Devinder Kumar Dhiman's Blog, page 2
October 1, 2013
Effect of Dark Energy on Space-Time Concept
Space-time concept of gravity is nearly a hundred year old, and is well established. It has firm proof in measurement of ‘time dilation’ carried out on board the satellites, where the precise atomic clocks record time slower than they would, at Earth. Hence, it seems imprudent to even suggest that there can be any reconsideration of this concept. Nevertheless, with the new notion of dark energy in space, we should re-examine this concept and see if there is any influence on it.
In space-time concept, time is considered flexible whereas space is not, because it is assumed, that there is nothing in the space that can have a variable value. But, with the discovery of dark energy in space, this assumption has to change. Dark energy can have diverse values at different locations in space. When we visualize this dark energy as a medium of space, in the form of lines of force spread in all directions in space, then we can calculate its variation at different locations. The variation pattern of dark energy in space can fulfil the same function, as accomplished by ‘time dilation’, in space-time concept.
‘Time dilation’ in outer space, is calculated as extra time taken by light to travel between two reflecting surfaces of an atomic clock. This slowdown in measurement of time, can also be attributed to different intensity of dark energy in outer space (where atomic clock is present), than at Earth. It implies that, it is the dark energy of space that is causing time dilation, whereas time itself is absolute.
Overall, the effect of dark energy on space-time, is that the space itself is responsible for gravity, and there is no requirement of fourth dimension of time. This makes study of gravity and other assertions of physics straightforward, contrary to complex justifications of observer dependent gravitational and quantum physics.
To learn more about the effect of medium of space (dark energy) on various theories of physics, read the book ‘Lines of Space- source of fundamental forces and constituent of all matter in the Universe’ available at http://amzn.to/15Yg5JY
In space-time concept, time is considered flexible whereas space is not, because it is assumed, that there is nothing in the space that can have a variable value. But, with the discovery of dark energy in space, this assumption has to change. Dark energy can have diverse values at different locations in space. When we visualize this dark energy as a medium of space, in the form of lines of force spread in all directions in space, then we can calculate its variation at different locations. The variation pattern of dark energy in space can fulfil the same function, as accomplished by ‘time dilation’, in space-time concept.
‘Time dilation’ in outer space, is calculated as extra time taken by light to travel between two reflecting surfaces of an atomic clock. This slowdown in measurement of time, can also be attributed to different intensity of dark energy in outer space (where atomic clock is present), than at Earth. It implies that, it is the dark energy of space that is causing time dilation, whereas time itself is absolute.
Overall, the effect of dark energy on space-time, is that the space itself is responsible for gravity, and there is no requirement of fourth dimension of time. This makes study of gravity and other assertions of physics straightforward, contrary to complex justifications of observer dependent gravitational and quantum physics.
To learn more about the effect of medium of space (dark energy) on various theories of physics, read the book ‘Lines of Space- source of fundamental forces and constituent of all matter in the Universe’ available at http://amzn.to/15Yg5JY
Published on October 01, 2013 08:05
•
Tags:
dark-energy, gravity, space-time, time-dilation
September 10, 2013
What is 'Gravitation'?
Do you know why the earth pulls everything towards itself? Certainly, you know the answer to this simple question, that pulling effect is due to ‘Gravitation’. But what is ‘Gravitation’, and from where it has originated? When you go slightly deeper and ask your-self such questions, you find that it becomes difficult. Gravitation, as explained to us by Einstein, is ‘Curvature’ of ‘space-time’. To visualize ‘space-time’ and its ‘Curvature’, you have to envision ‘Time’ as fourth dimension, in addition to three dimensions of space. Imagining fourth dimension of ‘Time’, and trying to figure out 'Gravitation', requires the mind of a well-trained physics student. Can’t we make it simple? Yes, we can. We can get the explanation of 'Gravitation' with only three dimensional space, without relating with time. But how? The answer is provided by the concept of ‘Lines of Space’. To download this book, click on http://amzn.to/15Yg5JY
Published on September 10, 2013 08:01
•
Tags:
gravitation
August 21, 2013
Speed of Light vs Speed of Cricket ball
Mostly everyone is aware that speed of light is constant i.e. 300000km/sec, but many of us get surprised when we learn that Einstein further theorized that this speed is constant with respect to observer also. This implies that effect of the observer’s own speed on the relative speed of light coming toward him/her is Nil even when he/she is moving at a very high speed (say sitting in rocket going to space) towards the source of light. Even if we assume the rocket speed to be so high that it becomes quite comparable to speed of light (say 100000km/sec), the observer in the rocket will observe the speed of light coming towards him to be 300000km/sec instead of 400000km/sec as we would reasonably expect.
We shall now try to co-relate this phenomenon with speed of a cricket ball. Assuming that a good shot is hit by a batsman and a fielder sees the ball coming towards him. He makes a quick judgement that the ball may land a few steps in front of him, so he dashes forward to catch the ball and succeeds. He gets a good applause from his team-mates and the crowd.
Now, consider the ball to behave as light. if the fielder is a physicist, he will reason that his running towards the ball will have no effect on the relative speed of the ball coming towards him similar to the speed of light. So, he will not run forward and its result is obvious. Thank God, Cricketers don’t think like physicists!
We shall now try to co-relate this phenomenon with speed of a cricket ball. Assuming that a good shot is hit by a batsman and a fielder sees the ball coming towards him. He makes a quick judgement that the ball may land a few steps in front of him, so he dashes forward to catch the ball and succeeds. He gets a good applause from his team-mates and the crowd.
Now, consider the ball to behave as light. if the fielder is a physicist, he will reason that his running towards the ball will have no effect on the relative speed of the ball coming towards him similar to the speed of light. So, he will not run forward and its result is obvious. Thank God, Cricketers don’t think like physicists!
Published on August 21, 2013 05:56
•
Tags:
speed-of-light
August 15, 2013
Review by Periodical Gazette
Please click on below link to read the latest review of this book:-
http://periodicalgazette.blogspot.in/...
http://periodicalgazette.blogspot.in/...
Published on August 15, 2013 04:55
•
Tags:
review
August 11, 2013
Reg medium of Space
Time has come to reconsider the existence of a medium (or ether) of space due to recent developments in science on presence of dark energy in space.
Michelson and Morley experiment in 19th century had disproved the existence of the medium of space (ether) that could cause 'ether wind' by rotation of earth, but that experiment was not conclusive for the medium of space that can remain undisturbed by movement of earth. In 21st century, there is a need to look beyond earth for existence of medium of space.
Michelson and Morley experiment in 19th century had disproved the existence of the medium of space (ether) that could cause 'ether wind' by rotation of earth, but that experiment was not conclusive for the medium of space that can remain undisturbed by movement of earth. In 21st century, there is a need to look beyond earth for existence of medium of space.
August 4, 2013
Review of the book
Ganga Shankar Dixit wrote about this book:-
Read the book in one go … very innovative … interestingly & simplistically explained complex aspects of science.
Simple but very concrete explanation of the nature & space.
The electron, proton & neutron funda is superb and best explanation I have read.
A complete and undisputed explanation for electrons not collapsing into the nucleus & maintaining balance with each constituent maintaining its space in the composition.
Bending of Light when passing closer to heavenly object & over a bend is better understood.
Also the phenomenon of expanding universe has been given a new angle which the top scientist should give importance and include in their search & research work. They should take this lead positively and use it to better understand nature.
Read the book in one go … very innovative … interestingly & simplistically explained complex aspects of science.
Simple but very concrete explanation of the nature & space.
The electron, proton & neutron funda is superb and best explanation I have read.
A complete and undisputed explanation for electrons not collapsing into the nucleus & maintaining balance with each constituent maintaining its space in the composition.
Bending of Light when passing closer to heavenly object & over a bend is better understood.
Also the phenomenon of expanding universe has been given a new angle which the top scientist should give importance and include in their search & research work. They should take this lead positively and use it to better understand nature.
Published on August 04, 2013 04:02
August 1, 2013
Why I wrote this book?
Yesterday, someone asked me, "Why did you write this book?"
I was momentarily startled by the sudden and direct question, and before I could recuperate, next question was hurled at me- "Is it for money?"
I was quick to reply, "No, I earn good from my job, why should I worry?"
Then I heard the next one, "Is it for fame?"
I retorted," No, by nature, I like to keep by myself, I am not interested in that either."
"Then what?" probed the questioner.
"It is not straightforward to explain the motive behind writing this book," I countered and continued after a short pause," I had studied about Creation of the Universe through Big-bang and always wondered how that was possible? While investigating this phenomenon, I came across an idea that Universe may have got created from space itself, and my quest took a new turn. I spent many years to visualize the relation between space and matter. My calculations and rough diagrams mostly landed in the waste basket in a mutilated condition beyond recognition, for the fear of anyone discovering what I was working on, to save myself from embarrassment of trying to fix something which I was not considered capable of. When I sniffed success in my endeavor after years of collecting information on this subject secretly and countless hours of cogitating, my trepidation vanished and I started saving the calculations and diagrams. Now, I only had to add text details to make a case."
"So, why you chose to write a book instead of presenting your case to a science magazine?" I was interrupted.
"Not being a trained physicist, I was at a disadvantage. I also discovered that if the established laws are not adhered to, a new proposal is not considered valid by the science periodicals. My contemplations, though logical and mathematically correct, were in disagreement with some of the laws of physics. I was in a fix, and in the danger of squandering all my work without anyone evaluating it. My calculation and drawings were too arduous for any individual to understand."
"Is your book difficult to read?" Questioner got anxious.
"At that stage, it was very challenging, not now," I clarified and resumed my rejoinder," At that juncture, I decided to weave a story to make the content unpretentious by elucidating the prevalent theories from the fundamental level and then anatomizing them in relation to the core idea. Being a novice at writing, I learned the process of writing and publishing and subsequently the book was released after devoting three years to this process. This is how; the book 'Lines of Space' was born which explains how matter can originate from empty space. So, I wrote this book because I was confident that my concept is plausible, logical, innovative and unique."
"But, only you believe in your book, why anyone will read something which is not in agreement with present physics?" the questioner expressed reservations from the point of view of other readers.
"I am not the lone believer in this concept. Whosoever studied my concept, found it astounding and worth publishing, and persuaded me to share my view on conversion of space into matter with everyone irrespective of the fact that it gives a new dimension to certain laws of physics."
"Has anyone read it after its release?
"So far, scores of people have read this book, and I am getting good remarks from all of them. Latest comment made by one of my friends on Facebook is -[Gone through yr book…Excellent work…you hv got deep knowledge…a daring and revolutionary mind challenges the basic beliefs and practices, and you have done that through your book…that is remarkable!]"
"That is great! Wish you all the best for the success of your book."
"Thanks."
I was momentarily startled by the sudden and direct question, and before I could recuperate, next question was hurled at me- "Is it for money?"
I was quick to reply, "No, I earn good from my job, why should I worry?"
Then I heard the next one, "Is it for fame?"
I retorted," No, by nature, I like to keep by myself, I am not interested in that either."
"Then what?" probed the questioner.
"It is not straightforward to explain the motive behind writing this book," I countered and continued after a short pause," I had studied about Creation of the Universe through Big-bang and always wondered how that was possible? While investigating this phenomenon, I came across an idea that Universe may have got created from space itself, and my quest took a new turn. I spent many years to visualize the relation between space and matter. My calculations and rough diagrams mostly landed in the waste basket in a mutilated condition beyond recognition, for the fear of anyone discovering what I was working on, to save myself from embarrassment of trying to fix something which I was not considered capable of. When I sniffed success in my endeavor after years of collecting information on this subject secretly and countless hours of cogitating, my trepidation vanished and I started saving the calculations and diagrams. Now, I only had to add text details to make a case."
"So, why you chose to write a book instead of presenting your case to a science magazine?" I was interrupted.
"Not being a trained physicist, I was at a disadvantage. I also discovered that if the established laws are not adhered to, a new proposal is not considered valid by the science periodicals. My contemplations, though logical and mathematically correct, were in disagreement with some of the laws of physics. I was in a fix, and in the danger of squandering all my work without anyone evaluating it. My calculation and drawings were too arduous for any individual to understand."
"Is your book difficult to read?" Questioner got anxious.
"At that stage, it was very challenging, not now," I clarified and resumed my rejoinder," At that juncture, I decided to weave a story to make the content unpretentious by elucidating the prevalent theories from the fundamental level and then anatomizing them in relation to the core idea. Being a novice at writing, I learned the process of writing and publishing and subsequently the book was released after devoting three years to this process. This is how; the book 'Lines of Space' was born which explains how matter can originate from empty space. So, I wrote this book because I was confident that my concept is plausible, logical, innovative and unique."
"But, only you believe in your book, why anyone will read something which is not in agreement with present physics?" the questioner expressed reservations from the point of view of other readers.
"I am not the lone believer in this concept. Whosoever studied my concept, found it astounding and worth publishing, and persuaded me to share my view on conversion of space into matter with everyone irrespective of the fact that it gives a new dimension to certain laws of physics."
"Has anyone read it after its release?
"So far, scores of people have read this book, and I am getting good remarks from all of them. Latest comment made by one of my friends on Facebook is -[Gone through yr book…Excellent work…you hv got deep knowledge…a daring and revolutionary mind challenges the basic beliefs and practices, and you have done that through your book…that is remarkable!]"
"That is great! Wish you all the best for the success of your book."
"Thanks."
5 reasons to write (science books)
After pondering over the reasons for writing a science genre book, I came across the following facts that motivate a writer.
You have an innovative idea, that you believe shall be useful for others, and want to convey to the world. You consider yourself fortunate that you have discovered something that nobody until then have thought of. You want to spread the idea as well as want to protect it from the unscrupulous elements who can project your idea as their own, so you find yourself in a tight spot; neither you can reveal your idea to anyone nor you can keep it a secret. Then you are left with only alternative of writing it all in a book or an article, getting its copyright and publishing it. Now, you have got a proof that the idea is yours and have the satisfaction that it can be circulated to the public as your idea.
If you are a natural teacher and love educating others, then you will be writing books for the fun of it because you feel satisfaction after explaining a certain topic in your own way, by giving your own concocted examples and illustrations. You feel contented when the readers inform you that they find your book useful.
Another reason is that you find a flaw in some scientific theory or disagree with a statement in any science book, and with your research you arrive at correct version, then you wish to disclose to the world your finding. This urge is the most compelling and can overcome any of your disabilities of writing a book; it will certainly make you an author one day.
Making money is a motive common for every genre and this inspiration is generated from the plenty of stories of authors becoming rich after success of their books. Though such stories are more common with fiction books which everyone can easily read and enjoy, but a scientific mind finds it difficult to craft a scenario of fiction, and finds himself at ease when writing about science and thus opts to write the book in the area of his own interest.
A science book may also be written in the hope of becoming famous in your field of study and enhance your value in social circles which can bring added benefits such as promotions and increasing the number of your students or followers. You also get delighted whenever your book is discussed in print or other media.
You have an innovative idea, that you believe shall be useful for others, and want to convey to the world. You consider yourself fortunate that you have discovered something that nobody until then have thought of. You want to spread the idea as well as want to protect it from the unscrupulous elements who can project your idea as their own, so you find yourself in a tight spot; neither you can reveal your idea to anyone nor you can keep it a secret. Then you are left with only alternative of writing it all in a book or an article, getting its copyright and publishing it. Now, you have got a proof that the idea is yours and have the satisfaction that it can be circulated to the public as your idea.
If you are a natural teacher and love educating others, then you will be writing books for the fun of it because you feel satisfaction after explaining a certain topic in your own way, by giving your own concocted examples and illustrations. You feel contented when the readers inform you that they find your book useful.
Another reason is that you find a flaw in some scientific theory or disagree with a statement in any science book, and with your research you arrive at correct version, then you wish to disclose to the world your finding. This urge is the most compelling and can overcome any of your disabilities of writing a book; it will certainly make you an author one day.
Making money is a motive common for every genre and this inspiration is generated from the plenty of stories of authors becoming rich after success of their books. Though such stories are more common with fiction books which everyone can easily read and enjoy, but a scientific mind finds it difficult to craft a scenario of fiction, and finds himself at ease when writing about science and thus opts to write the book in the area of his own interest.
A science book may also be written in the hope of becoming famous in your field of study and enhance your value in social circles which can bring added benefits such as promotions and increasing the number of your students or followers. You also get delighted whenever your book is discussed in print or other media.
Published on August 01, 2013 02:15
•
Tags:
science-book, writing
July 22, 2013
Amazon-kindle link for '|Lines of Space'
Amazon-kindle e-book download link is http://amzn.to/15Yg5JY
Published on July 22, 2013 09:31
July 18, 2013
Press Release link
Following is the link to press release on this book-
http://www.pressbox.co.uk/detailed/En...
http://www.pressbox.co.uk/detailed/En...
Published on July 18, 2013 20:31
•
Tags:
press-release