Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's Blog: The Most Revolutionary Act , page 670
September 7, 2021
Military Members Dying and Suffering Crippling Effects from COVID Vaccinations
Several military families are claiming to have been affected by these COVID shots. They range from members in the earlier phases of their careers, to those retired.
This article will focus on six of them, two of which are deaths.
Brooke is an active duty military member who almost lost her life and her leg after her Pfizer shot, according to her parents. Her mother Rachel Gronbach and father Greg Gronbach have both posted on social media in regards to their daughter’s experience, and it sounds pretty traumatic. Brookes experience with her Pfizer shot, has changed the course of her life.
Brooke had her shot in December then developed blood clots in her lungs. She underwent emergency surgery, and was placed in ICU. The vascular surgeon initially thought her leg would need amputated due to one of the clots that was 3” and because it had been stuck for several hours.
Brooke has undergone seven surgeries since January and has at least one or two more to go. She will be on blood thinners for the rest of her life. According to Brookes mother, Brooke’s military career is over. 2021 has been quite a setback for this once healthy 23 year old woman.
Brooke is not alone in regards to active duty military members having issues after their covid shots. Noah has been having issues for five months according to his mother Debbie Jones. His issues began four days after his shot. After many tests it was determined that he had a narrowing of his intestines.
Noah’s current health condition as of today, is unknown.
Tonia Boyer posted that her husband DJ Boyer, recently had a Johnson & Johnson shot. While deployed, DJ began having heart issues. He was placed in the medical section of his ship while waiting to get to a hospital.
According to Tonia, DJ couldn’t even stand up without his heart flatlining. The Navy is of course saying it is unrelated, however, Tonia is correct in questioning the sudden change in her husband’s health.
DJ’s current health status as of today, is unknown.
[…]
Study – COVID Shot Enhances Delta Infectivity
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola
STORY AT-A-GLANCEAccording to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, people who got the COVID shot early are now at increased risk for severe COVID diseaseThis may be a sign that antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) is occurring, or it may simply indicate that the protection offered is limited to a few months, at bestRecent research warns the Delta variant “is poised to acquire complete resistance to wild-type spike vaccines.” This could turn into a worst-case scenario that sets up those who have received the Pfizer shots for more severe illness when exposed to the virusTo “stay ahead of the virus,” the Biden administration is now considering recommending a booster shot five months after the initial two doses rather than waiting eight months, as previously suggestedIsraeli data show Pfizer’s shot went from a 95% effectiveness at the outset to 39% by late July 2021, when the Delta strain became predominant. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s expectation for any vaccine is an efficacy rate of at least 50% compared to placeboThe official COVID-19 vaccine narrative changes rapidly these days. It took just one month for it to go from “if you’re vaccinated you’re not going to get COVID,”1 including the Delta variant,2 to “people who got vaccinated early are at increased risk for severe COVID disease.”3
From the get-go, I and many other medical experts have warned of the possibility of these shots causing antibody dependent enhancement (ADE), a situation in which the shot actually facilitates a cascade of disease complications rather than protects against it. As a result, you may suffer more severe illness when encountering the wild virus than had you not been “vaccinated.”
While we don’t yet have definitive proof that ADE is occurring, we are seeing suspicious signs that it might be. Data showing those who got the shot early this year are now at increased risk of severe infection could be such a sign. At bare minimum, it’s an indication that the protection you get from these shots is very temporary, lasting only a few months.
This makes sense when you consider they program your body to produce just one type of antibody against a specific spike protein. Once the spike protein, or other elements in the virus, starts to mutate, protection radically diminishes. Worse, the vaccine facilitates the actual production of the variants because it is “leaky” and provides only partial ineffective immune protection.
Natural immunity is far superior, as when you recover from the infection, your body makes antibodies against all five proteins of the virus, plus memory T cells that remain even once antibody levels diminish. This gives you far better protection that will likely be lifelong, unless you have impaired immune function.
Real-world data from Israel confirms this, showing those who have received the COVID jab are 6.72 times more likely to get infected than people with natural immunity.4,5,6
CDC Admits ‘Vaccine’ Immunity Doesn’t LastIn an August 20, 2021, report, BPR noted:7
“’The data we will publish today and next week demonstrate the vaccine effectiveness against SARS COVID 2 infection is waning,’ the CDC director [Rochelle Walensky] began … She cited reports of international colleagues, including Israel ‘suggest increased risk of severe disease amongst those vaccinated early.’
[…]
Via https://www.citizensjournal.us/study-covid-shot-enhances-delta-infectivity/
Shocking Conclusions from Africa Study Expose Why Big Pharma’s Puppets are Suppressing Ivermectin Data
by JD RuckerNOQ ReportJoe Rogan, Kirstie Alley, and a handful of other celebrities have brought out the anti-Ivermectin wolves in America. Mainstream media is in full attack-mode. Big Tech is censoring posts to the point that people are coming up with creative ways to indicate they’re even talking about Ivermectin so as not to trigger the filters. The CDC claimed the drug was for horses only, neglecting to remove their own recommendations for people to take Ivermectin for other issues.
If the CDC is recommending what they deemed to be a “horse dewormer” to people traveling from Africa, does that mean the CDC is racist?
A graph made its rounds on social media yesterday that raised some eyebrows. It showed the clear difference between countries in Africa that use Ivermectin regularly versus those that do not. The differences were startling as the Ivermectin-nations showed unambiguous advantages against Covid-19. The mortality rates were very low compared to countries that do not use Ivermectin on a wide scale.
This graph prompted me to dig deeper into the study. As it turned out, the graph is the tip of the iceberg. There are other data points supporting the use of Ivermectin as a treatment for Covid-19 scattered throughout the study. I’ll publish the whole thing below, but here are some important takeaways for easy digestion.
First, the countries that use Ivermectin have less-sophisticated medical facilities than the nations that do not use Ivermectin. This means that life expectancy is lower and testing is more sporadic. Universal Ivermectin use seems to be the only factor preventing these nations from a full-blown Covid-19 catastrophe.
Second, Africa seems to be the perfect environment for this type of study because of the stark differences in mortality rates. Nations that push Ivermectin as an antiparasitic agent were not attempting to fight Covid-19. They’ve been using the drug universally for years. Therefore, the data regarding mortality clearly delineates between Ivermectin nations and non-Ivermectin nations. As the study states, “The community-directed onchocerciasis treatment with ivermectin is the most reasonable explanation for the decrease in morbidity and fatality rate in Africa.”
The final and arguably most important “hidden” takeaway from the study is that recovery and fatality rates for Covid-19 cases were not statistically significantly different between Ivermectin countries and non-Ivermectin countries. That means that once a person was tested and officially declared a Covid-19 case, they recovered or died at essentially the same rates across the board.
This tells us that other factors such as medical proficiency, environmental differences, or access to vaccines do not contribute to whether someone lives or dies once they have become sick with the disease. Since overall mortality rates per capita are significantly lower in Ivermectin nations but case fatality rates are the same, Ivermectin is clearly effective as an early treatment and perhaps even as a preventative measure.
[…]
100+ Ontario Youth Sent to Hospital for Vaccine-Related Heart Problems, Report Shows
By Megan Redshaw
According to a report released last week by Public Health Ontario, as of Aug. 7, there were 106 incidents of post-vaccine myocarditis and pericarditis in people under the age of 25 in Ontario.
A report released last week by Public Health Ontario (PHO) showed the incidence of heart inflammation following mRNA vaccination was significantly more prevalent in young people.As of Aug. 7, there were 106 incidents of myocarditis and pericarditis in people under the age of 25 in Ontario –– slightly more than half of the total of all such incidents, the Toronto Sun reported.
There were 31 cases in the 12- to 17-year age group and 75 cases in 18- to 24-year-olds. Eighty percent of all cases were in males.
“The reporting rate of myocarditis/pericarditis was higher following the second dose of mRNA vaccine than after the first, particularly for those receiving the Moderna vaccine as the second dose of the series (regardless of the product for the first dose),” the report stated.
PHO added the reporting rate for heart inflammation in those 18 to 24 was seven times higher with Moderna than with Pfizer. Pfizer is currently the only vaccine authorized for use in 12- to 17-year-olds in Ontario.
In early June, PHO issued an Enhanced Surveillance Directive, requiring Public Health Units to prioritize follow-up for any reports of myocarditis or pericarditis following any COVID mRNA vaccine and to notify PHO of the report.
Since the start of the COVID immunization program in Ontario on Dec. 13, there have been a total of 314 reports of myocarditis or pericarditis following receipt of mRNA COVID vaccines.
As of Aug. 7, there had been a total of 202 emergency room visits across all age groups for heart inflammation following vaccination, with 146 leading to hospitalization. Three cases resulted in ICU admission.
[…]
Breastfeeding Following Covid Jab: Reports from Mothers
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Back in April this year we published a video commentary by ReallyGraceful where she reported that many mothers who were nursing their babies had their breast milk dry up after taking a COVID shot.
[…]
As more and more data is entered into the government Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), we are now seeing cases where babies that are breastfed are suffering adverse reactions to the COVID shots that their mothers are taking. The shots have not yet been authorized for infants, although such an authorization is expected any day now.
Celeste McGovern of LifeSite News reported on one case where the breastfeeding baby died with blood clots, something rarely ever seen in infants, but a common side effect we are seeing with people who take the COVID shots, blood clots which the CDC states are “rare” in spite of the data in VAERS that shows over 10,000 cases of “thrombosis”, including 488 deaths.
VAERS report ID 1532154 was apparently filed by the mother, a 36-year-old woman from New Mexico:
On July 17, my baby passed away.
I had been breastfeeding my 6 week old baby at the time that I received the first Pfizer vaccine on June 4, 2021.
He became very sick with a high fever about 2 weeks after I got the first Pfizer vaccine on June 21. He was treated for 2 weeks with IV antibiotics for a supposed bacterial infection.
However, they never found any specific bacteria, and called his diagnosis culture-negative sepsis. At the end of his hospital stay he tested positive for rhinovirus.
I ran a search in the VAERS database to see how many other reports have been filed with mothers who are breastfeeding babies, and came up with 94 cases, which included one other infant death. (Source.)
The other breastfeeding infant death is VAERS case 1166062 which lists Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura as one of the symptoms. Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura is a rare blood disorder in which blood clots form in small blood vessels throughout the body.
[…]
Here are a few more cases in VAERS where the COVID shot given to the breastfeeding mother apparently also affected the baby. Some of the cases of breastfeeding mothers getting the COVID shot report reduced milk flow, green milk, mastitis, thrombophlebitis in the breast, heavy menstruations even though breastfeeding, etc.
I am only including some of the cases here that affected the baby who was breastfeeding, and who did NOT get the shots but apparently had side effects from drinking the breast milk from their mothers who got the shots.
30-Year-Old Connecticut Breastfeeding Mother with 5-month-old son – Vomiting, Diarrhea, Body Rash, and Hematuria36-Year-Old California Breastfeeding Mother – HivesVAERS case 970309: Patient is breastfeeding her 5 month old son. Two nights after her 1st Moderna dose, he had violent vomiting, diarrhea, body rash, and hematuria (blood in urine).
31-Year-Old California Breastfeeding Mother with 4-month-old-son – DiarrheaVAERS case 999040 (Pfizer): Breastfed son have severe hives x5days.
38-Year-Old New Jersey Breastfeeding Mother with 3-month-old daughter – Skin RashVAERS case 1070803 (Pfizer): I was exclusively breastfeeding at the time of receiving both doses. My 4 month old son developed diarrhea on February 1st and it lasted 2 weeks. Lab work/stool studies were negative for any bacterial or viral infections.
35-Year-Old Alaska Breastfeeding Mother with 12-month-old infant – Anaphylaxis shockVAERS case 1111787 (Pfizer): I am breastfeeding my daughter exclusively. She was born December 9, 2020. She is roughly 3 months old. She had an all body rash.
[…]
Infant Breastfeeding Boy in Alaska – Anaphylaxis shock[…]
34-Year-Old California Breastfeeding Mother with 11-Week-Old infant boy – Appetite decrease, Vomiting[…]
40-Year-Old Breastfeeding Mother with 1-Month-Old Infant – Diarrhea for 36 hours[…]
29-Year-Old New Jersey Breastfeeding Mother with 15-Month-Old child – Ear infection[…]
31-Year-Old Illinois Breastfeeding Mother with 10-month-old son – Persistent Fever of 100 – 103 F.[…]
34-Year-Old Indiana Breastfeeding Mother with son – Skin rash[…]
30-Year-Old Indiana Breastfeeding Mother with son – Rash spread from his stomach to his entire body[…]
28-Year-Old Indiana Breastfeeding Mother with 9.5-month-old son – Fever, Abnormal feces[…]
37-year-Old New Jersey Breastfeeding Mother with 3-month-old baby – Diarrhea[…]
33-Year-Old New York Breastfeeding Mother with infant – Projectile vomiting[…]
27-Year-Old New York Breastfeeding Mother with 8-week-old infant – Fever[…]
25-Year-Old Florida Breastfeeding Mother with daughter – Fever, diarrhea[…]
35-Year-Old Breastfeeding Mother with 14-month-old – Diarrhea[…]
30-Year-Old California Breastfeeding Mother with 22-month-old daughter – Fever, irritable[…]
32-Year-Old Breastfeeding Mother with 7-week-old baby – Lethargic, increased spitting up[…]
31-Year-Old North Carolina Breastfeeding Mother with 2-month-old infant – Blood clot, dark stools[…]
32-Year-Old Texas Breastfeeding Mother with 4-week-old infant – Fever, nasal congestion, loss of appetite[…]
37-Year-Old Texas Breastfeeding Mother with 10-month-old daughter – Hives on face and body[…]
Watergate: Was Nixon Set Up?
Watergate – Chapter 1
The History Channel (2016)
Film Review
While this six-part series is rich in intriguing detail, people need to be aware it ignores extensive evidence Russ Baker compiled for his 2009 book Family of Secrets. In the later, Baker concluded Nixon was the victim, not the perpetrator, of Watergate. In other words, Watergate (like the JFK assassination) was a coup to remove a democratically elected president from power. *
Chapter 1 starts with background about Nixon’s initial escalation of the Vietnam War, via secret (and illegal) bombings of Laos and Cambodia.
It also plays excerpts of the infamous White House tapes** revealing Nixon was extremely paranoid, particularly of the CIA. With good reason. As Baker reveals in “Chapter 10 Downing Nixon” in Family of Secrets, Nixon had been at war with the CIA ever since his 1969 inauguration. This was mainly due to his demand that they provide him classified records of their role in the failed Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba, the assassination of South Vietnamese president Ngo Dinh Diem in November 1963 and the CIA overthrow of the elected government of the Dominican Republic in 1954. (The History Channel documentary “Watergate” reveals none of this.)
Nixon feared (with good reason) he could become a CIA target like Kennedy and strongly suspected the CIA had infiltrated both his White House staff and re-election committee. Baker provides extensive evidence Nixon’s legal counsel John Dean,*** deputy assistant to the president Alexander Butterfield and deputy director of the Committee to Re-Elect the President Jeb Magruder all helped end the Nixon presidency by orchestrating both the Watergate scandal and the coverup that ensued.
The best part of Chapter 1 is when the History Channel pays excerpts of the Nixon tapes where he expresses his belief the CIA orchestrated the Watergate break-in*** and Assistant to the President for Domestic Affairs John Ehrlichman asserts the FBI also believes the CIA is behind the burglary. However the filmmakers neglect to link these statements to orders Nixon later gives for the CIA (given their responsibility for the operation) to instruct the FBI to shut down their investigation. Without this context, this documentary makes it look like Nixon is guilty of obstruction of justice.
Although this episode notes that this was the second time (CIA) “plumbers” had broken into the Democratic headquarters, it passes over the distinct difference between the two events. With the first (a May 28, 1972 clandestine operation to bug the telephones), the “burglars” left no trace of their illegal entry. With the second (three weeks later), the intruders pried the door open with a crowbar, smashed windows and vandalized the office. It’s Baker’s belief they did so to make sure to generate a burglary report, which would bring the incident to court and ultimately to public view.
The film also conveniently overlooks the point Baker makes in his book: once left-wing peace candidate George McGovern became the Democratic front runner, Nixon faced an easy victory (he went on to win all but one state) and there was no rationale for his re-election committee to organize a break-in to Democratic headquarters.
This sanitized Watergate series also neglects to mention Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward’s**** historic links to the CIA through his work in Naval Intelligence.
*Baker cites three books (each relying on very different facts and sources) that support this assertion: Jim Hougan’s 1984 Secret Agenda, the 1991 Silent Coup by Len Colodny and Robert Gettlin and James Rosen’s 2008 The Strong Man: John Mitchell and the Secrets of Watergate.
**Baker indicates that Cold War hawks in the CIA were angry about Nixon’s efforts to improve relations with the Soviet Union and China. Ironically towards the end of his presidency, Nixon was fighting with the same special interests (independent oil barons) as JFK over the same issue (the oil depletion allowance). In 1973, Nixon’s Justice Department was investigating close friends and associates of George Bush Senior (who Baker suspects of helping to orchestrate the Watergate scandal) for antitrust violations.
***According to Baker, Nixon recognized the name of some of the so-called “burglars” owing to their involvement in the CIA-orchestrated 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba.
****The Woodward-Bernstein series on the Watergate break-ins was essential in mobilizing public pressure for both a grand jury and a congressional investigation.
The series can be viewed free on Kanopy
September 6, 2021
How (and why) Israel changed what “fully vaccinated” means
Kit Knightly
Offguardian
Newspeak definition opens the door for more authoritarian control, huge Big Pharma profits…and potentially the worst deception of the entire “pandemic”
Israel has been at the forefront of the vaccination push ever since November 2020, when they signed agreements with Pfizer to run what were essentially medical experiments on their civilian population.
They were the first country to roll out the Pfizer vaccine. They were the first country to try out the (since abandoned) “Green passes” system of medical segregation. And now they’re the first country to change the terms of the “get vaccinated and get your freedom back” contract.
That’s right. Just as “three weeks to flatten the curve” turned into around 18-months (and counting), “double jabbed” is now evolving into “triple jabbed”.
To quote Dr Salman Zarka, Israel’s “coronavirus czar”:
We are updating what it means to be vaccinated,”
So, there you have it. In Israel, officially, those who have been injected with two doses of Pfizer’s so-called vaccine are no longer counted as vaccinated.
What does this mean?
Well, first of all, it means all those “vaccinated” people can kiss their recently acquired freedoms goodbye, unless they’re willing to get at least one more booster.
According to the Wall Street Journal [paywalled article]:
Holders of Israel’s vaccine passports must get a third dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine within six months of their second dose, or lose the so-called green pass that allows them more freedom.”
It should also be noted that the third booster is not considered the last. The Israeli Ministry of Health “has not ruled out further boosters in the future” and the third shot will only extend the “vaccinated” status for six months, not permanently.
So, essentially, the precedent has been set that your freedoms are the state’s to take away on a whim. And, if you comply, they will simply use your compliance as an excuse to take even greater liberties (pun very much intended).
Israel has been the Petri dish for this since the beginning. If it works there, expect the “booster shot requirement” to be instituted in other countries all over the world fairly quickly.
To all the people who have taken the vaccine, and are now realising they may have done something foolish. Sorry, but we did try to warn you this would happen.
Financially speaking, this is yet another boon in a golden year for Pfizer, who can now ship even more doses of their experimental and unnecessary gene therapy to people who are literally legally obliged to use it. If you don’t want to take the jab, just take some of Pfizer’s new magic anti-Covid pills instead.
So don’t worry about the death of freedom and democracy in the name of an almost-completely-harmless disease. At least the Pfizer shareholders can afford that second private island and golden costumes for their human chess sets.
[…]
Via https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/02/how-and-why-israel-changed-what-fully-vaccinated-means/
U.S. Air Force Pilots Resign Rather Than Submit to the Jab
27 active duty Air Force pilots resign rather than accept Covid vaccine.
Source: Larry Johnson
This is good and bad news. It is good because it shows that principled military officers are not going to be bullied into taking a questionable vaccine. Especially since emerging evidence shows that many “vaccinated” people are still getting Covid.
Twenty-seven active-duty U.S. Air Force pilots have resigned their commissions over the unconstitutionality of Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin’s mandate requiring all Armed Forces members to at once receive a Covid-19 vaccination, Real Raw News has learned.
The exodus began on August 27, with 12 pilots from the 1st Fighter Wing at Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Virginia, (that represents 20% of the pilots) submitting to their commanding officer letters of resignation only hours after they received a 4:00 a.m. text message instructing them to submit to mandatory Covid-19 vaccinations by 10:00 a.m. that same day. It’s unknown whether the pilots collaborated ahead of…
View original post 169 more words
Is There any Doubt Now That Israel Is Destroying Itself? Citizens Told To Get Ready For 4th Shot
Fauci is calling for a Covid booster every 6 months.
Source: Tsionizm Staff
As we’ve beendetailing of late, the goalposts in ultra-vaxxed Israel keep perpetually moving after health authorities’ recent initiative to demand all citizens get a third COVID jab. This even as this past week witnessed the small Mediterranean country reach yetmore daily case records.
Despite the WHO coming out against countries giving their populations booster shots at this point, Israel has as of Fridayissued a third dose to2.5 million Israelis. Given the likelihoodthat this too will fail toblunt the growing numbers of infections, naturally the question is:so what next?
You can’t make this up, health authorities are providing this “answer”:“Israel’s national coronavirus czar on Saturday called for the country tobegin making preparations to eventually administer fourth doses of the coronavirus vaccine,”The Times of Israelreports…
To read more visit Zero Hedge.
September 5, 2021
Care Workers Are Quitting En Masse After Being Told To Get Jabbed Or Lose Jobs
RT reports: In response to the mass exodus, the industry is now desperately calling on the government to end its mandatory vaccination policy for care workers, warning that a “catastrophe” is on the horizon.
Source: RT
Care workers in the UK have been leaving the industry en masse and creating huge staffing shortages after they were told to get vaccinated against covid or lose their jobs
After speaking to to several care home industry officials,The Guardian reported: “three-quarters of care home operators are reporting an increase in staff quitting since April,” They said the reasons were “a desire for less stress and for higher pay” and “to avoid mandatory vaccination, which comes into effect on 11 November.”
Senior care staff say they are “genuinely concerned about the safety and sustainability of services” amid the ongoing staffing shortages, exhaustion and the extreme difficulty in recruiting.
The Department of Health and Social Care said the government has been trying to boost recruitment with a national campaign and pushing care posts in jobcentres.
RT reports: In response to the mass exodus, the industry is now desperately calling…
View original post 287 more words
The Most Revolutionary Act
- Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's profile
- 11 followers
