Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change (The Politically Incorrect Guides)

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change, please sign up.

Answered Questions (1)

Nelson This argument employs the genetic fallacy. You don't refute an argument merely by pointing out what you perceive to be a potential bias of the author.…moreThis argument employs the genetic fallacy. You don't refute an argument merely by pointing out what you perceive to be a potential bias of the author. You should focus on the argument, not the one making it. I do not know whether what your'e saying is indeed the case with regard to Marc Morano, but it is quite irrelevant. There are also a great deal of people who benefit from pushing the climate change agenda - including scientists (who receive funding by making it an issue), corporations (who benefit financially from having the green agenda pushed by government) and environmental groups. But despite that it is silly to dismiss the argument solely because of this.

To summarise, you should actually read the book and make arguments against the points contained therein. It is a logical fallacy to think you can discredit the book by merely attacking the author on the grounds of bias.(less)

About Goodreads Q&A

Ask and answer questions about books!

You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.

See Featured Authors Answering Questions

Learn more