date
newest »

message 1:
by
Stephen
(new)
Apr 18, 2017 04:52AM

reply
|
flag







I agree with you...it is not ok for a Christian to date an unbeliever. That is a message of old going back to the OT days where Israel was to be a peculiar people, and not mix with the nations surrounding them. That analogy applies today as well, but for Christians. The grass is not greener on the other side even though it may appear that way (sometimes).
Also, a Christian is a Christian, not a denomination, so I strongly agree on your take on that as well.

"Upon further reflection, our relationship and communion with God is of such a deep and complete level and so is our relationship with our spouse, that to have into this union a person who does not share in the same practices and beliefs, and cannot enter God's presence with you, means you cannot have a full and completely intimate relationship. Also, of interest are the verses of Ezekiel 44:7-9, which explain that an unbeliever is considered unholy by the Lord and if brought inside the "temple" it desecrates it. After being sanctified by the blood of Christ, we have earned the right to enter into the sanctuary of God, but we cannot bring along any unbelievers with us and thus defile His temple. We should not do this to our God; Israel was punished severely many times over this."
I do believe if we delve into the Word, we will find the answer not only to this but every other question we may have. God is indeed gracious.

Hmm . . . it does have to do with the heart, but, it only starts there, it goes on to include charity, forgiveness, good works, and so many things. And denominations do have a key factor, because, unfortunately, sometimes certain denominations only believe certain aspects of the Bible, or tradition (going solely off of Scripture can be dangerous as, thanks to that, we now have more than one denomination because everyone begins to think their "interpretation" is the right one). That, in and of itself, can be a problem for a marriage of people from two different denominations.
Yes, it should be simple, but, thanks to the devil and the worldly, it has to be a little bit more complicated to differentiate between the lukewarm and the soldiers of Christ. Yes, God, and only God, can read our hearts, but He wants us to spread His light to the whole world, and to sit back in comfort while others stumble around in ignorance (the great bane of man, as pointed out by the Ghost of Christmas Present) and/or in pain and poverty does not prove our love for Him. As it is said, 'actions speak louder than words' and, Christ Himself said, "Truly I tell you, whatever you did for the least of My brothers and sisters, you also did to Me" (Matthew 25:40).


All good Amy, but remember that many 'Christians' don't view us as fellow believers at all (for example, https://www.chick.com/m/reading/tract...). Sadly, after a lot of attempts to build friendly relations with non-Catholic Christians, I concluded that in general the only variable was how much they desired to see our beloved church destroyed.

Yes, unfortunately, it's so sad. It only tells me I'm in the right place. And as for those who are questioning the Eucharist, what about the Last Supper, or are they interpreting it their own way now (which is more dangerous than having something set up to prevent that? The devil can work in more than one way, he isn't stupid)? Didn't Jesus say to "Do this in memory of Me"? Someone's clearly picking and choosing from the Bible for Jesus also gave to Peter and the Apostles the power over sins (or did they take that out of their Bibles?). It's really sad that, while this post claims that Helen is brainwashed, they're brainwashing other people into taking their word that everything we do started with paganism. My friends who converted to Catholicism through research can tell them something very different.
But, I have hope, Jesus also said that the doors of hell will not prevail against the Catholic Church, no matter how many times we fall. And, we also have the Blessed Virgin Mary, who has said that her Immaculate Heart will triumph as it is her Son's wish that the time of peace will belong to her. Also, it seems we are making a comeback, many seem to have grown tired of hearing things like that about the Catholic Church (not only that, but the path we are following in America is even less pleasing in God's eyes than anyone can claim that the Catholic Church is). They know we're the true faith because we still stand strong after two hundred years (Protestants and Baptists, and all other denominations came later). So, yes, while that post made me angry and cry at the blatant stupidity of that kind of thinking and the lies, I know God is stronger and He Himself will let those who truly seek Him know where He is.
The Catholic Church is far from being destroyed, in fact, we've been in need of some kind of persecution for a while now. If we really truly follow Jesus Christ, we will accept any kind of persecution that comes our way, for the servant is not greater than the Master, and if the Master underwent persecution, so too shall the loyal servants.
(Also, hence why I'm only seeking a Catholic. Did go out with a 'Christian' who, though he believed the Bible, didn't believe in the devil, and that's the worst place to be because the devil can use that to his advantage.)

Now, it is sad that many Protestants use harsh rhetoric and language when confronting the Catholic tradition, and I would even say unbiblical, because the Word encourages us to correct and admonish with love and humility, not with pride and self-righteousness. But our failures as believers do not negate the fact that the Word of God will always trump man-made traditions and will be the sole basis for our doctrine. If the Bible says something that I, my pastor, priest, or even the pope does not agree with, than we are all wrong, and the Bible right. And the Bible isn't really that difficult to interpret; if we pray for understanding and study the Word for ourselves, the Holy Spirit will always enlighten us.
Having said that, as far as I'm concerned, if anyone believes that they are sinners and they are saved through - and only through - Jesus Christ's sacrifice on the cross, having repented in their heart and confessed with their mouth that He is their saviour, they are Christians.
P.S. I believe all this side-discussion might have been avoided if Natalie would have used the word "believer" instead of "Christian" in her article, though for me personally she is correct. So many define Christianity as a lifestyle choice or traditional upbringing, as opposed to being a daily follower and servant of Jesus Christ.
Blessings


Hahaha. I was thinking also, you posted why a believer should not date a non-believer....I think it has been proven risky for believers to date believers... :)

Hi Susan. I had a feeling that statement would raise an eyebrow; perhaps I should have chosen better words and made my thought clearer.
What I meant to say is that when you pray for understanding and allow the Holy Spirit to guide you through reading and studying the Word - the one who actually authored it - He helps you interpret it the way it was meant to. Unfortunately, we rely more on our own wisdom and understanding, which so often leads to misinterpretations and wrong doctrines. I know the Bible is complex and deep as well as prone to so many different interpretations and did not mean to actually imply that all of it is easy to understand, but rather "not impossible to get to its truth".
I hope that answers your question also. Blessings.

Thanks, I understand what you are saying, but it must be pretty impossible to get to it's truth individually, because there are an awful lot of people claiming truth and yet there can only be one Truth. And although, yes, the Bible was Divinely inspired, it was the Catholic Church that compiled it. It just seems to me that Jesus was far too wise to leave things up to mere men individually to decide things on their own (knowing how we are, as has been proven) without some Divine assistance as was instituted in the Church. Thinking of it merely rationally even, that just wouldn't make much sense to me. They worked so hard to stay in fidelity to what He taught in the beginning. Thanks for the response.

Well written post and as a Christian brother I could not agree with you more one what you said. Be encouraged and stand firm in Lord!
God Bless!

My apologies for getting back to you so late, things have been crazy.
It would have been better is if Martin Luther fought the immorality within the Church rather than leave it and risk being trampled by the devil. Many others have done the same, why could he not? The devil has already proven that he can use Scriptures against us, he tried to use it against Jesus, and you know how that showdown went. We are mere mortals and do not have the wisdom of Christ, and sometimes, though we ask for it, still refuse it, thus practically allowing an open field for the devil. Why then are there many denominations? Why is it that, instead of trying to bring back to God what was already His, we leave it and create something new based on what we think He wants us to do?
As for the man-made traditions, that was what the early Church had for thirty or so years before the New Testament was finally written and put together. Some traditions even came from the Jewish traditions that were God-made. The major point is, is that the traditions should be the balance to the Scriptures and an aid to make sure we do interpret them correctly. If we go all traditions or all Scripture, there's a greater chance of falling into pride as, as noted above, there is more than one person who can interpret the Scriptures their way and say that they're right.
May I also point out, by noting that Luther did leave the Church that the Catholic Church is the one instituted by Christ and run by fallen men. There will be good men and bad men, every barrel has its bad apples. Just don't throw the baby out with the bath water because of it, please.