Len Gutman's Blog, page 17

March 14, 2012

AFI #58: The Gold Rush

The Gold Rush is the second Charlie Chaplin silent film on the AFI Top 100 list and there's yet one more down the line. This one finds our hero the little tramp on the Alaskan frontier trying to make it big during the gold rush. This one is really slow for my money and not nearly as funny as Modern Times and I suspect not nearly as good as City Lights (at least I hope). I really don't see why AFI had to include three Chaplin films in the list since they are all pretty much the same. But hey, it's not my list.


I got bored with The Gold Rush and gave up after an hour.


Next Up: Rocky



Filed under: AFI Top 100
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 14, 2012 20:40

March 12, 2012

AFI #59: Nashville

I have a love/hate relationship with the late director Robert Altman. On the one hand, he made some films I really loved including MASH, Come Back to the Five and Dime, Jimmy Dean, Jimmy Dean, Fool For Love and one of my all-time favorites The Player. On the other hand, he also made some piles of dung including Popeye, Dr. T and the Women and Pret-a-Porter. He made Short Cuts, in which he pretty much ruined some of my favorite Raymond Carver short stories and gave us full frontal nudity by both Julianne Moore (thank you) and Huey Lewis (yuck). And then there was Nashville, which I watched for the first time this weekend. Nashville makes the AFI list, as does MASH. How can the AFI be so inconsistent?


For me, Nashville was 159 minutes of WTF! I can't say I hated it, but I definitely didn't like it. Again, we find ourselves in the early 70s where for some reason film directors feel compelled to shock and confuse us with so-called art. Nashville revolves around a handful of people in Nashville over the course of several days. The characters are interconnected, but it's not always clear how or why. There's the aging country singer trying to stay relevant. There's a television producer working on a concert for a non-traditional presidential candidate (we see vans for the candidate throughout the film and hear his ramblings over a loud speaker but never see him). There's a gospel singer with two deaf kids and a husband who has political aspirations. There's a BBC reporter wandering around town interviewing everyone she thinks is important. There's a young hippie woman visiting home from Los Angeles. There's a guy who shows up in town to make it in the music business. There's a woman hiding from her husband also trying to make it in the music business. There's a beautiful but untalented singer trying to make it in the music business. There's a young rock band on the verge of breakup. There's a famous country singer teetering on the edge of sanity. And of course there's Jeff Goldblum riding around on a three-wheel motorcycle picking up and dropping people off for no apparent reason. You get the idea — pure Altman madness.


The film shuffles back and forth between the characters and the conversations in dizzying fashion. Random people have sex with each other. There are many painstakingly complete musical performances from the characters (awful if you don't care for Grand Ole Opry style country music — and who does?). I don't have a problem with the sort of slice of life style of this film in which the viewer quickly bounces back and forth between scenes, but for me the trouble with Nashville lays in the lack of character depth. I don't have a clue about the motivations of these characters.


WARNING: SERIOUS SPOILER ALERTS


I don't know why Barbara Jean is so tortured. I don't know why Tom wants to sleep with Linnea so badly and I don't know why when they finally do sleep together she simply walks out afterward and he could give a shit despite hounding her for days to meet him and declaring his love for her. I don't know why L.A. Joan is in Nashville nor why she doesn't seem to care that her aunt is dying. I don't have a clue where presidential candidate Hal Phillip Walker stands on issues beyond his hatred of lawyers. I don't know why Elliott Gould and Julie Christie make random cameos as themselves. I have no idea if Opal actually works for the BBC or if she's just insane and I don't know why Jeff Goldblum is riding around on a motorcycle and doesn't have any lines in the film. And most of all, I have no flippin idea why Kenny randomly decides to shoot Barbara Jean! I don't even know if she's dead when the film ends. At least in Days of Our Lives we have some context. This is just random weirdness.


I think AFI has its head up its ass on this one. As for Altman, MASH deserves its high place of honor on this list…but The Player is so much better than Nashville. Not even close. Oh, and the Academy Award judges are clueless as well. Nashville was nominated for Best Picture and Best Director. It won for Best Song, a slow little ditty performed by that "well-known musical genius" Keith Carradine. Here, see how much of this garbage you can stand:



Next up: The Gold Rush



Filed under: AFI Top 100
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 12, 2012 20:06

March 11, 2012

AFI #60: Duck Soup

If you don't laugh while watching a Marx Brothers movie you are not a member of the human race. It's just not possible to not laugh. If I ever end up on death row my last wish is going to be to watch a Marx Brothers marathon. I guarantee I'll go out smiling.


Duck Soup is the second Marx Brothers feature on the AFI top 100, following A Night at the Opera at No. 85. I have to admit that if given the choice I preferred A Night at the Opera, but they are both hysterically funny films. In Duck Soup, Groucho plays Rufus T. Firefly, the newly selected president of Freedonia and while he's running around enjoying his time in the spotlight he is unaware of a secret plot my neighboring Sylvania which has designs on taking over Freedonia. Harpo and Chico play a pair of spies who have been asked to monitor the activities of Rufus T. Firefly. Hilarity ensues.


Like a lot of Marx Brothers features, the individual bits are more recognizable than the films. You may not have ever seen Duck Soup, but surely you have seen this famous scene:



Of course, the scene has been spoofed by tons of comedians including the famous spoof with Lucille Ball and Harpo Marx reenacting the scene in 1955 on an episode of I Love Lucy:



Trust me, if you're ever feeling down go on YouTube and watch some Marx Brothers bits. They won't solve your problems, but you'll surely forget about them for a while.


Next Up: Nashville



Filed under: AFI Top 100
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 11, 2012 12:55

March 5, 2012

AFI #61: Sullivan’s Travels

One of the reasons I decided to watch and blog about all of the films in the American Film Institute’s list of the Top 100 American films of all time was to discover some gems I hadn’t ever seen. Nearly 40 films into the list, I hadn’t really been blown away yet — until last night. I had never even heard of Sullivan’s Travels, No. 61 on the list. Admittedly, I was skeptical for that very reason, plus it was made all the way back in 1941. I held out some small hope only because it was made just a year after one of my favorite films, The Philadelphia Story. Not only did I enjoy Sullivan’s Travels, the screenplay reminded me of The Philadelphia Story because of its lovely sarcastic wit.


Sullivan’s Travels is the story of wealthy Hollywood director John L. Sullivan, who is tired of making fluffy comedies because America is in a depression and they deserve to feel the emotion of the times. When his studio points out he has no idea what it’s like to be one of the downtrodden, he foolishly decides to go undercover as a tramp to see what it’s like. He sets off in dirty and torn clothing with only a dime in his pocket to learn enough to make a “commentary on modern conditions, stark realism, the problems that confront the average man.” Along the way he meets a discouraged young actress who is ready to give up on her dreams, leave Hollywood and return home. Hilarity and powerful lessons about the human spirit ensue.


There is so much to like in this film. Sullivan is played by Joel McCrea, well-known for his many roles in Westerns. McCrea provides a real charm to the character that is reminiscent of Cary Grant and the dialogue is brilliantly funny and even edgy. The scene where his butler first sees him dressed in rags is classic:









: I doubt if they would appreciate it, sir. They rather resent the invasion of their privacy, I believe quite properly, sir. Also, such excursions can be extremely dangerous, sir. I worked for a gentleman once who likewise, with two friends, accoutered themselves as you have, sir, and then went out for a lark. They have not been heard from since.


This sort of exchange is repeated throughout the film and caused me to laugh out loud more than once. The screenplay was written by Preston Sturges, who directed the film as well. I have heard of Sturges, but when I looked up his filmography on IMDB I saw that I have never seen any of his films. I now plan to check out quite a few others! By the way, this is also the first film on the list that was available in its entirety for free on You Tube. I actually streamed it to my tablet.


Sullivan’s Travels was also my first introduction to actress Veronica Lake. The only thing I knew about her prior to seeing this film was that a model was “cut” to look like her in the film L.A. Confidential so creepy men could pay to have sex with her. Nice. Veronica Lake is absolutely beautiful and had quite an interesting life. She made nearly 40 films and TV shows before dying at age 50 from hepatitis. She was also the daughter-in-law of Sen. Joseph McCarthy. She was well-known for her beauty, particularly her long blonde hair which she often wore covering one eye and giving her the nickname The Peek-a-boo Girl. She is classic 1940s Hollywood glamour.


Another interesting fact about Sullivan’s Travels is that the film Sullivan was going to make about America’s poor was to be called O Brother Where Art Thou? Yep, the Coen Brothers used the name as an homage for their 2000 masterpiece starring George Clooney. The things you learn when you do a little homework! Also, Sullivan’s Travels did not garner any Academy Award nominations, maybe because it came out the same year as a little film called Citizen Kane. By the way, Citizen Kane lost most of that year’s Oscars, including Best Picture, to How Green Was My Valley. Ah, hindsight.


Next Up: Duck Soup



Filed under: AFI Top 100
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 05, 2012 18:13

AFI #61: Sullivan's Travels

One of the reasons I decided to watch and blog about all of the films in the American Film Institute's list of the Top 100 American films of all time was to discover some gems I hadn't ever seen. Nearly 40 films into the list, I hadn't really been blown away yet — until last night. I had never even heard of Sullivan's Travels, No. 61 on the list. Admittedly, I was skeptical for that very reason, plus it was made all the way back in 1941. I held out some small hope only because it was made just a year after one of my favorite films, The Philadelphia Story. Not only did I enjoy Sullivan's Travels, the screenplay reminded me of The Philadelphia Story because of its lovely sarcastic wit.


Sullivan's Travels is the story of wealthy Hollywood director John L. Sullivan, who is tired of making fluffy comedies because America is in a depression and they deserve to feel the emotion of the times. When his studio points out he has no idea what it's like to be one of the downtrodden, he foolishly decides to go undercover as a tramp to see what it's like. He sets off in dirty and torn clothing with only a dime in his pocket to learn enough to make a "commentary on modern conditions, stark realism, the problems that confront the average man." Along the way he meets a discouraged young actress who is ready to give up on her dreams, leave Hollywood and return home. Hilarity and powerful lessons about the human spirit ensue.


There is so much to like in this film. Sullivan is played by Joel McCrea, well-known for his many roles in Westerns. McCrea provides a real charm to the character that is reminiscent of Cary Grant and the dialogue is brilliantly funny and even edgy. The scene where his butler first sees him dressed in rags is classic:









: I doubt if they would appreciate it, sir. They rather resent the invasion of their privacy, I believe quite properly, sir. Also, such excursions can be extremely dangerous, sir. I worked for a gentleman once who likewise, with two friends, accoutered themselves as you have, sir, and then went out for a lark. They have not been heard from since.


This sort of exchange is repeated throughout the film and caused me to laugh out loud more than once. The screenplay was written by Preston Sturges, who directed the film as well. I have heard of Sturges, but when I looked up his filmography on IMDB I saw that I have never seen any of his films. I now plan to check out quite a few others! By the way, this is also the first film on the list that was available in its entirety for free on You Tube. I actually streamed it to my tablet.


Sullivan's Travels was also my first introduction to actress Veronica Lake. The only thing I knew about her prior to seeing this film was that a model was "cut" to look like her in the film L.A. Confidential so creepy men could pay to have sex with her. Nice. Veronica Lake is absolutely beautiful and had quite an interesting life. She made nearly 40 films and TV shows before dying at age 50 from hepatitis. She was also the daughter-in-law of Sen. Joseph McCarthy. She was well-known for her beauty, particularly her long blonde hair which she often wore covering one eye and giving her the nickname The Peek-a-boo Girl. She is classic 1940s Hollywood glamour.


Another interesting fact about Sullivan's Travels is that the film Sullivan was going to make about America's poor was to be called O Brother Where Art Thou? Yep, the Coen Brothers used the name as an homage for their 2000 masterpiece starring George Clooney. The things you learn when you do a little homework! Also, Sullivan's Travels did not garner any Academy Award nominations, maybe because it came out the same year as a little film called Citizen Kane. By the way, Citizen Kane lost most of that year's Oscars, including Best Picture, to How Green Was My Valley. Ah, hindsight.


Next Up: Duck Soup



Filed under: AFI Top 100
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 05, 2012 18:13

March 3, 2012

AFI #62: American Graffiti

I think a lot of so-called great films are fully dependent on the generation of the viewer and as I make my way through the AFI Top 100 there have been several examples of this generational bias. American Graffiti is definitely a film that reaches a certain demographic. Set in the early 60s and made in 1973, the film is not much more than a nod to that mythical time known as "the good old days." For director George Lucas, the film is a bit of a love letter to his teenage years growing up in small town Northern California when kids cruised the streets and pranked each other with shaving cream and the biggest issue was whether or not they should leave this Rockwellian dream for the big city (or in this case, college "back east"). American Graffiti captures that moment in time quite well, and it obviously had an impact on viewers of a certain age.


That being said, for my money American Graffiti is just an average film that isn't even among the best of its genre. The Hollywood Knights is basically the same plot but a much better film overall. Barry Levinson's Diner also delivers the same emotion and is one of my favorite films of all time. I think American Graffiti gets more recognition because it's Lucas' first film and because it stars young actors who later become very famous, including Richard Dreyfuss and Harrison Ford. It's an enjoyable little film, but it's certainly not one of the 100 best American films of all time.


Nostalgia is a great film genre that has delivered some amazing films. Last year's wonderful Super 8 comes to mind. But nostalgia films are by their nature going to be more meaningful to those who lived during a similar time and can therefore relate to the nostalgia. I'm not a baby boomer, and I can appreciate how cool it must have been in the 50s and 60s to cruise your car up and down the street and have burgers delivered to your car by a hot girl on roller skates, but I'm not going to be moved by a time period that I didn't live through. I imagine baby boomers don't feel the same way I do when I watch Sixteen Candles or The Breakfast Club. And that's okay, but don't tell me American Graffiti is one of the best films ever. It's not.


By the way, I've seen bits and pieces of American Graffiti before but this is the first time I'd ever sat through it beginning to end. There are some memorable scenes (like the one in which Toad tries to buy some whiskey and ends up in the middle of a hold up). But seeing it all the way through — the damn thing has a really depressing ending. Cindy Williams almost dies in a car crash, Toad gets killed in Vietnam, Milner gets killed by a drunk driver, Steve ends up selling insurance in Modesto because he doesn't go to college and Curt moves to Canada. Geez…good times.


Next up: Sullivan's Travels



Filed under: AFI Top 100
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 03, 2012 08:53

February 20, 2012

AFI #63: Cabaret

I get it. Cabaret is a metaphor for the decadence that leads to the rise in nationalism that makes it possible for the Nazi Party to rise to power in Germany. Sounds like a good plot for a musical (insert sarcasm here).


I'd like to dismiss this film because I'm not a big musical guy, but the truth is I don't mind a good musical. I love the film version of The Music Man. I loved Evita with Antonio Banderas and Madonna. A Chorus Line with Michael Douglas is one of my favorites. Hey, I even like Sound of Music which also includes Nazis so that's not a good enough reason for me to have not liked Cabaret. I just found Cabaret to be too wannabe 60s, theater of the absurd, experimental trash. Not my cup of tea. That being said, it was a huge hit in 1972 and won eight damn Academy Awards so what do I know.


Cabaret is the story of cabaret performer Sally Bowles (Liza Minnelli) and takes place in Berlin circa 1931 just as the Nazi party is coming to power. Sally is an over the top dreamer trying to make it big with thoughts of becoming a world-famous actress, but she's really just using her body to make a living. She meets an English expatriate (Michael York) who turns out to be bisexual and both he and Sally fall for the same German baron. Meanwhile, the Nazis are gaining power and the mood of the city is "narrated" by the master of ceremonies of the cabaret, a creepy and pansexual dude played by Joel Grey. The musical numbers are raunchy and loosely tell the tale. The musical version of the show won eight Tony Awards including Best Musical in 1967.


Again, not my kind of musical and it was filmed during a film era that I don't typically enjoy (there was something about the late 60s and early 70s that didn't do it for me). Oscar disagreed with me and awards were handed out for Best Actress (Minnelli), Best Supporting Actor (Joel Grey), Best Music and Best Director (Bob Fosse). It did not win Best Picture…thank god. That rightfully went to The Godfather, but what it does mean is that Francis Ford Coppola not win Best Director for what was in my opinion one of the greatest films ever made. Joel Grey also stole the Oscar from the likes of Al Pacino, Robert Duvall and James Caan (who perhaps split votes leading to Grey's win). Minnelli actually beat Diana Ross for Lady Sings the Blues which is also quite a crime.


Life may indeed be a cabaret old chum, but I hope my cabaret is a little more fun with fewer Nazis.


Next up: American Graffiti.



Filed under: AFI Top 100
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 20, 2012 14:00

February 14, 2012

The Heart of the Matter

Valentine's Day is a silly made up Hallmark holiday designed to con men into buying flowers and candy, not to mention a corny greeting card inscribed with someone else's sentiment. When you've been married for nearly 18 years, it's hard to take Valentine's Day too seriously. I can never figure out what to do for my wife on Valentine's Day. She doesn't eat candy and flowers seem so cliché. Jewelry is out of the question because she isn't a big jewelry person and what she does wear belonged to her dead mother so how can I compete with that? This year I can't even really take her out to dinner because I can't eat much of anything on my post heart attack diet. I've been thinking about it for a few days now, and what I've decided to do this year is give her a gift from my heart — hell, it is my heart.


Dear Leslie,


Tomorrow is the four-month anniversary of my heart attack and I have made so much progress it is remarkable. But what is even more remarkable is how much you have been there for me. I always thought wedding vows were just a formality, but I have a new appreciation for "in sickness and in health." It's one thing to stand by your partner in tough times, but there are degrees of being there — not everyone is capable of giving as much as you have given to me over these past few months. From the moment Dr. Kerr called you from her office and told you I was headed to the emergency room you changed your entire life for me. Hell, you beat the ambulance to the ER and was waiting for me when I arrived! At that moment I put my faith in you to make decisions about my health because I knew after 17 years of marriage I could trust you more than anyone with life and death decisions. I never once felt scared because I knew you were there for me, which is why I seemed to be so cavalier about the whole experience. I was scared inside, but I also had a tremendous peace about things because I knew you were going to take care of me.


In the days and weeks that followed you took the bull by the horns and made my care your top priority. You didn't just sit by my side, you owned this crisis and became an overnight expert on heart health. You researched all of my medicines and asked a million questions of my healthcare team, all so you'd know how best to take care of me. And then there was the food! I don't think people understand how critical food is in the first six months post heart attack, but you do. Reading labels is only the start…but you went so far above and beyond the call of duty its astounding. I don't think I had to cook a single meal in the first few weeks, and even today you make my eating life so much more amazing than it would have been had I been in charge. I don't think there's any doubt had I been alone on this journey I would be eating peanut butter and jelly sandwiches for every meal. In the past few months you have made — from scratch — a variety of meals fit for a heart-healthy king. Pizza. Lasagna. Sweet and Sour Chicken. Chili. Soups. Fish. Casseroles. Grilled cheese. Even hamburgers this week! All low fat and low sodium. This is no small task and I want you to know how much I appreciate it. And have I mentioned the bread. I had no idea that when you bought a bread machine I'd be eating every kind of low sodium bread under the sun. Rye. Pumpernickel. Wheat. Sourdough. Homemade bagels and buns! You are not normal and I am so damn lucky.


Not every wife would have come with me to all my doctors appointments, or reminded me to take my pills (and there are so many of them!). When I started cardiac rehab you came three days a week with me until I settled in and got comfortable. You are one of the only spouses who regularly attends the learning sessions so you can have even more knowledge to take care of me. But it's so much more than my physical health that you've taken care of these past four months. You've managed to do all of this while still making me laugh, and going on walks with me, and taking me out to restaurants and parties and friends houses. You planned my first post heart attack "vacation" with an incredible weekend for all of us in Coronado over New Years and while it could have been so stressful it was instead a new beginning and it shed the light on our future together. We can travel and eat out and enjoy the life we were meant to share together. You even encouraged me to buy the expensive impractical car and you haven't complained yet about my new (is it permanent?) facial hair!


It hasn't always been easy. But I really haven't had too many down periods since all of this shit hit the fan. On the rare occasions when I've felt overwhelmed, you've simply been there for me to talk to or to hug. You have been so strong through all of this, and though I know you've had your moments as well, they have been few and far between. You are such a strong person…I could only hope to be as strong as you someday.


Through sickness and in health. We have been together for 20 years and it hasn't always been easy. Relationships are hard work, and there is a reason why most marriages don't make it. But through it all, you have been there for me. This may have been the biggest crisis we've had as a couple, but there were plenty of smaller ones. The common theme though is that you always rise to the occasion. Whether it was Connor's health issues or our ill-fated move to Georgia or my career fiascos, it never mattered to you — you simply did what comes natural to you and took charge. I think you are the most remarkable woman on the planet and I don't know what I did to deserve you. You are the most beautiful, intelligent, funny, caring, sexy, amazing woman in the world and you're my Valentine. And I'm your Valentine. I wouldn't want to be with any other woman in the world…ever.


I love you and Happy Valentine's Day.


Lenny



Filed under: General, Heart
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 14, 2012 06:30

February 12, 2012

AFI #64: Network

A couple of year's ago I stopped watching television news because it had become a cesspool of crime and horror. My New Year's resolution last year was to stop paying attention to politics because it was bringing too much negativity into my life. Yesterday a friend of mine reported that he too has limited his intake of "news" because it was far too negative. Television in general has become a wasteland of "reality" that is anything but real. These days save for a couple of solid cable shows  and a whole lot of sports I use TV purely as background noise…I doubt I'll ever be one of those people who claims to not have a television or says they don't watch it, but I get it. Soothsayers have been saying since its inception that TV was a beast that would eventually control us, and while that seems farfetched it's hard to argue that we haven't become a society of slaves to the tube. Some people argue that TV is simply a reflection of society. If that's true, god help us! Network was released in 1976 and it caused quite a stir. It's dark humor explored what would happen if the accountants took over the news department and TV news became beholden to ratings and profitability and was run by corporations. Yep, it came out nearly 40 year's ago even back then the disease of corporate control was under scrutiny. There's nothing new under the sun.


The film is most famous for the iconic character of network news anchor Howard Beale, who because his ratings were slipping had a breakdown on live television and because his meltdown was good for business he was given the green light to continue to proselytize about the demise of society and the devil inside the box known as TV. His famous line "I'm mad as hell and we're not going to take this anymore" became a national catch phrase and Peter Finch's portrayal of Beale won him an Oscar for best actor (albiet posthumously). I'm not going to share that famous scene, but rather I'd like you to take a few minutes to watch this scene that I think sums up the spirit of Network's message:



I don't think I'll say much about the film itself other than to say it was ahead of its time and its message was eerily prophetic. But I would like to comment on where we have found ourselves in 2012 in terms of the sort of television this film considered satirical. Have you spent much time flipping through the proverbial dial on your cable box these days. Most of us are guilty of watching some of this so-called programming (I have my guilty pleasures). What the hell are we watching? Hoarders Buried Alive. To Catch a Predator. Celebrity Rehab. Hillbilly Hand Fishing. Strange Sex. Cops. Toddlers and Tiaras. Bad Girls Club. Kourtney and Kim Take New York. I Didn't Know I Was Pregnant.


These are real shows…not satire. Network was supposed to be satire. Showing the assassination of a newscaster on live television was a joke. The "Mao Tse Tung Hour" in which a left wing terrorist group filmed themselves committing crimes was a crazy idea. But honestly, how close have we come? Would anyone be surprised if the next big reality hit was a live broadcast of an execution?


What I'll say about Network is that it was a film that made you think about the state of the media and society in general. Not too shabby for 1976. I also think a great sequel to the film (or a perfect complement for a radical double feature) would be Natural Born Killers! That's one of my favorite films and it too takes the reality TV concept to its potential horrific end game.


Next Up: Cabaret



Filed under: AFI Top 100
 •  1 comment  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 12, 2012 12:48

February 9, 2012

Take this With a Grain of Salt

I promised I wouldn't be preachy about heart disease awareness, so take this post for what it is — a cautionary tale. I have been on a very strict diet since October as I try to ensure my heart has the best chance it can to remodel itself following the damage of my heart attack. As you can probably guess, I'm seriously watching my cholesterol and fat intake. You may also know that there is a pretty clear link between salt (sodium) and heart disease, but I bet you didn't know how clear.


Excess sodium can increase blood pressure which increases the risk of both heart disease and stroke. My cardiologist and the American Heart Association recommend heart patients limit daily sodium intake to less than 1,500 mg per day. One teaspoon of salt equals 2,300 milligrams of sodium. One Original Rubios fish taco has 450 mg of salt. A Big Mac has 1,040 mg of salt. A six-inch Subway Spicy Italian sandwich has 1,520. Get the idea?


Yesterday I made what I thought was a pretty healthy decision at lunch. I had mahi mahi tacos with nothing on them from my company cafeteria. A few hours later I went to cardiac rehab and my resting heart rate was elevated — with medications these days it's usually around 60 bpm and it was close to 80. What caused the jump? The friggin tortillas! Two small flour tortillas together probably had about 700 mg of sodium and there was probably some seasoning on the fish I wasn't aware of. I've been doing a really great job of sticking to around 1,000 mg per day so my lunch was way out of line — and it instantly affected my heart. That salt is some scary shit.


Ironically, yesterday was also the day that the CDC came out with a new report that most Americans were getting far too much salt in their diets. You can read the article online, but here's a fact:


Americans eat on average about 3,300 mg of sodium a day. The U.S. Dietary Guidelines recommend limiting sodium to less than 2,300 mg a day, and about 6 out of 10 adults should further limit sodium to 1,500 mg a day.


I can tell you from experience that limiting salt is a pain in the ass. Eating out is nearly impossible and so many food items you bring home from the grocery store are also overloaded with it (ever looked at the nutritional values on a typical "healthy" frozen lunch?) This has become the hardest part of my post heart attack lifestyle. Salad bars are even dangerous. Leslie has done an amazing job of cooking for me and is even baking sodium-free bread from scratch. It's still tough to stay on target.


It's not that I miss the salt or the taste…it's just so hard to find true low-sodium foods.



Filed under: Heart
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 09, 2012 15:54