Albert Meltzer
Born
in London, The United Kingdom
January 07, 1920
Died
May 07, 1996
|
Anarchism: Arguments For and Against
—
published
1981
—
5 editions
|
|
|
I Couldn't Paint Golden Angels
—
published
1996
—
6 editions
|
|
|
The anarchists in London, 1935-1955
—
published
1976
—
3 editions
|
|
|
A New World in Our Hearts: The Faces of Spanish Anarchism
—
published
1978
—
8 editions
|
|
|
The International Revolutionary Solidarity Movement: A Study of the Origins and Development of the Revolutionary Anarchist Movement in Europe 1945-73 ... Reference to the First of May Group
—
published
2005
—
4 editions
|
|
|
The Origins of the Anarchist Movement in China
by
—
published
2013
|
|
|
Black Flag Anarcho-quiz Book
—
published
1976
—
3 editions
|
|
|
Miguel Garcia's Story
|
|
|
First Flight: The Origins Of Anarcho-Syndicalism In Britain
—
published
2002
|
|
|
Newcastle Fights the Fascists: Pages from history or lessons for today?
by |
|
“Though I knew so far as Anarchism was concerned I was backing a lost cause, it didn't seem to matter as every other cause had won at some time but that of the people themselves. At least it threw so a light on any other political persuasion.”
― I Couldn't Paint Golden Angels
― I Couldn't Paint Golden Angels
“Those who use the word 'anarchy' to mean disorder or misrule, are not in correct. If they regard government as necessary, if they think that we could not live without Whitehall or the White House directing our affairs, if they think politicians are essential to our well-being and that we could not behave socially without policemen, they are right in assuming that anarchy means the opposite to what government guarantees. But those who take the reverse opinion, and consider government to be tyranny, are right too in considering anarchy, no government, to be liberty. If government is the maintenance of privilege and exploitation--and inefficiency of distribution its tool then only anarchy is order.”
― Anarchism: Arguments For and Against
― Anarchism: Arguments For and Against
“Nobody is fit to rule anybody else. It is not alleged that Mankind is perfect, or that merely through his/her natural goodness (or lack of same) he/she should (or should not) be permitted to rule. Rule as such causes abuse. There are no superpeople nor privileged classes who are above 'imperfect Mankind' and are capable or entitled to rule the rest of us. Submission to slavery means surrender of life.”
― Anarchism: Arguments For and Against
― Anarchism: Arguments For and Against
Topics Mentioning This Author
| topics | posts | views | last activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anarchist & Radic...: [April/May 2013] Anarchy in Action - Ward | 6 | 67 | Apr 18, 2013 05:58AM |









