Goddammit, Popular Science. You had one job.

I used to subscribe to a lot of magazines, but over the years I’ve let all the subscriptions lapse. If I really want to read something, I pick it up on a newsstand, or read it online. One of the great things about my Kindle, for instance, is how I can grab an individual issue of something like The Nation or Mother Jones when I’m on vacation, and not have to deal with another physical piece of media that’s going to take up space in my bag.


I’ve found that I most frequently read magazines when I’m on airplanes (which is about twice a month, it turns out), so I usually pick up the latest WIRED or Scientific American or Mental_Floss when I’m on my way to the gate, read it, and leave it behind for the next passenger to enjoy.


But I know that magazines rely on subscriptions, and subscribing to things I really like is a good way to support that publication’s writers, editors, and staff, so I recently went ahead and subscribed to Popular Science and Mental Floss. When I signed up, I specifically requested that my information not be shared, rented, given, sold, gifted, delivered, or handed off in a dark alleyway dead drop to any third parties. Because I know that publishers don’t always honor these requests, I use unique and humorous names when I subscribe to magazines, so I know who isn’t honoring my requests.


So far, Mental_Floss is doing a great job not sharing my information. But Popular Science? Not so much. this delightful bit of junk mail showed up yesterday, along with my latest issue:


Popular Science gave my information to a third party. Not cool, PopSci


This is incredibly annoying, and violates the trust I placed in the magazine when I decided to give them my money. Awesomeface Wheaton will not be renewing his subscription, and now I get to enjoy months of telling all the third parties that Popular Science gave my information to that I don’t want their bullshit.


Look, print publications, you’re fighting with Internet and digital for eyeballs every single day. When you do shit like this, it just hastens your demise.


Don’t be a dick, magazine publishers. Do not share my information means do not share my information.




13 likes ·   •  5 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 27, 2013 10:17
Comments Showing 1-5 of 5 (5 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Kim (new)

Kim I love this idea and will be using it with future subscriptions.


message 2: by Deb (new)

Deb L Ive done this with email addys, see if junk emails start showing up. Its much more of a big deal, I think, when they sell out where you, your spouse, your KIDS (hello...?), not to mention your expensive car, electronics, jewelry, etc., all live! Hope you bring a strong complaint to them. Personally, I wont be picking up a Popular Science mag, paper or electronic, any time soon.


message 3: by Deb (new)

Deb L Oh, and hope you dont mind I'll be using the 'AWESOMEFACE'... love it! ;)


message 4: by Anne (new)

Anne Sting That's not a bad idea!


message 5: by Agnes (new)

Agnes Tomorrow I knew someone who used different middle initials for the same purpose, but this is far more amusing! Kudos to you(dos)!


back to top