date
newest »

message 1:
by
Bianca
(new)
Dec 08, 2012 08:00PM

reply
|
flag


And just because the woman who wrote the review is a writer shouldn't mean she should be obligated to like your work or understand your point of view or your feelings towards criticism. All writers are judged and just because they get a bad review shouldn't mean every other writer has to come to their defence. If she didn't like the work, she simply didn't like it and wrote her review with a bit of humour and sarcasm. Not the first reviewer to do that.

And by the way there is no comparison.
A. 50 shades is erotica, this is Young Adult/New Adult
2. 50 shades is based on another book/movie. . . (I'll let that one sink in)
and finally, my book is not a NYTimes Bestseller. Well, yet anyway, :) <= my own attempt at humor.
The point is: Those types of reviews spawn comments full of negative and malice statements.
I wrote that post for my readers, and anyone else who felt like I did. And YEAH I KNOW I put it out there. But I did it because it needed to be said. I didn't realize that the honesty rules were different for authors. Sorry that I decided to believe in myself and my work, and in turn, stand up for myself, when I felt my work was attacked. I don't care that she didn't like it, that is not my issue, my issue is the insulting manner, the delivery method.
Sadly, I have a feeling we are just going to have to agree to disagree, because it's never going to be OK with me to get a laugh at someone else's expense. But I hold no ill will toward you for commenting or anyone else for that matter who disagrees with me on this. I'll keep my mouth shut next time. And this comment is the last that I'm saying about this matter.
Good luck with your writing. It's an amazing feeling to be able to do something you love.
-Mia


Yes, criticism is never fun is it? But it's hardly anything you should get worked up over and misinterpret so drastically. You do realize that every single book ever written in history receives harsh criticism? I'm sure J.K Rowling has received more than a few insults directed towards her books and her writing and her mother and so on, but I hardly see her having a strop about it.
Also, where on earth are the reviews whose 'sole purpose' is to hurt the author? That doesn't exist on Goodreads. That might exist on the author's twitter page where some troll will insult them at random using poorly constructed grammar and spelling, but not here. Just because a review is harsh and criticizes the book and the author, it doesn't mean it is a direct attack against the author. In fact, hey, they're just expressing an opinion and being honest. Isn't that what you're doing with this post? You said so yourself.
Yes, you're just showing your opinion. So the reviewers don't get to do the same? And you want your fanbase to report negative reviews? Uhm, have you ever noticed how this isn't a George Orwell dystopia, but the real world where freedom of speech will hopefully still be an existing right? Apparently their opinion is only valid to you if it doesn't hurt your feelings. Well, sadly an online community of billions doesn't work that way, my dear. But it's just something you're gonna have to suck up and accept that yes, your work is going to get negative feedback. And let me promise you this, there is no such thing as 'kind' negative feedback. I can't tell you how many 'respectful negative reviews' that tried to be as 'respectful' as possible still received attacks, even by people who were close to the author of whom the book was reviewed. People can't nicely criticize something without pointing out several flaws, and no one is happy about finding flaws. You can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs, right? But you can't expect everyone in the world to be nice to you just because you worked hard on a book.
I understand how difficult writing a book is. And I know it sucks to have your work ripped apart. But you can either have a fit over it and get upset, or you can suck it up and maybe learn something from it. If you read negative reviews with a more open mind, you'll find you can find a lot of constructive criticism that might help. But of course that wont happen if you just interpret a bad review as being pushed over in the playground by a horde of bullies. Come on.
There really is no need for this reaction from you, especially considering you are an author. You will find many respected authors will find this kind of attitude that you and many other authors share absolutely ridiculous. If you don't believe me, feel free to read up on Holly Black's comments on this matter on her LiveJournal. Of course at the end of the day you can always just ignore negative reviews and focus on the people who love your work. That's always going to make you feel better, so why seek out the things that just piss you off when you have a fanbase? All this getting upset and demanding censorship of reviews that are 'mean' is childish.

i have not read your book, and do not know to what review your are referring to.
my issue here is you basically banning others opinion and supporting censorship.
Just as much as you expecting to be given the freedom to write how and what you like they have the same right.
by publishing and putting your work out there, you give everybody the right to critique you.
You encouraging your readers to ban a review, is just as bad as someone being disrespectful. Or perhaps even worse.
I do get that you feel hurt by negative reviews, I find it always hard to have my work critiqued (i am a designer so its a really different field still same process) so all i can advise you, ignore the general reviews. Let your publisher read them and give you a brief feed back. The publisher wont take it personal and will give you the most important pointers you need to further your work
If there are really disrespectful people attacking your work, the PR person of your publisher should deal with them.
Frankly i thought that was how it was dealt with on a professional level.
Besides that I do think that ARCs are a good way of getting feed back which again I am sure your publisher should have dealt with
if your publisher has not done ANY of the above..honestly fire them, they aren't doing their job and due to that you were hurt.
As i see it the issue is not us readers but the fact that your backup is not doing what they supposed to be doing. Leaving you to react in a totally unprofessional way - i get why you did this still it is unprofessional and doesnt help your cause
Last you have to bear in mind that everybody has a different taste. while tons of people did like Twilight I found the writing appalling and couldnt read past page 50..same with Nabokov, who is by all means a total genius, I just dont like the way he writes. NO matter how clever the story is or what anybody else says. And if I were to review either author, they wouldnt be positive despite their huge public successes.
Reading is a very personal experience and in the end totally subjective and up to the individuals taste.
Its not a personal thing against the author more a personal thing about the book...
good luck with your future works and i hope you will take this up with your publisher.

You want respect? Write a better book"
*Slow clap*


She didn't shame the reviewer, push a point down anyone's throat or overreact. Just as she has been told to get over herself I suggest reviewers do the same.