Moiz’s comment > Likes and Comments
Like
Kellhus was way too powerful? I don't know if I can agree with you there, Maouz. Kellhus' power was earned; he had to learn magic. But I do think that by the third book, the other characters became more interesting than him. Once things became easy for him, the development of other characters began to shine brighter.
I myself just couldn't bring myself to compare George Martin with Scott Bakker. The former is certainly adumbrated by the superior latter.
Bo wrote: "I myself just couldn't bring myself to compare George Martin with Scott Bakker. The former is certainly adumbrated by the superior latter."
Well, I reserve any further comment due to ignorance about G.R.Martin at this time, LOL. After I've read him I may have a change of heart... it's happened before.
Martin's good if you just want to read something breezy and accessible. Although you won't get the same intellectual satisfaction you get with Bakker. :)
back to top
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Alfred
(new)
Jan 21, 2012 06:42PM
Kellhus was way too powerful? I don't know if I can agree with you there, Maouz. Kellhus' power was earned; he had to learn magic. But I do think that by the third book, the other characters became more interesting than him. Once things became easy for him, the development of other characters began to shine brighter.
reply
|
flag
I myself just couldn't bring myself to compare George Martin with Scott Bakker. The former is certainly adumbrated by the superior latter.
Bo wrote: "I myself just couldn't bring myself to compare George Martin with Scott Bakker. The former is certainly adumbrated by the superior latter."Well, I reserve any further comment due to ignorance about G.R.Martin at this time, LOL. After I've read him I may have a change of heart... it's happened before.
Martin's good if you just want to read something breezy and accessible. Although you won't get the same intellectual satisfaction you get with Bakker. :)
