Sylvia’s comment > Likes and Comments
1 like · Like
Oh! So it will be mentioned in the following books then? (Thanks btw!)
Was, not is. By the time she mentions it, she is referring to the birth of the baby in past tense.
back to top
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Nina
(new)
Feb 25, 2013 07:47AM
Oh! So it will be mentioned in the following books then? (Thanks btw!)
reply
|
flag
Was, not is. By the time she mentions it, she is referring to the birth of the baby in past tense.
