More on the Imperfect Science of the Heart

New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis by Sigmund Freud
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Every modern, educated person should read this book's predecessor, the (old) Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis. For those interested in learning still more about psychoanalysis, the New Introductory Lectures are also vital. The latter work reflects clarifications in Freud's thinking since the original lectures given from 1915 to 1917 at the University of Vienna.

His daughter Anna Freud's book, The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense is also a very clear, very helpful and common sensical treatment of the subject of psychological defenses--i.e., the varieties of ways the mind lies to itself to protect itself from painful feelings and ideas.

There is at least one chapter in the New Introductory Lectures that is completely bizarre--Freud at his most cavalier and speculative, bordering on ridiculous--and it will do little to dispel the common canard that psychoanalysis is a "pseudo-science." It suffices to say that Freud wasn't perfect. But many great scientists make mistakes or fall prey to ideology; Einstein did (see this article, "The Master's Mistakes" from Discover Magazine); Linus Pauling, one of two people ever to win a Nobel prize in two different areas (Chemistry and Peace), had fairly lunatic ideas about vitamin C; and Isaac Newton wasted a lot of time in foolish speculations about alchemy. But we don't throw out what Einstein and Newton had right and we shouldn't throw out what Freud had right, which is about as revolutionary and beautiful as either of those physicists. Freud's works ought to be read like any other thinker's, not like orthodox readings of a Bible--that is, readers have no reason to try to retrofit reality to correspond with his scriptural errors--and just the same readers have no reason to dump the baby with the bathwater.

View all my reviews
 •  3 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on July 08, 2012 09:18
Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Thom (new)

Thom Dunn Confusion results from the overlap of notions: Freud the scientist v. Freud the Idea Man.


message 2: by Thom (new)

Thom Dunn Austin wrote: "Thom wrote: "Confusion results from the overlap of notions: Freud the scientist v. Freud the Idea Man."

Thom! How are you? I have lost steam on the trivia game. Meanwhile, I have recently discover..."


Austin ! I stumbled on this note. Am posting much on listopia, but several including me have lost interest in the Trivia Game since the "Featherbedders" came, those who obviously are simply racking up points without playing the game (There are several strategies). These "99 %--ers" have made themselves into the "1%"--possibly an objective correlative for the economy.


message 3: by Thom (new)

Thom Dunn Austin wrote: "Thom wrote: "Austin wrote: "Thom wrote: "Confusion results from the overlap of notions: Freud the scientist v. Freud the Idea Man."

Thom! How are you? I have lost steam on the trivia game. Meanwhi..."


There are those "Corinthians" who play each and every question as it comes up, never cherry-picking, never skipping, never "cheating"--I put the word in quotes because Architect Otis Chandler (blessings and peace be upon him) has never, to my knowledge, set out any list of rules for play.


back to top

Austin Ratner's Blog

Austin Ratner
Untimely thoughts on books both great and supposedly great.
Austin Ratner isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Austin Ratner's blog with rss.