oh for the normally bad

There’s one rhetorical tic to which Trump supporters are addicted that I desperately wish I could banish from the earth. It’s when they say that Trump is “no saint” or “admittedly imperfect” or “not a moral paragon” or “not without flaws” — that kind of thing. I see some such formulation almost every day. To speak that way is to imply that Trump’s critics demand perfection or at least sainthood. But our criticism of Trump is not that he has sinned and fallen short of the glory of God, it’s that he is a person of exceptionally terrible character: He is a petty, vindictive, mercurial, willfully and grossly ignorant, self-serving, congenitally dishonest, paranoid narcissist. We just want a President who, to borrow a phrase from P. J. O’Rourke, is bad within normal parameters.

2 likes ·   •  1 comment  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 12, 2019 10:46
Comments Showing 1-1 of 1 (1 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Laura (last edited Dec 30, 2019 11:06AM) (new)

Laura Yes! I've had this frustration for some time. I've seen so many conservative Christians try to justify Trump by citing some version of "God works through imperfect people," but I find this rationalization grossly wrong. By this logic, God can use any one of us for his will since we are all imperfect sinners. He could've used Hillary Clinton or literally any other politician. I find it so troubling that people are trying to say Trump is God's will. God has control over all things, but sin is never his will. We shouldn't be using "God's will" to justify abhorrent behavior. Or is my own logic flawed? I have such a hard time wrapping my mind around the Christian defense of Trump.


back to top

Alan Jacobs's Blog

Alan Jacobs
Alan Jacobs isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Alan Jacobs's blog with rss.