H (trying to keep up with GR friends) Balikov’s review of Bad Movies We Love > Likes and Comments
19 likes · Like
Yikes, H!!!!
Mark wrote: "Yikes, H!!!!"
Your, "Yikes", is much appreciated, mate!
H, I too was an MST 3000 fan, but it worked because of the characters and the format. Hard to duplicate that in a book, so I'm not surprised this one missed the mark.
Ouch. I am sorry you had to suffer through this. Excellent review, though!
"Most people who see the movies think of themselves as competent critics and they demonstrate that by the clever or snarky things they can say about a film, its actors or director."
I do not get to be "most people" all that often so I guess thanks for letting me into a majority.
However,
Does this only apply to those who review movies?
Gary wrote: "H, I too was an MST 3000 fan, but it worked because of the characters and the format. Hard to duplicate that in a book, so I'm not surprised this one missed the mark."
I had to take a look, Gary, but your supposition is impeccable. The MST 3000 was the way to go. Thanks for commenting.
Alexandra wrote: "Ouch. I am sorry you had to suffer through this. Excellent review, though!"
Very kind of you, Alexandra. We "serve and protect" ;-)
Phrodrick slowed his growing backlog wrote: ""Most people who see the movies think of themselves as competent critics and they demonstrate that by the clever or snarky things they can say about a film, its actors or director."
I do not get t..."
Haha P!
I suspect that you could offer some extensions of this assertion.
Credit for audacity in having the forward by Sharon Stone. I wounder how they did her make up and lighting during the forward?
Terrific insights, H. I also responded to your comment of the Meltzer book I read, fyi. 😊
back to top
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Mark
(new)
7 hours, 20 min ago
Yikes, H!!!!
reply
|
flag
Mark wrote: "Yikes, H!!!!"Your, "Yikes", is much appreciated, mate!
H, I too was an MST 3000 fan, but it worked because of the characters and the format. Hard to duplicate that in a book, so I'm not surprised this one missed the mark.
Ouch. I am sorry you had to suffer through this. Excellent review, though!
"Most people who see the movies think of themselves as competent critics and they demonstrate that by the clever or snarky things they can say about a film, its actors or director."I do not get to be "most people" all that often so I guess thanks for letting me into a majority.
However,
Does this only apply to those who review movies?
Gary wrote: "H, I too was an MST 3000 fan, but it worked because of the characters and the format. Hard to duplicate that in a book, so I'm not surprised this one missed the mark."I had to take a look, Gary, but your supposition is impeccable. The MST 3000 was the way to go. Thanks for commenting.
Alexandra wrote: "Ouch. I am sorry you had to suffer through this. Excellent review, though!"Very kind of you, Alexandra. We "serve and protect" ;-)
Phrodrick slowed his growing backlog wrote: ""Most people who see the movies think of themselves as competent critics and they demonstrate that by the clever or snarky things they can say about a film, its actors or director."I do not get t..."
Haha P!
I suspect that you could offer some extensions of this assertion.
Credit for audacity in having the forward by Sharon Stone. I wounder how they did her make up and lighting during the forward?
Terrific insights, H. I also responded to your comment of the Meltzer book I read, fyi. 😊
