ريتشارد دوكنز's Blog, page 618

December 9, 2015

The Ethics Of Climate Change: What We Owe People – And The Rest Of The Planet

Environment





Photo credit:

ricochet64 / Shutterstock



Ethics is a particularly relevant if underreported topic of conversation at the United Nations conference on climate change in Paris. While technical disputes grab the lion’s share of attention, we should not forget the moral reasons we must address global warming – because of the substantial harm it does and will do to the human and nonhuman world.


Climate justice refers to the disproportional impact of climate change on poor and marginalized populations, while climate equity refers to who should bear the burden of responsibility for addressing climate change.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 09, 2015 09:30

Nazis, Lies And Spying Private Detectives: How Thalidomide’s Maker Avoided Justice

Health and Medicine





Photo credit:

Stephencdickson / Wikimedia Commons



THALIDOMIDE SERIES: In December 2013, a class action by Australian and New Zealand victims of the drug thalidomide reached an A$89 million settlement with Diageo, the company that now owns Distillers, which distributed the drug in the region.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 09, 2015 09:18

GM Crops Can Benefit Organic Farmers Too

Environment





Photo credit:

igor.stevanovic / Shutterstock



Have you eaten organic food today? If you have eaten anything, then technically you’ve eaten organic. By definition, all food is organic, it just may not have been grown under industry standards, such as Australian Certified Organic (ACO).


Most people who choose to eat certified organic do so because they believe it is cleaner and greener, or chemical free. But the most modern cultivated plants are genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and so are precluded from being certified organic.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 09, 2015 09:00

December 8, 2015

First U.S. Penis Transplants To Begin Next Year

Health and Medicine





Photo credit:

The penis transplant aims to help veterans with severe genitourinary injuries. Oleg Ivanov IL/Shutterstock



In 2016, surgeons from Johns Hopkins University are going to perform 60 penis transplants, a type of operation which has never been conducted before in the U.S. The first will be an unnamed patient injured in Afghanistan.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 08, 2015 15:26

Stretchy Hydrogel “Band-Aid” Can Be Used On Bendy Joints

Technology





Photo credit:

A sheet of the hydrogel is shown with electrical components embedded. Melanie Gonick/MIT



Getting a cut, scrape or graze on the body’s bendy bits can be a frustrating experience, as Band-Aids just never seem to stay stuck on these joints. However, the recent invention of a novel ultra-stretchy gel could herald the beginning of a new age in wound healing, leading to the creation of superior dressings that are not only far stickier than anything that has come before, but can also incorporate sensors, medications, and a range of smart electronic components.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 08, 2015 15:24

Grab some pine, meat!

I want that! I want that! I want that!

“Ownage is ownage.” That’s what Mike Krukow, one half—along with Duane Kuiper—of the legendary San Francisco Giants broadcasting team, says when a great hitter just can’t get a hit on a certain pitcher. Or a great pitcher just can’t seem to get a certain hitter out. In my book, when it comes to explaining reality, science should have ownage over politics. Because you know that old Daniel Patrick Moynihan quote: everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts. And science is a powerful way to determine what the facts are. But lately, in the House Science Committee, politics is trying hard to establish ownage over science.



Michael E. Mann is one of many scientists crying foul. Mann, Distinguished Professor of Meteorology and Director of the Earth System Science Center atGrab some pine, meat!We have the ultimate weapon on our side. Scientific truth. It may take time to win out, but it ultimately it will prevail.

the Pennsylvania State University, graduated with honors from the University of California, Berkeley, with an A.B. in applied mathematics and physics. He went on to earn his Ph.D. in geology and geophysics from Yale University. He was one of the lead authors of the “Observed Climate Variability and Change” chapter of the third IPCC Third Assessment Report, published in 2001, which helped to win the 2007 Nobel Peace prize for the IPCC. He is perhaps most famous for a 1999 paper that included the original “hockey stick” graph showing a dramatic increase in the Earth’s temperature since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. TL;DR version: the guy’s got some serious scientific chops.



Mann is also famous for being the target of attacks in 2005 by Rep. Joe L. Barton (R–Texas) and Senator Jim Inhofe (R–Oklahoma)—he of the snowball in the Senate chamber incident. Barton sought access to all of Mann’s personal e-mails and notes in an effort to show that the hockey stick results were concocted by a scientific conspiracy. The Inspector General of the United States, the Office of the Inspector General, and the National Science Foundation, in three separate inquiries, eventually totally exonerated Mann. It was a wrenching experience, but one that inspired Mann to step up his efforts as a spokesman for science and the importance of protecting the scientific enterprise from political interference. (In the next issue of Reports of the National Center for Science Education, we have an interview with Mann (a member of NCSE’s advisory council) that describes how “Climategate” changed his life. (Shameless plug: join NCSE today to get RNCSE in your mailbox in January.)



[image error]Rep. Lamar S. Smith, R-Texas

Meanwhile, Congressman Lamar Smith (R–Texas) also went to Yale. He says that he intended to study physics there, but, as a first-year student in a physics class, “I soon realized that I was sitting next to the future Einsteins of the world, and I wasn't one of them.” That, apparently, is where his formal acquaintance with science, and any possible comparison to Michael Mann, ends. From Yale, Smith went on to law school, practiced for a couple of years, then went into politics. He’s been a member of Congress since 1986 and on the House Science Committee for 26 years. In 2011 he became its chair. He was already known as a staunch rejecter of the scientific evidence for climate change (I won’t dignify that with the word “skeptic”).



Terrifyingly, of the three Republican Science Committee members seeking the committee chairmanship back in 2011, Smith was arguably the least crazy contestant with respect to climate change. That was, I should add, a low bar, as one of his rival­s, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R–California), suggested in a hearing that dinosaur farts contributed to past global warming, while the other, Rep. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R–Wisconsin), once claimed that the EPA might require farmers to put catalytic converters on cows to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Well, Smith won the chairmanship, but Sensenbrenner and Rohrabacher are still on the committee, so there’s a whole lot of crazy to go around.



Frankly, though, I’d prefer any amount of crazy talk to what Smith has been up to, which is, as I’ve written about here and here, seeking scientists’ and government officials’ personal e-mails on the theory (n.b.: not theory in the scientific sense of a unifying explanation for a wide range of natural phenomena, but theory in the vernacular sense of a wild idea for which there is no evidence whatsoever) that they have subverted the scientific process and conspired to publish fraudulent information. In short, Smith is accusing scientists and government officials of manipulating data, lying about it, and withholding evidence.



Those are serious accusations, for which there is—as Krukow would say—none evidence. Nevertheless, in the face of near-universal criticism from scientists, scientific societies, and his Democratic committee colleagues, Smith is doubling down on his postulations that scientists have something to hide and he has the right to ask them for anything he wants.



And that’s where Michael Mann comes in. In an opinion piece published today in The New York Times entitled “The Assault on Climate Science,” Mann describes Smith’s various attempts to bully and intimidate scientists. But perhaps what is most chilling about Mann’s article is this: when Mann himself was under attack from Rep. Barton and Sen. Inhofe, many members of Congress from both sides of the aisle came to his defense, including Rep. Sherwood Boehlert (R–New York, then the House Science Committee chair) and Sen. John McCain (R–Arizona). Today, by contrast, in Mann’s words: “Mr. Smith’s efforts at intimidation have met with no resistance from his fellow Republicans.”



The intensifying polarization between Republicans and Democrats has so many terrible consequences for our country, but from my point of view, the dragging of science into the mix is particularly distressing. It means discrediting the best tool we have for objectively investigating the world around us. For politicians, it means rejecting one of the best possible ways to explain to voters why it’s sometimes important to take difficult political decisions. And for NCSE, turning science into a political football means that even more science teachers will be uncomfortable presenting the science of evolution and climate change forthrightly and without apology.



Grab some pine, meat!Altogether now: "You're out!"

It’s high time for Smith’s Republican colleagues to stand up for science, to object to the politically motivated use of intimidation tactics, and to tell Smith—to use a baseball metaphor—that he has struck out, looked silly in the process, and needs to go sit on the bench now. If they like, I bet Mike Krukow wouldn’t mind if they used another of his trademark phrases (at 1:21 in this review of the immortal Kruk and Kuip bobblehead): “Grab some pine, meat!”



 



 

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 08, 2015 14:23

Amazing Image Reveals How Dolphins See The World

Plants and Animals





Photo credit:

Willyam Bradberry/Shutterstock



In a world first, scientists have been able to capture how dolphins use sound waves to create a perception of the world around them. 


To record the echolocation signals, scientists from Miami and the United Kingdom used a technique called CymaScope, an imaging process which is able to imprint sonic vibrations of water.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 08, 2015 13:44

Cockroaches Attract Each Other With Their Poop

Plants and Animals





Photo credit:

An aggregation of German cockroach nymphs. Ayako Wada-Katsumata/NC State



Cockroaches can communicate using their feces, according to a new study. Researchers studying roach aggregation behaviors found that compounds produced by bacteria in the gut of roaches help bring the insects together. The findings, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences this week, suggest that microbial communities in the gut may play a role in insect-to-insect communication.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 08, 2015 13:13

Enigmatic New Humpback Whale Song Frequency Heard in Hawaii

Plants and Animals





Photo credit:

Humpback whales in the waters around Hawaii have been recorded making some unusual sounds. Whit Welles via Wikimedia Commons



 


Humpback whales have for years left marine biologists dazzled and mystified with their eerily beautiful yet bafflingly complex array of songs. Though they have always been known for their wide vocal range, humpbacks in the waters around Hawaii have recently been observed producing bursts of sound at much lower frequencies than any previously recorded, adding to the sense of mystery surrounding their choral behavior.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 08, 2015 13:09

Protect the Right Places For Biodiversity

“Protected areas are hugely important for conservation. Over the last 20 years there’s been a massive growth in the number of protected areas, both in the marine realm and the terrestrial realm.”


James Watson with the Wildlife Conservation Society’s Global Conservation Program.


“But what we’re noticing is that these protected areas aren’t well placed. They don’t really stop biodiversity loss in many places, because they’re not where important areas of biodiversity is. We also notice that protected areas aren’t well managed and therefore often protected areas don’t actually lead to any significant conservation outcome.”


To address these issues Watson and colleagues published a blueprint describing how “the scientific community can actually really help national governments and protected area managers really place protected areas that really prioritize important biodiversity areas and achieve ecological representation.”


Their report is in the journal Conservation Biology. [James E.M. Watson et al, Bolder science needed now for protected areas]


“Protected areas aren’t the only tool in the toolbox and we’ve got to make sure that other efforts actually work together holistically with protected areas. So scientists can help identify metrics that help allow us to assess this. In these three ways, scientists can really help the conservation movement ensure that the protected areas are in the right place and managed effectively and can achieve conservation outcomes in the long-term.”


—Steve Mirsky


(The above text is a transcript of this podcast)

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 08, 2015 12:34

ريتشارد دوكنز's Blog

ريتشارد دوكنز
ريتشارد دوكنز isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow ريتشارد دوكنز's blog with rss.