Stranger in a Strange Land

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Stranger in a Strange Land, please sign up.

Answered Questions (19)

Matt I read recently that this book took Heinlein years to write, and he wrote it roughly in two parts - I think the split is pretty identifiable, as the l…moreI read recently that this book took Heinlein years to write, and he wrote it roughly in two parts - I think the split is pretty identifiable, as the last 1/3 of the book seems completely different (and frankly, worse) than the first 2/3.

The first part is a tightly-focused adventure with a few philosophical rants from Jubal thrown in. The second part is preachy and pretentious, and just doesn't feel like the same book.(less)
Nick Valentine is human but was raised by Martians. I think Heinlein is attempting to portray the vastness of human potential as Duane said, as well as our…moreValentine is human but was raised by Martians. I think Heinlein is attempting to portray the vastness of human potential as Duane said, as well as our adaptability. Who's to say that being raised by creatures with abilities surpassing humans wouldn't open up new avenues within the human brain. We are more complex than we can ever know. The nature of the brain is largely unknown, what could we be missing due to the constraints of our surroundings? (less)
Leslie Farquharson If it IS you, then its BOTH of us because I felt the same way. Got through the first quarter of the book and was half lost and half bored. I'm determi…moreIf it IS you, then its BOTH of us because I felt the same way. Got through the first quarter of the book and was half lost and half bored. I'm determined to go back to it, but not because I'm jones-ing.(less)
prcardi I've not read the original publication, but the longer, "uncut" edition needed to be shorter and extensively cut. Unless you are actually studying Hei…moreI've not read the original publication, but the longer, "uncut" edition needed to be shorter and extensively cut. Unless you are actually studying Heinlein as an author and how his ideas and styles changed over time, I suspect it is not worth reading the longer version.(less)
Dani I think, unfortunately, it is sometimes necessary to ignore the nasty parts and just try to take something away from the art. However, I known there i…moreI think, unfortunately, it is sometimes necessary to ignore the nasty parts and just try to take something away from the art. However, I known there is a difference between a book being a a product of its time and having a few off colour ideas presented to the reader and a reader being overwhelmed by messages which conflict with their world view. For example, Anna Karenina is very much a product of its time/location. Leo Tolstoy held some disgusting views, a few of which leak into the mindset of some of the characters. I think that book is 100000x more palatable than SSL. Heinlein has his characters say one thing and act in the opposite way. He presents only one world view which is 'Correct'. There is little wiggle room to give him a pass. That being said, I think there are interesting aspects to the story and much to take away from the book if those things can be ignored. If someone puts down this book unfinished, however, I cannot blame them.(less)

Unanswered Questions (3)

This question contains spoilers... (view spoiler)

About Goodreads Q&A

Ask and answer questions about books!

You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.

See Featured Authors Answering Questions

Learn more