Two men of honor at a time when there was a great need for honor

On September 20th, 1187, Saladin began the siege of Jerusalem, which figures in Ridley Scott’s epic, Kingdom of Heaven. Most of you know I am something of a purist when it comes to historical films or novels, so you won’t be surprised by my verdict on this film. It is visually stunning, but historical fantasy. They got only two facts right about the real Balian d’Ibelin—his name and that he was the savior of the Holy City.

Balian was one of the few lords to escape the debacle at Hattin, and he asked Saladin for a safe-conduct so he could go to Jerusalem and bring his wife and children to safety. Saladin agreed, on condition he remain in the city for only 24 hours. But upon his arrival, Balian discovered the city in an understandable state of panic, for Saladin intended to take Jerusalem by storm, which always meant a bloodbath when a medieval city was not able to surrender, an orgy of killing, rape, and looting. The capture of Jerusalem during the First Crusade had led to a massacre of the Muslims and Jews in the city, with crusader chroniclers boasting that blood ran in the streets up to the ankles of knights’ horses. It was to avenge this notorious slaughter that Saladin had vowed to take Jerusalem by force, slaying or enslaving all of those sheltering within the city.

There was no one to organize a defense of Jerusalem and Balian was torn between his promise to the sultan and the pleading of the citizens, who begged him to stay. He finally sent word to Saladin, explaining his plight and asking to be released from his promise. Yes, there were men in the MA who took honor seriously. Saladin not only agreed, he permitted Balian’s wife and children to leave the city and provided an escort to see them to safety. Balian then tried to rally the city’s defense, which included knighting the sons of townspeople since they had so few fighting men. They managed to stave off the Saracen army for a time, but they knew they were doomed and Balian made a desperate gamble. He told Saladin that if the city were not allowed to surrender and the citizens ransomed, they would kill all the Muslim prisoners in the city, destroy all of the Muslim holy sites, and fight to the death since they had nothing to lose.

He must have been convincing for Saladin agreed to a surrender. Ransoms were set—10 dinars for a man, 5 for a woman, and 1 for a child. When Balian said there were about 20,000 poor in the city who could not raise these ransoms, Saladin agreed to release 7,000 of them for a lump sum payment of 30,000 dinars. Henry II had been providing money for the support of the kingdom for a number of years and Balian used what was left of this money now to buy the freedom for as many of the poor as he could. Those who could not raise the ransom were destined for the slave markets in Damascus and Cairo, but there were individual acts of mercy. Although the Patriarch of Jerusalem had departed the city with as much of the Church’s wealth as he could carry away, which shocked the Saracen chroniclers, Saladin’s brother, al-Adil, asked the sultan for the gift of 1,000 of these slaves. When Saladin agreed, al-Adil freed them all. Although the patriarch was not willing to use the Church plate and relics to save these poor souls, he did ask Saladin for 700 as a personal favor and again the sultan agreed. Saladin also granted Balian’s request for 500 of them and then ordered the release of the elderly. He gave widows and orphans money to tide them over on their journey to safety and made sure that none of his army plundered the city or harmed the captive Christians. It has been estimated that as many as 11,000 were taken off into slavery, but thousands of others were spared thanks to Balian’s efforts, Saladin’s mercy, and Henry II’s money.

So Balian definitely deserves a film of his own for the role he played in the salvation of Jerusalem, just not the one he got. He was a member of the powerful d’Ibelin family, Lord of Nablus by his marriage to Maria Comnena, former Queen of Jerusalem, stepfather to the future queen, Isabella, who would wed one of my favorites, Henri of Champagne, so I envisioned Balian spinning in his grave like the proverbial top after he was transformed into an illegitimate French blacksmith who learned knightly skills on his two month journey to the Holy Land and ran off with Queen Sybilla (who was never his lover and had been dead for 3 years) at film’s end.
16 likes ·   •  27 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on September 20, 2014 06:55
Comments Showing 1-27 of 27 (27 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Carolina (last edited Sep 20, 2014 07:28AM) (new)

Carolina Casas I love Ridley Scott's sci fi films. I'm a big sci fi fan and I love Alien and Blade Runner the most (the two are based on horror sci fi stories of chthulu by HP Lovecraft and mind bending author Philip K Dick's do androids dream of electric sheep? respectively). But his historical flicks are very flawed and I know its Hollywood but there are just so many mistakes there.


message 2: by Iset (last edited Sep 20, 2014 07:26AM) (new)

Iset On the one hand that film did get me interested in Outremer, its politics, and its royal family (Baldwin IV was surely one of the film's few redeeming features!), but on the other hand I shudder at Balian's rewritten biography.

I can't help but ask, Sharon; does Baldwin IV feature in The Land Beyond the Sea? I do hope so. What a fascinating monarch.


message 3: by Sharon (new)

Sharon I am not totally consistent, Athena, for The Lion in Winter takes historical liberties, too, and yet it remains my all-time favorite film. Maybe because it is so well done that it is easy to suspend disbelief while watching it and also because it does not totally rewrite Henry and Eleanor's story the way Kingdom of Heaven did with Balian. Other historical films that can send me into a rant are Becket and Braveheart and Elizabeth I. But I love Anne of a Thousand Days and Mary, Queen of Scots with Glenda Jackson and Vanessa Redgrave even though it has Mary and Elizabeth meeting, which they never did in real life.


message 4: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Yes, Isis, Baldwin is a major character in Outremer, the Land Beyond the Sea. He was a remarkable young man, amazingly courageous, and I think he is going to break some of my reader's hearts. He is already breaking mine.


message 5: by Iset (new)

Iset I can sense it! Some historical characters just seem set to break hearts. (Pyrrhos, King of Epiros, often known as the spiritual successor to Alexander the Great, is already muscling in on that role in my own work! He gave us the phrase "a Pyrrhic victory".) Baldwin IV made his share of poor decisions, but he also made a slew of clever and brave ones too, and to do it all whilst suffering from leprosy - ! I very much look forwards to his appearance.


message 6: by Sharon (new)

Sharon And the bad decisions he made, Isis, occurred when he was quite ill and therefore more susceptible to bad advice from his mother. Leprosy seriously weakens the immune system and so he was always more vulnerable to fevers and infections, in addition to the damage that the disease was doing to his body.


message 7: by Iset (new)

Iset Undoubtedly the best scene in the whole of that rather wince-inducing movie was Baldwin striking down Raynald de Chatillon. Although Baldwin is one of the lesser known figures of history, I believe he is one of those "what if" figures, as he had the makings of a great king. Certainly, Richard would have found an ally in him, as both men recognised the importance of breaking Saladin's power base in Egypt.

Oh Sharon, my eyes are actually welling up right now. I'm sure I'll be a blubbering mess when the book comes out. It just seems so sad. What a promising young king, with such a terrible affliction and a life cut short too soon.


message 8: by Marquise (new)

Marquise There's going to be a novel with Balian d'Ibelin as a character written by you, Ms Penman? If so, I can now go dig my grave and lie on it happy! I've long been interested in this man, but not enough fiction about him to satisfy me, and now you and Helena Schrader are working on him!


message 9: by Sharon (new)

Sharon I think he is the most tragic figure I've ever written about, Isis. He showed amazing courage in fighting his illness, insisting upon being carried onto a battlefield in a horse litter once he was no longer able to ride. He was a highly skilled rider, according to the chroniclers, and loved horses, so when the day came that he could no longer ride must have been horrible for him. Writing the scene in which he finds out that he has leprosy--he is only 14 at the time--was very challenging for me.


message 10: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Yes, Marquise. The title is Outremer, the Land Beyond the Sea. Balian is the central character and it covers the years from 1172-1193. The more research I've done about Balian, the more I've come to admire him. At times he seems as if he were the only rational being in a kingdom cursed with partisan politics and feuds.


message 11: by Molly (new)

Molly Murphy Wow- awesome. Sounds like a great novel! I'm already dying to read A King's Ransom, since Lionheart blew me away. I totally agree about his courage, though I only just now heard of him. Hope you write it soon!


message 12: by Iset (new)

Iset Of course Baldwin was Henry II's first cousin, and Richard's first cousin once removed, by virtue of being Fulk of Anjou's grandson (readers of When Christ and His Saints Slept may recall Fulk, the father of Geoffrey the Fair, being offered the crown of Jerusalem).


message 13: by Marquise (new)

Marquise Sharon wrote: "Yes, Marquise. The title is Outremer, the Land Beyond the Sea. Balian is the central character and it covers the years from 1172-1193. The more research I've done about Balian, the more I've com..."

That's truly awesome news! I remember him in Lionheart as the sole cool head together with Henri de Champagne, for the rest spent more time fighting each other than the Saracens.

Do I understand it that it was your research for the two novels on Richard Coeur de Lion that made you embark on this new project? Or were you interested in him before?


message 14: by Sharon (new)

Sharon I was interested in Balian before Lionheart, although the research I did for that book confirmed my interest in Balian. He was the only one who seemed to understand that the intense rivalries ripping the kingdom apart would eventually doom it. He was certainly ambitious and I am sure he was delighted to wed a former queen, a marriage that made the fortunes of the d'Ibelin family, rising them from the ranks of the nobility to the truly elite, for the d'Ibelins became one of the most important families of the 13th century, both in Outremer and Cyprus. But Balian also did his best to dampen down the partisan politics, at one point probably averting a civil war. An interesting man.


message 15: by Marquise (new)

Marquise Fascinating indeed! Thanks for the details on how you began this novel, Sharon. Another one to look forward to, and if it's as good as your other novels, then there'd be another book by you in my favourites.


message 16: by Iset (new)

Iset A quick question, Sharon. How are you handling the three Baldwins? Baldwin V is easy enough - his nickname Baudouinet can be used. My guess is for Baldwin IV and Balian's brother you are retaining the Baldwin spelling for one of them, and using the French spelling Bauduin for the other?


message 17: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Yes, that is what I'm doing, Isis. Baldwin for the young king and Baudouin for Balian's brother. For the two Williams, the archbishop of Tyre gets William and Sybilla's first husband gets Guillaume. Relatively easy for this book. The Angevins provided greater challenges, especially with all those Henrys, etc. I had four Eleanors in Shadow, for crying out loud! I loved Francis Lovell in Sunne if only for his name.


message 18: by Molly (last edited Sep 25, 2014 03:03PM) (new)

Molly Murphy LOL. FOUR Eleanors?! Everybody used the same names back then. I kind of understand Hal the young king's "feast of the Williams" now.


message 19: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Some books were worse than that challenge, Molly. I went with Eleanor, Eleanora, Nell, and Ellen. But there are no nicknames for Simon and sometimes I had so many Henrys and Edwards that I wanted to scream. William is actually a good name, as is Geoffrey, for they both have a number of medieval variations I can use. Philip is like Simon, though.


message 20: by Iset (new)

Iset I can safely say that juggling upwards of 15 Ptolemys and 7 Kleopatras is a re-naming nightmare.


message 21: by Molly (new)

Molly Murphy No nicknames for Simon- that would've driven me insane!


message 22: by Sharon (new)

Sharon I ended up giving his son and namesake a nickname, Molly, calling him Bran. No way was I going to write a sentence: "Simon said to Simon,"


message 23: by Iset (new)

Iset Sharon, I don't suppose you've discovered what the official colours or heraldic device was of Outremer and/or her monarchs? Such as France's fleur de lys and the three lions rampant of the Medieval English royals?


message 24: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Isis, the kingdom used a Jerusalem cross, gold on a white background. You can Google it to find an image.


message 25: by Molly (new)

Molly Murphy Bran- smart. For the sanity of the reader and the author. What about all the Edwards?


message 26: by Sharon (new)

Sharon That is why so many historical novelists drink, Molly. The medieval had a deplorable habit of recycling the same family names, sometimes even using the same ones for legitimate and illegitimate sons. John did that, naming two of his sons Richard, and I am not even speculating on why he'd name his sons after the brother he'd betrayed and so envied. I think all of the Angevins could have used some time on a therapist's couch; the males in the family could certainly have benefited from anger management classes.


message 27: by Molly (new)

Molly Murphy LOL :D I agree. TWO sons named Richard? Just like Henry II's Geoffrey and Geoffrey. That IS ironic about John and Richard.


back to top

Sharon Kay Penman's Blog

Sharon Kay Penman
Sharon Kay Penman isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Sharon Kay Penman's blog with rss.