Meanwhile, back in 1758...




As many of you have already seen on Facebook, I now have the final cover to the re-release of Surrender. I was elated to see the first images of the cover — posted here a while back — because they demonstrated the care my editor at Berkley has put into getting historically accurate images on the cover.

Compare this to the original cover with its entire village of tipis — I had sent an email telling my first publisher to make sure there were no tipis — and its "chastity plaid" that made an absolute waste of Nathan Kamp's excellent chesticles — a request made by a shall-not-be-named distributor that is now defunct. Yes, I wept when I saw this cover, and not in a good way.


But by now, most of you have seen the little gold medallion on the front that says, "Includes new material." I thought I would explain what's going on.

Basically, we've gone back to square one with the original manuscript. So the novel is getting a new edit — I am making small changes to the text, but not to the plot — and my editor has edited it in a slightly different way. The manuscript was never altered very much from the original, and these changes are subtle.

For example, my previous editor felt that using "ken" and "kent" in the story made it hard to read and irritating for people who don't like the Scottish burr, so all of those were changed to "know" and "known." But my editor at Berkley has left them the way I originally wrote them.

(Those of you who wonder where I got my way of denoting the Scots accent and such might be interested to hear that I got it from Scottish music. The way I spell things and much of the vocabulary comes not from my imagination, but from old Scottish folk songs.)

What won't be subtle are new scenes or extended scenes that will be included in the final version.

When I wrote Surrender, I was not too far away from the experience of having 100 pages cut from Carnal Gift. It wasn't that the book sucked and needed to be cut. It's that the original publisher just would not print anything beyond a certain number of pages, and I had overshot that by a significant number. It ruined the story, in my opinion.

So, when I wrote Ride the Fire, I was very conscious of this page limit and was simultaneously trying to write and not write too much. That's a hard thing to do as a writer. It was the same experience in writing Surrender. I never, ever wanted to go through the pain of having pages I'd worked so hard to craft cut just to please some bean counter somewhere. (It costs more to ship books if fewer fit in a box.)

Now with this new edit, I can loosen things up a bit. How much new material will be in the story? I can't say. But there will be some.

This same process will occur with Untamed in about a month. The difference with Untamed is that the original manuscript had 25 pages cut out to make the book fit the original publisher's even smaller maximum page count. (I was not pleased.) Those 25 pages will be restored, and the book will get a new, fresh edit.

The same thing will occur with Ride the Fire later this year, only my focus there will be to get in the epilogue I didn't have the stamina to write when I originally wrote the book. A deeply personal story for me, Ride the Fire stripped me to the bone. I had nothing left and couldn't function for about six weeks after I finished writing it. So, the epilogue just never happened. It still isn't written.

A lot of things will be happening in a short period of time as we move deeper into 2011. Here's a list:

Later this summer — Sweet Release and Carnal Gift will be available in the original print versions as I sell off the limited stock I have of those books. I bought a case of each, and I'll autograph them and sell them online or through email.

Early autumn — Sweet Release and the original version of Carnal Gift will be available as ebooks for Kindle, Nook and in other formats. I'm going to be self-publishing them, and that means those 100 pages will be included in the ebook version of Carnal Gift. You can judge whether what I wrote is better than what was originally published.

December — Surrender will be re-released in print and as an ebook by Berkley with the cover you see at top, the new edit and the new material.

January — Untamed will be re-released in print and as an ebook by Berkley with the cover you see at top, the new edit and the new material.

February (or later) — Defiant, Connor's story, which you have all (im)patiently been awaiting, will be released. This is a new book, not a re-release.

So those of you who've been waiting for more historicals from me will be getting what you asked for, and the entire series, which went out of print after the original publisher hit hard financial times, will be available in one format or another, part of it self-pubbed.

I'll keep you up to date as a I go along. As we get closer, we'll do a MacKinnon's Rangers reading challenge so that everyone can remember who these guys are and what the heck three Scottish brothers from the Highlands are doing in Colonial New York.

This weekend, I'm hanging with Iain and Annie, re-editing Surrender and making notes for ideas for new and extended scenes. It's something I've never done before, and I'm finding it kind of fun.

Have a great weekend!
 •  10 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 03, 2011 20:00
Comments Showing 1-10 of 10 (10 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Tonya (new)

Tonya Gentry I can't wait to read the original books! And I just wanted to say that I'd rather pay more for the books to help cover shipping costs than them make authors cut pages.


message 2: by Pamela (new)

Pamela Hi, Tonya — I was so sad when they cut those pages! And then the maximum page count kept shrinking. So CARNAL GIFT lost 100 pages. RTF is shorter than CG. SURRENDER is shorter than RTF. UNTAMED is shorter than SURRENDER. I became so aggravated. I would see readers post out around the Internet about books seeming shorter, and I wanted to tell them they weren't imagining things.

The publisher would tell me that readers liked shorter books, but I'm a reader, and I love something beefy I can sink my teeth into, so I don't believe that and never did.

Nothing I've written for Berkley has been cut. UNLAWFUL CONTACT is almost as long as CG was, and they didn't cut a single paragraph. The I-Team books have been published pretty much exactly as I wrote them, minus silly typos.


message 3: by Tonya (new)

Tonya Gentry You should've been sad. I would've been too. I can't even imagine the time & effort that authors put into writing their books. I appreciate that. Even if I read a book I don't like, I appreciate the author's time & effort. And I don't send her nasty emails telling her how horrible her book is. Just because I didn't like it doesn't mean it's not a good book. It just means I didn't like it.

It doesn't matter to me how long or short a book is as long as it's complete. And I'd rather read the book as the author intended for it to be read. If that's 200 more pages then, so what? I don't really pay attention to how many pages a book has. The only time I prefer to read a short book (like a Harlequin Blaze) is if it's a Monday afternoon & I'm going to buy a new release on Tuesday morning. That way I can finish it before I start on the new one. Any other time it doesn't matter. And yes, I agree. I don't believe readers prefer shorter books. I think they would want to read it uncut like the author originally wrote it. I've also seen comments about the price of books. It's $7.99 (usually) whether it's 300 pages or 450 pages. Some people are upset about that.

And speaking of typos...I read a book a few months ago (not yours) that was full of mistakes. Lot of missing punctuation, misspelled words, sentences that didn't make sense. And it was a lot of mistakes. I wasn't the only one that noticed it. I saw a lot of comments about it. Anyway I was wondering how that could happen. I'm not an editor or anything. And I know nobody's perfect & everyone makes mistakes. But it seemed like the book hadn't even been edited. I've read other books by this author but this one was the only one like that.


message 4: by Joan (new)

Joan This is exciting for me because I am a new fan of yours. I look forward to the re-releases of those books. And as far as I'm concerned, if the book is good...the longer the better.

BTW. I just can't say enough about the I Team series. The books are so well written and interesting. I love the different personalities and that we can follow them through the series.

And I couldn't agree more...Julian is definitely, hands down the hottest so far! ;)


message 5: by Pamela (new)

Pamela Tonya — about the typos... Was that an ebook you were reading? If it was an ebook, then the typos can probably be blamed with problems resulting from the transition from text. Some cheap scanning methods create all kinds of ridiculous errors. I know that because the ebook versions of my historicals are full of unexplainable, ridiculous, preventable errors. One good thing about the reissue is that all of them will be put in ebook form from scratch, so hopefully there won't be typos. It's a shame that happens. Some publishers seem better able to manage new technology (it's not really NEW any longer, is it?) than others.

Hi, Joan — I'm so glad you've enjoyed the I-Team. That makes me very happy. Julian came in second in the recent reader poll I had of I-Team heroes. I thought he was going to win, but Marc Hunter beat him decisively. :-)


message 6: by Autumn (new)

Autumn  Pamela: i just bought all your back list last month. I have read all the I-team books so far, but haven't ventured yet with the historical ones. Do you think i should wait until the new releases come out??.. i dont know what to do.. ^_^ I love your writing so much, that after i finished "breaking point" i feel aching to read more from you!

ps: kudos with the Blog!


message 7: by Tonya (new)

Tonya Gentry First, let me say that I wasn't trying to put anyone down. I wasn't complaining about the mistakes. I was just wondering how that could've happened. It was a paperback book. It's the last book in a series. A book I had been waiting for for 3 years & I was so happy to be reading it that I didn't care about the mistakes. LOL Some people seemed to think the wrong copy got sent to the printer. Considering the number of mistakes in it, I think that could be what happened. I have heard people complain about mistakes in ebooks. Some people get really upset about them. I don't. As long as the book is readable the mistakes don't bother me.


message 8: by Joan (new)

Joan Pamela I voted for Julian of course, though I love them all.

Tonya I was mentioning to a friend recently that I find so many typos in books. Not so much in the older copies and I think a lot of the are missed due to spell check. Which is a great tool but it doesn't pick up the errors that make sense. Does this even make sense? LOL I am talking about names and homophones etc. I find them all the time.


message 9: by Lynsey A (new)

Lynsey A Pamela,
This is such exciting news! I'm looking forward to re-reading the re-releases of the MacKinnon Rangers. Looking forward to it all! Looking forward ever so much to Connor's story. :)

I love long books and I loved the length of your historicals. They were so well written it seemed like a short book...because I just breezed through it, enjoying it so much. Your writing keeps me interested from page 1 to the finish.


message 10: by Pam (new)

Pam I agree with what Lynsey said...."Your writing keeps me interested from start to finish." I love your historic romance books. I'm so excited to read that you are doing Connor's story. Keep these awesome books coming!


back to top