تهافت الفلاسفة

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about تهافت الفلاسفة, please sign up.

Answered Questions (2)

Michel Khoury Well this book actually contradicts the emanation and every other neoplatonism ; if you are looking for neoplatonism go for Ibn Sina and Al-Farabi ...…moreWell this book actually contradicts the emanation and every other neoplatonism ; if you are looking for neoplatonism go for Ibn Sina and Al-Farabi ...
Because Al-Ghazali is based purely on the holy book and not on any other philosophy, for him they are all heretics (including greeks and every person that was inspired from them- if you need any help contact me - PS : i'm working on Neitzsche) (less)
Muhammad Shehab u would if u read the 1st one (The Aims ...) 1st, Alghazali wrote this one as an introduction to the Incoherence, he wrote it as if he was one of them…moreu would if u read the 1st one (The Aims ...) 1st, Alghazali wrote this one as an introduction to the Incoherence, he wrote it as if he was one of them (philosophers) and he succeeded. And he wrote The Standard after he wrote The Incoherence so it would be explanation to logic which he used in the 1st 2 books. so u better read it as such:
1. The Aims of the Philosophers
2. The Incoherence of the Philosophers
3. The Standard for Knowledge (read it if u didn't fully understand logic in the 1st 2 books)

and sorry my weak English :)(less)

Unanswered Questions (1)

This question contains spoilers... (view spoiler)

About Goodreads Q&A

Ask and answer questions about books!

You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.

See Featured Authors Answering Questions

Learn more