Isabel’s comment > Likes and Comments
2 likes · Like
Oh yeah, I definatly think Harry should have died.
No. Here's what happened:
When Voldemort came to kill Harry and his parents, he couldn't kill Harry because of Lily's love. His body was destroyed, and so a part of him had to latch on to the nearest living thing; Harry.
So, when Voldemort tried to kill Harry, he only killed the part of himself that was in Harry. :)
I agree Isabel - Snape, Fred, Lupin and Tonks were indeed enough for me - not to mention Dumbledore....
Tehreem: that made me smile, yes, Voldemort is subconsciously suicidal. Such an ironicly amusing revelation.
There were enough major characters who died :-( No way should have Neville or Ginny died like you suggested (even though I'm not the biggest fan of Ginny) x
back to top
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
[deleted user]
(new)
Jul 10, 2012 05:03AM
That was WAY more than enough.
reply
|
flag
Again I was not talking about the amount, but should those people have died?Maybe a fewer number of people that played bigger roles or one person with a big role.
Oh yeah, I definatly think Harry should have died.
No. Here's what happened:When Voldemort came to kill Harry and his parents, he couldn't kill Harry because of Lily's love. His body was destroyed, and so a part of him had to latch on to the nearest living thing; Harry.
So, when Voldemort tried to kill Harry, he only killed the part of himself that was in Harry. :)
I agree Isabel - Snape, Fred, Lupin and Tonks were indeed enough for me - not to mention Dumbledore....
Tehreem: that made me smile, yes, Voldemort is subconsciously suicidal. Such an ironicly amusing revelation.
There were enough major characters who died :-( No way should have Neville or Ginny died like you suggested (even though I'm not the biggest fan of Ginny) x
