date
newest »


I like that attitude. <3

1) An interesting blurb - I don't care if I've never heard of someone and it's their first book, if I like the concept, I'll buy the book. (How I find that blurb will vary - may discover it in a blog post, maybe in a publisher newsletter, maybe from seeing a friend post a good review on GR, or another review site, it depends.)
2) Word of mouth from friends I trust
That's really the two big things. A nifty cover might catch my eye, a blog post might sound interesting and the person may even sound great, but if the topic is X, Y or Z or a genre I don't care for ... *shrug* I won't buy it. It's all about content. And my hot buttons for content will differ. I'll buy most any m/m/m (pervy? Who I?) but obviously others would rather gouge their eyes out with a rusty spork that read m/m/m.

1) Beautiful cover makes me click to the book page
2) Compelling blurb makes me add the book to my TBR shelf
3) Well-written reviews make me think about buying the book
Things that will push me over the fence are word of mouth from friends who say I'll like the book or if the book is cheap enough for an impulse buy.

How do you get to the point of looking at covers and blurbs on the first place?"
Give-aways yes. I will notice that and sometimes add it to my list if I don't win.
To be honest, I'm a browser. I'll go "I need some new books." (Need being loosely interpreted) and then I go to ARe or even publishers and just start scrolling the newest additions and see what catches my eye. It's totally random and there is no logic. I will also go to buy book A and start clicking around to see if anything else catches my eye. If I'm uncertain, I then come back to GR, see if anyone I know has read it and what they say and then decide if it's worthwhile reading.

Yes. I follow blogs via Google Reader on my PC and Newsify on my iPhone. I don't participate in giveaways but I do check out the book the blogger or author is giving away.
Lou wrote: "How do you get to the point of looking at covers and blurbs on the first place?"
Mostly I discover new books (new to me) on GoodReads. When I see my friends and people I follow adding books, I check them out.

To Anne's point, as a reader, I actually appreciate being introduced to new..."
I so, so want to name characters Spic and Span, now. ROFL

Well . . . shit. Why didn't you say this months ago? I could've been five-starring all my books and had a ready-made excuse: "Hey,..."
That is totally my excuse for everything. ;-)

That's pretty much exactly what they think. This is what I think happens: writing a book, turns out, is a lot of freaking work (if you do it right), so when they've done it, all the sudden they want a big pay off for having done it. The fastest way to get that big pay off is to have a hit book, so that's all they're thinking about.
Every time they see a discussion where someone isn't talking about their book, they're thinking, "What in the hell? Why aren't they talking about my book?" Because they're polite, they don't want to point out the wrong-headedness of the people having the discussion, so they try to gently redirect everyone back on track by just mentioning their book. Because they wrote it, and it's going to be a hit, right? So why aren't people talking about it? Sheesh.
Sometimes readers have to be redirected repeatedly.

And you know? It's as much work as writing another book, so why not just do that instead?

Oh, I like that. I need to try and remember it.

Oh, for goodness' sake. I must protest.
Over-pimpage? I agree with all of Josh's rules above, but even without such clear-cut rules, it's a lot like the definition of pornography. I know it when I see it. (And I don't even need the 'whah whah whah 70s music heavy on the sax,' either.


I totally agree with the "background info" vs. "give myself 5 stars" approach.... I remember the first time I saw an author's name in the reviews list with 5 stars, and thought "jeez, that looks needy and insecure" (sorry, Josh!) and figured it was a newbie author who wanted to boost the overall rating and was too new to have a big following who would post lots of reviews.
Then I saw it done by a couple of authors who are VERY popular, and certainly didn't need the extra review to boost their book's rating... still looked kind of insecure to me.
Background info/inspiration story is MUCH more likely to get me to read a book, regardless of other reviews and ratings. If the background AND the book sound interesting, I'll be off to the bookstore, because I love having that kind of connection to an author. (in the non-stalker, "fan" vs. "friend" kind of way)

Liking good reviews...I've seen mixed bag of reactions from readers on this too. Some like it and see the "like" as a thanks from the writer to the reader for taking the time to write out their thoughts & opinions. Others don't and see it as authors being intrusive.
Which cycles back to the "there's no pleasing everybody" thing. I don't think anybody sees either self-rating or liking good reviews as heinous or egregious, though, nothing like the flagrant BSP that generally sets our teeth on edge.

I know right now there is some *ahem* contentious conversation around the issue, and it's become clear to me that readers don't necessarily expect the writer to read their review, so it's best for all parties not to. Whereas the "professional" reviewer (there's a better term for that, right? What is it?) expects the writer to read it.

Oh Lou, I forgot to tell you that GR recently blogged about how GR users discover book: http://www.goodreads.com/blog/show/37...

I generally agree with you one hundred percent, Josh, but here I'll have to respectfully disagree. Whenever I see an author who's starred their own books, I can't help but think, "Tacky!"

Oh Lou, I forgot to tell you that GR recently blogged about how GR users..."
I don't know if M/M has an NPR equivalent. The biggest publicity would probably be a review at DearAuthor book blog.
Depends on how long the wait is till the next book and how much the reader liked the previous book if the next book is part of a series. I don't know honestly. I believe it differ from reader to reader.

:-D :-D
But they are and I do my best to keep my mouth shut not least because I respect my readers, so if they see something there, there probably IS something there that I'm blind to."
LOL. This made me smile widely. I think I recognize myself from this (maybe not the smart part *grin*) and I definitely recognize you, Josh. You are so polite, sweet and considerate towards your readers, you really are. :)"
I thought exactly the same as Johanna!
For the rest I dislike authors that rate their own books with 5 stars. I'm sorry when authors I like do this.

I can honestly say that I'm not sure how I feel about an author rating his/her own work. Many times self-evaluation is far more critical than any delivered by another. Of course, I am brutally honest and tend to be my own worst critic. Perhaps I'm alone in that!

That's a great idea!
As a matter of fact, one of the things I like about Shelfari is it has those kinds of tools for authors. I think that is fun for readers and certainly more fun for authors than the usual fields. It allows for more of a personal touch.

Shelfari feeds into Amazon, so that's probably what you saw. I believe those fields are available on Amazon, if you're not a member of Shelfari so either way you can update the pages with (hopefully) interesting tidbits.
And that's the kind of thing that costs nothing and requires nothing from anyone but you the author.

Being on the receiving end is not fun either. Like ..."
Or this -- when the big name author friends all your friends but NOT you. I've had that happen. Ouch.

Like Tam, I will browse. And I will listen to my Goodreads forum. Excerpts are often the death knell though. Unless it's a book we're doing for a group read -- or I'm just in that mood where I don't bother to read the excerpt because I just want to buy some books.
Yes, I do have those moments where I don't care, I just want new fiction and I'm going with the enticing blurb and nice cover!

How do you get to the point of looking at covers and blurbs on the first place?"
I shop amazon.

Writing your own reviews is just plain nuts. Truly.
Equally nuts is writing nasty reviews of other authors under fake names. Uh...I mean YOU using the fake name. :-D
The ratings...I guess I just don't take the ratings seriously enough to think much one way or the other. I usually snort when I see it.

No, I don't read them either (unless the readers point them out to me) so there's no question of liking or not liking.
Basically I like Goodreads for the social interaction in my groups. I never leave the groups section. the social interaction here is a little different than any other social media I belong to. Definitely more focused on books and reading, which I like.
That said, there is a lot of crossover. Many people I know on goodreads I also know on Twitter or Facebook or LJ or my blog. If I had to cut one out it would probably be between Goodreads and Twitter. With Twitter being most likely to get the axe.

Oh Lou, I forgot to tell you that GR recently blogged about how GR users discover book: http://ww..."
That was very interesting, but I thought it was slanted toward readers who are already heavily invested in Goodreads. And Goodreads is actually one of the smallest (though very focused) of the social medias. So while that was informative, I'm not sure how to interpret it beyond the boundaries of Goodreads?

..."
I believe you two share a guilty conscience. :-D

..."
I believe you two share a guilty conscience. :-D"
And the exactly same taste in books... ;)

I sometimes check through different publisher sites I've bookmarked to see what looks interesting - and I'll admit a good title and/or cover will make me stop and look at the blurb.
I also ask the opinion of the owner of the local LGBT bookstore - he's a bit old-school about the whole "is m/m really 'gay romance'" issue, but he's a big fan of Good Story books, and really knows what's up with print books.
I don't pay attention to Amazon - they have their own agenda about promoting/hiding books I'd probably like to read, and I don't trust either their ratings or their reviewers.

..."
This is true of every site. And every site has its own culture. You have to find the site that feels comfortable and that works for you. And you have to take everything with a grain of salt.
Or maybe a whole salt shaker!

..."
I believe you two share a guilty conscience. :-D"
And the exactly same taste in books... ;)"
Well, MOSTLY that's probably a positive.

Personally - I am willing to forgive a lot if the author is also interacting and contributing as a reader. If you vote for your book on a listopia, at least vote for the others you like that fit the list. If you mention your book on a thread talking about books, talk about other books that fit first and more often. If you add me as a friend, interact with me, before and after you mention your new release. I like authors. They should just at least pretend to like me back. :-)
The authors on Josh's GR group are a great example. I am glad to hear about their releases, because I already know them from the group. And they mention it once, and then go back to talking about what we are all talking about.
I saw that on Amazon once. Think it was Tara Lain? She added an author comment about what inspired the story. That was an interesting & useful bit of promo, I thought.