Gilad Atzmon's Blog, page 22
November 25, 2014
I Support Israel’s National Bill
By Gilad Atzmon
Mazal Tov: a controversial bill that officially defines Israel as the “Nation-State of the Jewish People” was approved by the Israeli cabinet last Sunday.
Finally Israel has acknowledged its true Jewish nature. Instead of pretending to be a ‘Jewish Democracy” - a contradiction in terms, the Jewish State admits that it is a theocracy guided by Jewish racial supremacist ideology.
The bill, which is intended to become part of Israel’s Basic Laws, recognises Israel’s Jewish character, institutionalises Jewish law as an inspiration for legislation and delists Arabic as an official second language. As if until now Arabic had been equal to Hebrew.
No longer will Jewish anti Zionists and their few Palestinian cronies be able to deny the Jewishness of the Jewish state. They may even have to admit that Palestine is engaged in a religious war that was imposed on them.
According to some Israeli critics, the new Israeli bill would weaken the wording of Israel’s declaration of independence, which states that the new state would “be based on the principles of liberty, justice and freedom expressed by the prophets of Israel [and] affirm complete social and political equality for all its citizens, regardless of religion, race or gender.”
Israel has always been the Jewish State, it has never been a liberal place nor has it been committed to justice or equality. The deepest truth is that universal humanism and ethical culture is foreign to Judaic thinking that is tribal and legalistic.
Interestingly, as Israel is finally admitting that it has little to do with democracy, the USA is strengthening its relationships with Iran. I guess that in the White House and the Pentagon they had already understood that Iran is the only democracy in the region.
November 24, 2014
Al Etejah-Panorama: Gilad Atzmon on Ed Miliband, The Labour and the Jewish Lobby (TV)
In this Al Etejah's Panorama program Gilad Atzmon elaborates on the dominance of Jewish lobby in the UK and America and the weak resistance it meets in both Britain and the USA. The activity of the Lobby clearly undermines the notion of Western democracy. We also spoke about the collapse of Left politics and future of Western thinking.
November 20, 2014
Must Watch: Hjernevask-Race
Hjernevask (Brainwash) is a Norwegian popular science documentary series that aired on Norwegian television in 2010. The series was produced by Harald Eiaand Ole Martin Ihle, and was completed in seven episodes consisting of interviews with Norwegian and foreign researchers who have different views on some controversial topics related to the world we live in and the human landscape.
Hjernevask (Brainwash): Race [With the missing... by HBDVideos
And here is my take on the Bell Curve and cognitive partitioning:
November 18, 2014
Hot Off The Press-Har Nof Jerusalem Is Deir Yassin and it is Remembered
By Gilad Atzmon
The attack on a synagogue in Jerusalem today took place in Har Nof, a Jewish neighborhood built over the ruins of Deir Yassin, a Palestinian village whose inhabitants were wiped out on April 9, 1948. The Deir Yassin Massacre delivered a clear message to the Palestinian people. The Jewish militias were driven by genocidal inclinations and the Arabs better run for their lives. However, it seems as if the Palestinian collective memory is alive and kicking - it may be possible that the Deir Yassin Massacre was commemorated today.
An Israeli Conundrum
By Gilad Atzmon
Israeli News Channel (Channel 10) recently covered my appearance as a guest artist on Pink Floyd's latest album, The Endless River. On the one hand they were very proud of my artistry, on the other, they admitted, he is not one of us anymore and he is not going to receive a “congratulations call from Bibi.”
The Israeli channel was honest in their reporting of my criticism of Israel and Jewishness. They reported that I had renounced my Israeli citizenship, They quoted my observation that Gilad Shalit had been a “post guard in a concentration camp (Gaza)”. And when they referred to my recent Press TV appearance about Gaza they translated the word ‘genocide’ as "Shoah." This is very revealing. While The Guardian Of Zion and the Soros funded BDS network would never compare the Palestinian plight with the Holocaust, the Israelis understand that the comparison is natural.
The message is clear. Israel is more tolerant of its critics than its Diaspora Jewish opposition (the Anti Zionist Zionists). This is why Israel rather than the Jewish Diaspora Left has produced the sharpest criticism of Jewish power, Judaism and Jewishness (Israel Shahak, Yeshayahu Leibowitz, Israel Shamir, Shlomo Sand, and many more).
It Is Not 3rd Intifada, It Is The End Game
Six killed in a Jerusalem synagogue
Two Palestinian liberation enthusiasts infiltrated a synagogue in Jerusalem.
Four Israeli Jews were killed Tuesday morning when two Palestinian freedom fighters attacked Jewish worshipers in a synagogue in Jerusalem. Eight other Jews were wounded; four are in moderate to serious condition. Two police officers were among the wounded.
This is not a civil uprising, it is all out war. The Jewish State is fighting for its life, and it doesn't stand a chance.
November 17, 2014
Shlomo Sand and The Jewish Left’s Lie
Introduction by Gilad Atzmon: The following extract is lifted from an Haaretz article discussing Shlomo Sand. The Author, Anshel Pfeffer has managed to grasp the gist of Sand’s argument that is identical to the criticism I developed in The Wandering Who: Jewish anti Zionism is a spin. It is not ethically grounded, it is not universal either! It exists to convey an image of Jewish dissent – or shall we call it what it is – a controlled opposition apparatus.
http://www.haaretz.com/mobile/.premium-1.626312?v=026A89510E1121BC919983707F199320
“I realized this at a lecture he gave last month at the London Middle East Institute and the Center for Jewish Studies at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. Nearly 300 people came to listen to Sand talk about his (Shlomo Sand) new book; a great many of them of that specific demographic that, for want of a better description, can be labeled “conflicted Jews.” In the Q&A part of the lecture, two of them asked Sand, with real pain in their voices, “instead of stopping being a Jew, why didn’t you write ‘How I Stopped Being an Israeli?’”
They simply couldn’t understand how their admired writer, who has dedicated a major part of his writing career to dismantling what he sees as the fake mythology of Jewish nationalism, and lambasting the Israeli state, could deny the Jewish part of his identity in favor of his Israeli one. But Sand has done the opposite of what they expected of him (and some of them have actually done themselves). Not only has he constructed for himself a new form of Israeli identity, but he denies these secular, progressive, non-Zionist Jews their intellectual integrity. He ridicules those who claim to be upholding Jewish values while criticizing Israel, and writes that they are no different from “overt pro-Zionists.” These “anti-Zionist Jews” who have never lived in Israel, he writes, “claim a particular right, different from that of non-Jews, to make accusations against Israel.” Living in their “diaspora,” a term he dismisses with quotation marks, they are “granting themselves the privilege of actively intervening in decisions regarding the future and fate of Israel.”
No universalist ethics
Sand denies the special right of secular non-Zionists to band together as Jews, as they do in dozens of organizations and forums, and sit in judgment of Israel. He goes further, accusing them of the same sin as Jewish nationalists; of trying to claim that there is something special or better about their Judaism. “But Zionism did pick up a lot of things from Judaism,” he argues. “And even if Zionism is not Judaism, it doesn’t mean that Judaism is an ethical religion – Judaism doesn’t allow marrying a non-Jew. Jewish ethics are not the ethics I dream of, it’s not universalist ethics.”
….There is nothing ethical about Judaism, says Sand, blasting away the much cherished liberal notion of tikkun olam – if it’s enlightened, then it’s universal, and therefore not Jewish. The long lists of brave Jewish revolutionaries and human rights advocates so beloved of progressive Jews mean nothing, he claims. If anything, they were denying their parochial Jewish roots and joining a bigger and better global brotherhood of man and woman.
Sand is the scourge of anti-Zionist secular Jews. Criticize Israel, by all means, he tells them; but if you identify yourselves as Jews when doing so, you’re phonies. You don’t get any special moral standing just by accident of birth. You are no better than the goyim. “
November 16, 2014
75% Of The French People Are Either Blind Or Naïve
Reported by Gilad Atzmon
The ultra Zionist Algemeiner reported today that recent Poll revealed that “no less than 16% of France’s residents think that there is a “Zionist conspiracy on a global scale,” according to results of a survey released Sunday.”
Additionally, one in four also believe that “Zionism is an international organization that seeks to influence the world and society in favor of the Jews,” according to the study conducted on behalf of the Foundation for Political Innovation (Fondapol) on the persistence of anti-Semitic prejudice in French public opinion.
My reading of the poll’s results is very different from the Zionist outlet. It only suggests that 75% of the French people are either liars or embarrassingly naïve.
Max Blumenthal Incites Terrorism!
By Gilad Atzmon and Doug Johnson
A few hours after I posted a video revealing Max Blumenthal’s toilet incident, Doug Johnson wrote to me the following insightful message:
“The thing that strikes me about this scene is the tacit acceptance of the idea that people accused of being anti-Semitic should naturally be physically assaulted or even killed.
Blumenthal and the bald Israeli (David Sheen) didn't object to the idea that Israeli or Diaspora Jews would attack or murder anyone, much less a fellow Jew, accused of anti-Semitism. They didn't balk at the concept of engaging in physical violence against people who have opposing political views.
Instead, their only objection was to which individuals are classified as anti-Semitic and therefore which individuals should be subjected to politically motivated violence, i.e., terrorism.
Doug Johnson”
Johnson’s astute observation is damning. Max Blumenthal defames activists, scholars and intellectuals as ‘anti Semites,’ clearly aware of the possible consequences. He appears to expect other Jews to exercise lethal terrorism against the subjects of his defamation. Blumenthal states that “smearing one as an anti Semite definitely” leads to an Israeli or Jewish “attack” (2:39): by framing me as an ‘anti Semite’, for instance, Blumenthal intended to incite a Jewish terrorist act against me.
But Blumenthal is hardly original. He follows a familiar Israeli Hasbara drill.
In a radio interview in 1990(1), hard core Zionist Joseph Lapid, at the time a senior Israeli columnist, explained what he thought of Victor Ostrovsky, the Mossad whistle blower. “Ostrovsky is the most treacherous Jew in modern Jewish history. And he has no right to live, except if he's prepared to return to Israel and stand trial.”
Valerie Pringle, the journalist interviewing Lapid asked: “Do you feel it's a responsible statement to say what you've said?”
Lapid: “Oh yes, I fully believe in that. And unfortunately the Mossad cannot do it because we cannot endanger our relations with Canada. But I hope there will be a decent Jew in Canada who does it for us.”
Pringle: “You hope this. You could live with his blood on your hands?”
Can anyone distinguish between hard core Zionist Lapid and alleged ‘anti’ Zionist Blumenthal? As far as I can see, both agitators are inciting murder by proxy. Maybe, after all, this bar mitzvah boy Blumenthal is just a Goliath wannabe rather than a peace activist.
