Matt Weber's Blog, page 21

stross & sterling on intelligence

We human beings are primates. We have a deeply ingrained set of cultural and interpersonal behavioural rules which we violate only at social cost. One of these rules, essential for a tribal organism, is bilaterality: loyalty is a two-way street. (Another is hierarchicality: yield to the boss.) Such rules are not iron-bound or immutable — we’re not robots — but our new hive superorganism employers don’t obey them instinctively, and apes and monkeys and hominids tend to revert to tit for tat quite easily when unsure of their relative status. Perceived slights result in retaliation, and blundering, human-blind organizations can slight or bruise an employee’s ego without even noticing. And slighted or bruised employees who lack instinctive loyalty because the culture they come from has spent generations systematically destroying social hierarchies and undermining their sense of belonging are much more likely to start thinking the unthinkable.

Edward Snowden is 30: he was born in 1983. Generation Y started in 1980-82. I think he’s a sign of things to come.

Via Charlie Stross. The longer Bruce Sterling article linked therein is also worth a read.

modification aggregator for recipe sites

We have a bag of shrimp to cook through, so I’m looking up shrimp curries, here among other places. Now, commenters on recipe sites are famous or infamous for commenting about their modified versions of the recipe, and this recipe is no exception, but something crossed my mind that never had before:

“My husband said it didn’t taste like something he would eat at an Indian restaurant as all the Indian food he’s had is pretty spicy and this was not. We ended up adding some curry and cayenne pepper.”

“I did, however, find it necessary to increase the spice amounts and added 1 tsp… I found the sauce to be a bit thin so I thickened it up by using a cornstarch slurry.”

“Very runny, though. Next time I’ll simmer longer and add some flour.”

It is, of course, not shocking that commenters might agree that a recipe needs modification in certain ways and also agree on how to do it. But wouldn’t it be nice to flag popular modifications that reliably improve the recipe?

The obvious difficulty here is how to dredge the comments for modifications automatically. I think the non-obvious difficulty is interpreting the star ratings, so you can figure out what modifications are really useful. If someone says “I had to thicken the sauce” and rates the recipe four stars, are they rating the modified version or the original? Presumably it varies. The best option might be to have a “needs” button, where you could pick from a drop-down menu or insert your own text; it would be easy to aggregate those results. But even if every recipe site in existence implemented such a thing tomorrow, there’d presumably still be some value in figuring out how to extract useful summary information from already extant reviews.

(This all said, I think I’m going to go with the Alton Brown-endorsed shrimp tikka masala from Martha Stewart Living.)

“keynote speech…” free on amazon through monday!

For anyone who missed the free promotion of BLOOD, WAX, MIRRORS, I’m now offering the first story, “Keynote Speech: Fourth Annual Symposium on Information Toxicity, Inaugural Section on Reverie Syndrome” at a 99-cent discount from its usual price of 99 cents until Monday, August 12. Here’s a brief passage:

I blame my wife for Kieran.

I’m not saying it’s fair. I’m sure I’d find my own excuses if it’d been my womb he’d grown in, and God only knows the Internet has said some uncharacteristically accurate things about my own role in the whole nightmare. I’m not saying you should blame her. But I do.

I’ve done this enough, I should be better at it. Here we go: Thank you, Dr. Desai, for your gracious introduction. And for such a distinguished physician-scientist to say such things about a humble carpenter, well, the heart just swells.

I am here behind this lectern because I famously sued several flagships of the insurance industry to medicalize reverie syndrome, an act of ham-fisted legal terrorism that Dr. Desai has elegantly edited to suggest that I was trying to set something right in the world. This, naturally, is arrant bullshit. Dr. Desai seeks to elevate both our fortunes by representing that we are in some alliance to improve your lives, him through medicine and me through stumbling around drunk on stage and telling you horrible things about my son. But I am impoverished by this ordeal, and I wish only to get paid—a disposition, incidentally, not entirely alien to Dr. Desai, who makes a fuck of a lot more from insurance payouts at his glittery new practice than he ever did running his cute little patient studies at the National Institutes of Mental Health.

So perhaps you now have some idea where I stand.

Should you download it, read it, and enjoy it (a tall order, I know, but I have faith), please consider following the blog for future announcements, purchasing the collection in which it skulks, or writing a review on Amazon or Goodreads. Thanks!

email to kindle

Here’s what I want: A Gmail plugin that will grab a long email, convert it to epub or mobi, and send it to my Kindle account so I can read it on any device I want. This may represent a lot of effort for relatively incremental value, as my phone has both a Kindle app and Gmail on it; nonetheless, it is my desire.

That is all.

ed robertson on starting up as an indie publisher

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

All worth reading. The “nuclear option” in Part 3 is an intriguing idea—definitely the opposite of my approach. I guess I’m worried about the preoccupation that the SPP started to develop in maybe late 2012 or early 2013—the idea that free used to be useful, but now (due to algorithm changes and miscellaneous jiggerypokery) isn’t worth the risk inherent in training your readers to expect all your work to be free at some point. But the SPP has always been in favor of permanently free books used as low-friction introductions to series, and that is essentially what Ed’s talking about.

I think the insight comes down to: If you’re a new author with just one title, or (if you’re me) a few unrelated titles, you’re not going to make any money anyway. So you might as well do what you can to get readers, and free is one of the more powerful things you can do.

At the moment, I’m not sure I have the cycles to devote to making a book permanently free in any case—honestly, I’m not sure I have the cycles to reformat THE DANDELION KNIGHT for Smashwords, much less execute any price-matching trickery correctly. And I’m not even working on the sequel to TDK right now, so permanent free isn’t going to buy me any follow-on sales for a while (although it could drive sales of BLOOD, WAX, MIRRORS or a subsequent collection). Still, it’s at least good practice to think about all this.

I think I’m on the final 10,000 or so words of THE EIGHTH KING. Two weeks’ work, in theory. We’ll see.

new book, free book

BLOOD, WAX, MIRRORS is free on amazon.com from 8/6-8/8!

Not entirely coincidentally, THE DANDELION KNIGHT is now available on amazon.com for $4.99! The plan is to get it to other distributors as well, but that’s going to take a bit of time. What I’d really like you to do, naturally, is to view this as an opportunity to get $8 of books for $5, rather than $3 for $0—but if free’s all you’re up for right now, I’ll take it.

It is perhaps worth saying that BLOOD, WAX, MIRRORS is unlikely to be free again in the foreseeable future. For those not conversant with how Amazon works, there are only two ways to make it free: (1) Put it up free somewhere else and wait for Amazon to price-match it, or (2) Enroll it in KDP Select, which allows me to make it free for 5 days out of each 90-day enrollment period in exchange for exclusivity on Amazon. BLOOD, WAX, MIRRORS is now in KDP Select, but I don’t want to keep the book exclusive to Amazon, so I don’t plan to re-enroll it. After I’ve built up my library a bit, it’s possible that I’ll go route (1), price-matching to free—but I think I need more books and stories out before that starts making sense.

This reminds me, I really need to see whether I can publish “Statler pulchrifex” and “Wormwords” on Amazon; those would be neat to have as permanently free promotional stories, since both are available for free online anyway. I’m reasonably certain I’m allowed to do this, but I’ve lost track of the contracts, so I should probably contact the editors at NATURE and COSMOS to be sure. Also, I need to set up proper affiliate links and update the DANDELION KNIGHT page on this here blog.

Also, I have a kid and a job. Well, one step at a time.

kindle worlds

Poking around Amazon for some unrelated purpose, I found the Kindle Worlds page. I’d read about it on John Scalzi’s blog a little while back, but it never made any real impression on me, perhaps because the last time I had any real impulse to write fan fiction was in middle school (and even then it was my own characters in a not explicitly but nonetheless pretty obviously D&D-oid setting, wherein the Drizzt love was not explicitly but, again, pretty obviously running rather hot). But it’s interesting to look at and think about. The royalties are worse than you’d like (35% on most work, less on work under 10,000 words, versus potentially 70% in KDP), and Scalzi’s misgivings about the rights situation are spot-on, but the value proposition is potentially interesting—if these worlds can exercise the kind of quality control that supports a fan base, the exposure angle might be enough to justify the lower royalties and vulnerability to idea-pillaging. That seems like a big “if” to me… but, again, I’ve never really been involved in fan fiction, and I know there are thriving communities where people voraciously consume all sorts of stuff, with no QC at all beyond upvotes by readers.

I suppose this once again highlights the usefulness of always having something else to sell. You don’t want your Foreworld Saga fanfic to be the only thing you have to offer the world; you want to use it as a way to direct people toward the work you control and can make a proper profit on. And, of course, a Kindle Worlds submission is a double down on Amazon, which has its ups and downs.

The only worlds I’d currently be interested in are the Foreworld Saga, the Silo Saga, and Valiant Comics; I don’t really know how to write horror, thrillers, or mystery, and I’m not sure I’d be up for teen drama. But I haven’t read THE MONGOLIAD, WOOL (beyond the first story), or any of the Valiant Comics, so I’d need to do some up-front investment before writing in those universes anyway. That puts more pressure on the value proposition for exposure—so it probably won’t happen any time soon.

It’s pretty interesting to look at the different “Additional Content Guidelines” for the different universes. Valiant Comics has so many stipulations on what you can and can’t do with the characters that it comes off almost as a voluntary Comics Code—various characters must be culturally sensitive, chaste, morally upright; “The Kindle Worlds work must present the protagonist(s), supporting character(s), and antagonist(s) in-character.” (Interestingly, though, it doesn’t specify that the work has to be a comic. I imagine it does, but I’m almost tempted to submit a prose piece and see what happens.) By contrast, see Hugh Howey’s guidelines for Silo fiction. The timeline and events of the universe are up for grabs, and slash is explicitly condoned; “other than [not using anything that's unique to a derivative property], the world is yours to play in as you see fit.” You can guess who I’m rooting for there, but perhaps more to the point, it’s interesting to see how the stipulations for a world echo the history of the original work’s form.

die word beast die

From THE EIGHTH KING:

Something gave the Worm pause; Datang shook her head when the words ceased, as though waking from a dream. When it spoke again, the words were mere sound, if puissant enough to loose knuckle-sized chunks of mortar from between the tower’s bricks. It looked down at something on the rim of the Gorge.

“ONE OFFERS HIMSELF TO BEGIN THE PROCEEDINGS.”

“Lin Gyat,” said Datang. And, indeed, the giant capered at the firelight’s edge, and she could hear the bellow of his own voice in a whisper, echoing from the mountains and the Gorge:

“Come, vermin! But beware—we clerics of Uä are tougher bits of gristle than once we were!”

“He is mad,” Kalsang said in awe.

“Of a certainty,” said Datang. “Shoot the Worm before it proves him wrong.”

“A GOD-MARKED MONK,” said the Priestkiller Worm. “I KNOW THE LAW, FLEA; I KNOW THE MARKS OF A DEITY’S PROTECTION. THOSE ARE NOT THEY. YOU ARE MERELY—”

“Cursed!” Lin Gyat’s reply came back in that same echoed murmur. “And a spicy curse it is, pest! You think yourself a lengthy snake? Behold a lengthy snake!”

“No,” murmured Datang—but, of course, there could be no intervening. Lin Gyat flung his robe wide; his breechclout fell in the dust around his ankles.

“Marvel at the Python of Degyen, beast!” Lin Gyat cried. “Thick enough to choke the Hinge-Gullet Goat of Tanggang, and cursed from tip to tail! I abjure you: Recede into your lair, or it will throw open the diseased gates of your jaws and fill your brain-pan with its pearly venom!”

Silence hung heavy in the unnatural night that veiled Pongyo Gorge.

1300+ words on the train this morning. Pyrotechnic fantasy shoot-em-up denouement with dick jokes == motivation.

slithy, frumious, vorpal

If I ever have a hundred hours that cry out to be wasted, the first thing I’ll do is write an urban fantasy series where the secret magical underworld is populated by creatures from JABBERWOCKY.

The more I think about it, the better it fits with the tropes. There are lots of different societies of creatures (toves, borogoves, mome raths) and unique foes (the Jubjub bird, the Bandersnatch, the Jabberwock). The obligatory alternate dimension can be the Tulgey instead of the Fey. The protagonist has a special weapon and a beloved parent, and slays the big boss at the end. Then, of course, we can subvert it, so the protagonist is a skinny woman in a tank top with a big sword and the Jabberwock is largely humanoid (or a shapeshifter) with six-pack abs and “slaying” takes on a whooooole new meaning. The first trilogy could be SLITHY, FRUMIOUS, and VORPAL. If it takes off, I could hit up THE HUNTING OF THE SNARK as an encore.

… since I started writing this post a couple of months back, I actually went much of the way to a treatment for the thing, some of which may be entertaining or interesting enough to post. I think the question, if I were ever to do this, would be how straight to play it. I can’t quite tell whether the underlying premise (magical creatures harmed by logic) is self-parody enough, or whether something more would be needed. Anyway, here’s what I’ve got.

IDEA: Urban fantasy based on JABBERWOCKY.

SETTING:

Trenton. (“It is a truth universally acknowledged that Trenton makes and the world takes.”)

PLAYERS

Carla Ludovico Dodson, MC. Assistant professor of mathematical logic at (the fictional) Trenton State University, but gunning for Princeton. Poet, puzzlemaker, amateur magician.

Walker Abberline, campus security guard w/abs of steel. Notional love interest, wannabe cop, Segway stunt rider.

Alvise Ludovico, Carla’s father. Mental patient.

Grimus, the Jubjub bird.

Orlando, the Bandersnatch (“Orlando Frumioso”).

Rum, Carla’s Tove love interest. He returns her interest, but she stays away in the interests of neutrality.

TRIBES

the Toves — devious, stealthy creatures with the attributes of snakes and foxes. Naming convention: Politicians, thinly disguised (Rum, Chain, Bomb, Bide, Bush).

the Borogoves — whimsical creatures with the attributes of deer and songbirds. Naming convention: Punchlines and comedians.

the Mome Raths — angry creatures with the attributes of bears and eagles. Naming convention: Wesley Willis song titles.

SETUP:

Trenton forms a natural nexus between the Mome Raths’ New York territory, the Borogoves’ Philadelphia territory, and the embattled but entrenched Toves’ territory in central New Jersey (encompassing the major universities, Princeton and Rutgers, as well as a lot of pharma and high-tech). The tribes currently operate under an uneasy peace, the balance of power such that no one wishes to draw the ire of the other two. What are their objectives? They need food and shelter just like anyone else, and that’s an issue, but they’re running up against a bigger problem, which is their vulnerability to logic. The application of methodical thought and inference to them makes them sicken and eventually die; if humanity were to become conscious of them, it would be like smallpox blankets. So they are trying to inoculate themselves to logic by controlled exposure to it, courtesy initially of Alvise Ludovico and now Carla Dodson. Carla has learned to control her thoughts so she doesn’t harm them too much; Alvise slew a lot of them before he went insane enough to help, but now he’s too insane to help.

So Carla is trying to help all three, and in particular to keep them away from the brink of mutually assured destruction—if any tribe outed another tribe to the humans, they would probably all die. Trenton is a DMZ in which ambassadors from the tribes meet, negotiate border conflicts, and seek out Carla for inoculation.

What we need is for Carla to start on a quest to hunt the Jabberwock. And I guess the reason for it is that the Jabberwock is hunting Toves. [redacted for spoilers.] How has XXXXX persuaded the Jabberwock to kill Toves? Well, the Jabberwock is accustomed to hunting the sick and weak, which (historically) have been those afflicted by logic — so it can smell logic. But it doesn’t differentiate sound logic from faulty logic—reasoning that’s mostly good but fatally flawed. But it’s sound arguments that kill tribesmen. So XXXXX pulls them in with Internet trolling. It’s amusing and nonfatal to tribesmen, but it puts the scent of logic on them, which makes them targets for the Jabberwock…

I suppose that, if I were going to start with an homage to Jane Austen in the first line, I could just take the plunge and write the whole thing with the tone and diction of a nineteenth-century novel of manners. But that might be a bridge too far. (Get it?)