Questions About The Russia Hoax: The Illicit Scheme to Clear Hillary Clinton and Frame Donald Trump

by Gregg Jarrett

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Russia Hoax, please sign up.

Answered Questions (3)

should be called the book of lies, shouldn't it?

Justin no, because CNN has nothing to do with this book.

flag

see above in my last comment WHY ARE ALL THE PEOPLE IN THE BOOK NOT IN JAIL OR ON TRIAL??? ANSWER THIS...

Jon Angell I have wondered so many times why so many good people continue to let go with no consequence corrupted people again and again ... I'm hoping that over…moreI have wondered so many times why so many good people continue to let go with no consequence corrupted people again and again ... I'm hoping that over time the evidence and public outcry will force a cleaning of the swamp/deep state. What a mess we are in.(less)

flag

Mueller is a Republican. He found "no conclusion", not "no collusion". But it's all moot when considering the character and ethics of our President and the example he displays for us daily on Twitter. Hoax or not, does this book offer anything to change my not wanting my kids to emulate Trump as an example to strive for?

James Mc Donald Republican only in some circles. Even so, Robert Mueller is the same Robert Mueller who was head man in charge of the FBI on 9/11 and he reported the …moreRepublican only in some circles. Even so, Robert Mueller is the same Robert Mueller who was head man in charge of the FBI on 9/11 and he reported the FBI had no forewarning about what would happen that tragic day. However, there is a report from Congress most Americans are not aware of. It's the 9/11 Congressional report from Congress. Even worse, many more Americans confuse this report with the other that was public and that was the 9/11 commission report demanded by public outcry.

The short of it is that congress report's a different story with facts that the FBI was not being truthful about not knowing elements of the event on 9/11.

Now, Mueller has somehow obtained legal authority again to create a story. As it was then, it's the same now. Robert was assigned to validate the deep state's story's for both events.

It was the same back in 1963 too. The same elements of the leadership of the CIA/FBI covered up the real story about why JFK died.

Regardless of how you spin it about ""no conclusion", not "no collusion"., the end results is the investigation was to find evidence that Trump was dancing with the Russians regarding the 2019 campaign.

Mueller's observations:

Kindle section 605 reports the investigation did not establish the members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.

Kindle section 637 notes the investigation applied the term, “coordination” in that report did not establish the Trump Campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.

Kindle section 651 again notes the investigation did not find any evidence any U.S. personal conspired or coordinated with the IRA.

Kindle section 680 repeats that the investigation did not find any member of the Trump campaign [conspired] or coordinated with the Russian Government in its attempt mess up the 2016 election.

Kindle section 783 notes that "...while the investigation identified numerous links between individuals with ties to the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign, the evidence was not sufficient to support criminal charges. Among other things, the evidence was not sufficient to charge any Campaign official as an unregistered agent of the Russian government or other Russian principal. And our evidence about the June 9, 2016 meeting and WikiLeaks’s releases of hacked materials was not sufficient to charge a criminal campaign-finance violation. Further, the evidence was not sufficient to charge that any member of the Trump Campaign conspired with representatives of the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election."

Kindle section 783 references George Papadopoulos pleaded guilty of lying to investigators “about, inter alia, the nature and timing of his interactions with Joseph Mifsud,…” however, Judge Moss who rendered the two weeks in jail for Mr. Papadopoulos noted, “I don’t have any reason to believe and I don’t think there’s any reason in the record to conclude that Mr. Papadopoulos had any desire to aid Russia in any way, to do anything that was contrary to the national interest.”

Kindle section 797 notes the Mueller investigation did not find that any “official’s efforts to dilute a portion of the Republican Party platform on providing assistance to Ukraine were undertaken at the behest of candidate Trump or Russia. The investigation also pointed out that a meeting between Kislyak and Sessions in September 2016 at Sessions’s Senate office was nothing "more than a passing mention of the presidential campaign.”

Kindle section 3996 notes again the Mueller investigation did not find any evidence the “Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities."

Once again, Kindle section 4161 notes the evidence was not sufficient to charge anyone connected to the Trump Campaign acted as an “agent of a foreign principal within the meaning of FARA or, in terms of Section 951, subject to the direction or control of the government of Russia, or any official thereof” Specifically, the investigation found no “evidence likely to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Campaign officials such as Paul Manafort, George Papadopoulos, and Carter Page acted as agents of the Russian government-or at its direction, control, or request-during the relevant time period."

Kindle section 9778 references there was no evidence to show the POTUS was involved in an “underlying crime related to Russian election interference."

Finally, Kindle section 10398, notes to vol II: notes “8. presents "As discussed in Volume I, while the investigation identified numerous links between individuals with ties to the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign, the evidence was not sufficient to charge that any member of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with representatives of the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election.”
(less)

flag