Monogamous vs. Polygamous Reading: Which 'Type' Do You Prefer?

There's no wrong way to read. Some bibliophiles devour multiple books at once while others savor a single book at a time. We asked our followers on Twitter and Facebook which strategy they prefer and put together a list of some of the most popular comments. Which ones do you relate to?
1."One book at a time. I love experiencing every emotion in each plot while leafing through a copy," says Carol.
2. "Multiple books: that way my mind can travel to many places at the same time," says Marina.
3."I will have a regular book and an audiobook going at the same time. That way I can 'read' when it’s not feasible for me to visually read," says Valerie.
4."I used to read strictly one at a time. Then I realized that if I have two to three books going at once, I read so, so, so much more," says Beth.
5. "I alternate between both, depending on how I'm feeling and how much time I have. Sometimes, I'm so drawn into a book that I forget about the other one," says Gabriela.
6. "I can only read more than one book at a time if they are dramatically different, otherwise I start getting confused," says Dawn.
7. "I read multiple books at a time, especially if one is longer than the others," says Miriam.
8. "I only read one book at a time. I become very engrossed in what I read, so switching back and forth between books would be too distracting and would take away some of the pleasure of what I am reading," says Alexandra.
9. "Multiple books—usually of different genres as I am a mood reader," says Fiona.
10. "I always read at least two books at once—usually something on my Kindle for my bus rides to and from work, then a paperback or hardcover book before going to bed," says Michael.
11. "I do multiple books in multiple formats: ebook, audiobook and paper. I find that if I hit a slow spot in a book I can switch books," says Warren.
12."I always have two or three going at a time. I switch between them depending on my mood, my energy level, and whatever I'm interested in at the time," says Karen.
13. "One at a time. I've tried reading multiple books at once, but I found myself reading more of one and ignoring the other. I find it more efficient to just read one at a time," says Christina.
2. "Multiple books: that way my mind can travel to many places at the same time," says Marina.
3."I will have a regular book and an audiobook going at the same time. That way I can 'read' when it’s not feasible for me to visually read," says Valerie.
4."I used to read strictly one at a time. Then I realized that if I have two to three books going at once, I read so, so, so much more," says Beth.
5. "I alternate between both, depending on how I'm feeling and how much time I have. Sometimes, I'm so drawn into a book that I forget about the other one," says Gabriela.
6. "I can only read more than one book at a time if they are dramatically different, otherwise I start getting confused," says Dawn.
7. "I read multiple books at a time, especially if one is longer than the others," says Miriam.
8. "I only read one book at a time. I become very engrossed in what I read, so switching back and forth between books would be too distracting and would take away some of the pleasure of what I am reading," says Alexandra.
9. "Multiple books—usually of different genres as I am a mood reader," says Fiona.
10. "I always read at least two books at once—usually something on my Kindle for my bus rides to and from work, then a paperback or hardcover book before going to bed," says Michael.
11. "I do multiple books in multiple formats: ebook, audiobook and paper. I find that if I hit a slow spot in a book I can switch books," says Warren.
12."I always have two or three going at a time. I switch between them depending on my mood, my energy level, and whatever I'm interested in at the time," says Karen.
13. "One at a time. I've tried reading multiple books at once, but I found myself reading more of one and ignoring the other. I find it more efficient to just read one at a time," says Christina.
Do you prefer to read one book at time or multiple books at once? Share your two cents in the comments!
Check out more recent blogs:
Loved 'Ready Player One'? Check out these 8 Books
The Contenders for the Best Audiobooks of the Year
To Quit Or Not Quit a Book? Our Readers Weigh In...
Check out more recent blogs:
Loved 'Ready Player One'? Check out these 8 Books
The Contenders for the Best Audiobooks of the Year
To Quit Or Not Quit a Book? Our Readers Weigh In...
Comments Showing 151-200 of 376 (376 new)
message 151:
by
Nicoletta
(last edited Mar 29, 2018 09:39AM)
(new)
Mar 29, 2018 09:26AM

flag

Now, thanks to a recent (about two years ago) realization that audio books are amazing driving companions and perfect to listen to while doing chores, I am back to reading up to three at a time!
I don't feel as if I have to fly through them either just to keep my GoodReads goal up to date!



I agree! It's great being able to read several at a time.

@Tesalonica: The only joke is your defensiveness.
@JR: White people invented race. What goes around comes around.



That was funny! :)




How is this balanced? I get not avoiding books such as those you describe, but to only read books that fit those particular criteria rules out so, so many books that are great. You can't read John Steinbeck or James Clavell, for example. I don't get at all why you would want to narrow down what you read.
One of the fun parts about reading is to experience new and exciting settings, types of characters etc. It broadens your mind. By narrowing down what books you read you are somewhat counteracting that, to a certain degree. Men can, and do, have noteworthy stories to tell, too. Books with white main characters can also be worth reading. I don't at all get this exclusionary reading you have decided on. I would have the exact same opinion even if you were doing the reverse; excluding female writers or or not wanting to read books that feature people of color as the main characters, as well.



But it happens that I’d be reading several books at work (specific subject), but at home, its always 1 untill its done.


That is the same reasoning that convinced me to try multiple books at once, and I love it! I read much more when I have more than one going at the same time.













I can read only a book at time."
You are the only commenter I didn't feel was compulsive. Perhaps you have a life. Perhaps reading is just part of your life. You are not inadequate!


How is reading everything and anything, regardless of gender of the author, or color of the main characters' skins, the same as "swimming in the same 10-15% of the world's population like the rest of the status quo"? You're the one narrowing down your reading alternatives. Not me. I'd happily read a book no matter if it's written by a woman or a man. Or read a book regardless of the skin color of the main characters. I don't at all feel "uncomfortable" with your choice, as you put it, but you're being a bigot. Doubly annoying since you probably see yourself quite the opposite, because you want to read specifically female authors, and specifically about characters who aren't white. The same behavior but with other genders and skin colors and you'd probably be mad at the person doing it.

1) fiction
2) self-improvement
3) work related
4) investing related
That way the "plots" don't get crossed. The topics are distinct from each other.





How is this balanced? I get not avoiding books such as those you describe, but to only read books that fit those particular criteria rules out so, so many books that are great. You can't read John Steinbeck or James Clavell, for example. I don't get at all why you would want to narrow down what you read."
Hi Christian. I think Aubrey's system to read 4 books at once isn't as restrictive as you think:
1. One by a "woman of colour", eg Toni Morrison
2. One by a "man of colour" eg James Baldwin
3. At least two by women. A "woman of colour" is already one woman so one more meets this criterion, eg Tove Jansson
4. Any other book, which could easily be by a white man, eg John Steinbeck

