Wolfgang Smith

Wolfgang Smith’s Followers (112)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

Wolfgang Smith


Born
in Vienna, Austria
February 18, 1930

Died
July 25, 2024

Website

Genre

Influences


Wolfgang Smith is a scholar and researcher in the fields of mathematics and physics, but is also a writer on theology, metaphysics, and religion. Because of his unusual qualifications in both scientific and theological disciplines, he is able to write with great authority on many topics of concern to religious and scientific scholars today. He has published extensively on mathematical topics relating to algebraic and differential topology. However, ever since his youth, Smith has had a deep interest in metaphysics and theology. Early on, he acquired a taste for Plato and the neoplatonists, and traveled in India to gain acquaintance with the Vedantic tradition. Later he devoted himself to the study of theology, and began his career as a Cath ...more

Average rating: 4.32 · 510 ratings · 59 reviews · 35 distinct worksSimilar authors
Cosmos and Transcendence: B...

4.54 avg rating — 125 ratings — published 1984 — 10 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Quantum Enigma: Finding...

4.12 avg rating — 106 ratings — published 1995 — 19 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Wisdom of Ancient Cosmo...

4.44 avg rating — 50 ratings — published 2004 — 11 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Science and Myth: What We A...

4.17 avg rating — 46 ratings — published 2010 — 7 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Physics and Vertical Causat...

4.23 avg rating — 43 ratings — published 2019 — 6 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Ancient Wisdom and Modern M...

by
4.40 avg rating — 25 ratings — published 2013 — 6 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Vertical Ascent: From P...

4.61 avg rating — 18 ratings8 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Christian Gnosis: From Sain...

4.33 avg rating — 18 ratings — published 2008 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Teilhardism And The New Rel...

4.13 avg rating — 16 ratings — published 1988 — 3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Vedanta in Light of Christi...

4.25 avg rating — 12 ratings2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by Wolfgang Smith…
Quotes by Wolfgang Smith  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“It is difficult, almost impossible, in fact, for the scientific community to recognize the fact that Cartesian bifurcation is a philosophic postulate, for which there is absolutely no scientific basis [...] It is not that they can conceive or imagine a scientific proof of that hypothesis; it is rather that they are unable to conceive that it might not be true.”
Wolfgang Smith

“Hard science ... is ultimately self-corrective, and wiser, in a way, than the scientists who pursue it; in the end it is apt to lead us to the truth, if only we have 'eyes to see'. But science itself cannot give us this vision: science as such cannot interpret its own findings; and neither, I would add, can modern philosophy. What is called for, I maintain, is a grounding in the traditional metaphysical doctrines of mankind: the very tenets that have been decried since the Enlightenment as primitive, pre-scientific, and puerile. Strange as it may seem to modern minds, these teachings ... derive ultimately 'from above': from the Center of the circle, if you will. Originally formulated in the language of myth, they have served as a catalyst of metaphysical vision down through the ages; neither Plato, nor Aristotle, nor Aquinas invented their own doctrines: all have drunk from this spring—except, of course, for the pundits of modernity, who have rejected that heritage. By now, to be sure, one knows very well to what destination modernity leads: we have, after all, entered the disillusioned and skeptical era of postmodernism. The argument against the traditional wisdom has now run its course, and the way to the perennial springs is open once more. The time is ripe for a new interpretation of scientific findings based upon pre-Cartesian principles; what is called for is a radical change of outlook, a veritable metanoia. Whether the doctrines of science will conduce to human enlightenment or to the blighting of our intellect hangs in the balance.”
Wolfgang Smith

“Interest in alchemy seems to be nowadays on the rise. Whereas the educated public at large remains no doubt skeptical and indeed disdainful of the ancient discipline, there is today a deepening awareness among the better informed that what stands behind many an “exploded superstition” may be in fact a long-forgotten wisdom. Although Carl Jung was obviously exaggerating when ! he suggested that four centuries after being expelled from our universities,- alchemy stands “knocking at the door,” a number of factors have conspired; to render the prospect of re-admission less remote, at least, than it had been ; during the heyday of materialism. In any case, no truly solid grounds for rejecting the ancient doctrine have yet been proposed. Take the case of the so-called four elements: earth, water, air and fire. One can be reasonably certain that these terms were not employed alchemically in their ordinary sense, but were used to designate elements, precisely, out of which substances, as we know them, are constituted. Somewhat like the quarks of modern physics, these elements are not found empirically in isolation, but occur in their multiple combinations, that is to say, as the perceptible substances that constitute what I term the corporeal domain. Now, as I have argued at length in The Quantum Enigma (Peru, Illinois: Sherwood Sugden, 1995), corporeal objects are not in fact mere aggregates of quantum particles; and this clearly suggests that there may indeed be elements of the aforesaid kind. It turns out that our habitual opposition to alchemy is based mainly upon scientistic prejudice: upon a reductionist dogma, namely, for which there is in reality no scientific support at all.”
Wolfgang Smith, The Wisdom of Ancient Cosmology: Contemporary Science in Light of Tradition