Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's Blog: The Most Revolutionary Act , page 105
March 11, 2025
US Department Of Agriculture Created And Leaked H5N1 PSYOP-BIRD-FLU
2nd Smartest Guy in the WorldJust like the Intelligence Industrial Complex, their various Federal agencies, “nonprofits,” and corporate partners-in-crime created the PSYOP-19 scamdemic, so too has H5N1 PSYOP-BIRD-FLU been cooked up via gain-of-function (GOF) by yet another criminal government entity in the USDA.
And just like during the last viral crime against humanity, the solution is once again far worse than the disease; in other words, just like the Modified mRNA slow kill bioweapons that were injected into millions of fearful humans, so too does the USDA, CDC, FDA, NIAID, NIH, et al. want to poison all of the livestock with their latest PSYOP-BIRD-FLU “vaccines” that they are also angling at some point in the not so distant future to inject into humans as well.
Thankfully, Kennedy is opposing this bioterror democide of humans and animals alike; to wit:
MAHA BACK ON TRACK: RFK Jr. Opposes Mass H5N1 Animal Vaccination & Is Going After The BigFood Industrial Complex2nd Smartest Guy in the World10 Mar
After Kennedy’s recent faux pas of having framed the useless yet extremely dangerous MMR vaccine in a positive light…
Read full story:There is now compelling evidence that this latest Bird Flu strain, just like COVID, originated in a lab and is yet another manmade “pandemic” which deliberately took a mild wild virus and GOF’ed it into a more virulent variant:
These “biosecurity” protocols are designed to put pressure on the food supply, destroy perfectly healthy animals, decimate livelihoods and further impoverish Americans such that they are even easier to control and scare into taking the next rounds of BigPharma eugenics injections.
The research paper entitled, Proximal Origin of Epidemic Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Clade 2.3.4.4b and Spread by Migratory Waterfowl…
[image error]
Proximal Origin Of Epidemic Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5n1 Clade 2344b And Spread By Migratory1.2MB ∙ PDF file…concluded with the following:
The proximal origins of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 Clade 2.3.4.4b may be the USDA Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory (SEPRL) in Athens, Georgia and the Erasmus Medical Centre in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Genetic evidence and historical context suggest that laboratory activities, including serial passage and GOF research, could have contributed to the emergence of H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b. However, causation has not been established, and further investigation is urgently needed to confirm these findings and to identify all H5N1 laboratory leaks that may have occurred with a focus on mallard ducks and other migratory waterfowl, which have the potential to infect a large number of poultry and livestock facilities around the world. A moratorium on GOF research including serial passage of H5N1 is indicated to prevent a man-made influenza pandemic affecting animals and humans.
A moratorium on GOF is long overdue, as are mass arrests.
An incredibly important aside here is that no vaccine can prevent any respiratory disease, not a one, not in humans, birds, cows, swine or for that matter any other carbon based life form.
Any “expert” who claims this is possible is straight up lying; in fact, Dr. Mengele 2.0 aka Dr. Fauci is well aware that no vaccines are safe or effective and that every single one of them is dangerous and ultimately deadly; to wit:
Behind-the-scenes even Fauci admitted to RFK Jr. that none of 72 mandatory vaccines for children has ever been safety tested:
“For many years, I was saying that not one of the 72 vaccines mandated for children has ever been safety tested in pre-licensing, placebo-controlled trials,” began Kennedy, speaking at a Hillsdale College event. “Not one.”
Fauci went so far as to call Kennedy “a liar.”
When then-President Trump appointed Kennedy to run a vaccine safety commission, Trump ordered Fauci and Collins to meet with him along with White House counsel present.
Kennedy told Fauci, “You say I’m lying. For eight years you’ve been saying I’m lying,” and challenged Fauci to “show me the study” which shows that the multitude of vaccines America’s children are required to receive have been safety-tested.
Fauci claimed that he didn’t have it with him. “It’s back in Bethesda. I’ll send it to you.”
“I never got it,” said Kennedy, “so I sued him.”
“After stonewalling us for a year, their lawyers met us on the courthouse steps and said, ‘Yup, you’re right. We never had any study,’” said Kennedy.
[…]
Kennedy went on to explain how lucrative government-mandated children’s vaccines have been for the pharmaceutical industry:
There’s no downstream liability, there’s no front-end safety testing – that saves them a quarter billion dollars – and there’s no marketing and advertising costs, because the federal government is ordering 78 million school kids to take that vaccine every year.
What better product could you have? And so there was a gold rush to add all these new vaccines to the schedule that we don’t need. Most of these vaccines are unnecessary. Many of them are for diseases that are not even casually contagious.
It was a gold rush, because if you get onto that schedule, it’s a billion dollars a year for your company.
And in many cases, NIH is earning the royalties.
According to Kennedy, more obscene than the huge profits being horded by Big Pharma are the vast number of negative side-effects from all those untested vaccines.
“Neurological diseases” have “exploded,” he said.
“ADHD, sleep disorders, language delays, ASD, autism, Tourette’s syndrome, ticks, narcolepsy. These are all things that I never heard of,” said Kennedy. “Autism went from one in 10,000 in my generation according to CDC data to one in every 34 kids today.”
Not a single vaccine study shows safety, efficacy or necessity, not a one.
Not a single vaccine is safe, effective or necessary, not for measles, tetanus, PSYOP-19, PSYOP-BIRD-FLU or any other disease whatsoever, and all of the grifting murderous bioterrorist “experts” know it.
[…]
Via https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/the-us-department-of-agriculture
Utah to Become First State to Ban Water Fluoridation
Governor Spencer Cox confirms he will sign HB 81 in a landmark move to improve the water supply and protect public health.
Utah has passed House Bill 81 to ban adding fluoride to public water systems, with Governor Spencer Cox confirming his intention to sign it into law. This decision will make Utah the first U.S. state to enact such a ban.
This is great news for the public health of Utah, and it’s expected that more states and even the federal government may follow suit. Approximately72.3% of the U.S. population on community water systems receives fluoridated water. Fluoride is highly toxic and not an essential nutrient for any biological function in humans or animals. Industrial byproducts are used to fluoridate drinking water in the U.S: sodium fluoride (NaF); sodium fluorosilicate (Na2SiF6); and fluorosilicic acid (H2SiF6).
Research indicates that water fluoridation may lower IQ (Taylor et al) while failing to significantly prevent tooth decay (Cochrane Review). For every 1-mg/L increase in fluoride in a child’s urine, their IQ score decreased by about 1.63 points. (See link for article)
________________
**Comment**
And nobody to date has measured the total accumulated fluoride people are getting. Measuring water intake is fine and dandy but everything that contains fluoride (drinks sold from machines, bottled drinks, etc) must be added to that amount.
[…]
Ukraine Agrees to 30-Day Ceasefire with Russia After Trump Strong-Arms Zelensky
By Christina Laila
That was quick.
Ukraine agreed to a 30-day ceasefire with Russia after negotiations with the United States.
Late last month Trump abruptly ended his meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky after a blow-up in the Oval Office.
A defiant and ungrateful Zelensky was told to leave the White House and not come back until he’s ready for peace talks.
.@VP: “Do you think that it’s respectful to come to the Oval Office of the United States of America and attack the administration that is trying to prevent the destruction of your country?”@POTUS: “You don’t have the cards right now. With us, you start having cards … You’re… pic.twitter.com/iTYyAmfuCJ
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) February 28, 2025
Following the Oval Office blow-up, President Trump paused all military aid to Ukraine after Zelensky suggested the war with Russia would last a long time.
The pause halted all military aid that was currently in transit to Ukraine.
President Trump also stopped sharing critical intelligence with Ukraine until Zelensky moved toward a peace plan with Russia.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Ukrainian delegation in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia this week and after several hours of negotiations, Ukraine agreed to a ceasefire.
In a statement, the US said it “will immediately lift the pause on intelligence sharing and resume security assistance to Ukraine.”
CBS News reported:
Ukraine said it would accept a 30-day ceasefire with Russia after talks with the U.S. in Saudi Arabia aimed at ending the fighting on Tuesday, according to a statement issued by the U.S. and Ukraine.
The agreement came after more than eight hours of negotiations between Ukrainian officials and a U.S. delegation led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio in the Saudi city of Jeddah.
“Ukraine expressed readiness to accept the U.S. proposal to enact an immediate, interim 30-day ceasefire, which can be extended by mutual agreement of the parties, and which is subject to acceptance and concurrent implementation by the Russian Federation,” the U.S. and Ukraine said in a joint statement released by the State Department. “The United States will communicate to Russia that Russian reciprocity is the key to achieving peace.”
[…]
Via https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/just-ukraine-agrees-ceasefire/
RFK Jr. Announces Health and Human Services Mission to End… Anti-Semitism [ie protests against Palestinian genocide] ?
Yuri Gripas/Abaca/Sipa USA via AP Images
U.S. Secretary of Health Robert F. Kennedy Jr. raised eyebrows on Monday after he announced a Health Department mission to “end anti-semitic harassment on college campuses.”
“Anti-Semitism – like racism – is a spiritual and moral malady that sickens societies and kills people with lethalities comparable to history’s most deadly plagues,” wrote Kennedy in an announcement on Monday evening, adding:
In recent years, the censorship and false narratives of woke cancel culture have transformed our great universities into greenhouses for this deadly and virulent pestilence. Making America healthy means building communities of trust and mutual respect, based on speech freedom and open debate.
Kennedy then linked to a press release announcing a joint-effort by the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Education, and the General Services Administration to “end anti-semitic harassment on college campuses,” beginning with a “comprehensive review of Columbia University’s federal contracts and grants in light of ongoing investigations for potential violations of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.”
The announcement received criticism on social media, including from allies and supporters of the Trump administration, who argued that the Health Department’s involvement was clear overreach.
“THIS IS NOT HEALTH,” reacted commentator and Trump ally Mike Cernovich. “Calling everything you disagree with ‘public health’ was an Obama era tactic and risks overreach.”
[…]
Columbia Student Seized from Private Residence with No Warrant from Wife who is a US Citizen and 8 Months Pregnant
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Yesterday, it was reported that ICE agents forced their way into the private residence of a graduate student from Columbia University, who is a permanent resident of the United States with a Green Card, and took him away from his wife, who is a U.S. Citizen and is 8 months pregnant.
According to reports, she too was threatened with arrest from ICE agents, even though she is a U.S. Citizen.
The man’s name is Mahmoud Khalil, and he was a prominent leader of the pro-Palestinian protests last year at Columbia University.
Khalil phoned his attorney, Amy E. Greer of Dratel & Lewis, when ICE arrived, and she later gave a report to the media about his arrest.
“Last night ICE agents wrongfully arrested Mahmoud Khalil, claiming his student visa was revoked – even though Mahmoud is legal permanent resident (green card) and not in the U.S. on a student visa,” Greer said.
“Confronted with that fact, the ICE agents detained him anyway.”
Greer said the firm filed a habeas corpus petition overnight on “Mahmoud’s behalf challenging the validity of his arrest and detention.”
“Currently, we do not know Mahmoud’s precise whereabouts. Initially, we were informed this morning that he had been transferred to an ICE facility in Elizabeth, New Jersey,” Greer added.
“However, when his wife – a U.S. citizen who is eight months’ pregnant and was threatened with arrest as well by the ICE agents last night – tried to visit him there today, she was told he is not detained there.”
Greer added that the firm has received reports that Khalil may be transferred as far away as Louisiana.
“We will vigorously be pursuing Mahmoud’s rights in court, and will continue our efforts to right this terrible and inexcusable – and calculated – wrong committed against him,” Greer said. (Source.)
Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed that they detained Khalil, and accused him of being a “Hamas supporter.”
Mahmoud Khalil is a Syrian national. If they deport him back to Syria, he will be going to a country that is now in total chaos, where thousands of innocent civilians have been slaughtered in the past few days.
And how ironic that just last week, it was published in the media that the U.S. and Israel are actually the ones supporting Hamas, and that the Trump Administration is currently holding direct talks with Hamas themselves.
[…]
March 10, 2025
Osama Bin Laden’s Staged Death Exposed: Hackers Leak Emails Revealing Obama-CIA-Pakistan Conspiracy
Baxter DmitryIn a digital heist straight out of a spy thriller, a rogue hacker crew infiltrated Pakistan’s government servers, unleashing a bombshell: leaked emails that expose a jaw-dropping conspiracy between the Obama administration, CIA and Pakistani brass to stage Osama bin Laden’s death as a grand geopolitical charade.
In February 2023, an Indian hacker group known as Sidewinder breached Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry server, extracting a staggering 7.5 terabytes of data, including emails, chats, and documents.
While only a small fraction of this data—approximately 2 gigabytes, containing 10,000 to 12,000 emails—was released publicly on a Telegram channel linked to an individual claiming ties to Sidewinder, the leak has sparked intense speculation.
Among the files hacked by Sidewinder was a bombshell email from a government source that has seemingly confirmed a remarkable conspiracy theory: the claim that Osama bin Laden’s death in 2011 was staged by substituting a duplicate in his place.
The email in question, dated December 23, 2021, was sent from an address tied to sco.gov.pk, a domain associated with the Special Communications Organization (SCO), an entity controlled by the Pakistani military at the time.
The email’s contents primarily focus on internal Pakistani political dynamics, including threats to overthrow then-Prime Minister Imran Khan for his perceived allegiance to India’s Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) and his handling of the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), a domestic terrorist group.
Notably, it references Khan’s decision to release an Indian pilot, Abhinandan Varthaman, captured in 2019—an act the email’s author deems a sign of Khan’s subservience to India.
However, the email takes a dramatic turn when it pivots to a discussion of high-profile terrorist figures. It explicitly states that the death of “Aeman al-zeware” (likely a misspelling of Ayman al-Zawahiri, a key al-Qaeda leader and Osama bin Laden’s close associate) would be faked, just as bin Laden’s death allegedly was.
According to the email, bin Laden’s demise in the 2011 U.S. raid in Abbottabad was a ruse, with a duplicate planted to deceive the world.
Intriguingly, seven months after this email was sent, on July 31, 2022, the CIA announced al-Zawahiri’s death in a drone strike in Afghanistan—raising questions about whether his demise, too, might have been staged as the email predicted.
The email’s author also hints at their own significance, suggesting that if captured by Indian forces, they would be freed through “another Kandahar operation.” This is a reference to the 1999 hijacking of Indian Airlines Flight IC 814 by Harkat-ul-Mujahideen, who forced the Indian government to release imprisoned terrorists by landing the plane in Kandahar, Afghanistan.
This allusion implies the writer could be a high-value operative or terrorist with powerful allies, adding a layer of intrigue to the document’s claims.
The email’s broader context syncs eerily with real-world events, adding credibility to its claims. For instance, Imran Khan was indeed ousted as Pakistan’s prime minister via a no-confidence vote on April 10, 2022, just months after the email’s date, marking a historic first in the country’s political history. He was later arrested on May 9, 2023, by paramilitary forces, as the email’s warnings about his fate partially foreshadowed.
Yet the claim about bin Laden’s faked death remains the most explosive revelation, echoing long-standing conspiracy theories that have questioned the official narrative of the Abbottabad raid.
Skeptics might argue that the email’s sensational claims lack corroboration. Only 2 gigabytes of the 7.5-terabyte breach have been made public, and the individual analyzing the leak—who manually sifted through the files—has not released the full dataset.
Efforts to obtain the complete breach from the Telegram channel admin were rebuffed, with the admin claiming Sidewinder is state-sponsored by India and that the full data would only be shared with the Indian government.
The hacker confirmed the Sidewinder hacker group is state-sponsored by the Indian government and he will only give the whole data breach to the Indian governmentStill, the leak has ignited debate. If genuine, the email suggests a coordinated effort within Pakistan’s military establishment to manipulate perceptions of major terrorist figures’ fates, potentially for political or strategic gain.
Osama bin Laden’s death, announced by the U.S. on May 2, 2011, was a defining moment of the Obama administration, yet conspiracy theories have persisted—fueled by the lack of public photos of his body and the rapid burial at sea.
As of now, the Sidewinder breach and its revelations remain a tantalizing puzzle. The analyst, leveraging open-source intelligence (OSINT) skills, claims to have identified the email’s sender but has withheld that information for privacy reasons.
Without access to the full 7.5-terabyte dataset or further leaks, the theory that bin Laden’s death was faked hinges on this single, provocative email—a detail in a much larger intrigue.
[…]
Osama Bin Laden’s Staged Death Exposed: Hackers Leak Emails Revealing Obama-CIA-Pakistan Conspiracy
The COVID-Era Smearing – and Resurrection – of Trump NIH Appointee Dr. Jay Bhattacharya
Jay Bhattacharya was in pretty terrible shape five years ago. He was losing sleep and weight, not because of the COVID-19 virus but in response to the efforts of his colleagues at Stanford University and the larger medical community to shut down his research, which questioned much of the government’s response to the pandemic.
Some of his Stanford colleagues leaked false and damaging information to reporters. The university’s head of medicine ordered him to stop speaking to the press. Top leaders at the National Institutes of Health, Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins, dialed up the attacks, dismissing him and his colleagues as what Collins termed “fringe epidemiologists” while their acolytes threw mud from a slew of publications, including the Washington Post, The Nation, and the prestigious medical journal BMJ.
In the years since, many of Bhattacharya’s scientific concerns about the efficacy of lockdowns and mask mandates have been corroborated. Fauci, meanwhile, accepted a pardon from President Biden, protecting him from COVID-related offenses dating back to 2014, the year he started funding research at a Wuhan, China, lab that U.S. intelligence agencies now believe probably started the pandemic. And this week, Bhattacharya looks set to achieve surprising vindication as the Senate holds a hearing on his nomination to head the NIH, in a Department of Health and Human Services run by science nonconformist Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Bhattacharya’s path from health policy scholar to NIH director nominee is pockmarked with craters from missiles launched to destroy his scientific credibility by NIH leaders and their minions in academia. Even as he seeks to advance medical research, Bhattacharya’s personal experience will likely inform his pledge to clean up the NIH and clear the agency of some career civil servants who silenced dissenting scientific voices during the pandemic and created national policies that were not always supported by the public.
“Free speech is fundamental for science to function properly,” he notes simply.
Bhattacharya first caught the attention of the nation’s scientific bureaucracy in April 2020 when he reported that the COVID virus was not as dangerous but more widespread than many of his colleagues and government officials were maintaining. This suggested a policy focusing on the most vulnerable populations with fewer restrictions on younger, healthier Americans. The study was discussed at the highest levels of the government and was passed around by Fauci and others in the White House, according to emails made public by a Freedom of Information Act request.
“For anyone with an open mind, the study’s results implied that the lockdown-focused strategy of March 2020 had failed to suppress the spread of the disease,” Bhattacharya wrote in a 2023 essay. But the paper’s other obvious conclusion put Bhattacharya in the crosshairs of Stanford faculty: It suggested that fear-mongering about the fatality rate of the virus was irresponsible.
Bhattacharya’s contrary conclusions generated complaints that the research was unsound, and Stanford put together an ad hoc group to investigate. It directed him to change the study protocols, which would have shut down the research. “They also demanded to review and approve any manuscripts we would write,” Bhattacharya said. But he eventually ignored them and kept publishing.
In April 2020, a series of damaging articles by Buzzfeed reporter Stephanie M. Lee carried allegations that Bhattacharya and his colleagues failed to disclose funding for their study, even though they had actually already disclosed it to Stanford. Buzzfeed is the now-defunct news site that first published the now much-maligned Steele dossier.
Bhattacharya was confused by the articles when they appeared. He later concluded from the intimate details that Stanford faculty were leaking the information to the reporter to harm him, including a false allegation that a “whistleblower” had come forward.
Responding to the Buzzfeed flurry of reports, Stanford announced a fact-finding investigation of Bhattacharya’s research, which he began calling an “inquisition.” The administration later informed him there was no “whistleblower” as Buzzfeed had falsely reported, and they sent a confidential report that found him and his colleagues at no fault.
“I got a letter which basically says we did nothing wrong. But also a condition that I’m not allowed to release the letter,” Bhattacharya explained in a 2023 interview. “This was a low period in my life. I was getting death threats, racist attacks, because the press was attacking me.”
Bhattacharya also suspects that some of the attacks at the time were being generated by Stanford’s major funders in the federal government – the NIH’s Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci. Collins and Fauci orchestrated a campaign against Bhattacharya in earnest in October 2020. Collins resigned from his NIH position last Friday and did not respond to questions sent to him through the NIH communications office nor sent to his NIH contact. Fauci did not respond to questions sent to him through his attorney.
That month, Bhattacharya and professors Martin Kulldorff, then at Harvard, and Sunetra Gupta of Oxford released the “Great Barrington Declaration,” which called for rejecting harmful COVID lockdowns in favor of “focused protection” for society’s most vulnerable, such as the elderly. With the declaration building support, Collins, four days later, on Oct. 8, 2020, sent Fauci an email with the subject line “Great Barrington Declaration.”
“This proposal from the three fringe epidemiologists who met with the [Health] Secretary seems to be getting a lot of attention – and even a co-signature from Nobel Prize winner Mike Leavitt at Stanford,” Collins wrote. “There needs to be a quick and devastating published take down of its premises. I don’t see anything like that on line yet – is it underway?”
Some hours later, Fauci forwarded Collins a “refutation” of the Great Barrington Declaration written for The Nation by his friend and advocate Gregg Gonsalves, an AIDS activist who is now a professor at Yale. Fauci rose to prominence in the 1980s as an HIV/AIDS researcher. “Indeed, and well said,” replied Collins. The Gonsalves essay referenced no actual science but denigrated Bhattacharya, Gupta, and Kulldorff for ignoring what he called “progressive principles of justice and equality” in favor of “survival of the fittest.”
Fauci has praised Gonsalves several times over the years and, in his recent memoir, singles out Gonsalves and a handful of other activists “for their unflinching support over the past few years.”
Four days after Fauci forwarded Collins the Gonsalves essay in The Nation, Collins dismissed the Declaration in public comments as “fringe” politics. “This is not mainstream science,” Collins argued in a public statement. Gonsalves contacted Collins later that same day, emailing him another essay he had written, again vilifying the Great Barrington Declaration, this time in the Washington Post.
“Saw your comments on the ludicrous Great Barrington Declaration and wanted to thank you for speaking out and doing it ‘undiplomatically,’” Gonsalves emailed Collins. “After we saw what you had said about ‘fringe’ epidemiology, we wondered why we were so nice in our op-ed.”
Collins then forwarded Gonsalves’ email to Fauci, who responded with a smiley face emoji.
Several months later, Gonsalves was among those who hosted a surprise birthday greeting for Fauci. “We did it!” tweeted HIV activist Peter Staley. “A small gang of Tony Fauci’s HIV/AIDS comrades managed to surprise him yesterday with an 80th birthday Zoom.” A screenshot of the Zoom shows Gregg Gonsalves beaming into his camera.
Fauci and Collins’ effort to create a “quick and devastating” takedown of the Great Barrington Declaration remained secret until the emails between them and Gonsalves became public in late December 2021. In response, Gonsalves dashed off a Christmas note to Collins and Fauci thanking them for their service and alerting them to their now-public emails “that some on the right have been circulating as ‘proof’ of a conspiracy against the Great Barrington Declaration.”
“It’s interesting that an effort to call out genuinely dangerous recommendations from the GBD is called a conspiracy,” Collins emailed back to Gonsalves. “Truth itself seems to have become a conspiracy in many minds.”
“It’s been a privilege to have you as our leader at the NIH!” Gonsalves replied.
Gonsalves remained a dogged Fauci supporter throughout the pandemic, even attacking former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Robert Redfield when he went public in 2023 that he believed Fauci’s funding for gain-of-function virus research in the Wuhan lab may have led to the pandemic. “Robert Redfield, Trump’s CDC Director, has been trashing former NIAID director, Anthony Fauci,” Gonsalves tweeted in March 2023. “Anyone who knows Bob Redfield knows what an unsavory character he is.”
Working in concert with Gonsalves, two other academics were especially active in criticizing Bhattacharya’s COVID work: David Gorski, a Professor of Medicine at Wayne State University, and Gavin Yamey, Director of the Center for Policy Impact in Global Health at Duke University.
“They specifically targeted the scientific community to undermine Jay,” said a Trump transition team member, who is not allowed to speak to the press while shuffling Bhattacharya around the Senate. “There’s a market for hot pieces to attack Bhattacharya, and these academics coordinate on social media, repeating and amplifying the same narrative to dirty him up.”
Gorski is a self-described “misinformation debunker” and runs a website called Science Based Medicine. It doesn’t always get its facts straight. After the European Medicines Agency concluded in April 2021, for example, that unusual blood clots should be listed as a very rare side effect for AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine, Gorski decried the decision on his X account claiming, “Reported blood clots appear to be no higher than background and very likely unrelated to the vaccine.” The UK government eventually stopped offering AstraZeneca’s jab, and the company finally admitted that its COVID vaccine causes harm in what The Telegraph reported could result in millions of dollars in legal claims.
“Gorski is damaging to science,” said Bhattacharya. “He creates an environment where researchers can’t speak their mind if they cross the biopharmaceutical industry.” Bhattacharya described Yamey and Gorski as part of a network that carried out Collins’ devastating takedown. “I’ll never publish in a big mainstream journal,” he said a couple of years ago in an interview.
“Those of us in academic medicine, all we have is our reputation,” former CDC Director Robert Redfield told RealClearInvestigations. “These attacks, it impacts you substantially. You can’t function. You don’t get invited to talks, and groups won’t have anything to do with you.”
In late 2021, Gorski partnered with Yamey on a piece for the BMJ falsely charging that Bhattacharya and other Great Barrington Declaration signers were supported by billionaires “aligned with industry.” Bhattacharya and the other signatories met at a conference hosted by the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER), which, Yamey and Gorski argued, “has also received funding from the Charles Koch Foundation, which was founded and is chaired by the right-wing billionaire industrialist known for promoting climate change denial and opposing regulations on business.”
While Gorski and Yamey provided no evidence that Koch money funded the GBD signatories, the BMJ still published their piece. Association with a nonprofit that has distant links to Koch money was apparently enough to carry the whiff of dark money corruption, a charge that still circulates on social media to this day.
“The BMJ article is full of errors that ought to have never found their way into any publication,” wrote Martin Kulldorff in The Spectator. “While the AIER has received only a single $68K (£50,000) Koch donation a few years ago, many universities have received multiple, much larger Koch donations, including million dollar gifts to Duke, Harvard, Johns Hopkins and Stanford.”
Contacted by RealClearInvestigations, Gorski did not respond when asked why he had not corrected his allegations against Bhattacharya.
It was later revealed that Bhattacharya’s attackers had even more conflicts. In March 2022, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) released a trove of documents revealing Yamey’s ties to EcoHealth Alliance, a Fauci-funded organization run by Peter Daszak, which subcontracted with the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. USAID scientist Dennis Carroll ran a pandemic preparedness program called PREDICT and worked with several researchers, including Daszak and Yamey, documents show, to redirect federal funds from the PREDICT program to set up a nonprofit called the Global Virome Project.
[…]
Disney Facing Collapse: Hundreds of Staff FIRED as Viewership Plummets to Record Low
Sean Adl-Tabatabai
Disney has terminated hundreds of employees amid record-low viewership and shrinking profits, reports indicate.
According to The Wall Street Journal, the layoffs will consolidate several ABC News programs, including the merger of “20/20” and “Nightline” into a single unit.
Naturalnews.com reports: At Disney Entertainment Networks, which includes Freeform and FX, staffing reductions will hit program planning and scheduling. These cuts are part of a broader trend at Disney, which has been hemorrhaging money in its traditional cable and broadcast businesses as consumers abandon cable packages and advertisers flock to streaming services and digital platforms.
The timing of these layoffs is particularly telling. They come just over a week after MSNBC fired race-baiting propagandist Joy Reid, whose ratings collapsed following President Trump’s re-election in November 2024.
The decline of Disney’s news and entertainment divisions is not happening in a vacuum. Millions of Americans have turned away from legacy media outlets, opting instead for alternative platforms like X (formerly Twitter), long-form podcasts and independent news sources. Figures like Joe Rogan have become trusted voices, offering unfiltered commentary and challenging the narratives pushed by corporate media.
This shift reflects a growing distrust of mainstream outlets, which have repeatedly misled the public on critical issues. From the Hunter Biden laptop scandal to the origins of COVID-19 and the state of the economy, legacy media has lost credibility. As one conservative commentator put it, “The left’s propaganda machine has finally been exposed for what it is: a tool to manipulate, not inform.”
The Trump administration’s executive order banning government censorship has further empowered this new era of free thought. With the shackles of cancel culture loosened, Americans are embracing diverse perspectives and rejecting the monolithic narratives of the past.
Historical context: The rise and fall of wokeness
To understand the significance of Disney’s layoffs, it’s important to revisit the rise of DEI and woke ideology in corporate America. Over the past decade, companies like Disney embraced progressive causes, often at the expense of their core business. DEI initiatives, once seen as a way to promote fairness, morphed into a rigid orthodoxy that prioritized ideology over merit and alienated large segments of the population.
This approach reached its peak during the Trump presidency, as corporations and media outlets doubled down on their opposition to conservative values. However, the backlash was swift and severe. Audiences began to reject the constant drumbeat of identity politics, and companies that prioritized virtue signaling over quality content paid the price.
Disney’s current struggles are a direct result of this miscalculation. By alienating half the country with its woke messaging, the company has lost its cultural relevance. As one industry insider noted, “Disney forgot that its job is to entertain, not to preach.”
A new era of free thoughtThe layoffs at Disney are more than just a cost-cutting measure—they are a sign of the times. The Overton Window has shifted, and the era of woke dominance is over. Americans are embracing a new era of free thought, driven by alternative media and a rejection of corporate propaganda.
[…]
Meet Mark Carney – Canada’s Next (Unelected) Prime Minister
By Kit Knightly
Regular readers are no doubt familiar with Carney, he’s had quite a few high-profile jobs over the years. As a quick reminder, let’s run down the highlights of his CV:
1990-2003: Goldman Sachs (various)2003-2007: Department of Finance, Canada (senior associate deputy minister)2007-2013: Central Bank of Canada (Chairman)2010-2012: Bank of International Settlements Committee on the Global Financial System (Chairman)2013-2020: Bank of England (Governor)2020-2024: Brookefield Asset Management (Vice-Chairman)2020-2025: UN Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance2025-????: Prime Minister of Canada…apparentlyMy, there are a lot of banks on that list, aren’t there? Not to mention his special appointments at Chatham House and the World Economic Forum or his regular appearances at Bilderberg. However, the eagle-eyed may note the absence of previous elected offices.
In fact, not only has he never won any elected office at any level of government, he’s never even run before. He will be the first Canadian Prime Minister to have never held a seat in the House of Commons.
Now, we could talk policy here. We could ask ourselves, “what is Carney in favour of?” or “how are things about to change?” but that would waste my time and yours. Look at his résumé. Bilderberg, UN Climate Envoy, Goldman Sachs…we know what his policies will be. The same as everyone else’s.
The only meaningful change he can offer is the further degradation of our supposedly “democratic” system.
The Liberal Party’s leadership “election” is the entire extent of his political career, and (supposing it wasn’t fixed) he won that running against a single opponent with a 37% turnout of one political party. 100,000 people. One-quarter of one percent of the population of Canada.
Three days ago we published a piece on the state of “democracy” in Romania, calling it “the first post-election democracy”. It looks like Canada is pushing hard for that silver medal.
[…]
Via https://off-guardian.org/2025/03/10/meet-mark-carney-canadas-next-unelected-prime-minister/
The Toxic Legacy of NATO’s Depleted Uranium Weapons
NATO Uranium Truce
RT (2024)
Film Review
This film explores the aftereffects of tens of thousands of depleted uranium (DU) cruise missiles, air bombs and shells NATO deployed during their war on Serbia in the late1990s. In numerous Serbian villages, numerous villages nearly everyone dies of a cancer and few live to reach old age. Birth defects are also drastically increased.
Based on thousands of DU studies, both in Serbia and Iraq (where NATO also deployed DU), a cancer specialist asserts its use constitutes a war crime.
Ironically NATO troops have also experienced a high incidence of cancer (mainly leukemia and brain tumors) related to to DU exposure. Commissions appointed by Italy and Greece to study the phenomenon estimate that, of 30,000 NATO troops deployed in the Bosnian and Serbian wars, 10,000-18,000 have died of cancer linked to DU exposure. Five hundred Italian NATO troops have filed a class action suit against the NATO command, with Czech, Spanish, Greek and Belgian NATO veterans ready to join them.
An Italian lawyer who estimates 8,000 Italian EU troops suffer from DU-linked cancer has won 350 DU-related cases. Despite this clear proof that DU-coated bombs and shells are dangerous, the NATO command continues to use it in Ukraine. A Serbian lawyer is filing a similar case against the NATO command, demanding that they clean up all the shells and bomb casings that continue to contaminate Serbia water supply and food chain.
Serbia has also appointed a commission to investigate the 20-30% increase in birth defects, miscarriages and stillbirths in Serbian livestock.
Despite the hundreds of NATO soldiers who have died prematurely from exposure to DU dust, no NATO member country acknowledges how dangerous it is – despite a 1973 Florida studying revealing DU weapons tests contaminated the soil with radioactive nanoparticles.
A German documentary about the Iraqi doctor who first discovered in 1991 that American DU weapons were causing high levels of birth defects was banned after a single screening.
The International Atomic Energy Agency denies that DU affects human health. In the film, the current IAEA president Rafael Gross makes the following gobbledygook explanation on camera:
“There may be isolated cases of people inhaling particles causing a health issue of a normal nature rather than a radiologic issue.”
Thousands of Iraqi veterans who were diagnosed with leukemia and neurodegenerative diseases (known as Gulf War Syndrome) tried, unsuccessfully, to file a case with the International Court of Justice.
As of 2011, all US GIs are required to sign an agreement not to enter areas affected by DU bombs or shells. Those who fail to honor this agreement, can be denied compensation if they later develop cancer or neurodegenerative disease.*
*Like they’re given a choice? GIs who fail to follow orders in combat are shot.
Film link: https://en.rtdoc.tv/films/1361-nato-uranium-trace
The Most Revolutionary Act
- Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's profile
- 11 followers
