Self Publishing Versus Traditional - The Debate Rages On...

It seems every discussion forum I go into that has anything to do with writing has this debate somewhere within its threads. Most times the debates become quite heated as both sides express their points and take personally the arguments their 'opponents' give for their camp. I try to stay as neutral as possible, as I have friends who have self published (those friends have often said how much work goes into it and how unbelievably hard it is to make money self publishing) and I don't enjoy...
1 like ·   •  6 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 13, 2010 09:02
Comments Showing 1-6 of 6 (6 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Joe (new)

Joe I'm on the fence with this debate.

On the one hand it's a ton of work to get the word out that you even have a book, and on the other publishers don't just accept anyone and just getting a publisher to read your story seems way beyond difficult.

-Joe-


message 2: by Renee (new)

Renee If it were easy though, we'd all be published with a big name publisher and we'd have a booming career. They make it hard for a reason.


message 3: by Minnie (last edited Mar 16, 2010 10:07AM) (new)

Minnie Renee, I believe you know my position on publishing. I wrote my opinion on my GR blog about that several weeks ago.

Either way, you will work your tail off to get the attention of an agent, a publisher, work with their editor with their required changes, and marketing your baby once it drops. There's a long wait for any royalties.

Self-publishing is for a business minded writer, after the creativity comes all the necessary stops along the road--find editor (and pay), find printer with specials (including designing cover), decide on the number of books to print (the more the cheaper), after the book is printed, how much will it cost you to buy copies your copies (yes you will be come the consumer of your own goods). You need a great marketing plan (get quotes from adverters in advance of signing a print contract that fits your budget). And sell, sell, sell. Everything inccluded carries a cost, it's like buying a car, options cost.

Some printers are connected with distributors for a small extra charge but worth it, unless you plan to sell out of the trunk of your car. No car? Well, there's always the dreaded book signing at wherever you can. Spring to the end of summer are great times for fairs. Pay the cost of table space, hotel, air fare if out of town, food and A CAR.

My choice, self-publishing--I've done it twice. and it's faster. My main reason for not sending queries and waiting to be picked up by a publisher is time and my age. I can't afford a 2-3 year wait, from search, contract, drop. I'm 74 (in a few months) and would like to get as many books out of my head as possible.

I don't write to make money. I write because I love it.
P.S. belonging to writing groups helps--it's called networking.


message 4: by Renee (new)

Renee Which is what I pointed out as well, I have friends (like you) who have taken the self publishing route, but they educated themselves first. You were never under the illusion that it would be easy, were you? No, of course not. You wanted to write, you're good in business and marketing and you work your tail off for the sales you get.

Plus, thanks for the very realistic look at what you have to do in order to promote your books and the list of costs involved. As you said, 'Everything carries a cost.'

If a writer is going into this knowing that they will pay, in time and money, and that they must, must, must hire an editor if they want to put out a quality book, then I say go for it. But it's a long, hard road both ways.

I'm curious, if you'd decided to write in order to publish say even ten years ago, would you have tried the traditional route?


message 5: by Minnie (new)

Minnie Renee wrote: "Which is what I pointed out as well, I have friends (like you) who have taken the self publishing route, but they educated themselves first. You were never under the illusion that it would be easy,..."

Yes, I tried the traditional route with my first book. I waited and waited and sent query after query and received rejection after rejection. I was a late bloomer and knew time was against me. Then I took part in a forum on a writers book site and listened to an author and journalist talk about self-publishing. At that time we were getting beat up, saying our work was inferior. When I asked what was inferior about SP work-- it was quality, grammar and confusing plot. I knew what I had to do. Get an editor to make my work shine. The second time was much better.


message 6: by Renee (new)

Renee Exactly, and it's people who don't consider this who put out an inferior book. Editing is a must. For every author. Good for you, Minnie.


back to top