Error Pop-Up - Close Button Must be signed in and friends with that member to view that page.

FAQ Friday – Do I need to start my book with a prologue?

You may have seen my first post of this nature a few weeks ago addressing the elephant in the writer’s room about the nagging feeling of dissatisfaction about the previous day’s efforts. This post will take the same format as the last, where my answer is written in direct response to the original questioner, but, as always, I hope it can help one of my fellow writers who may have the same question at heart.


Question: You talked about the prologue and the promise. I am a discovery writer by the way, but sometimes I like to walk outside while listening to epic music to get inspired. The thing is that I don´t really feel comfortable doing a prologue because that could spoil a little bit the story. However, I am concerned about the readers. If I don´t make a prologue and I start with chapter one… well, of course, it will not be that interesting as the magical battle or evil growing on the prologue.


So what should I do? Spoil a little bit? Or just start showing my character from 0. I’ve had this dilemma for a while. I can assure you, Mr. Sanderson, that my story is going to be epic and different from the conventional. Just mindblowing. Transcendental. It will have a lot of scaling so I have to start from 0. But how can I lure my readers on the first pages without spoilers? (Question from A. Martinez)


Well, I’m proud to have been able to chat with you before you make it big! I like how you talk and how you think. Stay confident, but also to be willing to listen to feedback and criticism. If you want to become the great writer you dream of being, you do so (in my experience) by listening.


As for prologues, I should say that you certainly do not need them. In fact, many authors use them as a crutch. It is perfectly acceptable (even recommended by some editors I know) to skip the prologue and go right into your story. (Though it’s not something I often do myself, so perhaps this is a “do as I say, not as I do” sort of situation.)


The important part is not what you call your opening, but in making certain your opening is making the right kinds of promises. You say you want to start at zero and ramp up–that’s great, and you can totally do that. But try to devise an opening to your story that is engaging, and gives foreshadowing of the type of story you want to tell. Figure out how to start small, but make big promises. Some stories do this with a prologue. But other stories start with the protagonist trying something bold and beyond their skill, to show that they are challenging themselves–and this can be something as simple as running a foot race, or boldly speaking when others remain silent. It doesn’t have to actually include something epic to imply epic turns are coming.


Best of luck to you! I suggest just starting where it makes the most sense, then writing your story. Once you are done, you can look back at that opening and see if there are revisions you could make to better align it with the story you ended up wanting to tell.


Best,


Brandon

69 likes ·   •  6 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 09, 2019 13:42
Comments Showing 1-6 of 6 (6 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Dolf (last edited Aug 16, 2019 05:58AM) (new)

Dolf I hate prologues. Every time I read a book that starts with one I'm like ugh, have to get trough that shit again before getting to the actual story. And I've never read a prologue that was actually necessary to the story.

And yes there is also a chance that it spoils things sometimes not even just a little. I've even had it happen that the story catches up to the prologue part at the very end of the book. Man that pisses me off. (authors really should take more care to not piss off their readers, in general)

I just started reading the 10th volume of Re:Zero. So I read the prologue which is a flash forward promising the protagonist finally coming in direct contact with the entity that has her hand wrapped around his heart disallowing him to die.

But here I am now just basically waiting to get to that point making it more of a chore going trough all the stuff that comes before. (authors should just stick to telling things chronologically, in general)


message 2: by [deleted user] (new)

To quote one of my favorite authors and YouTubers, Jenna Moreci, think about what your book is about and see if you need it for any reason, if not, dump it. I agree with Brandon that most authors use it as a crutch, the same with epilogues if the story over don't write more just to make the book longer. Not to disregard what the person above me said, but not all authors who write them are just writing a backstory; they are part of the story. Lisa Jackson is one who's prologues, which she doesn't write all the time, are a pivotal part of the story. I have read books with beautifully written prologues and the story itself was shit. One I read was ok, but the character never came in the story, so what was the point? I never skip any part of a book; I read cover to cover. In my book, "Second Time's The Harm," I have a prologue only because it explains how and why she was fired. Here is the link for Jenna's video... https://youtu.be/RAyXMU-fgP8


message 3: by Dolf (new)

Dolf Serenity wrote: "To quote one of my favorite authors and YouTubers, Jenna Moreci, think about what your book is about and see if you need it for any reason, if not, dump it. I agree with Brandon that most authors u..."
But if the prologue as you say is part of the story then there is no need to isolate that part as being the prologue now is there? Why not just make it the first chapter?

I haven't come across that many unwelcome epilogues. Usually it tells a bit about the characters lives after main plot. That's nice, in my experience it's more often the case that the story just cuts off too abruptly. The ending of the "soldies son series" (https://www.goodreads.com/series/4035...) always comes to mind as one of the most frustrating endings in this regard, it cuts off on the way back just one city removed from getting back home. I love how Sarah J. Maas does it right and actually rounds off things nicely. But I'm not sure if she uses epilogues to do so, so it's also not necessary for that part as well to be separated as an epilogue.


message 4: by Jonathan (new)

Jonathan Grothe After reading through all the comments I have to wonder if the real question is, What is the benefit of separating a portion of the story in the first place?

I would imagine a prologue is there to set the tone of the world or the problem within it that will need to be addressed, without actually introducing any of the characters yet. That would make sense why you would want to separate it from just being chapter 1.


message 5: by Brenda (new)

Brenda Not many books I read have prologues, but the ones that do often leave me in a time warp of sorts. Mr Sanderson had one in Way of Kings, and three books later we're still learning more about who what why where when this event happened, and the repercussions. Honestly, I want to go back and re read that prologue to verify the long-reaching effect of these characters choices.

So in this case, it wasn't a spoiler, but a portent of things to come based on that which has passed.


message 6: by Dolf (new)

Dolf Brenda wrote: "Not many books I read have prologues, but the ones that do often leave me in a time warp of sorts. Mr Sanderson had one in Way of Kings, and three books later we're still learning more about who wh..."
I would prefer that what you describe to be integrated into the story, you now where the current characters find out about things that happened in the past and then instead of having it told (often in excessive details) in the prologue just have it mentioned more like a footnote than a whole thing.

It's also annoying to have another story being told in the prologue and then when you're actually getting into it cuts off and a different story starts and what you were reading suddenly is (ancient) history. And if you don't get into it it's just that much more of a chore to get trough. It also opens the doors for prequels, who doesn't hate those as you already know the outcome. If a story has room for prequels it should have started there in the first place (dear authors stick to chronological story telling please!).


back to top