Jason Arnett's Blog, page 31

March 1, 2013

Storytelling: The Limited Series

I don't agree with Dave Sim's personal
views but Cerebus is one of the most
interesting comics out there.I grew up reading comic books and watching TV shows that had new episodes each week during a 'season' that ran from September through May. Comics came out monthly or bi-monthly in general and we had to go to bookstores or grocery stores that had spinner racks or magazine racks. The networks were only three plus PBS back then. Sometimes there would be primetime previews of cartoons that would run on Saturday mornings. Sometimes those cartoons were based on comic books that I read.

Occasionally an adaptation of a film into a comic book would appear in the spinner rack. If it was one of the Marvel Super Specials it was magazine-sized and colored beautifully. (I have fond memories of discovering Steve Oliff's talents among those comics.) If it wasn't a MSS it was a comic and it was usually a two-parter. A very limited series.

According to this article on Wikipedia, Dave Sim is credited with creating the first (and longest) limited series with his title Cerebus the Aardvark. DC Comics published the first modern miniseries, The World of Krypton, after the cancellation of its excellent and long-running title Showcase which functioned as a kind of tryout book for new characters or B- or C-list characters. Three issues long, WoK appeared monthly in the spinner racks as did Untold Legend of the Batman and then so many, many others.

In TV, they call them miniseries, too. At least in America. The first one I remember watching was Roots and when that proved wildly popular there were two or three miniseries on every network each season. One of my fondest memories was watching the adaptation of Ray Bradbury's The Martian Chronicles. It stuck in my mind so hard that when I stumbled across the DVD version of it at my library in the last three or four years I had to see it again.

Of course it wasn't as good as I remembered. The sequence of the Martian woman falling in love with a human and the connected story of Jeff Spender (played wonderfully by Bernie Casey) going native were still powerful stuff but the rest of the series showed its age. It seems that the time might be right to revisit the stories and see if an update could happen. I digress.

Fast forward. In comics we had extended limited series with titles like The Sandman, Preacher, and 100 Bullets where creators (remember Dave Sim?) announced there was a definite end. And the creators stayed to the end, mostly. (Sandman had rotating artists as each new arc began after creators Sam Kieth and Mike Dringenberg left.) This is part of what made all three of those, in particular, so successful.

On TV, The Sopranos on HBO had a definite end announced by creator David Chase. I seem to remember David Milch saying that Deadwood also had a definite end but it was cancelled before it was reached. As well, Carnivale was cancelled before its intended ending, though that show may have been too ambitious for its own good. Regardless. You get what I'm saying. On the other side of the pond, the BBC produces limited series that return from year to year (Downton Abbey is the most prominent in popular culture right now but hardly the first) in the same way. In fact, HBO's approach of 10 - 13 episode seasons I bet was inspired by the BBC. I can't confirm that, though.

My point here is that I believe limited series storytelling is the way to go. Get in, tell the tale you want to tell, have a definite ending, and go home with acclaim and awards or at least something that can disappear quickly. I've always believed that. Ever since I read World of Krypton all those years ago.

A series of miniseries works better than an ongoing, never-ending narrative that must be sustained by keeping characters the same as they've always been. Next time I'm going to get into why I think that characters like Superman, Spider-Man, and even James Bond (in film, at least) have failed their fans more than they've succeeded.
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 01, 2013 04:30

February 27, 2013

Closing Time

This was a postal substation until 15 years ago or so. It's
difficult to turn left out of here, but it's really a pretty
convenient location. If you're in town, go and buy
something, willya?My local Half Price Bookstore is closing in June. This makes me extraordinarily sad.

The debate over whether or not it's appropriate for books (and movies and music and board games and magazines, etc...) to be resold in a nationwide ultimate garage sale-type setting doesn't really bother me that much. I want creators to get paid, but I think most writers want to be read no matter what. So, really, what makes me sad is that another bookstore is going away from my town.

When I was growing up there were two Town Crier bookstores (both had tobacco shops in the back), two used bookstores on the same street but four blocks apart, an independent bookseller on the developing south side of town, another two or three in the downtown, one at the University, another at a shopping center at a major intersection and I'm sure more scattered across the city that I wasn't aware of. Oh yeah and there was Quantrill's Flea Market where there were books and comics and records and all sorts of things in little niches under an ancient building downtown. It was a treasure cavern in there, to be sure.

The two used bookstores were J. Hood Bookseller and Dean's. I got the majority of my Bantam Doc Savages at J. Hood and I got a lot of old comics from Dean's, too. The one that got away there was a pristine copy of The Super-Hero Women and Marvel's Greatest Super-Hero Battles for $20 total. Yeah, I kick myself for leaving those on the shelf. Sigh.

About twenty years ago, Hastings came to town and drove one of the independent booksellers out of business by opening up in a vacant Safeway two doors down. Hatch's was a good store for me. I bought a good deal of science fiction there. It was huge and fun to shop. Sigh.

Adventure A Bookstore went away shortly after that. They were downtown and couldn't compete with the prices Hastings was charging (or not charging). The really sucky part for Adventure and Hatch's was that Hastings also sold CDs (and tapes but they went away pretty quickly if I remember) and rented movies. VHS back then, but still. Hastings was a major chain store that had a lot of stuff and people flocked there and forgot about Hatch's and Adventure.

Then about ten or twelve years ago, Borders moved into downtown and that killed all but one of the booksellers in the business district. The Raven - again just about two doors down from Borders - managed to not only compete with Borders but survive. It's still there even though Borders is gone now for over a year. They specialized in catering to locals who were loyal. I went there when I couldn't get what I wanted at Borders and when Hastings let me down with their (in)ability to order titles I wanted. To be truthful, I didn't go there often enough.

Over the last four or five years I've ordered more and more off the internet: Alibris, abebooks, halfdotcom, Amazon. You know the drill.

Why did I do this? When Borders closed we were down to the Raven, Hastings, Half Price Books, and another used place - The Dusty Bookshelf. And the very much weakened University bookstore. That's it. In a town that had less than 50,000 residents (when University was not in session) we had at least half a dozen bookstores of various stripes. That was the 70s and 80s. As the town's grown we've lost bookstores.

So when I went looking for a title like Hitchcock by Truffaut, I had to look on the internet. And that's not the only title, I promise.

But I always looked around locally, first. If I could find the book in a store in town I would (usually) buy it in town. If the price locally was significantly more than the cheapest price plus shipping I would buy off the 'net. If it was close, I'd buy locally. If it was new, I'd buy local.  More often than not.

And that's why the HPB is going away. Because I (and a lot of other people) chose to be impatient and order from the internet rather than give people in our community who needed jobs the opportunity to do them.

I feel a little guilty.

I could rail against the unfairness of a corporation that's dressed up a used bookstore failing to recognize that there's a core group of customers who go to our local HPB often, but that won't accomplish anything. It comes down to numbers. I understand numbers. Not enough locals bought often enough. That's why the store's closing. That's why my local comic shop closed. That's why my favorite record store closed. That's why everything closes.

This is why Amazon and iTunes and all the others are thriving. Because they have things we want with minimal fuss. And for an ultra-cheap price. Also, you can buy things without wearing pants.

At the cost of locals who could have been working at half a dozen bookstores and record stores and other retail outlets. Ah, dammit. Ultimately it's my fault and the fault of the rest of the city that once was a town. The 'buy local mantra' didn't make a dent and likely won't, even after this.

I spent my formative years going from one local bookstore to another after school and on Saturdays. My mom always took us to bookstores and we always spent at least half an hour there. Then we'd go to the library.

It's too bad that doesn't happen now. Because we are impatient. Because we don't know how to wait.

If you live in the same town as me, hell even if you don't, click on the link to my local HPB and like 'em on Facebook or give 'em a +1 on Google. Please. It probably won't make a lick of difference but maybe, just maybe...
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 27, 2013 04:30

February 25, 2013

The Steel Seraglio by Mike Carey, Linda Carey, and Louise Carey

This book.

Wow.

This book is amazing.

I was transported - completely - to the world of the story.

Here's the description from the publisher's website:

The sultan Bokhari Al-Bokhari of Bessa has 365 concubines—until a violent coup puts the city in the hands of the religious zealot Hakkim Mehdad. Hakkim has no use for the pleasures of the flesh: he condemns the women first to exile and then to death. Cast into the desert, the concubines must rely on themselves and each other to escape from the new sultan’s fanatical pursuit. But their goals go beyond mere survival: with the aid of the champions who emerge from among them, they intend to topple the usurper and retake Bessa from the repressive power that now controls it. The assassin, Zuleika, whose hands are weapons. The seer, Rem, whose tears are ink. The wise Gursoon, who was the dead sultan’s canniest advisor. The camel-thief, Anwar Das, who offers his lying tongue to the concubines’ cause. Together, they must forge the women of the harem into an army, a seraglio of steel, and use it to conquer a city. But even if they succeed, their troubles will just be beginning—because their most dangerous enemy is within their own number . . . .

Like Mike Carey's rather brilliant The Unwritten (for DC/Vertigo - you should be reading this if you aren't already) The Steel Seraglio is a story about stories. Points of view are shifted as different narrators take over to tell the reader what happened. Each of the main characters has depth, is well-formed, and changes along the way. The two semi-significant male characters are less defined in comparison to the women and that's fine because it serves the story.

The villains are also male and reprehensible because they cannot believe that women could actually pose them any threat. Their superiority is what fuels them though one is driven more by belief than any real sexism.

And now we come to what may be the biggest issue for some (at least according to some critics on the internet): it's not set in Western culture. After all, how can Western writers really understand the Eastern mind and tell stories that are meaningful? How can we, as Western readers, want to read those sorts of stories? What's our way in?

Well, obviously - maybe only to me, it's the story itself.

I picked up the book because I've read a lot of Mike Carey's other work and all (I think) of his novels. I've especially enjoyed his off-beat comics like Crossing Midnight and the Felix Castor novels which reminded me of his Hellblazer run. As I read the back cover copy of Seraglio I was not just intrigued, but enthralled with the idea of exploring the possibility of 365 concubines taking on the males of their world.

While I was reading, the Careys use language in ways that are intriguing and so unfamiliar to me that it reenforced the world of the story and the time of its setting. I can't confirm that they've invented new words or terms but it certainly seemed like it. Additionally, the fact that the voices change with the narrators is an enhancement rather than a detriment. They've done an excellent job in keeping their voices out of it in favor of letting the characters take over. I can't tell you which parts were written by Mike and which weren't. It didn't matter, anyway. I was swept completely into the story.

And, having finished it, I had a helluva lot of fun reading. The religion is never mentioned by name and I suspect that a good many of the cities named in the book are invented as is the name of the god of the story: the Increate. (If I'm wrong about this, my apologies. However when I searched, 'increate' came up as a word, not a concept or deity. It means "not yet created" which added a level to the story. Either way, I'm interested to know if the term is invented or in use somewhere. Let me know.)

This book is very sharp, reads quickly, and took me into a world that I hadn't spent a lot of time in. After all, the desert peoples of the world are fascinating as evidenced by stories like Lawrence of Arabia and Hidalgo. And the reason I mention this book concurrent to those to films is that The Steel Seraglio would make an excellent film. Not only because it's a terribly entertaining read but because it would be good for Americans in particular and the Western world overall, to see a vibrant story about strong, smart, determined women who don't look like they stepped out of Vogue.

I can't recommend this book any more highly. It's a terrific fantasy that's not only well-written but engrossing, intriguing, thought-provoking and ultimately, about how stories are told. As a writer, I can't ask for anything more from any book.
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 25, 2013 04:30

February 22, 2013

Go Visit

While you're over there, check out all my friends' work
at the Cafe. I couldn't ask for a better group of folks to
be associated with. They're awesome.I'm taking today off here to point you to my post at The Confabulator Cafe where I'm writing about how I critique other writers.

Between here and the Cafe I'm blogging about 2000+ words a week and not writing nearly enough. True, I can crank out a week's worth of posts on a good day and I need to get focused on some fiction things. (By the way, my post next week at the Cafe is a fun one, Conned - Based on a True Story. Watch for it.)

Also, digging out from the snowstorm. Check out my Twitter feed for pictures if you missed them yesterday.

And re-writing a draft of a new novelette that had some serious problems and one giant gaping plot issue that bothered me almost from the beginning. It was just too heavy-handed. With any luck I'll be able to knock that out pretty quickly.

See you Monday. Or on Twitter.
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 22, 2013 04:30

February 20, 2013

Self-Publishing on My Mind

You all remember Narcissus, don't you?Oh, NPR, how I love you.

A while back there were some articles on the publishing industry. This one ran on Monday, this one on Tuesday.

For years I've been extolling the virtues of self-publishing. I've self-published. I've even blogged on the subject for the Confabulator Cafe. My grandfather self-published a book of stories that he'd been telling the family for years and years. Well, vanity-published.

That's different, isn't it?

Back in '41 when my grandfather was a wee lad... Hold on. That's not how this should start.

Vanity publishing goes back to about 1941 (or earlier) according to this here article on Wikipedia. Pretty much what it comes down to is that anyone who charges an author a fee to 'publish' a book is a vanity press. But doesn't Amazon charge a fee to host or 'publish' your book? Sure they do. But they take it out of the sale of each individual book rather than charging the author up front.

When you see it like that, it kind of sounds like vanity publishing, doesn't it?

Well. Regardless.

No, hang on. That does sound like vanity publishing repackaged. The explosion in self-publishing fired by Amazon's hosting service for ebooks that they touted and that the big New York publishers refuse to deal on in terms of pricing is a prettified vanity press. (Maybe. I'm hyperbolizing here for effect. It's my soapbox here and you can do what you want on your own blog. Deal with it.)

Go on. Read that article on self-publishing that I linked to. Here, in case you don't want to scroll up. Want proof? How much risk does Amazon assume in 'accepting' your book for 'publication'? Hm? I guess they're selective to a degree, but in general just about anyone can publish anything on Amazon, right? Do you disagree? (Let's not get into a bunch of semantics here, either.)

Do you see what I'm getting at?

Even publishing with Amazon, you pay a fee, they aren't all that picky about what you write, and they incur minimal (if any) real financial risk.

I'm not saying you shouldn't self-publish. You should if you want to. But make it truly self-published. Do the work yourself. Don't depend on Amazon's name to 'sell' your book for you. Sell a high-quality, DRM-free PDF of your book. Your Kindle app will import it just fine. Spend some money on a cover. Spend money on an editor. Give artist and editor credit in the book and in the way you describe it. Then find a distributor.

That's not Amazon. Or any other platform that takes a fee out of every sale you make. If they're printing it, fine, paper and labor need to be paid for. But for ebooks? Come on. You can do it better yourself.

That said, here's my Amazon author profile. (He said with chagrin.)

Look, just think about it. You can sell just as many copies through your own website as through Amazon.

If you want to.
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 20, 2013 04:30

February 18, 2013

Energy

I don't know if it looks like this in my brain when I get
a new project, but it certainly captures the elegance of
the process.I tend to get energy, that is get pumped up, when I conceive an idea or when I start a project. A lot of people do. Further, that energy translates into the task at hand once I've initiated it.

All the energy I get, I push back into the task which must be accomplished.

This explains why I was so high on my novel while I was writing it AND why I get so jazzed when I go back to it. The idea was so compelling, to me and I hope ultimately to a publisher, that I couldn't walk away from it. I could see things so crystal clear, like it was high-def in the best way.

Ever heard the saying "can't see the forest for the trees"? I can see the trees, all right in this case, it's the fact that they make up a forest that's eluding me.

All these disparate elements - characters, plotlines, intrigues - are what I'm anxious about. These are the parts I tell people who ask about the book. I think this is why I had such a difficult time in outlining the damn thing.

When I opened up a novelette I wrote in 2011 and revised in 2012 just recently, I saw a lot of mistakes I'd made. Things that were unnecessarily clunky and muddy, turns of phrase that could have been better, points of view that weren't the main character's. All of them had to be fixed. I thought I would just turn this around in a week and get it gone again, off to be published.

Didn't work that way.

Instead, the group that's editing it sent it back with more notes. Sigh. Really? I'd missed all these things in three or four tries? I was going to have to revise this book AGAIN?

Well, it was my fault in the first place. That I hadn't adequately plotted/outlined the book I was writing. I thought I had, but it turned out the book I thought I was writing wasn't at all the book that needed to be written. If I showed you the manuscript, you'd be shocked at how many different colors there are on it. It's a rainbow riot.

But it's because I get wrapped up in the excitement of The New, The Now. I figure I'll worry about things Later because I'm so pumped to start writing Now...

Don't let this happen to you.

Take some time to really think what you're doing through. Throw down an outline that you have to follow. Then flow chart it. See where you can make decisions count for more by asking "what if" more often.

Or don't. Then you'll end up endlessly revising and losing your enthusiasm for a project that you loved at the first.

The upside of this is that you may find your love for the project once you get digging back into it. That's what's happened to me. I love this book more now than when I first wrote it. To be truthful, I'm glad it wasn't published the way it was. It is sooooo much better now.

So. On with your day. Find your energy and get enthusiastic about what you're doing.
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 18, 2013 04:30

February 15, 2013

Writer's Doubt

Everyone feels like they fake it sometimes. Don't
think you're the only one. Illustration from here.I don't believe there's such a thing as writer's block. Never have, really. Sure every writer struggles with concepts, constructing sentences that are supposed to make sense and come out like a bad Hunter Thompson hallucinations but that's par for the course. It happens to us all.

But where does it come from?

My opinion - because this is my soapbox - is that it's doubt. I've known a lot of creative types, even business types, who think that they're in over their heads. That sinking feeling that really they are a fraud and sooner rather than later they will be found out and excoriated for having dare to pretend they are anything more than anyone else.

There's the cliche of someone looking at an abstract piece of art and saying "My four-year old could do that! How is that art?"

The cliche of the starving artist having to work a crappy job at a fast food restaurant, who talks about making art with friends who don't understand, who say "do you want fries with that?" is common, too.

We are programmed to not reach beyond ourselves unless it's in terms of sport. Women aren't supposed to be as successful in business as men. They aren't supposed to be as smart. (Remember when a talking Barbie once said "Math is hard?") People from lower class circumstances aren't supposed to be smart or pretty or funny or anything that the middle class isn't.

As a society we look down on people who want to create things, or change things, or make things better for others who aren't as fortunate. We belittle, we demean, we make these people and the lower classes they champion feel somehow less for not toeing the line. How dare they want others to have what we have? Why, that's communist!

It's bullshit.

What it creates, when people who are smarter and richer and prettier than you are, is doubt. Of course I can't be better than what I am. I was born into this. I am supposed to be less than them. What was I thinking?

You were thinking that you could be like your hero, your inspiration, your muse.

Maybe you can't be exactly like that person or persons but that doesn't mean you can't try and be your own person who might inspire someone else further down the line. For me, I'll never be a writer like Heinlein or Gaiman or Wyllis Cooper. But I can be a writer who writes and learns and grows as a writer and become my own persona. I can be myself.

It's getting past the crap that we pull down onto ourselves that causes the greatest harm. Don't listen to the detractors, don't let the bastards grind you down. Reach as far as you can and keep on doing it. Exceed your grasp.

When you look back, you'll find you've reached farther than you ever thought you could when you started.
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 15, 2013 04:30

February 13, 2013

Thanks for the Love

I don't always bring roses home, but I like having
flowers in the house as much as the missus does.Tomorrow is Valentine's Day and I'll be working like any other day and coming home to my wife like any other day. Like most of you who work away from the house and come home to your spouse (or significant other).

I'll come home with flowers, like I usually do on February 14th, and like I also do several times over the course of the year. My wife and I will probably go out for dinner somewhere nice but not too nice. It's a routine.

But today I want to thank all of you who've taken the time to read the blog here. There's been a significant rise in traffic over the last three months or so. I'm not sure if it's that I've been writing things that you all want to read (I hope that's it) or what, but I'm really and truly grateful for the love you've shown Jason Arnett dot com. There have been retweets of links, more pluses on Google+, comments on Facebook links and shares there, too.

I'll keep at it, but I wanted share a list of the most popular posts so far this year. Here it is:

Don't Pirate My Book(s) - because Chuck Wendig told me to say it.
The Truth of the Lie - Outright lies are just meant to hurt their victims or, at the minimum, cast the teller of the lie in the best possible light.
Pranks - ...a good prank is a good prank and everyone should be able to chortle about it afterwards.
Widespread Panic - ...this post is more about procrastination than about finishing.
Mr. Know-it-All Owns Up - I realize I don't know everything there is to know.
Vampires and Zombies Are Not For Me -  ...if I were to write a vampire or zombie story, what would be my contribution to the genre? I can't see one yet.

I'll keep trying to keep the blog engaging here, gang. If there's something you want to ask me, don't forget that you can click over to my still-nascent Tumblr and fire away. I forgot to mention in this post that I'm on Goodreads, too. Feel free to follow there.

Hope you all have a happy Valentine's Day or a good Thursday. Whichever works best for you.
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 13, 2013 04:30

February 11, 2013

Overtweaking

I've been whacking away at trying to be a creative person for a number of years now. Well, all my life, really, but seriously for the last thirteen or fourteen. Well, only seriously for a total of five or six years of the last thirteen or fourteen. You get what I'm saying.

I hope.

Anyway, November of 2011 saw Evolver: Apex Predator hit digital shelves at Amazon and Barnes & Noble. Immediately following that book's acceptance by Actionopolis I began working on another for them.

We're about two steps closer to seeing that book come out. There's some cover artwork and the final edits have been turned back in. I'm hoping it's going to be ready sooner than later. Reading the book again before it goes out was weird. I looked at what I'd written and while I think it still tells a good story, I would have approached some things a little differently. As it was, I fixed some clarification things and just some minor housekeeping stuff.

If I were less secure, I could have kept tweaking little things here and there and here and there. Finally I  sighed and decided it was time to let it go. So off it went in an email.

What inspired the re-read and edits was getting to see a preview of the cover.

Those are the little moments that have made me wanting to be a writer worth all the time and energy I've been putting in. Well, that and getting paid for writing the books. I guess that makes me somewhere between an amateur and semi-pro. Doesn't it?

Anyway.

All this led to another email that said go ahead on a third book that I turned in last year. The draft was in need of some attention and now that the other book is in production I'm feeling good about taking care of this one.

Look, I'm sorry to be vague but these are books that will definitely see the light of day. Through the fault of no one, little delays piled up around them and now it appears those have been cleared and we're rolling again. Here's to hoping that 2013 is the year of these books coming out and getting some attention. I'll need your help on that last part, but I'm good with the writing and editing bits.

I promise I'll share covers and announcements when I can. For now, I'm glad that the work is moving forward.
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 11, 2013 04:30

February 8, 2013

The Confabulator Cafe

I've been kind of lax in reminding you every week to visit my writing group's blog, The Confabulator Cafe. It's a wonderful mix of writers exploring all the things that go into writing. Every week we have a prompt that pushes us to write about some aspect of storytelling. Categories include Writer's Life, Influence, Politics, Mechanics, and more.

What you get at the Cafe is all of us considering the week's question (this week's is Why Do We Need Stories?) and then being able to read ten or eleven or twelve responses, all from unique perspectives. Since we're all at different stages and want different things from being writers, it's often an eclectic mix of opinions and feelings and thoughts. I'm sure there are plenty of blogs by writers about writing all across the Internet (only about a million, I suppose) but this one is a little different. I think it's a little more honest and it's certainly a record of several journeys.

But we don't limit ourselves to only talking about our Processes or the Ephemera that go into writing, and in particular our writing. Every month we throw down and write a story to entertain our readers. Again, it's from a prompt and every story is unique. We don't all write in the same genres, either. We invite you to sample our writing styles and to show off how much fun we're having on this quest of ours. We're even writing in a common universe in the Straeon Manor stories with a bit of crossover in the last round.

What I want you to take away from this post is that while you have a lot of choices to spend your time on the Internet in pursuit of various entertainments or illuminations or just in wasting time, I think you might be taken with some of our bloggers there. I certainly am. I've learned a bit about other's processes and habits and been able to incorporate a bit of some of them here and there.

If for no other reason than we do it because we want to - we're not asking for your money, just a little of your time - come on over and read a bit while you're having your morning coffee. Pop the feed into your reader and keep up with what we're doing. Tell a writer you know about us. Who knows? We might be able to inspire someone to take the leap.

So consider this my honest attempt to entice you to visit The Confabulator Cafe, at least once, to see if there's anything you're interested in. Maybe it's just reading an entertaining post or maybe it's something else. Regardless, if you can all the Confabulators will be appreciative.


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 08, 2013 04:30