date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Caz
(new)
Jan 08, 2013 05:02AM
The point about children as political tools is a fascinating one and I'm sure, accurate. Modern sensibilities tend to forget that not only were men of the aristocracy at that time very far removed from the upbringing of their children, but that children from such families were routinely used as bargaining chips in forging political alliances. Henry was a shrewd man - his children, even illegitimate, would have been valuable 'currency' and he would surely have known and explioted that.
reply
|
flag
Totally agree Caz. You do see glimpses of aristocratic fathers having bonding moments with their children (I couldn't cite you offhand, but I could find examples if I went looking) but by and large business was business and a father's role was all about providing, protecting, and advancing the dynasty rather than being touchy feely.


