Cecily’s review of Flesh > Likes and Comments

155 likes · 
Comments Showing 1-38 of 38 (38 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Misha (new)

Misha Interesting!


message 2: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Misha wrote: "Interesting!"

It was! Hard to describe, but I'm glad I read it.


message 3: by Antoinette (new)

Antoinette You’ve definitely piqued my interest.


message 4: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Antoinette wrote: "You’ve definitely piqued my interest."

Definitely worth trying, but although I want authors to have good remuneration, I think this may be better to try, by library, than buy.


message 5: by Dmitri (new)

Dmitri Great review. I’m impressed by the ‘one sitting’ part as well.


message 6: by David (new)

David I have seen some unfavourable reviews Cecily and your is the first positive one!


message 7: by K (new)

K You've convinced me to put this one on my TBR. I've read so many mixed reviews about it, but your thoughts about make me feel that I would really like it. Fabulous review, Cecily!


message 8: by Cecily (last edited Feb 15, 2026 02:58AM) (new)

Cecily Dmitri wrote: "Great review. I’m impressed by the ‘one sitting’ part as well."

It took me by surprise, too. I delayed our evening meal by nearly an hour so I could finish it first!


message 9: by Cecily (last edited Feb 15, 2026 04:03AM) (new)

Cecily David wrote: "I have seen some unfavourable reviews Cecily and your is the first positive one!"

I haven't yet looked at other GR reviews. I wonder if some of them abandoned it in, or shortly after, the first chapter.

I had sympathy for Istvan (especially as teenager), but didn't much like him. I didn't like the dialogue-heavy writing. Some of the sex had more detail than felt necessary. And yet I couldn't put it down.

I always take notes when I read, but as I read the first chapter, on and off, during a shift in the local library, I treated it as a sampler. Then, when I got home and picked it up again... I just carried on, still without making notes. More immediate and immersive, and a shorter review than usual. I'm not sure if I'll read other books that way or not.


message 10: by Brad (new)

Brad Lyerla Cecily, I liked it too. My wife recommended it.


message 11: by Laura (new)

Laura Enjoyed your review Cecily. Well done.


message 12: by Ray (new)

Ray Interesting counterpoint to several poor reviews I have seen. Marked this up to a maybe - if I can find it secondhand I will try it out.


message 13: by Cecily (new)

Cecily K wrote: "You've convinced me to put this one on my TBR. I've read so many mixed reviews about it..."

Thanks, but read with caution, and if you don't enjoy the first chapter, read a little more, to see if you get hooked.


message 14: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Brad wrote: "Cecily, I liked it too. My wife recommended it."

We seem to be in a minority.


message 15: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Laura wrote: "Enjoyed your review Cecily. Well done."

Thanks, Laura.


message 16: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Ray wrote: "Interesting counterpoint to several poor reviews I have seen. Marked this up to a maybe - if I can find it secondhand I will try it out."

Caution advised, so second-hand, or library, is your best bet. I hope you find it worthwhile.


H (trying to keep up with GR friends) Balikov What a delightfully nuanced review, Cecily. Thank you


message 18: by Richard (new)

Richard One sitting is impressive! I was already intrigued because of a favorable review by another GR friend. Yours confirmed that I do want to read it. Thanks!


message 19: by Cecily (new)

Cecily H (trying to keep up with GR friends) Balikov wrote: "What a delightfully nuanced review, Cecily. Thank you"

Thank you, H. I find it tricky to explain how it took hold of me yesterday, but I'm glad you got the gist.


message 20: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Richard wrote: "One sitting is impressive! I was already intrigued because of a favorable review by another GR friend. Yours confirmed that I do want to read it. Thanks!"

It's mostly short sentences, with simple vocabulary, so it's easy to read quickly, and probably the best way to approach it. Don't ignore the unfavourable reviews though, as it is a book I'd hesitate to suggest to anyone, specifically. Reading a range of opinions will give you a firmer idea which camp you're likely to land in.


message 21: by Richard (new)

Richard I prefer to read reviews after I have read a book so as not to let the impressions of others influence me too much. Reading others’ reviews after I have finished sometimes helps me to clarify my own thoughts. Or introduces me to an element I had not considered…especially if they are thoughtful, in depth reviews like yours.


message 22: by Judy (new)

Judy Ok, I had my doubts but secretly thought this novel might be for me. You have convinced me! Thank you.


message 23: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Richard wrote: "I prefer to read reviews after I have read a book so as not to let the impressions of others influence me too much..."

Understandable. I read reviews of books I've not yet read with caution, but most of my friends here avoid spoilers, or else hide them. If I do go on to read a book, I always leave enough time that I don't remember any details.


message 24: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Judy wrote: "Ok, I had my doubts but secretly thought this novel might be for me. You have convinced me! Thank you."

I hope it's the right decision for you, and I hope to read your thoughts in due course.


message 25: by Ken (new)

Ken Lindholm Thanks Cecily for your review and reading suggestions. I have this in my potential reading queue, but was a bit on the fence about it. Your comments are encouraging, and I am an adherent to the “50 page” test before abandoning a book - which, I assume, would get me past the first chapter.


message 26: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Ken wrote: "Thanks Cecily for your review and reading suggestions... I am an adherent to the “50 page” test before abandoning a book - which, I assume, would get me past the first chapter.."

Yep. Reading to page 50 will take you to roughly half way through chapter 2.


message 27: by Stephen (new)

Stephen Great review.
Compelling perfectly describes the novel


message 28: by Mary (new)

Mary I too was hesitant about this one but your review has prompted me to give it a try, Cecily!


message 29: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Stephen wrote: "Great review.
Compelling perfectly describes the novel"


Thank you. And your mention (in your review) of sparse prose is important, too.


message 30: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Mary wrote: "I too was hesitant about this one but your review has prompted me to give it a try, Cecily!"

I hope you don't regret it!


message 31: by Ali (new)

Ali Loved this book also. 5 stars from me as well.


message 32: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Ali wrote: "Loved this book also. 5 stars from me as well."

For me, "loved" is not quite the right word, but I'm really glad I read it.


message 33: by Magdelanye (new)

Magdelanye gosh Cecily I had decided to skip this, it sounds so fraught and too similar to a few of the more disturbing reads I have been swept into recently ( Vladimir, The Occupation trilogy most recent) but you are persuasive and I will put myself on the library list.


message 34: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Magdelanye wrote: "gosh Cecily I had decided to skip this, it sounds so fraught and too similar to a few of the more disturbing reads..."

Yes, library is definitely the best bet. I hope you find it worth the risk, but if you don't enjoy it, no worries. Just don't stop reading because of the first chapter.


message 35: by Magdelanye (new)

Magdelanye there is a long waitlist for this (for once I'm okay with that} but I will be sure to remember your advice. And maybe you would like Vladimir


message 36: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Magdelanye wrote: "... And maybe you would like Vladimir"

Thanks, but is Vladimir a character or author?
(I tried searching for Vladimir, The Occupation trilogy, but not success.)


message 37: by Ken (new)

Ken I was more ambivalent than you, but can see its appeal, even though I lean more toward "ordinary" than "extra." Hamlet? I missed it. Were all the women so many Ophelias?


message 38: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Ken wrote: "... Hamlet? I missed it. Were all the women so many Ophelias?"

I don't think Ophelia is a good fit, but there were at least two mentions of the play, and none of anything else, so I thought of it in a looser sense of betrayal, abuse of power loss, and madness.


back to top