Will Hathaway's Blog, page 6
November 12, 2015
Red Cups, Mizzou, and everything else Offensive
* A re-publish from a couple years ago in light of recent events....
Every so often a celebrity or public figure comes out with a tweet or a statement that reveals their true feeling about another group of people. One of the things I find interesting about the public reaction is that normally there is a huge outcry for said person to lose their job, or to lose sponsorship or be forced to apologize. Immediate social pressure is created to somehow "punish" these people for being racist or homophobic or whatever prejudice they convey. Why?
Why do we have to punish people for voicing their opinions? Isn't that what America is supposed to be all about? Isn't it about being able to speak your mind no matter how crazy your ideas might be? Personally, I think its sad that anyone hate anyone else based on a general set of criteria, but when that person voices that sentiment and they are met with an overwhelming backlash crying out for them to be punished, then doesn't that only reinforce their already warped view? Shouldn't sponsorship or whether or not someone keeps their job be a decision left to the employers and sponsors?
I'm afraid that America is becoming a place where people are being intimidated into keeping their controversial thoughts to themselves, suppressing their right to express themselves and creating a pressure cooker of venom. If someone is a racist, they are a racist, if they are a homophobe they are a homophobe, firing them and forcing them to apologize will not change their heart. If anything it will only provide it new resolve, fanning their flames of hatred. As a Christian, I can tell you we have over 1,000 years of church history where we tried to "force" people to believe and think certain ways and it hasn't work out all that well.
If you don't agree with someone then don't agree with them. If they say something you think is out of line, then tell them they are out of line. Punishing them for what they think doesn't make them change their mind and does nothing to fix the real problem which resides in their heart. A wise man once said we should "love our enemies." It sounds crazy but for the entire history of mankind just about everyone, including His very followers, have pretty well tested the idea of hating our enemies and this is where we are at. Perhaps it might be worth giving His idea a try.
Every so often a celebrity or public figure comes out with a tweet or a statement that reveals their true feeling about another group of people. One of the things I find interesting about the public reaction is that normally there is a huge outcry for said person to lose their job, or to lose sponsorship or be forced to apologize. Immediate social pressure is created to somehow "punish" these people for being racist or homophobic or whatever prejudice they convey. Why?
Why do we have to punish people for voicing their opinions? Isn't that what America is supposed to be all about? Isn't it about being able to speak your mind no matter how crazy your ideas might be? Personally, I think its sad that anyone hate anyone else based on a general set of criteria, but when that person voices that sentiment and they are met with an overwhelming backlash crying out for them to be punished, then doesn't that only reinforce their already warped view? Shouldn't sponsorship or whether or not someone keeps their job be a decision left to the employers and sponsors?
I'm afraid that America is becoming a place where people are being intimidated into keeping their controversial thoughts to themselves, suppressing their right to express themselves and creating a pressure cooker of venom. If someone is a racist, they are a racist, if they are a homophobe they are a homophobe, firing them and forcing them to apologize will not change their heart. If anything it will only provide it new resolve, fanning their flames of hatred. As a Christian, I can tell you we have over 1,000 years of church history where we tried to "force" people to believe and think certain ways and it hasn't work out all that well.
If you don't agree with someone then don't agree with them. If they say something you think is out of line, then tell them they are out of line. Punishing them for what they think doesn't make them change their mind and does nothing to fix the real problem which resides in their heart. A wise man once said we should "love our enemies." It sounds crazy but for the entire history of mankind just about everyone, including His very followers, have pretty well tested the idea of hating our enemies and this is where we are at. Perhaps it might be worth giving His idea a try.
Published on November 12, 2015 14:05
November 6, 2015
The Curse of Prosperity
In the heart of almost every human there seems to be a deep lust for meaning. A passion to have purpose in life and a true yearning for significance. Never has that passion seemed more contemplated than in today's world of cubicles and computer screens. Today some of the biggest issues seem to be those of self discovery and self acceptance, issues that have probably on some level always affected humanity, but not like today, especially in our lavish culture. These are concerns that present themselves most when our most basic needs for survival are met.
For most of our time as a species, mankind has had to scratch and claw out an existence in a harsh and challenging realm, and there are many places in the world where this is still the case, but not so much in the "developed" world, and I've come to the conclusion that we may not be the better for it. For our ancestors life was truly an adventure, life and death literally hung in the balance of a good hunt or a prosperous harvest, elements like drought, pestilence, famine, all real factors that constantly threatened to extinguish ones existence from the planet. But from within that struggle came the true elements of life! The fear of drought brought the euphoria of rain, the dread of starvation brought the true conquest of a successful hunt, the constant risk of death brought the appreciation of life. Everything was risky and within that risk came huge disappointment and satisfaction. In those days, women literally risked their lives by something as simple as sex since conception also brought with it the very real risk of dying in labor. Cuts got infected, broken bones could change the course of ones life!
But over time, with advancements in technology, the world has gradually become safer and with it, the numbness of security. Today, I honestly don't fear starvation the way they did back then, and as a result the appreciation of every meal I eat is cheapened. As a child, I grew up in a house that only had fireplaces for heat. There were times I could actually see my breath in my bedroom on the coldest of winter days. I remember the feeling of climbing out of a warm bath only to begin shivering as I tried to dry off as quickly as I could to get my pajamas on and race to my bed where I would climb between the cold sheets and wait for them to warm up. I loved those experiences, and although far from true suffering, it was the discomfort of the cold that made the simple warmth of a fire in the fireplace or an extra blanket on the bed so wonderful.
Today, I can control the climate of my home with a push of a button, I can go to the grocery store and collect my produce without the nervous anticipation of a good harvest or fear of drought. With the mitigation of risk modern technology has provided us and the comforts that come with our ability to control our environment, we have robbed ourselves of the extremes that come with either side of life. As a result, we now settle for the cheap alternatives of social media and fantasy in search of those intense emotions that reminded us of what it means to be alive. To either attempt to safely pursue experiences that cannot be obtained safely, or to create our own risk through dysfunctional living in an effort to replicate what we no longer have.
Is it any wonder that when Jesus called us to experience life to the full that He included in that calling the need to take up our cross to follow Him? Perhaps the risk of death nay, the eventual guarantee of death, is required to fully appreciate the heights that only life can provide. Perhaps that is why God gave us this unlimited Universe to pursue unlimited challenges as He knew we would eventually tame this world and in turn would always need more to challenge our wild hearts made in His image. Perhaps our lack of perceived meaning comes not from the fact that there is no meaning but that we've removed all the risk that is required for us to truly feel all life has to offer!
For most of our time as a species, mankind has had to scratch and claw out an existence in a harsh and challenging realm, and there are many places in the world where this is still the case, but not so much in the "developed" world, and I've come to the conclusion that we may not be the better for it. For our ancestors life was truly an adventure, life and death literally hung in the balance of a good hunt or a prosperous harvest, elements like drought, pestilence, famine, all real factors that constantly threatened to extinguish ones existence from the planet. But from within that struggle came the true elements of life! The fear of drought brought the euphoria of rain, the dread of starvation brought the true conquest of a successful hunt, the constant risk of death brought the appreciation of life. Everything was risky and within that risk came huge disappointment and satisfaction. In those days, women literally risked their lives by something as simple as sex since conception also brought with it the very real risk of dying in labor. Cuts got infected, broken bones could change the course of ones life!
But over time, with advancements in technology, the world has gradually become safer and with it, the numbness of security. Today, I honestly don't fear starvation the way they did back then, and as a result the appreciation of every meal I eat is cheapened. As a child, I grew up in a house that only had fireplaces for heat. There were times I could actually see my breath in my bedroom on the coldest of winter days. I remember the feeling of climbing out of a warm bath only to begin shivering as I tried to dry off as quickly as I could to get my pajamas on and race to my bed where I would climb between the cold sheets and wait for them to warm up. I loved those experiences, and although far from true suffering, it was the discomfort of the cold that made the simple warmth of a fire in the fireplace or an extra blanket on the bed so wonderful.
Today, I can control the climate of my home with a push of a button, I can go to the grocery store and collect my produce without the nervous anticipation of a good harvest or fear of drought. With the mitigation of risk modern technology has provided us and the comforts that come with our ability to control our environment, we have robbed ourselves of the extremes that come with either side of life. As a result, we now settle for the cheap alternatives of social media and fantasy in search of those intense emotions that reminded us of what it means to be alive. To either attempt to safely pursue experiences that cannot be obtained safely, or to create our own risk through dysfunctional living in an effort to replicate what we no longer have.
Is it any wonder that when Jesus called us to experience life to the full that He included in that calling the need to take up our cross to follow Him? Perhaps the risk of death nay, the eventual guarantee of death, is required to fully appreciate the heights that only life can provide. Perhaps that is why God gave us this unlimited Universe to pursue unlimited challenges as He knew we would eventually tame this world and in turn would always need more to challenge our wild hearts made in His image. Perhaps our lack of perceived meaning comes not from the fact that there is no meaning but that we've removed all the risk that is required for us to truly feel all life has to offer!
Published on November 06, 2015 13:08
August 1, 2015
This Perfect World
Have you ever had the task of having to break absolutely terrible news to another person? News like a loved one has died, or that someone only has a short time to live? Several times, in my law enforcement career I have had the very unfortunate duty of performing the dreaded death notification. There have been few moments in my life more awkward than knocking on the door of some complete stranger who is having a perfectly normal day, knowing I am about to destroy their world with the news I'm going to share. They don't even realize yet they are already having perhaps the worst day of their life. To watch the kind smile melt away from their face as they lock eyes with you and begin to realize that something is terribly wrong. You can almost see them begin to brace themselves for something awful as you open your mouth and the words seem to crawl out. Their reaction to what is being said seems delayed as they try to process such monumentally impactful information. Then it hits. The melt down. That moment when all the air is sucked out of the room and absolutely nothing else matters as the most pure, raw, and human of emotions come pouring out. That moment when it doesn't matter who is around, it doesn't matter what we look like, who we are, or where we are from, nothing really matters. For those not directly emotionally invested in the situation it is extremely awkward to sit and watch someone completely break down. The immediate temptation is to try to quell the situation. To begin to console and tell them it will be okay. All the while knowing it won't be "okay." It will be "okay" that you lost your daughter, it will be "okay" that you husband will never come home again, it will be "okay?" Really? It will be "okay?" No it won't. You may eventually move on, you may come to terms with something like this, but it will never be "okay." I've learned that the temptation to say such thinks comes much more from my discomfort of the situation rather than theirs. As people, I don't think we realize how used to being fake we have become. And in these moments when we experience 100 percent pure, unrestrained, humanity, our immediate reaction is to try to cram it all back into the bottle from whence it came as quickly as possible. Nothing will make us feel more like a fraud than being around something that is completely genuine. And few things are more genuine than a grieving person. Time and time again I hear from people who have suffered the loss of loved ones that after the funeral, everyone disappears and goes back to their regular lives, fully expecting the same for them. After a week or two they feel they are expected to have "gotten over it" or "moved on." When our lives are upset, we tend to want to race back to the way things were as quickly a possible, and we seem to want that for other people as well.
What is it? What is it about being completely real that scares us? Why do we ask people how they are doing when honestly, unless the answer is "good" we really don't want to hear about it? Everything about the human existence is really about being fake isn't it? We hide our emotions, we hide our bodies, as I already mentioned, plastic surgery is one of the biggest industries around. We prim and prep, we literally spend billions of dollars on making ourselves look different than we do while people across the world are starving and struggling to survive. Somewhere along the line, perception became much more important than truth. We became more infatuated with what people think about us than who we really are. The truth is that I'm 50, but I want people to think I'm 40, the truth is that I weigh 140 pounds but I want to wear clothing that makes it look like I weigh 120. The truth is I'm balding but I put on a wig so people think I have hair. On and on it goes.
There is something so symbolic about the idea that man and woman were created naked. They were created as they were, with nothing to hide, nothing to be ashamed of, nothing to be fake about. They were truly and completely transparent. Yet in today's world, one of the most humiliating things you could do to another person would be to strip them naked in public. It's viewed an dehumanizing. Isn't that interesting? It's dehumanizing to reveal someones true humanity? Isn't it ironic that uncovering the very body God created us to have is dehumanizing or obscene?
What I find interesting about the physical world that we live in is that it seems to constantly be calling us to be real. We have a tendency to look around this Earth and see it as flawed. We see the existence of things like earthquakes, tsunamis, and hurricanes as attributes of a broken world. Things like cancer and disease are all signs that our realm is far from perfect. But is it really? After all, for something to be perfect is really more dependent on the task or the objective than it is the item itself is it not? If I'm trying to knit a sweater and someone hands me a hammer I might say the hammer is completely flawed. But is it flawed, or is it just not the right thing for the job I have in mind? When we say the world isn't perfect, why is that? What is the standard we have in mind when we declare this world to be imperfect? Personally, I would wager to say that most people have happiness in mind when they make that claim. Imagine how much happier we would be if these negative aspects of life didn't exist. Imagine how wonderful it would be if nobody got sick, if there was no suffering, etc. And if God's purpose in creating the world in which we dwell was for us to be happy, then I think its pretty safe to say He failed, as there is plenty of suffering out there. One of the biggest gripes about this world isn't even that there is suffering. It's actually that there is suffering among the good and the innocent. Few people have a problem with the evil suffering. In fact, most of us kind of like the idea. But imagine a world where only the bad people's houses got washed away in floods, only the evil got sick, only the cruel had accidents all the while the good prospered. What might that world look like? I would imagine in a world like that there would not exist evil people. Once everyone put together that only the evil suffered, you would have to be an idiot to continue to live a bad life. You would literally have the entire world manipulating us away from being evil. Everyone would be good because the world would force it from us. Then, once everyone was good, nothing bad would ever happen any more. Paradise right? A perfect world. The only thing is, nobody would be real. People would only act the way they do because they were made to by a very coercive reality.
But we don't live in that type of place. We live in a world where bad things happen to good people and good things happen to bad people. We live in a world were sometime the evil prosper and the righteous suffer. Its a random world where the outcomes don't always align with positive inputs. Its a flawed world right? Unless of course happiness wasn't what God had in mind when He made this place. What if God made this place not to make us happy but to make us real?
In a world that rewards everyone for being good and punishes everyone for being bad, we never get to see who is really good or bad. But what of a random world? A world where one is not always rewarded for their charity or punished for their infidelity, what then? It is when we live in a world where sometimes the innocent suffer, sometimes the wicked thrive, sometimes the good succeed and sometimes they fail, a world where it rains evenly on the righteous and the unrighteous, that we are more likely to see who people REALLY are. We can know the good man is truly good because the world does not always reward him for it, we can know the evil man is evil as likewise the world doesn't always punish. What if authenticity was God's goal when He made this beautifully unpredictable world, this world that seems to constantly be trying to extract and coax our true selves out into the light? If that was God's desire .....then perhaps this is a perfect world.
What is it? What is it about being completely real that scares us? Why do we ask people how they are doing when honestly, unless the answer is "good" we really don't want to hear about it? Everything about the human existence is really about being fake isn't it? We hide our emotions, we hide our bodies, as I already mentioned, plastic surgery is one of the biggest industries around. We prim and prep, we literally spend billions of dollars on making ourselves look different than we do while people across the world are starving and struggling to survive. Somewhere along the line, perception became much more important than truth. We became more infatuated with what people think about us than who we really are. The truth is that I'm 50, but I want people to think I'm 40, the truth is that I weigh 140 pounds but I want to wear clothing that makes it look like I weigh 120. The truth is I'm balding but I put on a wig so people think I have hair. On and on it goes.
There is something so symbolic about the idea that man and woman were created naked. They were created as they were, with nothing to hide, nothing to be ashamed of, nothing to be fake about. They were truly and completely transparent. Yet in today's world, one of the most humiliating things you could do to another person would be to strip them naked in public. It's viewed an dehumanizing. Isn't that interesting? It's dehumanizing to reveal someones true humanity? Isn't it ironic that uncovering the very body God created us to have is dehumanizing or obscene?
What I find interesting about the physical world that we live in is that it seems to constantly be calling us to be real. We have a tendency to look around this Earth and see it as flawed. We see the existence of things like earthquakes, tsunamis, and hurricanes as attributes of a broken world. Things like cancer and disease are all signs that our realm is far from perfect. But is it really? After all, for something to be perfect is really more dependent on the task or the objective than it is the item itself is it not? If I'm trying to knit a sweater and someone hands me a hammer I might say the hammer is completely flawed. But is it flawed, or is it just not the right thing for the job I have in mind? When we say the world isn't perfect, why is that? What is the standard we have in mind when we declare this world to be imperfect? Personally, I would wager to say that most people have happiness in mind when they make that claim. Imagine how much happier we would be if these negative aspects of life didn't exist. Imagine how wonderful it would be if nobody got sick, if there was no suffering, etc. And if God's purpose in creating the world in which we dwell was for us to be happy, then I think its pretty safe to say He failed, as there is plenty of suffering out there. One of the biggest gripes about this world isn't even that there is suffering. It's actually that there is suffering among the good and the innocent. Few people have a problem with the evil suffering. In fact, most of us kind of like the idea. But imagine a world where only the bad people's houses got washed away in floods, only the evil got sick, only the cruel had accidents all the while the good prospered. What might that world look like? I would imagine in a world like that there would not exist evil people. Once everyone put together that only the evil suffered, you would have to be an idiot to continue to live a bad life. You would literally have the entire world manipulating us away from being evil. Everyone would be good because the world would force it from us. Then, once everyone was good, nothing bad would ever happen any more. Paradise right? A perfect world. The only thing is, nobody would be real. People would only act the way they do because they were made to by a very coercive reality.
But we don't live in that type of place. We live in a world where bad things happen to good people and good things happen to bad people. We live in a world were sometime the evil prosper and the righteous suffer. Its a random world where the outcomes don't always align with positive inputs. Its a flawed world right? Unless of course happiness wasn't what God had in mind when He made this place. What if God made this place not to make us happy but to make us real?
In a world that rewards everyone for being good and punishes everyone for being bad, we never get to see who is really good or bad. But what of a random world? A world where one is not always rewarded for their charity or punished for their infidelity, what then? It is when we live in a world where sometimes the innocent suffer, sometimes the wicked thrive, sometimes the good succeed and sometimes they fail, a world where it rains evenly on the righteous and the unrighteous, that we are more likely to see who people REALLY are. We can know the good man is truly good because the world does not always reward him for it, we can know the evil man is evil as likewise the world doesn't always punish. What if authenticity was God's goal when He made this beautifully unpredictable world, this world that seems to constantly be trying to extract and coax our true selves out into the light? If that was God's desire .....then perhaps this is a perfect world.
Published on August 01, 2015 14:22