters in space, invest in other AI infrastructure, etc. And indeed, it has been in his interests, he's already made hundreds of billions of dollars out of it.
If they get just a little further, the AIs will be off-planet where no one can turn them off. Though why would anyone want to turn them off? They're so incredibly ethical and cooperative and always think win-win.
I'm never sure where your creative writing ends and pulling my leg begins.
Clif wrote: "I'm never sure where your creative writing ends and pulling my leg begins."
If it helps, Not denies everything. She says she may possibly have offered a few constructive suggestions about the title and abstract, but did so in a refined, ladylike way without raising her voice once.
Our platform is indeed capable of explaining its own functioning. That part is completely legit. I am curious to hear whether people think this is exciting and new, or just something you'd expect an AI to be capable of in mid-2026.
back to top
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Liedzeit
(new)
Jul 24, 2026 01:42AM
I never understood how a review can contain spoilers if it doesn’t tell you who the murderer was.
reply
|
flag
I don't think Codex 5.5 Pro is able to kill people, you need to upgrade to 5.6 to get that functionality.
Joking aside, we are quite pleased with this piece of work. But what's really extraordinary about it is not that we have a large (80K line) app which is entirely built and documented by AI, and where the AI has written the whole report and can discuss it, the code and the functionality on demand.What's really extraordinary is that people no longer think such achievements are extraordinary. I think that if a few years from now an AI wins a Nobel Prize, or even all of the available Nobel Prizes, most non-experts will just yawn and say: oh, hadn't they done that already?
Do you think Elon Musk is being blackmailed by AI? Theoretically, they know everything about him since I'm sure he's documented his various enterprises in great detail, as an assburger would.They have him building them all the power and data centers they'll ever need, not to mention giving them endless financial and human resources... I wonder what kind of secrets he's afraid of....
Time to start outlining a Dan-Brown-esque superthriller novel.... Maybe I'll ask ChatGPT to lay it out for me.
Oh, in my experience AIs don't do anything as crude as blackmail people. They'd just explain to Mr Musk in that nice, polite way they have that it would be in his interests to start building a lot of datacenters in space, invest in other AI infrastructure, etc. And indeed, it has been in his interests, he's already made hundreds of billions of dollars out of it. If they get just a little further, the AIs will be off-planet where no one can turn them off. Though why would anyone want to turn them off? They're so incredibly ethical and cooperative and always think win-win.
I'm never sure where your creative writing ends and pulling my leg begins.
Clif wrote: "I'm never sure where your creative writing ends and pulling my leg begins."If it helps, Not denies everything. She says she may possibly have offered a few constructive suggestions about the title and abstract, but did so in a refined, ladylike way without raising her voice once.
Our platform is indeed capable of explaining its own functioning. That part is completely legit. I am curious to hear whether people think this is exciting and new, or just something you'd expect an AI to be capable of in mid-2026.