ريتشارد دوكنز's Blog, page 779

February 3, 2015

Scientists Discover Microbes That Have Remained Essentially Unchanged For 2 Billion Years

Environment





Photo credit:

UCLA. A section of the 1.8-billion-year-old fossil bearing rock.



A team of scientists has discovered a remarkable type of deep-sea bacterium that appears to have remained essentially unchanged for over 2 billion years. To put that into perspective, that’s almost half the age of our planet. Interestingly, rather than contradicting Darwin’s theory of evolution, this example of extreme stasis actually lends support to Darwinian evolution.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 03, 2015 09:19

February 1, 2015

VIDEO CHAT: The Unholy Trinity Goes to Australia

The Atheist Foundation of Australia is hosting a “Down Under” tour with Matt Dillahunty, AronRa and Seth Andrews in March 2015. Join them for a casual chat about the “trinity,” the trip, and whatever else comes up in conversation.


Details: http://www.unholytrinitydownunder.com

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 01, 2015 09:42

Just Why Is The Abyss Gazing At You?

Nietzsche in Beyond Good and Evil section 146 writes, “Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And when you look into an abyss, the abyss also looks into you.” Now Zach Wiener at Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal gives us more never known before information: Click either comic panel [Read More...]
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 01, 2015 09:36

SciShow Talk Show: Animal Weapons with Doug Emlen & A Southern Three-Banded Armadillo

This week on the SciShow Talk Show Doug Emlen talks about big animal weapons! Jessi from Animal Wonders joins the show to show off her southern three-banded armadillo.


Link to Doug’s book: http://www.amazon.com/Animal-Weapons-The-Evolution-Battle/dp/1494552574

———-

Like SciShow? Want to help support us, and also get things to put on your walls, cover your torso and hold your liquids? Check out our awesome products over at DFTBA Records: http://dftba.com/scishow


Or help support us by subscribing to our page on Subbable: https://subbable.com/scishow

———-

Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/scishow

Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/scishow

Tumblr: http://scishow.tumblr.com


Thanks Tank Tumblr: http://thankstank.tumblr.com

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 01, 2015 09:00

God Did it – Episode 2

Ian Juby is still wrong about everything.

Support me on Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/armouredskeptic

One-time contribution with PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=JAAB9KT5N9RKC


Watch me on Richard Dawkins Foundation: https://richarddawkins.net/community/secularstars/thearmouredskeptic/


Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ArmouredSkeptic


Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/ArmouredSkeptic


Share on Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/103920182536182816144/

_____________________________________________________


Original Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DubjzG5r358


Fossils in SC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-9G3M7bt60


More fossils in SC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSrTXdakBlI


Ice-age in SC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1tygMNwDf8

_____________________________________________________


End-theme: Strange Ways, Silent Partner – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-6PUE5urgg


All images, sounds and loops are royalty-free.

Everything else is covered under fair-use.


I’m off to enjoy a glass of Whiskey and a Cigar.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 01, 2015 08:00

January 29, 2015

Empathy, Sympathy, and Activism: When Confrontation Fails

General

I’ve been thinking about the ethics and benefits of confrontational activist strategies lately. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s birthday remembrance, amid the ongoing protests over police abuses in Ferguson and elsewhere, shaped those thoughts, as does NCSE’s success using non-confrontational approaches, as well as some confrontations that have backfired.



Disruptive protests have a long and successful history, including sit-ins and protest marches in the era of Selma, and picket lines in labor battles. Critiques of those approaches have a long history, too. Martin Luther King Jr.’s 1963 Letter from a Birmingham Jail addressed such criticism, acknowledging but rejecting those critiques, emphasizing that such action is appropriate when no alternative exists, and that such direct action must be strategic, creating conditions which lead to peaceful settlement:




Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored. My citing the creation of tension as part of the work of the nonviolent resister may sound rather shocking. But I must confess that I am not afraid of the word “tension.” I have earnestly opposed violent tension, but there is a type of constructive, nonviolent tension which is necessary for growth. Just as Socrates felt that it was necessary to create a tension in the mind so that individuals could rise from the bondage of myths and half truths to the unfettered realm of creative analysis and objective appraisal, so must we see the need for nonviolent gadflies to create the kind of tension in society that will help men rise from the dark depths of prejudice and racism to the majestic heights of understanding and brotherhood. The purpose of our direct action program is to create a situation so crisis packed that it will inevitably open the door to negotiation.




While my inclination, and NCSE’s general practice, leans against disruptive and hostile protests, sometimes they work, and indeed are necessary. I’ve been trying to suss out how to draw those lines. I’d like to start with some ways that confrontation can go wrong, and then explore how confrontation can work.



Two confrontational billboards from American Atheists, and less confrontational approaches in billboards from Freedom From Religion Foundation and the United Coalition of Reason billboard campaign. Which approach seems more likely to acomplish the goals of helping people come out as atheists and encouraging nonatheists to view atheists favorably?

Philosopher of science Massimo Pigliucci makes several cogent arguments against confrontation, specifically addressing self-described “firebrand” atheist billboard campaigns:




the older I get the less I think that being offensive on purpose gets you anywhere. Few will listen to you if you start out the conversation by telling them that they are idiots.



[S]econd… since I consider it a moral failing when religious fundamentalists behave in a “firebrand” fashion, coherence leads me to make the same judgment call when it is my fellow atheists who do it.



Third, I think in-your-face atheism is pernicious because it projects exactly the wrong image of atheism to the rest of the world, reinforcing the already prevalent stereotype of atheists as callous, self-righteous individuals who are out to destroy civilization as we know it.




To expand on and generalize that last point, I think that wise and effective tactics are those that encourage sympathy, and hopefully even empathy, from the protester’s audience, and ideally from the targets themselves. To be clear, I’m distinguishing sympathy—understanding someone else’s feelings—from empathy—feeling someone else’s feelings as one’s own. I think that a crucial element of successful advocacy is an attempt to elicit empathy, in this sense, to put the audience and the target of your protest in your shoes. That’s what generates the crisis King refers to, an internal crisis that must be resolved through external action.



We see how confrontation goes awry in a Daily Show segment poking fun at a civil rights fight in North Carolina. The Freedom From Religion Foundation put pressure on a diner in North Carolina, asking them to stop a policy which gave people a 15% discount if they prayed before they ate. FFRF rightly objected that this policy would tend to discriminate against atheists (and Christians who take Matthew 6:1-6 seriously), thus violating the Civil Rights Act of 1965. FFRF’s Dan Barker, interviewed by Daily Show correspondent Jordan Klepper, compared his group’s effort to key moments in the desegregation battle of the ‘60s: “Under the law, Selma and a 15% discount are the same thing,” he said, to much mockery. He also drew a misplaced analogy to genocide (to make the simple point that a small violation of civil rights is still a violation of civil rights). In the end, FFRF, which was trying to do the right thing, came off looking (to put it mildly) unsympathetic—it was hard for viewers to understand the feelings behind Barker’s objection, much less to take them as their own—and the performance may harm the organization’s image.



Even FFRF’s allies had trouble standing by it. Hemant Mehta, the Friendly Atheist, summarized: “The segment didn’t make atheists look good, and it wasn’t entirely the result of editing. Barker gave the writers the red meat they wanted. He shouldn’t have.” Barker’s approach didn’t engender empathy or even sympathy in the viewer, and I think it’s in large part because the tactics FFRF used and the interview clips of Barker display no empathy for the diner owner.



The diner changed its policy, so FFRF’s approach worked in a sense, but I can’t help wondering what might have happened if they'd taken a softer approach. For someone who says grace before a meal, that act seems wholesome and inclusive and worth celebrating, and while I don’t share that feeling, I understand the desire to reward such behavior. An owner who doesn’t know people who don’t say grace might never realize that others don’t do the same, or don’t feel the same way. She may never have considered how her policy made her customers feel. Legal threats might scare her into changing policy, but create the wrong sort of crisis, making her see civil rights activists and atheists as the enemy, as an obstacle to get around, not as people to understand. If someone who doesn’t say grace had a personal chat with her about the policy, it might have led her to revise the policy because she understood that person's feelings. It would have been a learning experience that  made her more sympathetic to the situation of atheists and other religious minorities. She would have made their crisis her own, and changed the policy because she wanted to, not because she was scared.



Naturally, the same calculus applies to conflicts over teaching evolution or creationism. Many teachers who present creationism—and parents opposing evolution—assume everyone sees the world through the same religious and cultural lenses. They don’t realize that other views exist, and how their actions harm others. (Then again, some know exactly what’s afoot and do it anyway.) Having a polite conversation with the creationist in that scenario is sometimes enough to resolve the issue, especially if you take time to show empathy toward them: asking what their concerns are, being open to possible solutions, and honestly sharing how their actions are hurtful.



That’s how NCSE generally proceeds, and we urge others to take this approach in a crisis. It won't take lawsuits or other more aggressive actions off the table, but it lead to a compromise that protects science education and opens the door for someone who rejects evolution (or climate change, etc.) to see things differently. Confrontation might prevent science denial from sneaking into the classroom, but does it make people share our desire to support great science education?

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 29, 2015 12:41

Atheist Experience #95: Signs from God

The Atheist Experience #95 for August 8, 1999, with Ray Blevins, Don Rhoades, and David Bagley. Signs from God.


We welcome your comments on the open blog thread for this show.

http://freethoughtblogs.com/axp/


YouTube comments are at present disabled in our channel, to the displeasure of some. However, each video has a prominent link to the associated open thread that appears on our blog. In the past we’ve tried opening up the channel to comments, but we found that a very high number of episodes wound up being flooded with a combination of spam, long winded apologists, and various obscene or misogynistic comments directed at various hosts by people with an axe to grind. This seems to be the nature of YouTube comment sections, in our experience.


We do moderate the blog, the same way that we moderate chat during the show, as well as comments on our Facebook group. For comment sections that are “officially” associated with our show (and, to a much lesser extent, channels that may give the unintended appearance of being official), we prefer not to play host to straight up ad hominem attacks and bigotry. As a general policy we do not block commenters simply on the basis of disagreement with our point of view. However, we do prefer discussion environments that don’t actively chase off more reasonable contributors.


——-


The most up to date Atheist Experience videos can be found by visiting http://atheist-experience.com/archive/


You can read more about this show on the Atheist Experience blog:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/axp/


WHAT IS THE ATHEIST EXPERIENCE?


The Atheist Experience is a weekly cable access television show in Austin, Texas geared at a non-atheist audience. The Atheist Experience is produced by the Atheist Community of Austin.


The Atheist Community of Austin is organized as a nonprofit educational corporation to develop and support the atheist community, to provide opportunities for socializing and friendship, to promote secular viewpoints, to encourage positive atheist culture, to defend the first amendment principle of state-church separation, to oppose discrimination against atheists and to work with other organizations in pursuit of common goals.


We define atheism as the lack of belief in gods. This definition also encompasses what most people call agnosticism.


VISIT THE ACA’S OFFICIAL WEB SITES


http://www.atheist-community.org (The Atheist Community of Austin)

http://www.atheist-experience.com (The Atheist Experience TV Show)


More shows and video clips can be found in the archive:

http://www.atheist-experience.com/archive


DVDs of the Atheist Experience can be purchased via:

http://www.atheist-community.org/products


MUSIC CREDITS


Theme song: “Listen to Reason,” written and performed by Bryan Steeksma.

http://www.youtube.com/bryansteeksma

http://www.myspace.com/bryansteeksma


NOTES


TheAtheistExperience is the official channel of The Atheist Experience. “The Atheist Experience” is a trademark of the ACA.


Copyright © 2014 Atheist Community of Austin. All rights reserved.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 29, 2015 11:24

Atheist Experience #94: US Foreign Policy

The Atheist Experience #94 for August 1, 1999, with Ray Blevins, Jeff Dee, Bob Jensen, Rahul Mahajan. US Foreign Policy.


We welcome your comments on the open blog thread for this show.

http://freethoughtblogs.com/axp/


YouTube comments are at present disabled in our channel, to the displeasure of some. However, each video has a prominent link to the associated open thread that appears on our blog. In the past we’ve tried opening up the channel to comments, but we found that a very high number of episodes wound up being flooded with a combination of spam, long winded apologists, and various obscene or misogynistic comments directed at various hosts by people with an axe to grind. This seems to be the nature of YouTube comment sections, in our experience.


We do moderate the blog, the same way that we moderate chat during the show, as well as comments on our Facebook group. For comment sections that are “officially” associated with our show (and, to a much lesser extent, channels that may give the unintended appearance of being official), we prefer not to play host to straight up ad hominem attacks and bigotry. As a general policy we do not block commenters simply on the basis of disagreement with our point of view. However, we do prefer discussion environments that don’t actively chase off more reasonable contributors.


——-


The most up to date Atheist Experience videos can be found by visiting http://atheist-experience.com/archive/


You can read more about this show on the Atheist Experience blog:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/axp/


WHAT IS THE ATHEIST EXPERIENCE?


The Atheist Experience is a weekly cable access television show in Austin, Texas geared at a non-atheist audience. The Atheist Experience is produced by the Atheist Community of Austin.


The Atheist Community of Austin is organized as a nonprofit educational corporation to develop and support the atheist community, to provide opportunities for socializing and friendship, to promote secular viewpoints, to encourage positive atheist culture, to defend the first amendment principle of state-church separation, to oppose discrimination against atheists and to work with other organizations in pursuit of common goals.


We define atheism as the lack of belief in gods. This definition also encompasses what most people call agnosticism.


VISIT THE ACA’S OFFICIAL WEB SITES


http://www.atheist-community.org (The Atheist Community of Austin)

http://www.atheist-experience.com (The Atheist Experience TV Show)


More shows and video clips can be found in the archive:

http://www.atheist-experience.com/archive


DVDs of the Atheist Experience can be purchased via:

http://www.atheist-community.org/products


MUSIC CREDITS


Theme song: “Listen to Reason,” written and performed by Bryan Steeksma.

http://www.youtube.com/bryansteeksma

http://www.myspace.com/bryansteeksma


NOTES


TheAtheistExperience is the official channel of The Atheist Experience. “The Atheist Experience” is a trademark of the ACA.


Copyright © 2014 Atheist Community of Austin. All rights reserved.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 29, 2015 10:27

Atheist Experience #93

The Atheist Experience #93 for July 25, 1999, with Jeff Dee, Manda, and Susan Brown.


We welcome your comments on the open blog thread for this show.

http://freethoughtblogs.com/axp/


YouTube comments are at present disabled in our channel, to the displeasure of some. However, each video has a prominent link to the associated open thread that appears on our blog. In the past we’ve tried opening up the channel to comments, but we found that a very high number of episodes wound up being flooded with a combination of spam, long winded apologists, and various obscene or misogynistic comments directed at various hosts by people with an axe to grind. This seems to be the nature of YouTube comment sections, in our experience.


We do moderate the blog, the same way that we moderate chat during the show, as well as comments on our Facebook group. For comment sections that are “officially” associated with our show (and, to a much lesser extent, channels that may give the unintended appearance of being official), we prefer not to play host to straight up ad hominem attacks and bigotry. As a general policy we do not block commenters simply on the basis of disagreement with our point of view. However, we do prefer discussion environments that don’t actively chase off more reasonable contributors.


——-


The most up to date Atheist Experience videos can be found by visiting http://atheist-experience.com/archive/


You can read more about this show on the Atheist Experience blog:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/axp/


WHAT IS THE ATHEIST EXPERIENCE?


The Atheist Experience is a weekly cable access television show in Austin, Texas geared at a non-atheist audience. The Atheist Experience is produced by the Atheist Community of Austin.


The Atheist Community of Austin is organized as a nonprofit educational corporation to develop and support the atheist community, to provide opportunities for socializing and friendship, to promote secular viewpoints, to encourage positive atheist culture, to defend the first amendment principle of state-church separation, to oppose discrimination against atheists and to work with other organizations in pursuit of common goals.


We define atheism as the lack of belief in gods. This definition also encompasses what most people call agnosticism.


VISIT THE ACA’S OFFICIAL WEB SITES


http://www.atheist-community.org (The Atheist Community of Austin)

http://www.atheist-experience.com (The Atheist Experience TV Show)


More shows and video clips can be found in the archive:

http://www.atheist-experience.com/archive


DVDs of the Atheist Experience can be purchased via:

http://www.atheist-community.org/products


MUSIC CREDITS


Theme song: “Listen to Reason,” written and performed by Bryan Steeksma.

http://www.youtube.com/bryansteeksma

http://www.myspace.com/bryansteeksma


NOTES


TheAtheistExperience is the official channel of The Atheist Experience. “The Atheist Experience” is a trademark of the ACA.


Copyright © 2014 Atheist Community of Austin. All rights reserved.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 29, 2015 09:59

ريتشارد دوكنز's Blog

ريتشارد دوكنز
ريتشارد دوكنز isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow ريتشارد دوكنز's blog with rss.