Cindy’s comment > Likes and Comments

2 likes · 
Comments Showing 1-9 of 9 (9 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Ian (new)

Ian Moore I thought it was just me, I couldn't actually read all of it, I found it crude to the point of insanity. Sometimes the best way to incite reaction is less rather than more detail???? It HAD to be the porn factor.


message 2: by Anna (new)

Anna So badly written. It doesn't even have anything to do with the sex, it was just so technically bad. This is why editors are necessary.


message 3: by Ian (new)

Ian Moore Anyone could have written that way, I found it akin to the stuff you'll find on the back of a public toilet door. It was tasteless, crude and repetitive AND surprisingly through the entire editions. The author didn't seem to "feel" any of the characters or attempt to connect with the potential readers other than on a basic (very basic) carnal level.


message 4: by Tamara (new)

Tamara Philip 100% agree!!


message 5: by Marija (new)

Marija Very badly written, not creative with her sexual scenes either..same old same old...want good sex scenes...Clan of the Cave Bear was better!


message 6: by Madiduz (new)

Madiduz Agree. I thought perhaps jumping to the sexy scenes would make it worth the try, but I got tired of it.


+  geEkinTHepINk  x my sentiments exactly!


message 8: by Maggie (new)

Maggie Crawford But the "sexy parts" were boring, too.


message 9: by Peg (new)

Peg Seay Indeed! I like the genre (I've read MUCH better) but the writing was appalling!


back to top