Christian Cawley's Blog, page 50

Is Clara Dressing for The Part of The Doctor?

Andrew Reynolds is a writer at Kasterborous Doctor Who News and Reviews - All the latest Doctor Who news and reviews with our weekly podKast, features and interviews, and a long-running forum.

Call it Chekov’s jacket, call it a coincidence but don’t you think Clara is starting to dress a little bit like a certain Time Lord?

Maybe it’s the fact that during Series Eight’s Flatline she got to step into his very fashionable shoes and wield the Sonic while he dealt with the very small, big problem of the TARDIS miniaturising. Or maybe it’s the fact that we’ve seen her eyes in the title sequence after she proclaimed she actually was the Doctor in Dark Water’s pre-credit fake out. Whatever is causing the Radio Times to think this way, it does look as though Clara is starting to adopt a very magiciany look, if the preview pics for The Zygon Invasion are anything to go by.

White shirt? Check. Black buttoned down jacket? Check. Red lining? Well, red lipstick. That’s kind of close enough. Is it a subtle nod of things to come (the look, not the lipstick) Will Clara once again adopt the persona of the Doctor in some brilliant scheme to hoodwink the Zygons? Does it reach further than that? Will she actually turn out to be a Time Lady herself!

What’s more, Rigsy is back in episode ten. Will she start command-frowning at him again in the guise of Doctor Clara?

Or is it all just a massive wardrobe based coincidence *cough…

Either way, these and possible none of these questions will be answered in The Zygon Invasion, this Saturday on BBC1 at 20:15.

The post Is Clara Dressing for The Part of The Doctor? appeared first on Kasterborous Doctor Who News and Reviews.

Are You Watching Sherlock: The Abominable Bride at the Cinema?

Philip Bates is a writer at Kasterborous Doctor Who News and Reviews - All the latest Doctor Who news and reviews with our weekly podKast, features and interviews, and a long-running forum.

On 1st January 2016, Sherlock is back with a one-off Victorian special, The Abominable Bride – and what’s more, it’ll be screened at over 100 cinemas in the UK and 500 in the USA!

Though it’ll primarily hit screens on BBC One and PBS Masterpiece (in America), the cinema showings of the 90-minute episode will also include exclusive extra material, including a guided tour of the 221B Baker Street set from writer (and Doctor Who showrunner) Steven Moffat, and behind-the-scenes material starring the lead cast and crew. This will add up to roughly 20 minutes of additional content.

In the UK, these tickets will go on sale on 2nd November (that’s less than a week away!), and 6th November in the USA. Participating cinemas have yet to be revealed, but in America, the special will screen on 5th and 6th January. The Abominable Bride will be simulcast in the UK.

So will you be heading off to the cinema to see it? Or are you content to view it form the comfort of your own home, albeit it on a much smaller screen?

Are You Watching The Abominable Bride at the Cinema?

Let us know why you voted how you did in the comments below!

The post Are You Watching Sherlock: The Abominable Bride at the Cinema? appeared first on Kasterborous Doctor Who News and Reviews.

Five People Who Definitely SHOULDN’T Be The Next Companion

Andrew Reynolds is a writer at Kasterborous Doctor Who News and Reviews - All the latest Doctor Who news and reviews with our weekly podKast, features and interviews, and a long-running forum.

Clara is about to depart the TARDIS and already, plans are forming and names are being drawn out a metaphorical hat to replace Jenna Coleman as the Doctor’s companion. While we can’t tell you who should take the role *cough Faye Marsay*, we can definitely tell you who shouldn’t.

Don’t get us wrong. We’re not about to demean any actor/actress by pitting them against each other for the Doctors love, no sir. Instead we’ve combed all of time and space to find those characters, historical figures and monsters to find those who just aren’t made of the right stuff.

We’ve ruled out those who really shouldn’t travel with the Doctor – so sworn enemies like the Daleks won’t be invite aboard – and instead focused on those who either seem almost too good to be a companion, those whose philosophy doesn’t quite match with that of the Doctor or even just those who wouldn’t adapt or would make it difficult for the Doctor to be, well, the Doctor.

So here it is, five people who shouldn’t be the next companion.

The Ood, Hath, Hoix, or Sycorax

Ah, TV budgets. Minor miracles conjured from small change – the visual compromise between imagination and practicality.

The same goes for casting too. In the past, when canny producer RTD wanted to save a little money for his spectacular finale, he’d write a Doctor – lite episode or confine the action to a limited space and, more often than not, that’s where some of the best writing would occur.

So, given the recent budgetary troubles – as documented in Private Eye – could we foresee a time when the Doctor teams up with one of the stock aliens more often than not seen padding out the background of bar scene ala the Mos Eisley cantina scene from Star Wars.

Think about it, you wouldn’t have to pay a name actor to perform in the Ood suit, you could just pay, say, John Nettles for a day in the recording booth to add gravitas to the chosen alien’s plight. You could even iron out a few plot holes with a quick Skype call.

It would be great to have another off world companion but, with their presence in these world building scenes starting to become a little tenuous, if not disingenuous, it may send out the wrong message to fans if you raid the Doctor Who Experience once again and say, give the Hoix a tragic back story.

Osgood

You might say the cognitive dissonance created when trying to fathom the motivation for using, killing and then promoting a fan place-holder to the Doctor’s side – not to mention the clear positives and the troubling negatives of it all – pale into insignificance when Oliver and Capaldi get together on screen.

When it comes to popular opinion on who should replace Clara, Osgood is good – the plucky, young intelligent UNIT Scientist with a heart yearning for adventure; she’s the ideal choice to fulfill her promise and become a companion… which is why she shouldn’t board the TARDIS.

The Doctors champion, she’s tailor made to evoke and reflect the fans’ own love for the renegade Time Lord, and it’s this imbalance, this naked admiration that means she’ll never be on equal footing with the Doctor. Sure, she’ll always be there at his darkest moments to remind him of the good person he can be but, as his own face apparently does that, do we really need that same message in stereo?

I love Ingrid Oliver and Osgood, perhaps more so in The Day of the Doctor, where she wasn’t being unceremoniously thrown under a bus – however, I want Moffat to stick with her being dead.

The decision to kill her off was cruel but bringing her back and then making her a companion would just compound a mistake. I do think her death was misjudged – Doctor Who is not Game of Thrones –  but I also feel Moffat should stick to his guns and stand by the impetus to kill her. I don’t want to read about how it was always meant to be this way and I just missed the details in the letters section of DWM.

If her upcoming reappearance does turn out to be an extended goodbye, fair enough. She deserves at least that but not the keys to the kingdom.

Brockley – Daleks – Invasion Earth: 2150 A.D.

It’s fairly self-evident why he shouldn’t be allowed aboard the TARDIS. Brockley is not a noble creature looking to broaden his mind and enrich his life with endless adventure. He wants to sell you a tin of beans with the label missing before pointing out your location to the nearest human-hating beast he can find.

He’s a survivor… or he was until he tried to sell the Doctor and David out and was blown up in a shed.

In the transition from the small screen, the character changed from Ashton, played by Patrick O’ Connell, who hardened from an opportunistic black marketer who refuses to budge when asked to get Ian and Larry out of the Dalek camp, to Brockley, played by the great Philip Madoc, a black marketer who attempts to get the Doctor and David into the Dalek camp – and then sells them out to the new lords of Earth.

What makes him stand apart as a no-mark is that he’s such a transparent turncoat that the Doctor factors in his treachery to get him and David into the camp.

Historically, we know why the Daleks say ‘exterminate’ and here, a character like Brockley, the ‘spiv’ or ‘loveable rogue’ of the common World War II black marketer, pricks at our comfortable, largely favourable portrayal of the chancer. There’s no way to turn a blind eye if he gets your cigarettes every week. Here, in a war that makes a mockery of these double standards, Brockley is ultimately doomed.

The Doctor demands that you adapt – Brockley saw this as a gap in the market and paid the price.

The Time Lords

If the powers that be at the BBC are looking for a radical change for the show, they would do well to look to the past and the biggest change occurred when the Doctor was banished to Earth by the Time Lords. A variation on that would be a logical step; alter the format, change the show but a Time Lord other than the Doctor on-board the TARDIS? Could that ever work?

We’ve had hybrid Time Lords aboard the TARDIS but what of the original people of Gallifrey? What if the Doctor, in agreeance with the Time Lords, was allowed to continue exploring the numerous galaxies with a full crew of his own people? Could a representative of each of the six founders of the Time Lord society take up a place at the TARDIS console? How bad would that floating democracy be? Would it actually be a democracy?

Before you cry ‘non-interference policy’ the Doctor himself is only here because the Time Lords themselves breached the policy, thanks to the pleas of Clara. It’s difficult, what with the reason the Doctor left almost certain to be altered by Moffat this season (although, judging by previous changes, it’s probably just the means that will change, the end will largely remain the same – albeit now twice as convoluted as before), to see how the Time Lords will greet their prodigal son when he returns home.

Let’s not forget, Rassilion and his plan to survive as beings of pure consciousness got Panopticon-wide support, how will he deal with that? There surely must be Time Lords who are opposed to the Doctor still?

In the past, the Doctor has served as their ‘plausible deniability’ in serials such as The Two Doctors, but now, with the people apparently backing the Doctor or at least approving of his exploration of time and space with a whole new cycle of regenerations; just what reception and factions will he have to deal with every time the TARDIS lands on a new planet or enters a different time period at their behest? There must come a price with his extend life beyond saving his home planet.

And that’s really the problem with home, you can never go back there.

Ayn Rand

The ‘celebrity historical’ treads a fine line between honouring human endeavour and capturing the spirit and essence of the creator. Place the Doctor in the centre of affairs and you run the risk of undermining some of our greatest achievements – which is why The Unquiet Dead is probably my favourite of the recent episodes.

It’s the template from which we judge how various learned characters react to the idea of their world being that little bit smaller without ever seeing the impact in their lives’ work (mostly because Charles Dickens passes away before he can commit anything to paper). It’s that impact that matters the most, lean too heavily on the Doctor and his magical blue box and it undermines the individual’s achievement.

Now try to image that scenario with someone for whom time travel would serve no altruistic benefit – where the only achievement is to separate yourself from your fellow man. For Ayn Rand, the past is a concept rather than somewhere to visit and the future, a potential utopia of self-interest and objectivism, would only serve to disappoint.

Imagine the Doctors a priori thinking clashing with Rand’s rejection of any form of ‘just knowing’ – seriously, if the Doctor had a plan, she would want to see the footnotes.

Bringing this back to the ‘celebrity historical’ again, you can almost see the tendrils of a story – a young Rand, shown the wider universe by the Doctor, frightened by what she sees, she goes home and creates a theory that seeks to accelerate the position of the individual. For some, all that splendour can be frightening, and, confronted with the idea that we are not alone, who wouldn’t seek to reinforce what makes us great.

But that’s the danger of the ‘celebrity historical’ even if you disagree with the philosophy, everyone has the right to stand by their ideas. It’s just not everyone who gets to ride with the Doctor wants to or should ride with in the TARDIS.

So that’s that, then. Who shouldn’t travel through time and space. Admittedly, there are many more: Scooby Doo; Mario; Sirius Black; Persuasion and Enlightenment; the assembled cast of Cats… But who do you think definitely shouldn’t be welcomed into the TARDIS?

The post Five People Who Definitely SHOULDN’T Be The Next Companion appeared first on Kasterborous Doctor Who News and Reviews.

The Zygon Invasion TV Trailer and Image Gallery

Philip Bates is a writer at Kasterborous Doctor Who News and Reviews - All the latest Doctor Who news and reviews with our weekly podKast, features and interviews, and a long-running forum.

The Zygons are coming! No, wait, actually – the Zygons are already here. They’re amongst us.

And the BBC has proof of this: the new TV trailer shows the Unified Intelligence Taskforce (aka UNIT), including their scientific adviser, the Doctor, taking on the alien shape-changers.

The Zygons, a race of shapeshifting aliens, have been living in secret among us on Earth, unknown and unseen – until now!

When Osgood is kidnapped by a rogue gang of Zygons, the Doctor, Clara and UNIT must scatter across the world in a bid to set her free. But will they reach her in time, and can they stop an uprising before it’s too late?

Yep, Osgood (Ingrid Oliver) is back in this sequel to the 50th anniversary special, The Day of the Doctor.

Looking for more clues as to what this next episodes of Series 9 holds for us? Fortunately, we have some stunning pictures to peek through…

Written by Peter Harness (Kill the Moon), The Zygon Invasion airs at 8.15pm on Saturday 31 October on BBC One…

The post The Zygon Invasion TV Trailer and Image Gallery appeared first on Kasterborous Doctor Who News and Reviews.

The Valeyard Judges The Woman Who Lived

The Valeyard is a writer at Kasterborous Doctor Who News and Reviews - All the latest Doctor Who news and reviews with our weekly podKast, features and interviews, and a long-running forum.

I’m back. Deal with it.

Quite frankly if most of you accepted that explanation from Missy then I see no reason to expand on my own, long overdue, return.

Much has changed since I last did one of these articles for Cawley, my face being the most obvious one. It’s a good face, much more in keeping with one of the children of Kasterborous. The other change of note is the site now seems to be run by a gentleman by the name of Doris (Phil actually – Ed) and I now answer to him rather than Cawley.

So, I seem to have missed the start of the series, but no matter I’m sure I’ll catch up quickly enough.

Ah, so we come to The Woman Who Lived. It’s not a bad episode, but not very much happens, does it? An awful lot of talking about responsibility and repercussions. I felt sure I’d covered this in a fraction of the time in a wee cafe in 1963; most of an episode seems a tad indulgent. When a degree of action does finally appear on the screen it does so in the form of Lion-o, Lord of the Thundercats. It’s mildly off-putting, but I suppose I should be thankful that the Snarf monstrosity didn’t also appear.

The only other amusing aspect of this episode comes from Rufus Hound. Given the history of comedians appearing (I’m looking at you, Peter Key) I must confess I feared the worst. But Hound does a passable job as a Highway man facing a potentially  immortal future. Not unlike a poor man’s Captain Harkness whom I notice got name checked. I can live with with name checks, but nothing more, Mr Barrowman.

The end of the episode reveals that he’s replaced Pond as well as his face. Granted he’s gone for a 21st century earth girl again, but at least she’s not ginger…

All in all not a terrible affair. I may return next week if Doris (Phil!!- Ed) requires my services again.

The post The Valeyard Judges The Woman Who Lived appeared first on Kasterborous Doctor Who News and Reviews.

What You Thought of Under the Lake: Reaktion Round-Up

David Power is a writer at Kasterborous Doctor Who News and Reviews - All the latest Doctor Who news and reviews with our weekly podKast, features and interviews, and a long-running forum.

At the start of this month, we asked what you all thought of the first part of Toby Whithouse’s aquatic adventure. So, how did you respond?

Enjoyable, atmospheric fun! 60.24%(253 votes)

Instant classic 23.33% (98 votes)

Undecided until Before the Flood 13.57% (57 votes)

Whithouse’s worst yet 1.67% (7 votes)

A let down after The Witch’s Familiar 1.19% (5 votes)

Well that looks about right to me. Compared to all the hype surrounding other episodes this season (Missy! Zygons! Maisie Williams!), Under the Lake didn’t seem to garner as much attention. Once I learned that Toby Whithouse was writing a ghost story I knew it would probably be a solid story and then moved onto other things. Toby’s been a consistently good writer for Doctor Who over the years, and one of his many strengths is making quite buzzwordy concepts feel original.

While you can describe some of his stories casually as “the one with the vampires in Venice” or “the one with the cyborg in the old west town”, there’s always enough going on in said episodes to make them feel compelling and tightly written  when you’re watching them. Under the Lake is no different. The atmosphere is engrossing, the characters are likable, and the ghost design is genuinely spooky.

Undeservedly, the viewership numbers didn’t reflect the quality of the episode. Overnight viewings for this episode barely beat last weeks at 3.74 million, while the final consolidated ratings were 5.63 million, unfortunately being the lowest of any episode of Doctor Who since the revival in 2005. A large possibility is, like with The Witch’s Familiar, the lower ratings are due to the England v Australia match in airing simultaneously. Although thankfully the episode received an Appreciation Index score of 84, one higher than last weeks! So there’s something.

So, what did everyone else think?

The Daily Telegraph‘s Michael Hogan acclaimed the episode, giving it a flawless five stars. He explained:

“This rollicking, hair-raising romp demonstrated that the sci-fi franchise still has the power to thrill and chill in equal measure. Forty minutes flew by and the credits rolled too soon, leaving on a creepy cliffhanger that left me baying for more. If next week’s conclusion of the story – and the 12-part series as a whole – can keep up the standard set by the opening three episodes, we’re in for a treat. Doctor Who will have regenerated once more”.

Digital Spy‘s Morgan Jeffery praised the episode, labeling it “atmospheric”. He said:

“It’s this sense of claustrophobia that is among the episode’s biggest selling points – watching a crew’s camaraderie crumble as the pressure gets to them never grows old. Gloomy visuals and a haunting score from Murray Gold also do much to generate atmosphere and tension. Chills, action, adventure – this is old-school Doctor Who given a modern sheen and, most of all, it’s enormous fun”.

IGN’s Scott Collura was highly impressed with the episode, awarding it a score of 8.5/10, deemed by the site as “great”. He particularly praised the episode’s cliffhanger ending, stating:

“But oh, the ending of this episode! So great! I always welcome the creature-feature Doctor Who episodes, and “Under the Lake” does that tradition proud. The shimmering, ghastly specters are scary enough, but the apparent fate of the Doctor in this cliffhanger is the real shocker”

Now the question remains, what did you guys think of this story’s conclusion…?

The post What You Thought of Under the Lake: Reaktion Round-Up appeared first on Kasterborous Doctor Who News and Reviews.

David Tennant Terrifies in First Jessica Jones Trailer

Andrew Reynolds is a writer at Kasterborous Doctor Who News and Reviews - All the latest Doctor Who news and reviews with our weekly podKast, features and interviews, and a long-running forum.

The first full trailer for Marvel’s Jessica Jones has dropped and the dark heart of the piece is none other than the Tenth Doctor himself, David Tennant.

Debuting on Netflix on 20th November, the 13 part series follows Krysten Ritter’s Jessica – a former superhero turned private investigator in Hell’s Kitchen, New York – as she finds herself caught in the destructive path of Tennant’s Kilgrave aka The Purple Man.

We get a taste of the pairs past in some very eerie scenes where Kilgrave demonstrates both his knack for ‘verbal suggestion’ and his cavalier attitude towards other people’s existence; does anyone else find it a little perturbing to hear the Tenth Doctor’s voice coming from such a malevolent character?

The clips from the trailer nail the adult tone of its comic book counterpart – the character Jessica Jones made her debut in Alias, the first comic book printed under the adult orientated Marvel MAX banner – which sees Jessica battle with demons both personal and professional.

Marvel’s Jessica Jones will debut via Netflix on 20th November.

The post David Tennant Terrifies in First Jessica Jones Trailer appeared first on Kasterborous Doctor Who News and Reviews.

Out Now: The Way of the Empty Hand

Philip Bates is a writer at Kasterborous Doctor Who News and Reviews - All the latest Doctor Who news and reviews with our weekly podKast, features and interviews, and a long-running forum.

Big Finish is going from strength to strength. We’re all still buzzing from the news about the Tenth Doctor Adventures, but their Classic Who range continues too, and its storytelling and cast are just as fantastic.

This month’s Short Trips release, The Way of the Empty Hand, is out now, a Second Doctor story narrated by Jamie McCrimmon himself, Frazer Hines. Here’s what it’s about:

The war world of Combatia. A great mechanised planet that traverses the universe, overseen by its benevolent and infallible overlord, plucking up the finest warriors of every world it passes and pitting them against each other to determine which of them is greatest. Their consent is irrelevant – all that matters is the battle. The greatest warrior must be found. Will it be Bloodbane, King of Carnage? Jamie McCrimmon? Gichin Funakoshi? Or the strange little man who calls himself the Doctor?

Written by Julian Richards, and directed by Lisa Bowerman, the story is the tenth in the series’ fifth series. It’s only available for download, but it’s only £2.99 – so what are you waiting for?!

The post Out Now: The Way of the Empty Hand appeared first on Kasterborous Doctor Who News and Reviews.

Jekyll and Hyde: The Strange Case of The Doctor Who Effect

Andrew Reynolds is a writer at Kasterborous Doctor Who News and Reviews - All the latest Doctor Who news and reviews with our weekly podKast, features and interviews, and a long-running forum.

What is the elusive quality that Doctor Who has that makes it succeed where other Saturday night dramas have failed?

In the case of Jekyll and Hyde – which started last night and stars Tom Bateman as Robert Jekyll – you might say ‘Well it’s on Sunday for a start’ but other than that, with its focus on big names, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, and evening friendly horror (well maybe not so ‘friendly horror’ judging by near 500 complaints received by ITV and Ofcom), it’s ITV’s attempt to that capture lightning in a bottle effect – and it could be doomed to fail. Radio Times Huw Fullerton has been examining just what it takes to emulate the Doctor.

Creator of Jekyll and Hyde, Charlie Higson is no stranger to attempting to bring fantasy to the mainstream. Before Russell T Davies hit it big in 2005, Higson attempted to revive Randall & Hopkirk (deceased) in 2000 for a mainstream audience with little success.

“What I really loved was, when Russell [T Davies] came in with Doctor Who, and brought that back, and it was a hit, I thought ‘well he managed to pull off what I was trying to do,’” Higson told the Radio Times. “And he did it probably better than me.

“So, I was very pleased when he did that. And I think it did slightly open the doors for different types of stuff. Although, from this country we haven’t really had another big fantasy-type hit since he brought back Doctor Who. Yet!”

Not that they haven’t tried. The BBC attempted to fill the vacant Doctor Who spot with fantasy fare like Merlin (which lasted five series), Atlantis (which lasted two before it sunk without a trace) and Robin Hood (which ran out of tights after three series). While ITV scored reasonable hit at the formula with time travel/dino romp Primeval and a sizeable miss with teen drama Demons.

The fact remains, Jekyll and Hyde represents the best bet for a while to connect with audiences. So why is it doomed to fail?

Looking back at the ultimately doomed Demons, which shares a Victorian gothic vibe with Higson’s show, could its failure be attributed to a lack of identity? Higson certainly think so: “I think possibly the problem was with Demons that it was slightly hard to tell what the show was about, what its identity was.

“So at least we’re starting with a thing that’s like ‘Oh, it’s Jekyll and Hyde, I know what that is. Let’s see what they do with it.’”

But has Jekyll and Hyde put too much faith in audiences’ relationship with preceding media; is Robert Louis Stevenson tale just too slight to paint a thousand worlds and offer endless possibilities like the Doctor in his TARDIS does? Is it simply trading on a name recognition?

This sense of freedom, of joy unbound by convention, you might argue, has been missing from Doctor Who for a while but, at its best, this is what the show promises. Regardless of how well you mimic the premise, timeslot, crew, and casting choices ultimately, that’s not important. It’s making sure the show lives up its promise.

Unless Jekyll and Hyde cements its own identity and finds its audience quickly, it could end up joining that great list of pretenders to the throne; rather than being a fun, clever piece of counter programming.

 

The post Jekyll and Hyde: The Strange Case of The Doctor Who Effect appeared first on Kasterborous Doctor Who News and Reviews.

Peter Capaldi to Stay On One More Year?

Andrew Reynolds is a writer at Kasterborous Doctor Who News and Reviews - All the latest Doctor Who news and reviews with our weekly podKast, features and interviews, and a long-running forum.

Three years and then out. That was Patrick Troughton’s advice to Peter Davison on the eve of him assuming the mantle of the Doctor. Wise words, indeed. Not long enough to outstay your welcome but short enough to make sure you leave ‘em wanting more. Or so goes the old adage.

Now, if rumours turn out to be true, those words may just have advised another Doctor on the best way to exit stage left.

Peter Capaldi is rumoured to have agreed to stay on one more year after BBC bosses had feared he would not renew his contract – with a shortlist of replacements already been drawn up.

An unnamed BBC source, so take it with an entire salt mine of sodium chloride, has told The Mirror that Capaldi had begun to find the 13 episodes for 9 months a year schedule a slog but, the shadowy insider said the Twelfth Doctor will return next year. The source said:

“Peter has made it clear he is happy playing the Doctor for as long as the BBC – and viewers – want him. We are very happy with him and viewers are also warming to him.

“He loves playing the Doctor and of course we want him to do another series. Peter is keen to complete three years playing the Doctor to round off his storylines. That will take us until the end of next year. After that, who knows?”

Other rumours have the next series reduced down to a trio of feature-length stories with Sherlock’s shooting schedule taking priority and the BBC still in something of a conflab over just how to approach the flagging ratings – although they have begun to rise again.

A BBC spokeswoman declined to comment, telling The Mirror: “We never discuss contracts.”

So should it Capaldi stay one more year? Should he stay longer than that? Are feature length episodes the way forward? Isn’t it a bit of a leap from ‘I’m happy to stay’ to ‘I’ve signed a new deal’ how much weight do we give to these rumours?

The post Peter Capaldi to Stay On One More Year? appeared first on Kasterborous Doctor Who News and Reviews.