Writing What You Don't Know

Beginning writers are often advised to write what they know.Personally, I've always considered that rather limiting advice. Granted all of us have experiences which we might utilize in our writing. But is your experience broad enough to justify a novel? And should a good novel be autobiographical? A good writer should have curiosity and imagination, two traits which go beyond mere experience. Not that I'm opposed to experience. I believe experience to be a great teacher--if you're willing to learn from it.But I prefer to believe a writer should write what he wants to know.As E. L. Doctorow put it, "Writing is an exploration. You start from nothing and learn as you go."This desire to learn has the power to stimulate your imagination and take you places you've never experienced before, a voyage which can transform your writing and give it a power it might otherwise lack. Your enthusiasm for the subject should shine through and transfer to the potential reader what you've learned about a subject.For me, research is half the fun of writing and provides opportunity to delve into many fascinating topics. But we need to beware of lecturing to our readers. What you've learned about a particular subject must conform to the story you're telling and contribute to the advancement of the plot. It may please you to elaborate on a particular theme and this is where you need to exercise care lest you stall your story and leave your readers exasperated.Read Hemingway's story Big Two-Hearted River. One of the things I initially liked about the story when I read it as a boy was all it had to say about the pleasures of fishing. The story isn't about fishing. But there's a lot of fishing in it, which gave me pleasure and also taught me a few things both about fishing and writing.A powder mill is an essential element in my first novel, Schlussel's Woman, and I read extensively on the process to understand how powder is manufactured. But, in the novel, millworker Isaac Inch's explanation of the process to the artist Titus Kuhns is kept to less than half a dozen paragraphs spread over several pages. My intent was to provide the reader with just enough to understand its importance to the plot.
As with description, a writer  should introduce what's been learned in gradual, digestible supplements to his prose. It's the old premise of show, not tell (though there are instances where tell is appropriate).
2 likes ·   •  4 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 10, 2017 05:36
Comments Showing 1-4 of 4 (4 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Pamela (new)

Pamela Allegretto Excellent article! Great advice! I agree; research is at least half the fun of writing. The tricky part is to consolidate all that newly discovered, interesting information and present it to the reader in such a manner that it informs and entertains without information overload. You explained this beautifully. My compliments!


message 2: by J.R. (new)

J.R. Pamela wrote: "Excellent article! Great advice! I agree; research is at least half the fun of writing. The tricky part is to consolidate all that newly discovered, interesting information and present it to the re..."

Thank you. Your comment is much appreciated.


message 3: by Gary (new)

Gary Inbinder Excellent post, and your advice regarding the use of historical research in fiction reminded me of something I wrote on my blog
a few years ago.

"A final word concerning info-dumps. After spending a great deal of time and effort gathering your material, there’s often an urge to show off your hard-earned knowledge by using everything you’ve got. I try to avoid that natural urge, and when I do introduce historical detail I try to work it into the action and narrative in such a way as to not draw undue attention to it.

For example, you may have a scene where your protagonist inspects some lines on her face as reflected in a mirror. Some detail about the mirror and the source of illumination (candle light, oil, kerosene, gas, electricity)can reveal much about the time and place of the scene, but those technological details must never crowd out what’s of primary importance: What does that look into the mirror reveal about the character and how does the scene connect to the story-line?"


message 4: by J.R. (new)

J.R. Gary wrote: "Excellent post, and your advice regarding the use of historical research in fiction reminded me of something I wrote on my blog
a few years ago.

"A final word concerning info-dumps. After spendin..."

Well said, Gary. Thanks for commenting.


back to top