Matthew Roland's Blog, page 2
September 10, 2020
Writing Flawed Characters: What We Can Learn From the Failures of Captain Marvel

It is a truth widely acknowledged that a character’s flaws are much more interesting than any abilities they might have.
Iron Man’s suit of armour is the stuff of awesomeness, but let's face it: if he didn’t start his journey as a self-absorbed jerk who only cared about himself, then we would be much less interested in how his story ends.
Darcy’s flaws and struggles far outweigh his material possessions.
Boromir wouldn’t be Boromir if he didn’t already own the inherent weaknesses that made way for his cathartic redemption.
It is these emotion-fraught struggles that elevate a story’s status from “pretty good” to the unforgettable and deeply personal.
Subsequently, it is the deeply personal that most impacts their audiences, turning a good yarn into an instant classic for the ages.
We commune with such stories because they are vessels from which spring not only heroes and victors, but flawed men and women struggling to do the right thing, despite what consequences may arise against them.
As fallen creatures, continually harried by sin in all its forms and guises, we empathize with and admire those heroes who endure the same trials and tribulations which we must also undergo.
To better illustrate this principle, let’s take a look at Captain Marvel—a film that deviated from this long-heralded tradition and subsequently suffered the consequences—and see what we learn from its failure, in order to write compelling characters of our own.
Why Captain Marvel Falls Short of the Marvel Model
Many would quickly concur that Marvel Studios has endured the years and become the most renowned film franchise of our generation due to its investment in character growth and development.
The last two Avengers films succeeded because of skilful storytelling; but the reason fans showed up in droves to make them the highest-grossing films of all time, primarily owed to how invested they had become in the ensemble cast.
Marvel films don’t sell solely due to their trademark humour, escapism, or even their expansive world-building: they sell because they’re some of the best in the business at crafting characters and personalities that connect with their audience.
Doctor Strange is perhaps the most striking example of this phenomenon.
In terms of plot and overall world-building, it’s okay. It’s good, but not great. However, as many can testify, the saving grace of that film (apart from the humour and visuals) is the person of Doctor Stephen Strange.
When we first see him, he’s portrayed as a medical wizard, with an aptitude for remedying ailments that would have defeated even his celebrated peers. To put it simply: he’s the best there is, and he knows it. His amazing abilities are deftly contrasted with his maddening flaws. We are shown evidence of his astounding track record, only to watch him refuse patients one minute later that might taint his reputation. Yes, he’s a medical genius, but he’s one with a major ego and is, on the whole, an infuriatingly narcissistic individual.
So, what happens next? He’s in his Lamborghini, on his way to accept yet another prestigious award, when his car skids off the road in a freak accident, leaving him physically impaired.
Next thing, he’s in the hospital, his once-gifted hands filled with needles. He will never perform another surgery again. He’s lost everything, save the love of those who care for him, which he drives away soon after in a fit of anger.
It takes many more losses for him to finally realize that “it’s not all about you,” and it is only once he learns this essential truth and loses his ego that he is granted the means to defeat the villain.
Compare and contrast with Captain Marvel: Carol Danvers is not only the first female Marvel superhero to get a solo outing, but she’s the strongest. Her seemingly-endless display of powers makes those of every hero before her look puny and unimportant. And yet, for all that, Captain Marvel falls utterly short of the mark set by its predecessors.
Unlike the majority of her MCU counterparts, Danvers doesn’t really have any perceivable flaws, save for maybe being “too emotional”?
This shoddy attempt at grafting in real human conflict is present in one of the opening scenes, wherein Jude Law’s character makes a point of telling her, “There’s nothing more dangerous to a warrior than emotion. You have to let go of the part of yourself that makes you vulnerable.”
According to David Ehrlich of indiewire.com, the “context behind [his] axioms couldn’t be clearer, nor the message more pointed: Women are always being told that they’re too ‘emotional’ to lead, but [Danvers’] convoluted journey will lead her to see that emotions can be a superpower unto themselves, and that her vulnerability is also her greatest strength. If only [Danvers’] movie didn’t treat that sentiment like a self-fulfilling prophecy; if only it earned the beautiful idea that it lays out at the start.”
Gender politics aside, there are still several issues at play with this “flaw,” Number One being that Brie Larson’s persona repeatedly comes off as someone who has the exact opposite problem.
Whether this was intentional or not (an argument can be made for both sides), the idea of being “too emotional” as a flaw doesn’t really work quite that well within the context of the film.
At the end of the day, it’s just simple logic: If the story is trying to say that having emotions are invaluable to growth and success, then such a flaw is no longer a deeply-engrossing flaw—it’s something to aspire to, and not the other way around.
Her only real problem besides this is “being held back.” Throughout the film, she’s constantly searching for who she is and was, or the “best version” of herself. And it’s only when she breaks free (and non-coincidently, casts off the restraints placed upon her by male authority figures), that she becomes the famous Captain Marvel.
What Differentiates Captain America from Captain Marvel
Now, some might point to her lack of shortcomings and say that Danvers is just the female equivalent of Steve Rogers (and, indeed, the filmmakers referenced the latter in the development of her character); however, there are distinct differences at play here: Steve is an everyman.
He’s patriotic and loves his country; he’s constantly in conflict over what’s the right thing to do; he weeps and grieves and struggles over loss; and his convictions repeatedly come at a high cost to him and those he loves.
Repeat: his convictions repeatedly come at a high cost to him and those he loves.
Also, stress: as the story of an amnesiac who’s trying to find her identity, Carol Danvers doesn’t yet have any concrete convictions.
As seen in illustrious figures like Superman and Captain America, static characters can work—and can do so exceedingly well—but only if they already have a set of values or morals that are frequently and determinedly challenged throughout the story. The attraction of those conflicts that causes an audience to empathize with such a character is seen in what they must suffer as a result of their beliefs.
However, in the case of Captain Marvel, it is not until the very end of the film that she forms any plausible convictions that might attract conflict; and even then, it’s difficult to pinpoint what those convictions actually are, other than the typical “it’s the right thing to do, so, of course, I’m going to do it.”
And strangely, it’s worth noting that the Captain America films—despite the unbending nature of their primary protagonist—are some of the most emotion-filled, heartstring-tugging films in the entire Marvel franchise. And this is, above all, because Captain America is a man we can feel for and commune with: we’ve seen him as the struggling, scrawny weakling, who eventually proved that it’s the heart, not the outward condition that matters the most.
We’ve seen him stay true to his convictions, despite the consequences, of which there have been many. And in the end, I think few who would be at variance with the truth that the Star-Spangled Man has, perhaps, the most tragic history out of all his many colleagues.
On the other hand, Captain Marvel is none of that. It’s almost utterly bereft of the emotion and angst that have driven the success of those that came before. In the words of one critic, “Superhero films are not known for their romantic subplots, but Captain Marvel may be the chilliest of the lot.
Indeed, the most affection we see on screen here is, really, the lavish attention that Nick Fury bestows on Goose, the movie’s enigmatic cat.” It’s a testament that some critics were irritated by the clear lack of heart that their annoyance overbore the fear of being politically incorrect. Indeed, at 78%, Captain Marvel owns one of the lowest ratings for a Marvel film on Rotten Tomatoes to date.
Looking back, Danvers’ perceived lack of a personality was an oft-noted complaint among fans during the marketing that proceeded the release of the film.
Dani Di Placido, a senior contributor at forbes.com, took to the internet to address these criticisms, postulating that the reason why she “looks bored” was, in fact, precisely “the point.” He goes on to say that “What we’ve seen so far indicates that this a story about a superhuman becoming human, rather than the other way around. This is…an emotionally detached character who has to rediscover her humanity in order to become a hero, rather than a super weapon mindlessly fighting on behalf on the Kree. And that is a really interesting concept for a superhero origin story, which tend to stick to the same tropes that were established more than a decade ago.”
At the time, I might have been inclined to concur with Mr. Di Placido. The idea of starting on the opposite side of the spectrum by forcing the most powerful superhero of them all to gain a degree of humanity is, by nature, a very intriguing concept.
However, this stance was taken about four months before said film was released to audiences around the world, and we now know the truth for what it is. And while Captain Marvel is certainly an entertaining film, it is still an objectively bad film, altogether due to the simple fact that she undergoes no real character arc.
Let’s Talk About Character Arcs
Now, I, and you, and your grandmother, as I’m sure (I would hope?), are well aware of what a character arc is, but let’s just get it out of the way for the sake of this exercise. According to the wonderful, most-blessed Wikipedia, a character arc is the “transformation or inner journey of a character over the course of a story.” Another authority (lightsfilmschool.com) better defines it as “when a character starts the story off with a certain viewpoint and then through trials and tribulations, that viewpoint changes. Essentially, the arc is the emotional or psychological growth, transformation and development of your character.” Matthew Kadish, at medium.com, further asserts that “…character arcs allow the audiences to see a character transform.”
With this in mind, what does Ms. Danvers learn throughout the course of her story?
How does she transform in a way that fundamentally alters the prospects that face her?
In what way is she forced to change or grow by the end of her arc?
Well, for one, she learns who she once was. She learns that she is on the wrong side of a war. She learns the full extent of her powers. She forges a connection with Nick Fury, which will impact later events in a significant way. She meets a strange, demented cat named Goose. And…that’s all I can really think of.
Maybe you’re beginning to see a problem with all this. All these things are external, not internal. The external should always be the means, not the end. The plot is a vehicle to drive forward crucial character development, and Captain Marvel fails because, while these combined elements manage to change her external circumstances in the Marvel universe, they fail to change her internally in any significant way.
As an audience, we should ask ourselves these questions:
I) What does Danvers stand to lose from these externalities?
II) What inherent struggle must she overcome in order to triumph over the villain?
III) Why should we (beyond in-the-moment entertainment) care about her story if we’re given nothing concrete to relate to?
The answer is this: Zero. Zip. Nada. Nothing.
For the sake of providing an equal amount of fairness, let’s apply the same questions to other famous superhero flicks of our time.
In what way is Tony Stark different from what saw of him at the beginning of Iron Man?
Well, instead of an extremely narcissistic, greedy individual, we have one, who (though, admittedly, still has a lot more growing to do) is now willing to sacrifice his own selfish ambition to better the interests and wellbeing of others.
In The Amazing Spider-Man, Peter Parker sets aside his restless, rebellious nature in the face of something greater than his personal vendettas and pursuits.
In 2011’s Thor, the arrogant, haughty God of Thunder undergoes a complete evolution.
Even in the much-maligned Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice, Ben Affleck’s Batman, learns to lighten up a bit.
And while many of these films suffer from a multitude of various problems, they all pack some sort of punch at the end because they are the recipients of clear character arcs and deep emotional stakes.
In fact, though I have many issues with Marvel Studios’ approach of sacrificing powerful character moments for yet another joke, I find myself hard-pressed to find a single film in their massively-long Infinity Saga that doesn’t end with the chief protagonist changing in some meaningful way or another (other than the aforementioned Captain Marvel, Spider-Man: Far From Home & Thor: The Dark World).
Contrast again, and the only thing that changes for Carol Danvers is her circumstances. The “best version” of herself is the same as the one given at the beginning, albeit one that now knows her past and has learned to harness her powers.
However, none of these external alterations truly impact her in any way, shape, or form.
Developing Points of Contrast
So…how to go about fixing all of this?
First of all—in any character arc—you should always be searching for some point of contrast between then and now. Always. There must be some point of realization, throughout all the many trials and tribulations, where that character changes—for better or for worse—in a way that directly reflects back upon their behaviour in the first act.
Example- The Dark Knight Rises: Bruce Wayne is reforged from a hurting, reclusive exile to one, who at long last, learns to rise above his darkness in escaping the underground prison wherein he dwells confined.
Example- Revenge of the Sith: Anakin Skywalker transforms from the young, over-confident war hero to a man, driven by severe emotional duress, that ends up bringing about the demise of Mace Windu—and subsequently the entire Republic.
Example- The Hobbit Trilogy: Thorin Oakenshield is transfigured from the dwarf who continually rejected the legacy of his grandfather, despised the Elvenking Thranduil, and wished to destroy the dragon Smaug, to a person, who in essence, becomes all three of those figures simultaneously.
All of these illustrious persons make a distinct choice: one that radically reshapes the remaining narrative. They all face a single point of contrast that cements the development of who they are or who they are becoming.
And so, if one wishes to fix such a film as Captain Marvel, one has to thoughtfully consider what story elements might make for a powerful antithesis.
If the goal of the story is to reverse the trends of previous superhero sagas by commencing at an inhuman level and gradually descending to a deeply-human, emotionally-charged bedrock that aims to provide powerful catharsis, then we need to do just that in the set-up of her arc: Make. Her. Emotionless. Not the bored, occasionally-wry character that exists for the duration of the film, but a merciless, ruthless, utterly-unsparing super weapon used by the Kree to further their political ambitions.
The current version we were shown in the cinemas is much too agreeable, civil, charismatic, and all of the above. If the Kree are taught to be cold and unfeeling, then she should epitomize those principles to mirror her later desire to break free of their andragogy.
Going forward, you can intersperse the revelations of her past with what she’s assimilating about the Kree in relation to the Skrulls. This can consequently drive her to a much more potent and dynamic moral dilemma, where these two opposing, deeply-entrenched sides of her are forced into direct conflict with each other.
Unfortunately, the Carol Danvers we get is never faced with any great moral or philosophical conundrum. When the moment arrives for her to make a choice between the Kree or Skrulls, the answer comes easy enough.
Of course, she’ll turn against the Kree. She’ll do it, and quite happily, thank you very much, because it’s exactly in line with the character established early on.
As such, this monumental choice, which should have been placed under much more stress, ends up feeling cheap and thoroughly unrewarding and does absolutely nothing to advance her character growth.
What We Can Learn
If you develop characters with real, human problems and failings, people will inevitably be drawn to your work. However, if you perform the opposite extreme, don’t be surprised when it fails to attract an audience.
To better aid and abet you in forging characters as dynamic as Doctor Strange, Peter Parker, and Thorin Oakenshield, you should ask yourself those same questions as proposed above:
What does your character learn throughout the course of his or her story?
How does he transform in a way that fundamentally alters the prospects that arise against them?
In what way is he forced to change or grow by the end of his character arc?
Thoughtful foreshadowing and expert plotting can draw anyone in, but it is primarily complex and tangible characters that will keep your readers returning.
If you can’t get this one thing right, then your stories will suffer accordingly.
Plot is almost on level with the former, but we must keep in mind that it’s also just a vehicle to bring your characters into conflict with one another, and drive them to make the hard choices and go through the trials with which we most identify.
Hence why such a film as Avengers: Endgame (despite what plot or cognitive problems it may have had) was so roundly praised and acclaimed.
Complex characters who deal with real-life troubles, give your story something all the world-building and plotting can never achieve on their own: heart.
If you can’t create compelling characters with deep flaws, tangible struggles, and emotional stakes, then your story will become just another one of the many shallow stories that pervade the market.
After all, Captain Marvel was about as marvellous as mildew, and I’m sure you don’t want to reproduce that effect for your stories.
[the above was taken from Matthew's post on KingdomPen.org , which was originally published on June 8, 2020]
Even in the Midst of the Fire, You Can Rejoice

You don’t have to go to war to acquire battle-scars.
Whether it’s in the form of a crumbling relationship, stress over one’s livelihood, or personal temptations, we—as fallen humans dwelling within a sin-trodden world—are susceptible to agonizing hardships every day of our lives. It seems that as soon as we manage to claw and scrape our way back to our feet, we’re beaten back down again.
For the Believer, these realities can strike especially close to home. And unlike what every prosperity preacher will ever tell you—Life. Is. Hard.
But we should not despair, but rejoice; for, while (at the time) these trials are unwelcome, unfortunate, and lamentable, they have a purpose, and in that, we can find true consolation.
TRIALS CAN BE A COMFORT, NOT A BURDEN
We shouldn’t be surprised by hardship. In fact, if you call yourself a Follower of Christ but don’t experience trials (i.e., life is always good), then you should be somewhat concerned!
If you remember, over and over again, Jesus tells would-be-followers to consider the cost of sacrificing all to embrace him (Matthew 8:19-20; Luke 9:23; Luke 14:26-27), with the rest of the Bible repeatedly stressing the universal truth that the life of a Believer will be taxing, demanding, and full of various trials and tribulations.
Take 1 Peter 4:12-14, which asserts, “Beloved, do not be surprised at the fiery trial when it comes upon you to test you, as though something strange were happening to you. But rejoice insofar as you share Christ’s sufferings, that you may also rejoice and be glad when his glory is revealed. If you are insulted for the name of Christ, you are blessed, because the Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you.”
So, not only should we not be surprised, but also comforted when adversity comes our way, seeking earnestly with all that is within us to glorify God and sing his praises!
TRIALS SHAPE AND MOLD
Through the fiercest fires and the hottest heat, steel is bent and shaped and refined over and over, till at last it becomes cold and resilient: a work fashioned in such a way so as to not break under the most extreme pressures.
Similarly, we are reminded in James 1:2-4 to “Count it all joy, my brothers, when you meet trials of various kinds, for you know that the testing of your faith produces steadfastness. And let steadfastness have its full effect, that you may be perfect and complete, lacking in nothing.”
War is an able tester of man’s mettle: the battle-scars it gives us will define who we are, and make manifest to all the true nature of our faith. You and I must take the time to ask ourselves this question: how will our faith fare when put to the test in the ravaging heat of these fiery trials?
Will our faith be stronger than ever before: our trust and reliance upon our great Father strengthened beyond all hope?
Or will the weight of our perceived affronts and pride overbear, where true faith would have otherwise prevailed? Will we shake our fists in defiance, disparaging his wonderful promises and counsel, and renouncing our once-proclaimed Lord and Savior?
May it never be!
As painful as it is, we must not break in the fire, but instead persevere, holding fast to Christ alone, so that our faith does not falter, but persists in all joy and thanksgiving and love, which—though mingled with grief, grows only greater.
TRIALS DRAW US CLOSER TO CHRIST—AND IN HIM WE TRUST
Time and time again as soon as I think life is indeed “good,” and my own pride begins to master all other thoughts, I am shortly subjected to some form of a trial.
And in that trial, whether over the course of hours, a few days, or even several years, I am forced to humble myself and plead before God for not only respite, but strength: such strength that I might persevere and with his aid, turn that pain into joy and thanksgiving.
For, relying upon my own strength to relieve myself is impossible, and earthly pleasures, while perhaps occasionally drowning out my grievous afflictions, can only provide the very briefest of reliefs before they are gone forever, and I am left as I was, without comfort or hope.
And so these tribulations, while seeming wrought with the sole intent to destroy, are instead for our benefit: to build up our faith and shape us into the men and women we are called to be.
When I look back and think upon my own blessings and afflictions, I find it an easy thing to say I have grown closer to Christ through the latter, rather than the former—save when that blessing comes as a respite to my trial, for then I am prompted to praise and worship the Almighty God, King of Kings, and Lord of Lords, who can rescue me from the darkest of despairs and make my cup overflow with abundant goodness and grace.
So I say this to you, struggling Believer: though at times all may seem dark and heavy and under the shadow of evil and heartache of pain, place your trust and hope in God, and then stumble on ahead in this present battle we wage.
Remember, God has an accorded end in sight for all things, and as Paul reassures us in Romans 8:28, he “causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to his purpose.”
Therefore, when a trial comes your way, don’t despair: cling to Christ, seek his face, and in the midst of the fire, rejoice.
[the above was taken from Matthew's post on therebelution.com , which was originally published on February 7, 2020]
August 16, 2020
Our Singular Calling: The Desire, Duty, and Hope of the Christian

If you are a Christian, you possess new affections.
If you are a Christian, you have a solemn responsibility.
If you are a Christian, you are free from the shackles of despair.
You may struggle, and you may fall; you may capitulate to various temptations and allurements, and times will come when you stray from the path of righteousness; but because of the new nature which now indwells your spirit, you cannot be dominated by such failings.
Even in the face of death, that doom which awaits of all men, we are possessors of a common hope that will avail us of our greatest fear. Even in the fiercest fire and the darkest desolation, there is comfort still to be found, if we are willing to humble ourselves before God, setting aside the supreme vanity of our own perceived might to cling to Christ in our all frailty and weakness.
In spite of the darkness that abounds all about us, we need not ever fear the future, for God indeed "is the One who has shone in our hearts to give the Light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Christ." (2 Corinthians 4:6) Trials and tribulations will overtake all, but with the eyes of the seeing, wrought of God, we are now steadfastly aware that there is yet purpose and assurance and hope, which even in the direst peril can never be wholly lost to us.
The Worldview of the Wicked
Conversely, things could not be more different for the wicked and unrighteous man. Left to his own devices, without bonds and principles to stay him, he will consume not only himself but those of him in the vomit of his great vanity. The fruit of this mindset is acutely assessed in Job's description of the wicked to his mocking friends: "They say to God, 'Depart from us! We do not even desire the knowledge of your ways." (Job 21:14)
Having purposed within his heart to remove the hope of God and dwell in defiant ignorance and stupidity for all his days, such a man must now place his faith in fallen men, to the detriment of them all. In of itself, the fallenness of our flesh can never truly breed long-standing monuments to a confident expectancy, before the very nature of that which first erected it, brings about its own destruction. The hope of men, therefore, is a counterfeit ruse, doomed from the very beginning to beget despair.
In the absence of light, darkness must pervade all. "The Light has," indeed, "come into the world," but "men loved the darkness rather than the Light, for their deeds were evil." (John 3:19) When the one, true Light of Christ has been displaced from the hearts of men, no other alternative exists with which they might cast off the shadow of the dark. Only fear, the fear that they will lose the little they have left to them, remains. As a direct consequence of this defiance, the trials we face present a great danger to an unregenerate world.
To those blinded by egocentric self-interest to the Light of Christ, and thus, bound fully by the fraudulences of the flesh, there is always something dreadfully amiss; they fear what is to come and what will be.
To avail them in their need, the Unbeliever places merit in their riches and possessions and standing, determined to drown out the Truth with the inundations of the moment, but when faced with death, these things are rendered naught: for to such as these, Death is a horror and ever-present fear that cannot be undone till the world is mended.
Such claims, they may, of course, deny; but as many can now safely testify, our present circumstances (specifically the sheer panic that ensued on behalf of COVID-19) have assuredly brought to light their own self-deceit.
For the unsaved, there is no hope. There can be no hope. It is decreed by the very truths to which they declare themselves bound.
Our Unchanging Desire
Unlike the fallen philosophy of many who take up residence within the pews of our churches, we are not the world. We are indeed in the world, but not of the world. (John 17:14-19) If we were of this world, "the world would love its own," Christ reminds us, "but because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, because of this the world hates you." (John 15:19)
This is important to differentiate because it defines our chief purpose in this life. No longer do we serve the interests of self, but Christ alone, being ourselves Followers of Christ. Our devotion has been removed from a state of perpetual narcissism to one of selfless commitment to the will of an almighty God. Certainly, we are still susceptible to the enticements of the flesh, but because of the radical work of the spirit which has taken place within us, these are deviations from a standard, not the standard.
In short, our desires and affections have been thoroughly upended. We were born "haters of God" and lovers of that which is evil, but upon our conversion, these two sentiments were exchanged fully for one another. Our uttermost desire exists now for the glorification of a loving Saviour.
Evangelist and expositor Paul Washer articulates it in this fashion: "The closer you come to God, the more of the world you must leave behind. The two are polar opposites. Mutually exclusive. Incompatible."
As Followers of Christ, our chief desire should—no, it must—be to grow in the knowledge of the living God, and through that avenue, further our desire for Him. That is from where all our actions must stem. The more we grow in the knowledge of God and all that He has done, the more we will aspire to submit in faithful obedience to the full enormity of His will.
Washer, who is perhaps my favourite preacher to listen to, further encapsulates this monumental truth in the following words: "The goal of the Christian life is the pursuit of an intimate knowledge of God that leads to a greater estimation of His worth, a greater satisfaction and joy in His person, and a greater giving of oneself for His glory."
This is further affirmed in Daniel 11:32, where we are presented with an account of the future deeds of Antiochus (explicitly linked as a direct precursor to Antichrist): "By smooth words he will turn to godlessness those who act wickedly toward the covenant, but the people who know their God will display strength and take action." (emphasis added)
The man known to many as the "Prince of Preachers," one Charles Haddon Spurgeon, openly declared: "There must be knowledge of God before there can be love to God: there must be a knowledge of divine things, as they are revealed, before there can be an enjoyment of them."
In 2 Peter 3:17-18, the apostle Peter ends his two books with this command: "You therefore, beloved, knowing this beforehand, be on your guard so that you are not carried away by the error of unprincipled men and fall from your own steadfastness, but grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ." (emphasis added)
"Unless we know God deeply, we cannot love him deeply," contends the late R.C. Sproul. "Deepening knowledge must precede deepening affection."
The apostle Paul stresses the vast significance of this in his rebuke to the Corinthians: "Become sober-minded as you ought, and stop sinning; for some have no knowledge of God. I speak this to your shame." (1 Corinthians 15:34)
Similarly, Solomon's discourse between a loving father and his son in Proverbs 2 puts the "fear of the Lord" and the "knowledge of God" at the summit of all wisdom.
The desire for the manifold knowledge of God ought to be at the epicentre of our Christian walk in its entirety. If we wish to walk worthy of the calling to which we have been called, we need to better contemplate, ruminate, and meditate upon His glory and goodness. We must direct ourselves through prayer to search out the mysteries of all that is revealed to us through the Holy Word and study His many attributes, till all our thought is bent upon Christ and nothing but Christ.
To know Christ is to climb the threshold of understanding. It is the beginning of comprehension: the comprehension of the full glorious magnitude of what His sacrifice truly portends. To the one whose eyes have been opened like the blind man, such knowledge can only breed everlasting thankfulness, and joy, and gratitude.
For is that not our sole purpose on this earth? Ought that not to be the dominating mindset that masters all our wayward thoughts, binding them together for a higher yearning?
Indeed, so! affirms Paul in his letter to the Colossians, saying, "For by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things have been created through Him and for Him.” (emphasis added)
All that we say, all that we do is for Christ. This is the bottom line. That is the foremost duty of all of creation. Take 1 Corinthians 10:31, wherein we are commanded, "Whether, then, you eat or drink or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God."
As the great Paul Washer would counsel us, "Go to your studies!"
Our Unshirking Duty
It is for these reasons that we cannot shirk the responsibility laid upon us by our Lord, whom the Scripture calls the Father of Lights, most blessed of all. As bondservants of Christ, our solemn duty is not to follow our own hearts but Him and Him alone. As Christ has decreed, so we must act.
To what purpose, then are we called? The answer is simple: to obey God (Jeremiah 7:23; John 3:36; Acts 5:29). What does obeying God entail? Whatever he commands of us, chiefest of which are to I) abandon sin and its lusts, keeping Christ as the foremost priority in our hearts and minds, II) deepen our desire for heavenly things by increasing in the knowledge of God, and III) preaching the Gospel to all the nations, telling all of the wondrous nature of the blessed Saviour, and calling every man to repentance.
In these uncertain times, do then as you are called! Mourn not, and save the lamenting over perceived afflictions to the sons and daughters of the Kingdom of Darkness. Put an end to this madness, which dissuades you from your course. If you think yourself afflicted, read again of the works of the apostles and all they suffered for the sake of their Lord; and in light of that, all your many maladies and misfortunes will seem as naught. No longer can you languish in solitude and the self-pity of a despairing heart.
Rather, do as you ought: rejoicing and praising God for His goodness. Set aside your earthly wonts and practises, and persist instead in carrying out His will and bringing the Truth to the nations by whatever means made available to you. If you suffer and are afflicted, consider it all for the Glory of God.
Such a time should not diminish our calling. Nay, but such a time should perform the opposite extreme! Think to yourself: what an opportunity! What a beautiful, blessed opportunity to spread and scatter the seeds of righteousness that tell of the love and truth of Christ amid uncertain and wavering minds! What an opportunity to do as you are called!
So, get to it, Christian! Pray unceasingly and steadfastly, giving praise and thanksgiving in all things. Hold fast to Christ; never let go! Stray not into folly by trusting in the things of the flesh. Lean not on the philosophies of the world, which seem wise to men but are only foolishness to God.
Does your mind whither and fade in boredom or languor? Cease swiftly from such ways and meditate now upon the Word and the precepts of God! You cannot now claim the lack of opportunity deters you from such ends. You have a work and commission: do them!
Our Abiding Hope
These things, these trials, and tribulations, they are to be expected. They are the signs of what is: the portents of a breaking world: a fallen, utterly wretched creation calling out for aid, amidst the many tears of grief-riven hearts. They are the Bad that must transpire before the Good can arise to wash away the sin of the world.
Even darkness must pass. All this sadness, all this sorrow, it's all a passing thing. This wretched world is coming to an end. It and all of its much-vaunted attributes are passing away forever. But of the supreme glory of all the attributes of God, that shall never fade!
The Light of Christ is such that naught can hope to stand and endure before all the glorious wonder of His revealed majesty. Naught can ever hope to prevail. There is no balance between good and evil. The myth of a darkness that is matched as an equal force to the Light is just that: a myth, and wholly false. The Light of Christ is everything, and the Kingdom of Darkness is nothing. There is no alternative.
A time will come, yea, it is here even now, when the darkness will enshroud all and everything will seem altogether fraught with danger and peril and every evil thing. And in that time, you must return to the reading of the Word and steadfast prayer. You must remember above all else the hope that will yet avail us in our greatest need.
In time, this Shadow will pass, and the Light will shine again. The dawn is swiftly approaching, even as I write these words.
Soon there will be a new heaven and a new earth, and all our tears and fears shall be wiped away for all of eternity. Soon the taint of sin will be cleansed utterly, and we will sing and live and worship God in holiness and righteousness and every good thing. Soon the darkness will pass, and the Light will shine all the greater.
So, encourage because you have been encouraged. Give because you have been given. Lovingly reprove because you have been lovingly reproved.
Turn away from the deceits bred of our fallen kinsmen and fellow men. Turn away from darkness and despair and everything dour. Just as that marvellous hymn relates, "Turn your eyes upon Jesus. Look full in His wonderful face, and the things of this earth will grow strangely dim, in the light of His glory and grace."
For the True Believer, there is hope. There has to be hope. It is decreed by the very Truth to which we know ourselves bound.
And this is the Truth, for this, we know, that we need not ever fear death: our majestic God has already conquered the Grim Reaper, setting a boundary that it cannot trespass, and He did so at the Cross.
So, turn away from deceit. Turn away from despair. Turn your eyes to Christ, and look full in His wonderful face.
For He alone is our salvation. He is our sole assurance. And that is our shining hope.
June 30, 2020
What you can expect in "The Mighty Shall Rise"

Besides an occasionally (and admittedly, somewhat cryptic) synopsis reveal every here and there and an exclusive first excerpt published
Point Number One: Upon Which the Former is Founded
To start off, let’s get something out of the way:
The Mighty Shall Rise is brutal. I mean, really brutal.
This is not to say it’s a violent sort of brutal--in that the prose in some scenes might prove uncomfortable for the general reader (I think we can all agree we don’t need any more of that in our reading).
On a brief note: More and more, as I’ve gotten older, I’ve desired to write stories that can be enjoyed by not only adults but young children as well. This was something that many of the classical authors did exceptionally well (Tolkien, Austen, Lewis, just to name a few), and I think it’s an approach that desperately needs to be reconsidered and reevaluated in this age that specifically targets certain age groups to its (in my opinion) detriment.
Continuing: But while I have endeavoured to keep it brimming with colourful characters and jocular witticisms, The Mighty Shall Rise is, above all other things, a story about human suffering—and to what ends we can be pushed until we are forced to lash out at those closest to us. It’s very much a spiritual journey if you will: a journey through darkness or the “valley of the shadow of death.”
And to those who might be given cause to wonder, it doesn’t get any better. One of my proofreaders for a draft of the 300-page serial wryly remarked as to the number of dire tragedies which met the central characters—even going so far as to place a number in the margin every time some character met his or her doom.
But that’s entirely the point. As referenced in the title, the focus is primarily on this downward struggle, this “horrific descent into darkness and despair” that enshrouds the chief protagonist, whom I’ve aptly named Endurian Stonehelm.
And from Page One, Endurian’s struggles, his battles, his fears—they don’t get any better. He’s hardly back on his feet when he gets knocked back down again. Things simply refuse to go well. Fate is not kind.
This continual state of darkness is a tradition that virtually every descendant of Adam has been forced to confront: the good seldom lasts till it is usurped by evil, which mars what was. Even in the supposed good, we find ourselves confronted by discomfiting feelings of discontentment and festering ill-will toward our fellow men. If it is the aspiration to overthrow darkness which (momentarily) lends us the freedom we all crave, then it is the pride brought about by our seeming triumph that ultimately leads to yet another downfall, in a line of never-ending falls.
It is in the face of this unshakable, irrefutable truth concerning the world wherein we dwell that Endurian is faced with the age-old question, which he articulates in the following words: “Why? Why then do we fight? Why do we continue on when we stand not a chance? Why do we persist in the face of so much wrong?”
It is these very questions upon which The Mighty Shall Rise is founded, and (I hope) adequately addresses.
Point Number Two: In Which I Address the Inevitable Issue of Allegory
While also fiercely decrying allegory, and expressing his desire for the use of the term applicability, Tolkien explicitly defined The Lord of the Rings as a fundamentally Christian work, “unconsciously so in the writing, consciously in the revision.”
The same, I think, could be said for The Mighty Shall Rise.
To those who know me well, I’ve made it no secret that I started out this process doggedly opposed to allegory in any way, shape, or form. But, as I’ve grown and matured, not only as a storyteller but a Believer in Christ, I’ve come to find it almost impossible not to write allegory in stories such as these, if that makes any sense.
As a Christian, my worldview will be diametrically opposed to the philosophy of the world, and it is a very hard thing to prevent the ideology of any author from finding its way into their work—especially work that deals with fundamental, human problems.
The problem, I’ve come to find, is not the inclusion of allegory at all, but rather the approach/execution of that allegory. If the execution forces your message to dominate the story in a way that characters do things unnatural to what has already been established, then such allegory can only turn off your readers. This, sadly, has occurred with a frightening consistency since the passing of storytellers like Lewis, MacDonald, Tolkien, and all the like.
On a brief note: My influences/favoured storytellers are not obvious at all.
Continuing: To better understand this difficulty, allow me to present a portion of a letter I sent in response to a fellow author’s novel, which I had consented to read and provide feedback. While I misunderstood his intent in regards to a certain scene, which took me completely out of the moment, it still serves its purpose in explaining my issues with common allegorical practises:
There is a danger in the writing of fantastical fiction to “allegorize” or draw direct parallels to crucial periods in the history of our world. In all work of this nature, a sense of “escapism” serves as one of the primary draws/enticements to the reader. But that same escapism can easily be broken, which is always why extreme care must be taken whenever one attempts to create a commentary on historical events. In his Stormlight books, Brandon Sanderson has used the conflict between “light-eyes” and “dark-eyes” to address issues such as race relations. However, knowing how such a narration might easily draw his readers out of his story and into the present-day world, he has disguised it accordingly.
As Christian authors, we are presented with two approaches to allegory: the subtle applicability and deep-seated nuance of Tolkien, or the overt, undisguised parable of Lewis. Both are valuable, and both have their uses.
The problem that inevitably ensues is when a would-be-author attempts to merge both methods. That can only lead to disaster. When a reader consents to read the work of another person, they’re accepting it on the author’ s terms—or the conditions they believe themselves to have accepted. With Lewis or MacDonald, one knows that they are receiving a distinctly allegorical work. If that appeals to them, then they can subsequently accept it as it is, without deceit.
On the other hand, you have The Lord of the Rings, or perhaps even more appropriately, The Silmarillion. It is probable that many people have read the latter and never truly been aware of the deep metaphorical truths that reside within it. Whereas Rings focuses primarily on the conflict between light and dark, and what such conflict engenders, The Silmarillion is a meditation on the human condition, as spread over thousands of years. At its inception, it loosely adapts the creation narrative of Genesis and proceeds to tell a tale about how the desire for knowledge and power ultimately corrupts all good intentions. If it is the aspiration to overthrow darkness [that leads to a victory], then it is the pride brought about by our seeming triumph that ultimately leads to yet another downfall. It is only when one realizes that all his efforts are futile and vanity (as seen in Eärendil/Common Man) that one understands the need to reach outside of oneself to a higher power (Eru/God). And it is only with a humble and contrite heart that Earendil can approach that power and plead for the aid that would avail his people.
But again, such nuance can rarely be discerned in the first reading. And by the time we do perceive it, we have already fully accepted the work; and our original opinion (like or dislike) can only deepen, not rescind.
The problem I have identified above is precisely why I find it nigh impossible to read many of the “Christian stories” of our present day. They all endeavour to bring the grounded, yet otherworldly beauty of Tolkien into coexistence with the real world. There is no nuance. There is no distinction. There is no subtlety. It would be much more beneficial for me to read [the actual Word of God] than anything else.
In the end, despite all my efforts, The Mighty Shall Rise has taken on deep allegorical undertones, and is, unabashedly and unadulteratedly, a “fundamentally Christian work.”
But for it to succeed where others have failed and rise above its prominent fellows, the execution must be on point, which is one major reason why I missed my release date of July 15.
Point Number Three: On a Brief, Biographical Note
In a sense, the character of Endurian Stonehelm is inseparably me, symbolically, more than literally.
I first devised him in April of 2017 for a story I called The Stranger’s Fire. As has already been recounted too many times to count, the latter, through a series of radical reboots and restarts, eventually evolved into the story I now call The Mighty Shall Rise. This evolution has been so profound as to make both Fire and Mighty two entirely dissimilar stories.
However, throughout it all, the person of Endurian has (might I say, more appropriately) endured.
I have been following his journey through the more transformative years of my life, and it is only natural that a large part of me should become infused into him, and vice versa.
It is only natural that I would use my own struggles and failures over the past several years to directly inform Endurian’s own. And while I must necessarily say that one must be careful in attempting to draw direct connotations between his actions and my own, a few of his thoughts and sayings are things I’ve thought and said myself.
Enough said.
Point Number Four: Genre?
Expect everything.
A big reason why the medium of epic fantasy has the potential to tell some of the most compelling and powerful stories of our time is because of its inherent ability to infuse almost every style/genre imaginable (save for futuristic science fiction), allowing for rich symbolism and nuanced depictions of fundamental truths concerning the world.
And, for the most part, I tend to stay away from stories that are singularly focused on one element or emotion: I like my stories to have a little of everything, whether that be humour, horror, thrill, suspense, action, adventure, romance, revenge, betrayal, you name it.
So, yeah. Expect everything.
Point Number Five: On My Willingness to Wait
My style of writing is very different from that of my peers.
I rarely start at the beginning of a story and even more rarely write through to the very end (in a first draft).
My manuscripts seldom grow smaller with consecutive drafts, until I am forced to cut it down, resulting in an even longer waiting period.
I am also a perfectionist, through and through. I’m always polishing, always revising, and (likely to the horror of many authors out there) much prefer the editing to the writing.
This is why I am fully willing to wait a ridiculous amount of time just to get the story right where I want it.
My eye is presently settled somewhere on mid-January for a full-volume release of The Mighty Shall Rise.
But I’m also ready to wait until summer of next year if events arise in which I am forced to amend the manuscript beyond what was formerly envisioned.
Point Number Six: First Word on...the Screenplay
I’m in the midst of adapting The Mighty Shall Rise into a screenplay, and despite being only 43 pages into it, let’s just say I’m having a spiffing good time.
Point Number Seven: In Which I Take My Leave

If you are a subscriber to my
If not, sign up
Until then.
April 13, 2020
NEWSFLASH: The Status of "The Mighty Shall Rise"
March 29, 2020
Read the compelling first excerpt from Matthew Roland's epic fantasy debut "The Mighty Shall Rise"
February 20, 2020
Read the compelling first excerpt from Matthew Roland's epic fantasy debut "Swords Unhallowed"
February 18, 2020
Read the compelling first excerpt from Matthew Roland's epic fantasy debut "Swords Unhallowed"
January 31, 2020
REVIEW: "Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker" - PART 2
December 31, 2019
REVIEW: "Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker" - PART 2
Matthew Roland's Blog
- Matthew Roland's profile
- 4 followers
