date
newest »
newest »
We thank all of you good GR readers for your expressions of sympathy. I am as curious as any spectator how the shooter's motives may feed the ongoing cultural debates, but his motives mean absolutely nothing to the families who have suffered such heartbreaking losses.
President Quack-quack is in town to offer his condolences. If I do anything besides shake my head or laugh at his pontificating, I will be pleasantly surprised. As most of you know, my expectations would be exactly the same if Pilloried Hillary were the President.
I suppose the political class from around the world would be criticized if they did not feed at the trough of these tragedies, but their porcine posing always strikes me as disingenuous.
David, "why???" [motives!!], is (and will be) for many of those families a source of worry, search for TRUTH...closure...,and justice.
Some won't be satisfied with some (fake?) narratives.
That's unbearably true.Allow me a strange (psychological) experiment; suppose you were targeted by...it doesn't matter. You just know you'll die at the hands of some sinister force; more powerful than you are. You can't control it. And you've got those who love you, but you know you'll die maybe suddenly, without warning.... Would you like them to know, after your death, the nature of that force, which struck you?
Can you put yourself in the place of a victim?




The post massacre debate should clarify if he really was a lone wolf, or was helped by other shooters. The narrative we get from the media is that he had "gambling debts"... had a Filipino woman, ...many guns stored, and passed all checks. Also some media said that Antifa lit was found in his hotel room. I heard also an American psychiatrist saying he targeted "Christian, conservative Americans". Evidently young people. But what were his motives?
There's yet a lot to be uncovered.