Sally Ember's Blog, page 95
November 17, 2014
SHARE! EXPERIENCED #editor #proofreader available for quick-turn around jobs
SHARE! EXPERIENCED #editor #proofreader available for quick-turn around jobs, any size/length, from blurbs/web content to full-length manuscripts. Will work during Holidays (don’t celebrate them, myself!).
image from http://www.kameronhurley.com
In a very crowded field, populated with scam artists and incompetent or inadequate editors/ proofreaders, whom do you select and how do you know if you’re correct to choose that person to work with you on your precious writing?
As a published nonfiction and ebooks fiction author with many years of teaching English/Language Arts behind me, many books I’ve edited/co-written/ghostwritten and many articles, short stories, poems and scripts as well, plus my own website and frequent blog posts, I have work you can see.
YOU can decide if you want to hire me by checking my published and printed writing.
[NOTE: If you are going to read my sci-fi/romance ebooks in The Spanners Series (Vol I, This Changes Everything, is free) to see how well I edit, you should know that I wrote those deliberately in the present tense to make a plot point, not because I don’t know how to use verb tenses.]
I can help you learn more about how to write better by discussing the reasons/foundations for the edits and corrections I provide
OR just provide proofreading/copy editing with no conversation:
your choice.
With my experience and academic background, I can edit/proofread:
fiction, most genres and any length
nonfiction, any length, including marketing materials and manuals for many purposes
academic or professional White Papers in education and social sciences
articles and essays on most topics
literature reviews and dissertations or other graduate theses/writing in education and social sciences, using APA Style formatting
Maybe you already have an editor/proofreader you’ve used before, but reviewers or readers have complained about typos, mistakes and other problems. I can be the professional editing consultant who assesses your previous work and then honestly tells you if someone you’ve hired in the past is worth hiring again.
Editing consultations cost a lot less than paying a bad editor/proofreader for sloppy work and then having to pay someone else to do it AGAIN, not to mention dealing with the upsetting delays.
I offer great rates (negotiable; see below), quick and reliable service.
Work online via email, Google docs or Drop Box.
image from http://soopllc.com
I will:
assess your project by discussing and reviewing the written piece with you in advance
provide an written rate and completion time estimate
fulfill that estimate on time or early
check in with you before proceeding to next phase or adding costs
not flatter or mislead you
give you honest, credible, useful feedback
be professional, clear and accurate with my written recommendations/corrections
We can SKYPE or use Google Hangouts/Chat to discuss or go over edits. We can make the experience more of a tutorial, if desired (different rates for tutoring).
Pay via PayPal within 14 days of completion of first project.
Rates
$50/hour for proofreading (minimal) to $125/hour for extensive editing/rewriting and/or tutoring.
OR $10/250-wd page for proofreading to $25/250-wd page for extensive rewriting
minimum of $50/web content or Book BLURB.
15% discount if paid within 24 hours of submission of completed work.
20% discounts for #NaNoWriMo #authors.
10% discount for returning customers.
10% discount for referrals that turn into customers for repeat customers.
DISCOUNTS MAY BE COMBINED!
Sense of humor and compassion: no charge.
Contact: sallyember@yahoo.com
Filed under: Writing Tagged: edit, editing, NaNoWriMo, proofreading
November 16, 2014
15 #Fiction #Promos that should be Revised or Trashed Completely
15 #Fiction #Promos that should be Revised or Trashed Completely
I’ve read so many of these that I really can’t tell which ones are funny because they’re amusing or funny because they’re awful. Your comments welcomed!
All responsibility for the grammar, spelling, usage, punctuation and syntax mistakes belong to the authors and editors of the following promos.
Just consider each one to be followed by a [sic]
15. “Destiny is written in the stars? Maybe, but when you’re in a black hole you make your own damn destiny.”
14. “Even the most powerful tracers can’t track you if the magical trace you leave behind is too old. But I can track almost anything, even dead trace. That makes me a unicorn, the Tooth Fairy, the Easter Bunny, and the Loch Ness Monster all rolled into one. In a word, I am unique. A very special snowflake. And if anyone ever finds out, I’ll be dead or a slave to one of the xxx criminal factions.”
13. “xxx had to admit—getting kidnapped wasn’t something she’d expected. Discovering her kidnappers were aliens who planned on selling her into sexual slavery, definitely tipped the scales into the truly bizarre. But she’s determined to fight her way through this–—until their slave ship is attacked, and xxx’s faced with an entirely new problem.”
12. “Can the xxx rally enough force to defeat the xxx warlord? Are they outmatched?”
11. “…an uncompromising adventure story about what it truly means to be human….Featuring complex characters and edge-of-your-seat action sequences, xxx will have readers guessing until the last page.”
10. “A great memoir about abuse, love, and dogs.”
9. “Very scary murder mystery about Riverdale New York. You’ll never do laundry again!”
8. “The baseness of his greed and the evil at his core is like a black oily pit centered around his body where his soul should be…”
7. “A triumphant intermingling of the sci-fi and mystery genres. Dog lovers will swoon over the dogs.”
image from http://www.cartoonstock.com
6. “If I could have put a noose around his neck, it would have been better.”
5. “Witchcraft, Spirit Possession, Sibling Rivalry and A Hot Vampire Viking!!!”
4. “The answer is in Nature and it requires eating it, not destroying it.”
3. “Even if you’ve never played an RPG, or killed a guy with an axe, you’ll probably enjoy these books.”
2. “An eyeless body. A menacing stranger. And a tangled mystery. It’s the summer of 1923 and two cousins hunting for hidden gold stumble on an decayed body.”
image from http://www.thetoddanderinfavoritefive.com
Finally, my absolute favorite:
1. This is not the best-written book in the world. It’s not even close. To be quite honest, referring to it as a ‘book’ is something even I haven’t quite got accustomed to yet. If you read it, good luck to you. You’ll need it. Sometimes I think parts of it must have been written by monkeys or something, but then I feel sorry to the monkeys for suggesting that they’d write such drivel, and I go and bake them a cake to make up for it. But this is beside the point. Not just because the monkeys have no idea why I’m bringing them cake.
Filed under: Blogging and others' content, Indie or Self-Publishing, Marketing, Opinions, Writing Tagged: Book promos
November 13, 2014
Reblogged: 34 Acts of #Kindness #Aliens Would Appreciate
“Suspended” coffee orders, free meals, conversations and empathy with those in need, assisting without being asked, thank-you notes, taking responsibility, rescues and generosity of all kinds are included in this post.
Just what we need to remind ourselves of what it CAN mean to be human.
Maybe the #aliens won’t keep ignoring us….
We ALWAYS have enough time to be kind.
from The Kindness Blog (link below)
Link to full article here, on The Kindness Blog:
http://kindnessblog.com/2014/11/03/34-examples-of-heart-warming-humanity/
Filed under: Blogging and others' content, Gratitude, Life lessons Tagged: aliens, heart-warming, kindness
November 11, 2014
Shopping in a Literary Farmers’ Market
Hey, UK’ers: Nov. 16! GO! Support #indieauthors!
Originally posted on Kobo Writing Life:
There is a trend around the world these days to seek out the local, the eccentric, the home-made. It’s a natural reaction to globalisation and the drive for relentless uniformity.
Those apples from the market garden down the road might be a bit misshapen, but they’re a variety the big growers no longer cultivate. Their cauliflower might occasionally harbour an alarming-looking caterpillar, but they were freshly harvested only a few hours ago. And it all tastes marvellous.
That hand-made whatnot from the craft fair might have flaws no machine process would permit, but the craftsman will share their techniques and even encourage you to learn some of these skills for yourself.
So, what if you could do the same thing with books? What if in one place you could find the daring, the unfiltered, the not-another-celeb-biography? What if you could meet the creative artisans behind the stories and ask them…
View original 281 more words
Filed under: Writing
**** for This Changes My Family and My Life Forever, Vol II of The Spanners Series
**** for This Changes My Family and My Life Forever, Vol II of The Spanners Series! by Sally Ember, Ed.D.
Review by: Brenda McCracken on Nov. 09, 2014: https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/424969
and
I found this to book to be a very imaginative and creative story. Ms. Ember’s Jewish faith shines through her characters in this book. This is the first I have read from the series and I found the uses of telepathy within her characters and the plot interesting. I love sci-fi and fantasy and this is the real deal. Although I disagree with the cover art. As someone who has dabbled with Poser and Daz, those characters on the cover give me the willies. No offense!
Thanks for the review, Brenda! Glad you enjoyed it, but I LOVE the cover art, by Aidana Willowraven!
Volume II is available everywhere ebooks are sold (links on http://www.sallyember.com on the right of every page) for $3.99.
Volume I, This Changes Everything, is FREE! Good idea to start with this one!
Filed under: Reviews, The Spanners, This Changes Everything, This Changes My Family and My Life Forever, Volume I of The Spanners, Volume II of The Spanners Tagged: aliens, Book Review, Buddhist, fantasy, Jewish, Sally Ember, sci-fi, Smashwords, telepathy, The Spanners Series, This Changes Everything, This Changes My Family and My Life Forever
November 10, 2014
Just Think About It
Wise words, here. Check yourself and remember: impermanence isn’t choosy. Neither is death.
Originally posted on The Search For Enlightenment:
No matter the situation, make sure that the last thing you say is not something, you or the person you say it to, will regret for the rest of your lives.
We’ve all been there, a disagreement or a heated moment, where we’ve said something we later regretted. Imagine if that were the last conversation we ever had with that person, it could leave a shadow hanging over us forever.
In terms of karma, it’s never going to be in the plus column either, is it?
So whatever you may be feeling, however the situation will be left, you can always find something positive, kind or caring with which to end the conversation.
What’s the worst that can happen? It may be the last chance you ever have to say it, so have the Wisdom, Courage and Compassion to make it constructive.
Namaste
Filed under: Writing
Latest News in #ParallelUniverses and/or the #Multiverse, According to #Science in 2014
A scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. –Max Planck
What is the latest News in #ParallelUniverses and/or the #Multiverse, According to #Science in 2014?
I’ve been collecting “Google Alerts” on these topics for the entire year. In this post, I will curate/annotate/collect some of the best of the news so you can decide what to think about it all. Or, if you’re older and entrenched in old thinking, keep right on going like that to your grave.
Those of us ready to embrace new thinking will ignore you! The Tractor Beam has become an actuality, too, and has got us all, so just relax and let it suck you in.
image from http://physicsworld.com
We are finding out almost daily that what we know is limited, biased and incomplete, at best, and flat-out wrong, at its worst. Whether or not you adhere to the tenets of a particular religion or faith or consider yourself outside of all that, science is blowing most ontological beliefs out of existence. I am excited, interested and thrilled by the latest discoveries.
I’m psyched! We’re getting more into White and Black Holes, Dark Energy and Dark Matter, Quantum Physics, Astronomy, Cosmology, Ontology and so much more! Can’t even do more than skim the surface in a blog post curating so much content, but here are some great tidbits.
Parallel Universes
How many of YOU can exist, and where are YOU all? Not just one “twin,” and not just an “evil” one, but infinite versions of every part of existence must exist somewhere. That is what physicists conclude after studying for decades. Whatever can happen is happening, many times, in every possible way, even ways we can’t even conceive of, to paraphrase many of them.
Most humans do not have direct knowledge of these alternate versions of ourselves, our world, the universe we inhabit. Some get the occasional “déjà vu” experience or dream. A few have psychic or extra-sensory perception understandings of a variety of futures or pasts. But, usually, what we live in is what we know.
image from http://www.rdanderson.com
Posted on November 2 by Talha’s Physics Academy on Google+ was a summary of some research conclusions that confirmed the existence of Parallel Universes. Here are some excerpts, below, and the link to the source material.
“Academics at Griffith University have published a paper stating that not only are there infinite parallel universes, but those worlds actually interact with each other all the time — and that interaction is what makes everything else not make sense.
“Yeah.
“parallel universes
“The Many Worlds theory was first proposed in 1957 by Hugh Everett, who said that the ability of quantum particles to occupy two states seemingly at once could be explained by both states co-existing in different universes. Instead of a ‘waveform collapse’ in which quantum particles ‘decide’ to occupy one state or another, they actually occupy both, simultaneously. And a new branch opens up every time such a ‘decision’ is made.
“This theory has risen in popularity since being initially dismissed, and while it’s still a subject of intense debate, a new paper seeks to move the theory on.
“In a new study, published in the Physical Review X, Professor Howard Wiseman and Dr. Michael Hall from Griffith’s Centre for Quantum Dynamics, and Dr. Dirk-Andre Deckert from the University of California, argue that parallel worlds aren’t just a bizarre get-out clause for why quantum mechanics is so strange. They argue that their existence itself explains quantum mechanics.
“They argue that parallel universes are able to repel each other with a subtle force. The interaction of these Newtonian worlds creates a more complex quantum substructure.
“‘In the well-known “Many-Worlds Interpretation,” each universe branches into a bunch of new universes every time a quantum measurement is made,’ said Wiseman to Phys.org via Griffith University.
“All possibilities are therefore realised – in some universes the dinosaur-killing asteroid missed Earth. In others, Australia was colonised by the Portuguese.
“But critics question the reality of these other universes, since they do not influence our universe at all. On this score, our ‘Many Interacting Worlds’ approach is completely different, as its name implies.’
“He argues that our world is just one among many, but that the repulsion between them leads to the very quantum mechanics that so confuse physicists.
“‘The beauty of our approach is that if there is just one world, our theory reduces to Newtonian mechanics, while if there is a gigantic number of worlds, it reproduces quantum mechanics'” said Hall.
“He suggests that physicists might even be able to test for the existence of these other worlds—and that by modelling their existence we might be able to explore new forms of maths and physics, potentially with practical implications.”
Summary from: talhaphysicsacademy.blogspot.com
Original source: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/10/31/parallel-universes-exist_n_6080934.html
Proof seems to be what 2014 is filled with, so far.
The Multiverse
Multiverse Theory: Avoiding Evidence of Design was posted Youtube on Jan 30, 2014, an 8-minute lecture (podcast with no video component) by David Boze. Boze supports the “Bubble Multiverse” theory and avoids supporting “intelligent design” or “God” as either is currently configured.
The intro offered: “Which requires more faith: a belief in multiple universes or a belief in the intelligent design of our universe? On this episode of ID The Future, host, David Boze, explores the ideas found in a recent Harper’s Magazine article by MIT physicist and author, Alan Lightman. Some physicists attempt to side-step the intelligent design implications of our finely-tuned universe by suggesting that ours is merely one of countless universes, each with its own laws and constants.
Then, Lightman is quoted as saying: “‘If the multiverse idea is correct, then the historic mission of physics to explain all the properties of our universe…is futile, a beautiful philosophical dream that simply isn’t true.'”
http://youtu.be/iM6nMiDMKNU
More like this from: http://www.idthefuture.com
image from http://space.mit.edu, The 4 Multiverse Theories of Max Tegmark
Then, the BIGGEST news (pun intended) of the year came in mid-March: “Big Bang discovery opens up possibility of multiverse” with this quote that reverberated across the globe: “…scientists announced this week that they found evidence of cosmic inflation, or the rapid expansion of the early universe, it supported the Big Bang theory. It also opened up the possibility of the existence of the multiverse — the idea that universes other than our own exist.”
This video from the article provided this evidence: “‘It’s hard to build models of inflation that don’t lead to a multiverse,’ said MIT theoretical physicist, Alan Guth (yes; the same Alan Guth who predicted inflation in 1980!). ‘It’s not impossible, so I think there’s still certainly research that needs to be done. But most models of inflation do lead to a multiverse, and evidence for inflation will be pushing us in the direction of taking [the idea of a] multiverse seriously.'”
A great summary statement: “The existence of other universes could also explain many of the weird astral phenomena scientists have witnessed.”
Another article about similar topics later in the same month offered this insight about scientific experimentation: “The null result of the experiment should in no way color our perception of these tests as a failure; they are simply veils of ignorance being pulled away from the truths of the Universe.”
http://beforeitsnews.com/science-and-technology/2014/03/comments-of-the-week-4-from-null-results-to-the-multiverse-starts-with-a-bang-2684654.html
image from http://consciouslifenews.com
Then, on April 1, Katia Mosvitch posted that a Middle Ages’ mathematician/scientist/philosopher and Catholic Bishop, Robert Grosseteste, had written De Luce, which was recently translated from Medieval Latin into English. In it, Grosseteste posited the existence of the Multiverse mathematically and scientifically, using many astronomy facts not known in Medieval times but since proven true.
Upon learning of this early astrophysicist’s genius, one modern UK physicist, Richard Bower, stated: “…in future centuries, a new generation of physicists will look back at how we understand the universe today, and think, ‘How could they not see that?’ Bower said. “‘Modern cosmology is a grasping towards a more complete understanding of creation, but we do not yet see the full picture.'”
http://www.space.com/25301-multiverse-concept-middle-ages-grosseteste.html
This story, of the middle ages scientist’s having first heralded what is now a recent discovery, continued to spread across the globe via the internet and print journalism for many weeks.
Making an excellent connection to my sci-fi novels in The Spanners Series, especially Volume I, This Changes Everything, I have to mention that I “solve” problems of and offer explanations of seemingly out-of-sequence knowledge-holders by listing previously unrevealed dream-time or hologram visitations by our benevolent aliens from the Many Worlds Collective.
How would YOU explain these time warps? How could we know what we know before we seem to have been able to know it?
image from http://xi4.com
On 4/2/14, Marcelo Gleiser posted on the Cosmos and Culture blog of NPR (National Public Radio in the USA) using this title: What Universe Is This, Anyway? and this description of the multiverse and our place in it: “…an eternally replicating cosmos, filled with bubbles within bubbles. Ours would be but one of them.”
He went on to pose and then not answer some key questions: “…how common is our universe and its laws among the myriad universes belonging to the multiverse[?] Are we the exception or the rule? The problem is that we have no way to tell.”
Why is there “no way to tell” what is typical or common? Because of this quandary: “How are we to establish what is normal when, in the realm of the infinite, everything is possible?”
Sit with that for a while.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/13.7/2014/04/02/297853038/what-universe-is-this-anyway
image from http://customerthink.com
Here is a 4/3/14 piece from a fun site with a great name and tagline: Exponential Times: THE FUTURE COMES FASTER THAN YOU THINK, posted by filmmaker and physicist, David Kaplan. The short video he narrates includes the transcript of it: Multiverse and Particle Fever. Kaplan asks basic questions, such as: “Is all the information we want…accessible? …Is it in our universe?”
He plainly states the ongoing scientific dilemma: “We are biased by what we measure by the fact that we are here measuring it” in reference to his team’s discovery of the Higgs-Boson particle (“The ‘God Particle'”) via the Large Hadron Collider (LHC).
Kaplan and others repeatedly remind us that some of the most intelligent, creative, knowledgeable scientists in our generation can only know what we know and only know it the way we know it, but there is infinitely much more to know.
image from http://richarddawkins.net
On 4/4/14, the creationists (Darwin/evolution-deniers, recently re-branded as “natural scientists” and/or “intelligent design” proponents) weigh in on the multiverse revelations (pun intended). Their website is unironically named “Evolution News.” Fabulous.
The author, Bruce Gordon (“Dr. Gordon is a Senior Fellow with the Center for Science & Culture and Associate Professor of the History and Philosophy of Science at Houston Baptist University. He is the co-editor with William Dembski of The Nature of Nature: Examining the Role of Naturalism in Science (Intercollegiate Studies Institute, 2011″), makes many wild claims, surrounding them with complicated sentences intended to make him sound smart, but succeeding only in obfuscating the points he wants to make. Here is my favorite: “… taken seriously, the inflationary multiverse proposal completely undermines scientific rationality.”
This lengthy, pseudo-scientific post concludes with this punchy statement: “…it’s intelligent design all the way through and all the way down and that theophobic scientific materialists, once they get past knee-jerk denials, must come to terms with what is, for them, a worldview-defeating fact.”
I love how the author decides to allude to the infinite regression fable of creation—“nothing but turtles, all the way down”—making me laugh even more at his ridiculousness.
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2014/04/a_matter_of_con084001.html
Posted on 11/1/14, scientists revisited the same questions we started with back in early 2014 and before in a debate hosted in late October by Pioneer Works in Brooklyn, NY, USA, entitled: “An infinite multiverse: a bad idea or inescapable? Two areas of physics say there may be another you in a different universe.” They invited this trio to discuss/debate these topics:
Janna Levin, a mathematician and theoretical cosmologist who declared herself agnostic about the multiverse, acted as a moderator. Arguing in favor was Max Tegmark, a cosmologist at MIT. His MIT colleague, Frank Wilczek, (winner of the Nobel for his work on the strong force) took the opposing position.
What did this conversation offer? John Timmer wrote the summary. I quote from him above and here:
“Levin pointed out that some infinities are bigger than others, so we’re not sure whether there really is enough universe to produce infinite copies of us.”
“But Tegmark countered that if there are a finite number of ways to arrange quarks–—and some indications are that this is the case–—then ‘in that case, a small infinity should work to get us all the possibilities.'”
“But Wilczek’s issue wasn’t so much one of whether this form of infinite universes is likely to exist. He made it clear that he privileges the reality that we can interact with, and thus do science with. Even if multiple universes are a necessary outcome of the physics we discover in this one, he’d still rather focus on what goes on here.”
http://arstechnica.com/science/2014/11/an-infinite-multiverse-a-bad-idea-or-inescapable/
What do you think? And, which you is thinking it, when and where?
Filed under: Science Tagged: astronomy, Big Bang, Black Holes, Bubble Universes, cosmology, creationists, Dark Energy, Dark Matter, evolution, intelligent design, multiverse, natural scientists, ontology, Parallel Universes, ParallelUniverses, psychics, quantum physics, White Holes
November 8, 2014
A Simple Guide to Deep PoV
And, Nicholas Rossis expounds on his writing style and choices more in our conversation on *CHANGES*, Episode 7. Tune in any time on Youtube to that and others: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLPbfKicwk4dFdeVSAY1tfhtjaEY_clmfq
Learn more about and get yourself or recommend someone to be scheduled as a guest: *CHANGES* G+ HOA http://sallyember.com/changes-videoca...
Originally posted on Nicholas C. Rossis:
Point of View (PoV) is a fascinating thing. It allows us to play god in the little universe we have created for ourselves (and, hopefully, our readers). And, like a zoom-in function, allows us to zoom in and out of our characters. We can either watch them from afar or listen in to their most intimate thoughts.
First, third, omniscient…
You are probably aware of the three main PoV used in most fiction: first-person, third-person and third-person omniscient, but here is a quick recap:
First-person uses, well, the first person: “I stared lovingly into her almond eyes. I love you, I wanted to tell her. She seemed unnerved.”
Third-person, imaginatively enough, uses the third person: “He stared lovingly into her almond eyes. I love you, he wanted to tell her. She seemed unnerved.”
Third-person omniscient resembles closely the former, but allows us to jump from one character to another…
View original 1,069 more words
Filed under: Writing
Today, in #SPAM
Congratulations!!! You have been selected to travel through time with American’s most beloved historian with your FREE quality spy equipment! Bring along your bankbook, since the Direct Deposits of $1532.12 (twice) and $4986.21, the 100DayLoan of $2500 and the Boseley Gift Card (FREE) of $250 will accompany you!
While on this journey, you could LOSE or GAIN WEIGHT with FREE and Natural Supplements (samples available NOW), enhance your physical prowess, attract new dates, chat online with hotties, get your cable installed FREE, regrow your hair, start an online degree program, refinance your home and find the money and relatives waiting just for you when you investigate your family tree for the family PROTANO.
Filed under: Blogging and others' content Tagged: SPAM report
November 7, 2014
Kobo Writing Life Podcast – Episode 024 with Kathy Reichs
Any “#Bones” books or TV fans out there, check out this interview with the author /forensic anthropologist, Kathy Reichs, the stories are based upon, right here! http://traffic.libsyn.com/kobowritinglife/KWL_024_KathyReichs.mp3
Originally posted on Kobo Writing Life:
http://traffic.libsyn.com/kobowritinglife/KWL_024_KathyReichs.mp3
Kathy Reichs & Bob Ramsay
This podcast includes the full and unabridged audio of the Kobo in Conversation interview with Kathy Reichs conducted by Bob Ramsay and hosted by Kobo’s Senior Director of Communications Tracy Nesdoly.
The interview covers the following:
The “Big Bang Break” that happens in an investigation – that one moment when realization explodes and the search hurdles forward on the right trajectory.
The new YA writing she is doing in collaboration with her son
How, even though she has sold millions of copies of her novels around the world, has a television series based on her popular recurring character Temperance Brennan, she is still on tour and treats every new book with the same enthusiasm as her first book
Kathy’s perspective on the book publishing business and the promotion and sale of books in the next five years, with respect to the fact that recent…
View original 439 more words
Filed under: Writing
