The Pioneers: The Heroic Story of the Settlers Who Brought the American Ideal West

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Pioneers, please sign up.

Answered Questions (9)

Josh Id argue that these answers are not entirely correct. The book is completely based off the real letters and diaries from 5 people who were actual pion…moreId argue that these answers are not entirely correct. The book is completely based off the real letters and diaries from 5 people who were actual pioneers that settled in Ohio and the midwest.

The book (imo) fails as a purely historical record, as the other 3 state it is. Which is strange for a McCullough book. I think with how short it is, and how it lacks a constant writing style.

The book honestly feels like it was cobbled together from rough drafts or pages of information/letters that haven't been sculpted into a book. Almost like a book that a Publisher completed after the author had passed away.

Back to your question after that context, the book very much DOES have an opinion. A opinion that feels EXTREMELY Revisionist to me. These commenters are very much in denial or didn't read the book.

The only mentions of Natives in this book are how they are merely an obstacle that the pioneers had to "overcome" so they could (and this is an actual quote) "build a community based on ideals that would come to define our country". It doesn't touch on anything from the point of view of the Natives.

The entire book, the characters are living in "fear" from them. I kept reading, expecting the next paragraph, page, or chapter to jump POV's to the Natives to combat the horrible stereotypes the book/main characters were painting. That never came.

That in mind, it's still a good non-fiction book if you want to learn about the perspective of the pioneers and what their lives were like.

It was just disappointing to me, McCullough almost always has included thought-provoking and empathetic information on whatever the subject he authors.

It really does feel like, there is an entire 1/2 missing from this book. Just my two cents.(less)
Ron I read both reviews and found them both biased. They both basically accuse McCullough of ignoring the "correct" version of history. The Slate "review"…moreI read both reviews and found them both biased. They both basically accuse McCullough of ignoring the "correct" version of history. The Slate "review" is nothing but a diatribe to set-out Ms. Onion's viewpoint. The WP review is a bit better but focuses too much on the writer's politically correct version of history. The WP piece does point out some of the deficiencies of the book. Ignore the reviews and read the book. Then make-up your own mind.(less)
Sue Shipley No, this book is mainly about Ohio and the impact of the Ohio River
Amy Payne Yes. I speeded it up to see if that would help, but I can't finish it.…moreYes. I speeded it up to see if that would help, but I can't finish it.(less)
Debbie $17.99 at B&N (SHARE15) for additional 15% off

Unanswered Questions

About Goodreads Q&A

Ask and answer questions about books!

You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.

See Featured Authors Answering Questions

Learn more