Gillian Polack's Blog, page 200
March 19, 2012
gillpolack @ 2012-03-19T23:54:00
Life continues. Life and work continue. Life and work include my latest BiblioBuffet article, on Sara Douglass. http://www.bibliobuffet.com/bookish-dreaming/1719-sara-douglass-lost-footsteps-031812
Why do some days seem bigger than others?
Why do some days seem bigger than others?
Published on March 19, 2012 12:54
Women's History Month - guest blogger, Mary Victoria
Once, there was a little old wise woman who lived in a hut and knew the secret names of birds and brewed up magic spells in her cauldron. Actually, she lived in Oregon and brewed up stories. Her name was, and still is, Ursula K. Le Guin.
I loved, and was deeply influenced by many women writers of fantasy and historical fiction growing up: Mary Renault, Rosemary Sutcliff and Mary Stewart, to name only a few. But Ursula K. Le Guin went one step further than the rest. She reached into the heart of nine-year-old me, her magic seeping through those black marks on that white page – reached right in there with that word-magic of hers, right into my very soul, and flipped a switch. On.
Think, she said. Think about life. Think about good and evil. Think about all you take for granted in your childish way. Are all the things you accept as true, without thinking, really and absolutely true, always and everywhere? Is there a truth that goes above and beyond them, holding them inside, still valid in their own way, but ridiculously small and unimportant when you look at the bigger picture?
It sounds a little teacherly when put like that. But the way she did it, keeping her philosophy beautifully embedded in her story, never preaching, never pedantic, made all the difference.
The tale in question was 'The Wizard of Earthsea', arguably one of Ms Le Guin's most beloved works, and for good reason. It is psychologically, dare I say spiritually, absolutely sound. After following Ged the hero in his quest for popularity and power (yes, I can relate to that) and seeing him crash and burn as a result (yes, I can relate to that, too,) there is a final chase. The dark thing Ged has released into the world first hunts him down, then is hunted by him in turn. The story culminates in a struggle between the two forces. Ged and the dark Thing wrestle in a state between land and sea, life and death, waking and sleeping.
Except that they aren't two. At the climax of the struggle, Ged names his nemesis: it is himself. He doesn't seek to banish the darkness or deny it any longer. He claims it and so has power over it. He takes it back into himself, becoming a wiser and more complete human being as a result.
It's a teaching story, in the best tradition of myths the world over. It holds a nugget of truth about life told in metaphorical terms. And for the little nine-year-old reader, whose whole being leapt and thrilled with that discovery – "It's him – of course it's him – that was the only way he could deal with it!" – it was a watershed moment. She has never gone back to a dully divisive world view in the years since and has always, doggedly, tried to name her darkness.
It may be out of fashion to imagine one can teach through stories. Market forces yell otherwise: "Entertain us!" they cry. "To hell with all the meaningful stuff!" But I suspect that's a passing craze. People have always been curious about the universe and how it works, and the human soul is a piece of the universe, after all. It needs exploring.
Thank you, Ursula, for helping me discover mine.
Note from Gillian: I have lost Mary's bio! I blame living in far too interesting times. You can find out more about her here: http://maryvictoria.net/
I loved, and was deeply influenced by many women writers of fantasy and historical fiction growing up: Mary Renault, Rosemary Sutcliff and Mary Stewart, to name only a few. But Ursula K. Le Guin went one step further than the rest. She reached into the heart of nine-year-old me, her magic seeping through those black marks on that white page – reached right in there with that word-magic of hers, right into my very soul, and flipped a switch. On.
Think, she said. Think about life. Think about good and evil. Think about all you take for granted in your childish way. Are all the things you accept as true, without thinking, really and absolutely true, always and everywhere? Is there a truth that goes above and beyond them, holding them inside, still valid in their own way, but ridiculously small and unimportant when you look at the bigger picture?
It sounds a little teacherly when put like that. But the way she did it, keeping her philosophy beautifully embedded in her story, never preaching, never pedantic, made all the difference.
The tale in question was 'The Wizard of Earthsea', arguably one of Ms Le Guin's most beloved works, and for good reason. It is psychologically, dare I say spiritually, absolutely sound. After following Ged the hero in his quest for popularity and power (yes, I can relate to that) and seeing him crash and burn as a result (yes, I can relate to that, too,) there is a final chase. The dark thing Ged has released into the world first hunts him down, then is hunted by him in turn. The story culminates in a struggle between the two forces. Ged and the dark Thing wrestle in a state between land and sea, life and death, waking and sleeping.
Except that they aren't two. At the climax of the struggle, Ged names his nemesis: it is himself. He doesn't seek to banish the darkness or deny it any longer. He claims it and so has power over it. He takes it back into himself, becoming a wiser and more complete human being as a result.
It's a teaching story, in the best tradition of myths the world over. It holds a nugget of truth about life told in metaphorical terms. And for the little nine-year-old reader, whose whole being leapt and thrilled with that discovery – "It's him – of course it's him – that was the only way he could deal with it!" – it was a watershed moment. She has never gone back to a dully divisive world view in the years since and has always, doggedly, tried to name her darkness.
It may be out of fashion to imagine one can teach through stories. Market forces yell otherwise: "Entertain us!" they cry. "To hell with all the meaningful stuff!" But I suspect that's a passing craze. People have always been curious about the universe and how it works, and the human soul is a piece of the universe, after all. It needs exploring.
Thank you, Ursula, for helping me discover mine.
Note from Gillian: I have lost Mary's bio! I blame living in far too interesting times. You can find out more about her here: http://maryvictoria.net/
Published on March 19, 2012 11:08
gillpolack @ 2012-03-19T18:44:00
PS Thank you all for being so wonderful and supportive. (And my camera is also gone, so when I was asked if I had taken pictures before I tidied up, I got to say "With what?" Jenny M - your mobile was left alone, entire and untouched.)
Published on March 19, 2012 07:44
gillpolack @ 2012-03-19T18:41:00
My very exciting day - next episode.
It could have been worse. It could have been better. It would be really nice if it hadn't happened at all.
A suspicious looking person was identified near my place at 2 pm, so while I was at the hospital. He stole my netbook, my camera, my most valuable jewellery (except my grandmother's unengangement ring, which he missed because it was in probably the only container he didn't open and fling across the floor), a bunch of chains and pendants, and some other small stuff including, oddly, half a box of whiteboard crayons. The forensics expert (I asked him lots of questions!) said that the crayons were probably for graffiti and I pointed out they were whiteboard and easily erased and he said good, that makes it easier for the cleaning crew. He and the two police reps and the three insurance bods were really reassuring, very helpful and very professional. I was apparently calm but talkative*.
The insurance bods have taken many details and walked me through the process.
My place was definitely broken into - there was clear evidence on the door. The police said that there's a lot of this activity around right now, but that this person wasn't the same person as the one they were looking into earlier. We talked about his modus operandi. I know a lot more about theft that I did and can now build up a personality from a style of operation if I ever want to use it for a novel. The police and the forensics person were happy to explain to me, when I told them this.
I switched to research mode because it was the only way of remaining calm - I couldn't see properly because of the eye drops from the hospital and my flat was a wreck - I had someone who was looking for certain valuables, but also took a joy in flinging things around. The oddest thing - apart from the crayons - was the violin. He pulled out everything from under the bed (mainly author copies of books) and opened the violin case. He left everything in the case, but he loosened the horsehair from the bow so it entirely needs restringing.
*I'm learning I react differently to different crises. I was not calm but talkative after the molotov cocktails, for instance.
It could have been worse. It could have been better. It would be really nice if it hadn't happened at all.
A suspicious looking person was identified near my place at 2 pm, so while I was at the hospital. He stole my netbook, my camera, my most valuable jewellery (except my grandmother's unengangement ring, which he missed because it was in probably the only container he didn't open and fling across the floor), a bunch of chains and pendants, and some other small stuff including, oddly, half a box of whiteboard crayons. The forensics expert (I asked him lots of questions!) said that the crayons were probably for graffiti and I pointed out they were whiteboard and easily erased and he said good, that makes it easier for the cleaning crew. He and the two police reps and the three insurance bods were really reassuring, very helpful and very professional. I was apparently calm but talkative*.
The insurance bods have taken many details and walked me through the process.
My place was definitely broken into - there was clear evidence on the door. The police said that there's a lot of this activity around right now, but that this person wasn't the same person as the one they were looking into earlier. We talked about his modus operandi. I know a lot more about theft that I did and can now build up a personality from a style of operation if I ever want to use it for a novel. The police and the forensics person were happy to explain to me, when I told them this.
I switched to research mode because it was the only way of remaining calm - I couldn't see properly because of the eye drops from the hospital and my flat was a wreck - I had someone who was looking for certain valuables, but also took a joy in flinging things around. The oddest thing - apart from the crayons - was the violin. He pulled out everything from under the bed (mainly author copies of books) and opened the violin case. He left everything in the case, but he loosened the horsehair from the bow so it entirely needs restringing.
*I'm learning I react differently to different crises. I was not calm but talkative after the molotov cocktails, for instance.
Published on March 19, 2012 07:42
gillpolack @ 2012-03-19T15:28:00
I've just come back from the hospital and I'm waiting for the police. The hospital is less exciting than it sounds - it was the first followup after last week's intersting event. So far I'm clear of retinal detachment but not out of danger yet - I have to go back in 2 weeks.
I just got in and my place was a mess. Even for me my place was a mess. Stuff thrown everywhere. The only closed cupboards were in the kitchen. When the police comes I'll have a better idea of what's actually gone (if anything - it looks as if my DVDs are not of the sort anyone wants - but why? Isn't Zorro's Foreign Legion the stuff of dreams?) and I am really not one for valuable jewellery (I can't tally the jewellery yet because it's all over the bed, but the most valuable is probably gone, which is my grandmother's engagement ring - I'll find out soon). The fumy thing is that it took me a few minutes of walking over boxes and things to realise taht I had a problem, not because the place was in any way the way I left it, but because I can't see a d* thing. Eyedrops and eye combine and make my home a hazard. I can't wait to see what the team of police (for they are sending a whole team) makes of this sudden junkheap.
After this has been sorted (and insurance if insurance is needed is done, I intend to have a *very* quiet day.
And I suddenly realised taht something *is* missing - my netbook. For certain. Damn. May I please hate thieves?
I just got in and my place was a mess. Even for me my place was a mess. Stuff thrown everywhere. The only closed cupboards were in the kitchen. When the police comes I'll have a better idea of what's actually gone (if anything - it looks as if my DVDs are not of the sort anyone wants - but why? Isn't Zorro's Foreign Legion the stuff of dreams?) and I am really not one for valuable jewellery (I can't tally the jewellery yet because it's all over the bed, but the most valuable is probably gone, which is my grandmother's engagement ring - I'll find out soon). The fumy thing is that it took me a few minutes of walking over boxes and things to realise taht I had a problem, not because the place was in any way the way I left it, but because I can't see a d* thing. Eyedrops and eye combine and make my home a hazard. I can't wait to see what the team of police (for they are sending a whole team) makes of this sudden junkheap.
After this has been sorted (and insurance if insurance is needed is done, I intend to have a *very* quiet day.
And I suddenly realised taht something *is* missing - my netbook. For certain. Damn. May I please hate thieves?
Published on March 19, 2012 04:28
gillpolack @ 2012-03-19T12:01:00
I've examined my coming week with a close and relentless scrutiny. Two half days lost to medical stuff, two lots of teaching, two meetings, two dinners with visiting friends, two review books and study. Study refuses to pair up and make two afternoons of study or two books or two anythings. It stands resolutely alone, reminding me that it must be done.
Speaking of books, as part of my close and relentless scrutiny, I have denuded my fiction library of its last duplicates. Most of them will go to CSFG people on Wednesday (first come, best dressed - and two are already spoken for) but the two books by Patricia Wrightson were intentional duplicates and are able to be posted to people who need more books by Australian women in their lives. Call it part of my WHM celebration.
If you would like a book by Wrightson, tell me about your favourite Aussie women writers below and I'll haul out the magical purple sparkly sorting hat again. I have two.
Speaking of books, as part of my close and relentless scrutiny, I have denuded my fiction library of its last duplicates. Most of them will go to CSFG people on Wednesday (first come, best dressed - and two are already spoken for) but the two books by Patricia Wrightson were intentional duplicates and are able to be posted to people who need more books by Australian women in their lives. Call it part of my WHM celebration.
If you would like a book by Wrightson, tell me about your favourite Aussie women writers below and I'll haul out the magical purple sparkly sorting hat again. I have two.
Published on March 19, 2012 01:01
March 18, 2012
Women's History Month - Trent Jamieson, guest blogger
Krissy Kneen Author of Triptych and Affection
Krissy Kneen* is my inspiration. I count her as a friend. I know a lot of writers, and, like the best of them, Krissy stands out in her absolute bravery, and her will for perfection. It terrifies and delights me.
She's a writer that you will be hearing about quite a bit in the next few years, and I suspect that she will be nominated for a few Aurealis Awards, too. She has already published two books with Text. Affection which was a frank discussion of sexuality through memoir, and Triptych a series of novellas looking at sexuality. There are few other writers that engage with the subject as beautifully and bravely. She's not frightened to be confronting.
Her prose is glorious, measured and challenging. She works hard, she struggles with everything, challenges everything - including her own beliefs - and manages to produce work that says so much. And she's prolific, without her prose reading as though it's forced or rushed. Expect to see at least three remarkable books from her in the next eighteen months.
She's a great writer, but Krissy has also been a tireless supporter of Australian writers for over a decade. Through Avid Reader (the bookshop where I work) she has launched more books than just about anybody in Australia.
Authors that pay it back to their fellow writers are fairly common (I think we all like to support other people who are struggling along just as much as we are) but there are few people who have done it to the degree that Krissy has. Our entire literary scene is richer as a result.
She is not only a wonderful person, she's damn talented, it keeps coming back to that. And, she keeps getting better. I say this without a hint of hyperbole, I think Krissy will be one of the major Australian writers of the next decade. Krissy doesn't need me to say this, of course, it's going to happen if the stars align and publishing doesn't collapse, but I wanted to get in early.
Krissy's the real deal, (like Margo Lanagan or Marianne de Pierres or Tansy Rayner Roberts or dozens of other brilliant writers) and we should count ourselves very lucky that we have her. It's a grand time to be a reader of Australian fiction and Krissy is one of the reasons.
*(pronounced Neen, the K is silent)
Trent Jamieson is the author of the Death Works Trilogy and the Nightbound Land Duology and can be found at http://www.trentjamieson.com
Krissy Kneen* is my inspiration. I count her as a friend. I know a lot of writers, and, like the best of them, Krissy stands out in her absolute bravery, and her will for perfection. It terrifies and delights me.
She's a writer that you will be hearing about quite a bit in the next few years, and I suspect that she will be nominated for a few Aurealis Awards, too. She has already published two books with Text. Affection which was a frank discussion of sexuality through memoir, and Triptych a series of novellas looking at sexuality. There are few other writers that engage with the subject as beautifully and bravely. She's not frightened to be confronting.
Her prose is glorious, measured and challenging. She works hard, she struggles with everything, challenges everything - including her own beliefs - and manages to produce work that says so much. And she's prolific, without her prose reading as though it's forced or rushed. Expect to see at least three remarkable books from her in the next eighteen months.
She's a great writer, but Krissy has also been a tireless supporter of Australian writers for over a decade. Through Avid Reader (the bookshop where I work) she has launched more books than just about anybody in Australia.
Authors that pay it back to their fellow writers are fairly common (I think we all like to support other people who are struggling along just as much as we are) but there are few people who have done it to the degree that Krissy has. Our entire literary scene is richer as a result.
She is not only a wonderful person, she's damn talented, it keeps coming back to that. And, she keeps getting better. I say this without a hint of hyperbole, I think Krissy will be one of the major Australian writers of the next decade. Krissy doesn't need me to say this, of course, it's going to happen if the stars align and publishing doesn't collapse, but I wanted to get in early.
Krissy's the real deal, (like Margo Lanagan or Marianne de Pierres or Tansy Rayner Roberts or dozens of other brilliant writers) and we should count ourselves very lucky that we have her. It's a grand time to be a reader of Australian fiction and Krissy is one of the reasons.
*(pronounced Neen, the K is silent)
Trent Jamieson is the author of the Death Works Trilogy and the Nightbound Land Duology and can be found at http://www.trentjamieson.com
Published on March 18, 2012 10:56
For Aussies - House of Reps marriage equality survey - IMPORTANT
Originally posted by
drjon
at House of Reps marriage equality surveyThis one should be shared far and wide: the House of Representatives has a very short, very simple survey about marriage equality, ie, should we have it? Word is that it's so far been spammed by naysayers, so it would be cool if that could be turned around. The survey is here: http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House_of_Representatives_Committees?url=spla/bill%20marriage/index.htm (snarfed from lizbee)
drjon
at House of Reps marriage equality surveyThis one should be shared far and wide: the House of Representatives has a very short, very simple survey about marriage equality, ie, should we have it? Word is that it's so far been spammed by naysayers, so it would be cool if that could be turned around. The survey is here: http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House_of_Representatives_Committees?url=spla/bill%20marriage/index.htm (snarfed from lizbee)
Published on March 18, 2012 08:00
gillpolack @ 2012-03-18T16:59:00
Thanks to the kindness of the estimable Amy Brown (I warned her I would use her name!) I am the proud owner of A Connecticut Fashionista in King Arthur's Court. It has a very pink cover, even brighter than my t-shirt, and said very pink cover is dominated by long sun-tanned legs wearing very short shorts. There is also a sword and a castle. If you wish to admire the beauty of this cover and envy me the ownership of the book, it's here: http://www.bookfinder.com/dir/i/A_Connecticut_Fashionista_in_King_Arthurs_Court/1741660556/
My little Arthuriana collection* is very content!
*a few hundred of the possible thousands of volumes
My little Arthuriana collection* is very content!
*a few hundred of the possible thousands of volumes
Published on March 18, 2012 05:59
Ditmars
It's that time of year - Australian fans need to nominate all their favourite works if their favourite works are going to be on the voting list for the Ditmars. The Ditmar wiki exists and contains lots of good stuff. It's here: http://wiki.sf.org.au/2012_Ditmar_eligibility_list It does not contain everything*, so if you have favourites that are not on it, don't forget to nominate them. You might also want to suggest to the listmakers that they put them on.
The only work I have this last year is non-fiction (the cookbook and all those essays and reviews - some of which are fan writing and some of which are criticism and some of which are both, because I'm Gillian and categories seldom fit me) and I never actually get nominated in those categories, so I won't give you a list of what I've done.
All natural members of Australian fandom are eligible to nominate works. The more nominations a given work receives, the more likely it is to be shortlisted. Everyone counts. Since you count, why not nominate your favourite work? No-one can have read everything this year. 2011 produced so much writing in this tiny little content. So what you read is as important as what someone else has read. Go ye and nominate! Time is short and lists are long and...
And now my eyes have had it (as opposed to the ayes having it, which is Ditmar voting) and I'm off the computer for a bit. It'll be a few weeks before I can work properly, but each day my right eye grudgingly permits me to do a bit more normal stuff, like this post.
*I can't see the history of the Conflux banquets, for instance, which is not even the beginning of the end of the world, since I wasn't expecting to see it
The only work I have this last year is non-fiction (the cookbook and all those essays and reviews - some of which are fan writing and some of which are criticism and some of which are both, because I'm Gillian and categories seldom fit me) and I never actually get nominated in those categories, so I won't give you a list of what I've done.
All natural members of Australian fandom are eligible to nominate works. The more nominations a given work receives, the more likely it is to be shortlisted. Everyone counts. Since you count, why not nominate your favourite work? No-one can have read everything this year. 2011 produced so much writing in this tiny little content. So what you read is as important as what someone else has read. Go ye and nominate! Time is short and lists are long and...
And now my eyes have had it (as opposed to the ayes having it, which is Ditmar voting) and I'm off the computer for a bit. It'll be a few weeks before I can work properly, but each day my right eye grudgingly permits me to do a bit more normal stuff, like this post.
*I can't see the history of the Conflux banquets, for instance, which is not even the beginning of the end of the world, since I wasn't expecting to see it
Published on March 18, 2012 01:10


