R.M. Engelhardt's Blog: Burn Brightly, page 29

June 9, 2013

Hell, A Prose Poem by Peter Johnson



 


HELL


 


“If you want to understand the social and political history of modern man, study hell.”


~ Thomas Merton


It’s probably like the excitement of your first cigarette, but it lasts forever, that dizzying nausea — the Unknown: with imitation human heads on their buttocks, bats leaping from black books, dragon tails waving, monkey glands everywhere, hope dying slowly like a bad marriage, “I am nobody” the only conversation.


But then again the damned might be as unrecognizable and stupid as the living: men who use the same condom twice, women who let them, the degenerate who molested Spider-Man — everyone perpetually suing each other, holding hands in a circle whose rim clangs like a counterfeit coin.


But more likely it’s the general humiliation of being dead, realizing your own personal Beelzebub might be the least weird guy you know.

© 1997 by Peter Johnson. 




 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 09, 2013 09:14

June 8, 2013

Books

Time Journal


Books measure time in both moments and years.


We all grow old but the stories never will.


~ R.M. Engelhardt



1 like ·   •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 08, 2013 07:34

June 7, 2013

10 Neurotic Quotes

10 Neurotic Quotes


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Mignon McLaughlin


(born 6 June 1913, died 20 December 1983)


I tell you this, and I tell you plain

What you have done, you will do again

You will bite your tongue, careful or not

Upon the already-bitten spot.


 


10 Neurotic Quotes



Everybody can write; writers can’t do anything else.
Most of us become parents long before we have stopped being children.
Most sermons sound to me like commercials – but I can’t make out whether God is the Sponsor or the Product.
We would all like a reputation for generosity and we’d all like to buy it cheap.
When threatened, the first thing a democracy gives up is democracy.
Neurotics are anxiety prone, accident prone, and often just prone.
It took man thousands of years to put words down on paper, and his lawyers still wish he wouldn’t.
No one really listens to anyone else, and if you try it for a while you’ll see why.
It’s innocence when it charms us, ignorance when it doesn’t.
A critic can only review the book he has read, not the one which the writer wrote.

McLaughlin was an American journalist and author. She wrote two volumes entitled The Neurotic’s Notebook and The Complete Neurotic’s Notebook . She became a journalist and write short stories for RedbookCosmopolitan, and other women’s magazines. She worked for Vogue in the 1940s, and was Copy Editor and Managing Editor of Glamour magazine in the 1960s and early 1970s.


by Amanda Patterson for Writers Write



 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 07, 2013 09:28

June 6, 2013

June 6, 1944

June 6, 1944

June 6, 1944



 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 06, 2013 07:24

June 5, 2013

Robert Mitchum was a poet? The poems of Robert Mitchum

 


mitchumpoet


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Cabo San Lucas


Rising early to beat the heat

a little dry from last nights booze.

We’re soon out miles from land where

the big fish roam under the sun

and stars, undisturbed by time’s

wave-measured march.


Slicing bonito for bait, the blood is

red against all the blue. Blue above

and below. The hook, hungering for

meat, shines blue in my hand as

I drop its feathered plume into the wake.


We drink beer and wait for the line to sing,

rattling off the reel like a runaway train,

tightening under the drag, burning the leather stop.

The marlin leaps, its bill skewering the sky,

carves and dances in the blue, then twists and dives.


The rod quivers in the belt. Leather biting my back

I reel and pull, the marlin leaps again,

I heave forward and rare back as fire

sweat and salt gather on my skin

A moment’s slack, a shake, the fish is free.


Why aren’t all losses as lovely as this?

Quien sabe?


For Reagan


He’ll go far, of that I’m sure

since grease and a smile

will get you a mile in this town.

People love him, but what do

they know? He’s just another

B-grade star with an A-grade grin

and a glad-hand ready for

any and all.


Fuck them all, I say. Only a few

here are worth their salaries

and the rest are mannequins

dressed for the window show.

Jesus, maybe New York was the

place, but I’d miss the beach and

the sunsets here. I’m damn lucky

even if I can’t have it all.


Out of the Past


These hills, that ocean out there, the sun

heating these roadstered streets at

noon where the young and the beautiful

pass me with their eyes empty of light

but filled with the darkness of longing.

Too often I’ve lost myself in them,

swallowed the dark draught and followed

them west, under the setting moon

to the edge of the world and oblivion

until the sun again ripples the air

above these roadstered streets

and dressed in someone elses clothes

I rise to become whoever I may be today.


The Rain


I hate the rain here. On location we’re

knee deep in fake blood and mud

and the asshole director with no soul

calls for us to make another take.


I’m going leave this all soon,

all the celebrity with its paper-moon

love and bulb popping phoniness.

There’s no space for anything but loneliness.


Sarah Vaughn 


I took the A-train uptown to hear her sing,

she said I’d be safe going in with her

but man, the looks I got. And all around

everyone looking so fine and cool

and eyes flashing out of those dark

spaces, filled with things I’ll never know.


And when she sang, it was like the moon

melting down, white pearls and black satin

and a sudden silence that only she could bring.


And Thunder Road….


Jimmy was slim.

I had a belly.

Lana Turner is dead.

And so’s Grace Kelly.

What does it matter

Fast or slow

Thunder Road

Or Vertigo?




 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 05, 2013 16:30

Don’t Be A Writer …

William Faulkner In Hollywood


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


“Don’t be a ‘writer’. Be writing.”


~ William Faulkner



 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 05, 2013 08:02

This is a bookshop.

Reblogged from 101 Books:

Click to visit the original post

I saw this image in the Reddit Book forums a few weeks ago, and I had to share it on my 101 Books Facebook page.


I just have one question:


Where is this bookshop, and how can I go there? I'll just forget that they incorrectly hyphenated bookshop and crossroads.


P.S. I'm not trying to start a flame war between digital and paper books.


Read more… 29 more words

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 05, 2013 07:59

June 3, 2013

DEAR LIFE

 


MACHINE 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Dear Life


 


Upon all the souls


Of all these poor saintly creatures & upon these very


Saintly apparitions of these very very


Saintly words of the very very dead gods you


Ask me to be a poet of this age and write


Something well,


 


New?


 


When love is merely a mortal look,


Long since the days of the camera began


 


But I will hear you.


Let you be my compass and agree


With thy heart as teacher to know my full sensibilities


And nothing in my verse nor in my time and


Not even in my mind nor soul


 


Which has never been pierc’d


With heat


 


Or truth.


 


For not in me is eternity


But only this temporal


And brief moment in time.


Copy die: nor can hold it


Up to the candle, the masses


No longer here to mourn for humanity


Eternal and cold


Like a machine


Everlasting


 


Oh muse,


I burn thee


Beneath the heart


Beneath the sea


 


Of lies


 


And sleep


Until you awaken


 


Again.


 


 


___________


 


R.M. ENGELHARDT



 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 03, 2013 20:43




What a joy it must be to be a truly great writer, even...

BUK


What a joy it must be to be a truly great writer, even if it means a shotgun at the finish.

~ Buk





 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 03, 2013 13:15

June 1, 2013

Surrealism & Automatic Writing: The politics of destroying language

image
By DJ Pangburn 185 days ago



Back in the 1930s, a French psychoanalyst and philosopher by the name of Jacques Lacan began his life’s work—an attempt to create the framework by which the human psyche could be analyzed within modern civilization. Such was his influence that Lacanian thought not only left a mark on the field of psychoanalysis but found integration in Marxist thought, most notably with Michel Foucault, Jean Baudrillard and Slavoj Zizek. Like many 19th and 20th century thinkers, Lacan was particularly influenced by George Wilhelm Fredrik Hegel. After failing a physical to enter the French army, Lacan took to studying psychoanalysis. By 1934 Lacan had published “On Paranoiac Psychosis in its Relations to the Personality.” The work did not cause much of a ripple, except in Parisian Surrealist circles.


The psychoanalytical umbilicus between Lacanian psychoanalysis and Surrealism is fairly-well established. A young Lacan published work in the Surrealist review Minotaur, and associated with Andre Breton and the radically-influential novelist and philosopher Georges Bataille(author of “The Story of the Eye”). Lacan, inspired by the Surrealists and their automatic writing, went on to create work that inspired philosophers like Gilles Deleuze (“Capitalism and Schizophrenia, co-written with Felix Guatarri), Foucault (especially his panoptic disciplinary consciousness) and Baudrillard (simulated reality); whose work in turn has helped us better understand the modern, media-driven political world in which we live.


It is true that the Surrealists, only a few years after coalescing, abandoned the idea of pure automatic writing, with Breton, Bataille, Louis Aragon and Phillipe Souppault, amongst others, writing critical Surrealist novels. But the efforts in automatism were vital. Language, ossified by the upper classes and imposed on all throughout history, needed to be liberated by “pure psychic automatism.” Breton may have been the “high priest of Surrealism,” ex-communicating members for trivial transgressions, but he was right about language.


At this moment, I, the writer, and you, the reader, are partaking at a banquet of language that we did not create—a system superimposed on our consciousness. The raw material of our minds is rendered by the symbolic aspect of language, and there is no escaping it; unless one takes psychedelics, descends into madness, attains a hightened non-symbolic spiritual state, or disrupts the historical, psychological superstructure of language.


Breton and the other Surrealists realized that language, its traditional structure (syntax, morphology, semantics and phonology, to varying degrees) and expectations, needed to be destroyed and rebuilt. While the group’s efforts in automatic writing never produced writing as famous as T.S. Elliot “The Wasteland,” for instance, automatism accomplished something far more important: it struck a blow to the politics of language.


By politics of language, it should be taken to mean the inherited system of thought and communication. We are defined by the words we use, yet we had no part in the construction of the system. This word means such and such. This is how one writes a sentence, a paragraph, an essay, a poem, a novel, a letter, etc. What we think is heavily influenced by the signs and signifiers we use in the form of words (to say nothing of visual cues), and when we attempt to express a thought verbally or through the written word, we must again revert to an imposed system to do so.


It’s helpful to think about language in this way through William S. Burroughs and Brion Gysin’s popularization of the cut-up theory, itself derived from Tristan Tzara’s Dada experiments. Like automatic writing, it was an acknowledgment that traditional language (speaking, writing) were systems of control. ”My basic theory is that the written word was actually a virus,” Burroughs once said, “that made the spoken word possible. The word has not been recognized as a virus because it has achieved a state of stable symbiosis with the host…” In other words, the language virus infects and becomes symbiotic with the human mind. Or to adopt a more Freudian perspective: the conscious mind places the unconscious self under its boot heel.


If language, in a very real way, imposes an order on our thought, then it necessarily limits the way we think about and debate politics. One can see this in the facility with which political operatives (propagandists) use campaign ads to influence voters. In fact, propaganda is the cynical acknowledgment and use of language’s power on the human psyche.


A clever conservative operative and ad agency can craft an ad with one or many sound bytes that paint a liberal as the dread “socialist” or whatever type of “other” is popular at the time. Indeed, “socialist” and “communist” were two of the most popular propagandistic words rising out of the 2012 election cycle’s conservative base. A liberal, on the other hand, can frame a conservative as a selfish brute, when the reality is that a good deal of partisans simply wants government out of their life; they’re manipulated by conservative monied elites into assuming aggressive rhetorical postures.


Many people are rhetorically, psychologically, emotionally and intellectually conditioned to perceive such words and imagery as the quintessence of reality. The world must be a reduction. It must have contours, a shape that is easily visible and defined. We must at all costs be able to make sense of the world as we experience it. Nowhere is this more true than in the world of politics.


Popular fiction, while not propaganda (in most cases), is a function of an established order: something quantifiable and acceptable. How else could James Joyce‘s “Ulysses” have precipitated an obscenity trial when its kaleidoscopic vision gave an immense cinematic, poetic and, one might say, very real vision of a day in the life of Dublin, its characters and environs? The same goes for Comte de Lautreamont’s “Maldoror” and William S. Burroughs’s “Naked Lunch.” Their words create a derangement of the senses (to borrow Rimbaud’s idea), and of the status quo, because the traditional order of language, of the written word, has been almost completely eviscerated.


This, of course, was what the Surrealists were after with automatic writing, with varying degrees of success. To find this deranged destruction of language, look to Andre Breton and Phillipe Soupault’s ‘The Magnetic Fields,” the Surrealist poetry of its members, as well as the short stories and novels of Benjamin Peret, Michel Leiris, Robert Desnos (the king of automatism) and George Limbour.


In Breton and Soupault’s “The Magnetic Fields,” automatic writing yields passages such as:




“The elephant tusks lean on the star-rise steps so that the princess can descend and the bands of musicians step out of the sea. There is nobody but me now on this sonorous scale-platform, the equivocal wavering of which is my harmony. Ah! to descend with one’s hair down and limbs in disarray in the whiteness of the rapids. What cordials do you have at your disposal? I need a third hand, like a bird that the others cannot send to sleep. I need to hear dizzy gallopings in the pampas. I have so much sand in my ears, moreover, that I do not know how I shall learn your language. At least, the contact-rings are threaded well enough away under women’s skins, and do not too many innocent little waves weep over the softness of beds? … Reduce speed. So long as I don’t lose courage at the last moment.”




There, Breton and Soupault unleash a virus into the existing virus of language. All personal history with language is destroyed as we grasp for meaning. Our conscious, filter-obsessed mind wants clarity, but there is none to be had—or very little at least.


Leiris explored the unconscious in his 1928 novel “Aurora,” and the result is fantastically surreal prose like the following:




…in order to see the whole history of the world reflected in its absolute reality on the frosted glass, the pure and bare inner surface, when the woman, rising with a sudden but graceful movement, having smoothed out the creases in her crumpled skirt with little touches of her slender hand, took three steps in the direction of a lawn and solemnly greeted the grape harvests of the future which were coming towards her in the form of hailstones. Then I heard the word “Aurora,” whispered in a gentle voice softer than despairing flesh…




Leiris tantalizes the reader with moments of clarity to serve as a foothold for reality, but then pulls the rug out from under us. It’s automatic writing infused with more traditional prose, but just as capable of causing derangement of the senses.


In this world of constant media bombardment, automatic writing takes on a new form of urgency. For the Surrealists it was an answer to the absurd chaos of World War I and the failure of rationalism. Automatic writing, like Dada, was at bottom political—an acknowledgment that bourgeois democratic politics were incredibly destructive. The Surrealists may have failed in creating a new and sustained subversive reality with automatic writing, but they provided for all subsequent generations a blueprint of how to liberate the mind.


Almost a century on we are circling back to something like the Surrealists’ post-WWI reality. The collective hallucination is now broken and everyone is trying desperately to reconstitute reality through politics, media and capitalism (in its perverse form). Order is again being imposed with the word.


A little writing and reading of automatic texts might be just the cure. A nice mental palette cleanser.





Source: deathandtaxesmag.com




 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 01, 2013 09:18

Burn Brightly

R.M. Engelhardt
Burn brightly still and stand in the fire of your own creation. Follow no false prophets or false voices . Stay an original and be unafraid to chart your own course. Those who understand will do the s ...more
Follow R.M. Engelhardt's blog with rss.