Jared Longshore's Blog, page 22

Boredom Is a Heresy

Boredom is a heresy, declaring God was wrong when he saw the goodness of the world.

R. J. Snell, Acedia and Its Discontents

The post Boredom Is a Heresy appeared first on REFORMATION & REVIVAL.

Sacrificial Table

Sacrifice is essential to any true community. If everyone is only taking and drinking, and no one is being poured out like a drink offering, then eventually the wine which gladdens the heart of man will run dry. Put another way, Paul said that death was at work in him and life in the recipients of his ministry. No death in the apostle, no life in others. Put yet another way, if everyone only wants to be loved and no one sacrificially loves others, then there indeed will be no genuine love among that people. None given and none received.

Even those in the secular world are beginning to see the necessity of sacrifice for genuine community. And we should thank the Lord for that light which He has given to some. But, any attempt to sacrifice for others apart from this sacrificial table is doomed to failure. There is no life in a zero-sum sacrificial community. In about three days that approach will turn into a sacrificial redistribution program, with a democratically elected commission informing Jones that he has more life at work in him than Thompson so he must sacrificially pour himself out for the commission which will ensure that the benefit is granted to Thompson’s account. 

No, there is no true community apart from the communion of the body and blood of Christ. Here is the sacrifice that informs all sacrifices. And not only by way of example. At this table, you are not simply being reminded, as by an illustration, that you should pour yourselves out for one another. At this table, the chief sacrifice is poured out for you. Here you partake of the One in whom all things consist, in whom all things live. So come in faith and welcome to Jesus Christ.

The post Sacrificial Table appeared first on REFORMATION & REVIVAL.

100 Billion Lighter and Faining for the Swine Food

Out there in the future, the grandchildren will ask us why we plunged them into such a murky clam chowder. The poor kids might have been able to swim out of a soup. But we are hellbent on the chowder, one that has sat on the stove for too long. The latest installment of this kind of thing was the 100 billion dollar foreign aid package recently passed by Congress. But this recent bit of folly only indicates the real trouble we will pass down to coming generations. The 100 billion itself isn’t the poison. It is an indicator of the poison.

I say the 100 billion itself isn’t the poison because I well know there are men out there with intel the average citizen does not have. A military strategist could likely explain how necessary the money is and how most of it is going to build our own military infrastructure and whatnot. My point does not need to contest those. My point is that our nation is the prodigal son three months into his bender when he still had enough money in the bank to keep him from chewing on the pig’s husks. But everyone knows that the boy is in trouble. Everyone can see the bad decisions. Mrs. Margaret, the local dairy farmer, is praying for the lad, hoping he will wise up.

The wisdom we should consider at the moment is twofold. The first fold involves the principles of just war. The second concerns what is required that we would abide by those principles. The first is a matter of the mind, the second, a matter of the heart. 

Principles of Just War

The principles of just war have been developed over centuries and they are still friendly guides. Just War thinking falls into three categories: 

(1) Justice in going to war. 

(2) Justice in war. 

(3) Justice in finishing war.

The principles involved in justly going to war include legitimate authority. Uncle Bob the plumber can’t declare war on North Korea. “Ah,” you say, “you don’t know my Uncle Bob.” Yes, I see, let me rephrase. Uncle Bob cannot declare war on North Korea while simultaneously meeting this “legitimate authority” standard of just war. Next up is just cause. No going to war because the nation next door gave you a wet willy. Just cause requires that you are defending citizens’ lives and livelihoods, or righting wrongs. Right intention comes next. Even if you have a just cause, you must add to that right motives if you’re going to war righteously. Follow these up with war being the last resort, having a likelihood of success, and ensuring that the ends justify the means (the money and the dead men really have to be worth it). That’s six principles in all in the first category. For a helpful sketch of these principles, and the ones coming in the next two categories, see A Basic Guide to the Just War Tradition by Eric Patterson.

The principles involved in justly waging war include military necessity. Once you are in the thick of it, you must do everything necessary and just to win the battle. No dragging war on because of the increased cash flow. Then there is proportionality. You cannot take out three guys on a hill with an atom bomb. Discrimination wraps up the third category. In short, don’t shoot the non-combatants.

Justly ending war requires order. You have to be able to govern the area after all is said in done. On this point, you might ask, can Zelensky really govern Crimea if he were to take it back? Justice comes next. This justice requires punishment of war crimes, restitution, and the like. Finally, there is conciliation. Come to terms publicly and sign the treaty, the equivalent of shaking hands and buying the other guy a beer.

Those are the principles and they are straightforward enough on the surface. But it takes all of two seconds to see the age-old question set before us: Legitimate authority, says who? Just cause, defined by what dictionary? The objectives of a particular war must be worth the men’s lives. And where is the scale upon which we can weigh such a value?

The trouble is that all of these principles involve justice. This justice is apparently the thing that our prodigal nation could not find if the blindfolded lady walked up to them on a Saturday in the park and slapped us in the face with a strong backhand. You can tell that we know nothing of this justice by a glance at the recent riots on college campuses. The reality is that you cannot get at justice without heaven, and more particularly, being reconciled to the God who dwells there.

George Washington has a pertinent word—”The propitious smiles of Heaven can never be expected on a nation that disregards the rules of order and right, which Heaven itself has ordained.” Saint Augustine does us one better. In a very Christian Nationalist sentiment, he responded to Cicero’s definition of commonwealth by essentially saying, “If Cicero is right on the terms, then pagan Rome simply wasn’t a real people but a mob. Here he is in toto—

“Where there is no true justice there can be no ‘association of men united by a common sense of right’, and therefore no people answering to the definition of Cicero. And if there is no people then there is no ‘weal of the people’, but some kind of a mob, not deserving the name of a people. If, therefore, a commonwealth is the ‘weal of the people’, and if a people does not exist where there is no ‘association by a common sense of right’, and there is no right where there is no justice, the irresistible conclusion is that where there is no justice there is no commonwealth. Moreover, justice is that virtue which assigns to every one his due. Then what kind of justice is it that takes a man away from the true God and subjects him to unclean demons? Is this to assign to every man his due?” (City of God, 19.21)

Say it with Augustine: No justice, no peace. No true God, no justice. And here we have the foreign policy of Christian Nationalism: Christ is the Lord of war. This foundational claim will certainly cause those Columbia University professors to set their hair on fire. But, come to think of it, they have already set their hair on fire because, I will say it again: No true God, no justice, and no peace. You will have Christ as the Lord of war, or you will have Lord of the Flies.

The real culprit in all of this is likely Hugo Grotius. He sent us down miles of bad road with a simple hypothetical. In his The Rights of War and Peace, he posited that natural law would exist without God. Given his Arminian tendencies, he essentially taught that natural law finds its source in human nature. As Reuben Alvarado put it in The Debate That Changed the West, according to Grotius, “The natural law is not dependent on God for its content, nor for its existence, but only for its implantation in us.” This is a very Pelagian idea in which God gives man capacity, but does not give him the will and action itself. You can hear the residue of Grotius’ thought in Washington’s quote above. Grotius would likely be just fine with our first president’s claim. We need the rules of order and right that heaven has ordained. Yes, so far so good. But how do we obtain those rules? Is it merely a matter of having eyes in our heads? Being smart? Following in the footsteps of our recent forefathers who worshipped at the throne of reason? How is that working out for us?

Let me put it to you another way. Kings reign by wisdom—”I wisdom dwell with prudence, and find out knowledge of witty inventions . . . by me kings reign, and princes decree justice. By me princes rule, and nobles, even all the judges of the earth” (Proverbs 8:12, 15-16). Now, you might say, disagreeing with Augustine you might say, that we could get some competent Turk to obtain this wisdom and keep our sons from dying on a foreign battlefield in a senseless war. But this same wisdom says only a few verses later, “The LORD possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old. I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the earth was” (Proverbs 8:22-23). 

Do you really want to claim that this is not an allusion to the Wisdom, the Word Himself through whom all things were made and in whom are found all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge? Do you want to go the way of Grotius and claim that this wisdom would exist apart from and without the Creator God? 

All of this shakes out to a very simple and full-proof gospel. Christ is Lord. You will kiss the Son or kiss the void. Man wants a wisdom machine, not a Living Wisdom. Man wants paint by numbers just war theory. He wants a just war thingamajig, one that will receive all of the relevant data on one end, run a mathematical equation, and pop out a right answer on the other. He wants this because it would enable him to carry on without repenting. 

But lower-case wisdom comes from upper-case Wisdom. And if you will not be reconciled to the latter, then you will not abide with the former. Christ is Lord of all, and that includes war. We are becoming weak and dumb because of our idolatry. Man becomes like the idols he worships, deaf, dumb, and blind. And while it is true that the iniquity of the Americanites is not yet complete, while it is true that the prodigal son still has some greenbacks to spend, there is a full measure, and we are well down the road toward that squanderer’s situation when he “fained to fill the belly with the husks the swine did eat” (Luke 15:16).

The post 100 Billion Lighter and Faining for the Swine Food appeared first on REFORMATION & REVIVAL.

Grace Upon Grace

In his gospel, John said that it is of Christ’s fullness that we not only receive grace, but grace upon grace. This abounding grace appears in God’s words to Abraham that he would not only be God to him; but He would also be God to Abraham’s children after him in their generations. The sign of that covenant promise was circumcision, which was given to Abraham’s children as much as it was given to Abraham. Likewise, in the new covenant, God has promised that His covenant is for us and our children, and likewise the covenant sign, which is baptism.

The post Grace Upon Grace appeared first on REFORMATION & REVIVAL.

Unzipping the Anxiety Luggage

Jesus told us that in this world we will have trouble. So it is not a sin to have cares and concerns. But, it is a sin to hold on to those cares and concerns. The world deals them to you. And then you must deal them to God. The Apostle Peter has said so: “Humble yourselves therefore under the mighty hand of God, that he may exalt you in due time, casting all your care upon him; for he careth for you” (1 Peter 5:6-7). This is the plague of the prideful man: He’s doomed to carry around his cares. They are too important. And he is too important, to hand them over to any other.

Now there is a difference between casting your cares upon  mighty God, and simply unzipping your anxiety luggage before Him in prayer, only to zip it back up and take it with you after you have spoken with Him. “Why Lord, don’t I feel the freedom of being carefree?” “Well,” He replies, “That freedom would require you actually handing them over.”

You might object to this with something like, “Well, I simply want to be responsible. I want to make a plan. I like fixing problems.” That’s fine and good. The problem is not you taking responsibility. It is the weight, the stress, the worry, then the coping mechanisms, and the way you are trying to manipulate the people around you to solve whatever trouble you are all twisted up about. All of that goes away when you hand the care itself over to the Mighty One.

But, you cannot merely go to the Lord for advice about dealing with your worries. There must be an actual transaction. You must hand Him your worries, and He will hand you His peace.

The post Unzipping the Anxiety Luggage appeared first on REFORMATION & REVIVAL.

Real Though We Can’t See Them

‘You don’t think—not possibly—not as a mere hundredth chance—there might be things that are real though we can’t see them?’

‘Certainly I do. Such things as Justice, Equality, the Soul, or musical notes.’

‘Oh, grandfather, I don’t mean things like that. If there are souls, could there not be soul-houses?’

C. S. Lewis, Till We Have Faces

The post Real Though We Can’t See Them appeared first on REFORMATION & REVIVAL.

Let Him Ask

Back in the 1970s a man named Laurence Peter developed a theory called “The Peter Principle.” It claimed that, within hierarchical organizations, individuals are regularly promoted past the point of their compentency. A man functions well enough at a certain level. But then he gets promoted to a positoin in which he is relatively incompetent. This is obviosuly to be avoided. And one way to avoid it is to abide by the teaching of James 1:5, “If any of you lack wisdom let him him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him” (James 1:5).

Now you can lack wisdom because you are simply unwise. Or you can lack wisdom because you have matured and advanced to new levels of responsibility. You are a wise man who has never faced this kind of battle before, and it is time to level-up. James has this latter example in mind because he adds that God gives liberally and upraids not. He means that God is a generous giver of wisdom, who will not find fault with you when you keep coming back to ask Him for more. When you do so, God supplies that wisdom and individuals, families, organizations, and communities rise to new levels of virtue, dominion, sanctification, and glory.

Now, anyone who has spent a good bit of time considering organizations or hierarchies will likely say, “Steady now. There is a lot of truth to that Peter principle. It is rare that people actually enlarge thier capacity and competency.” Granted, it is rare. But it is only rare becuase it is equally rare that men ask God in faith to give them wisdom. God stands ready to give you that wisdom and liberally so. But will you ask?

The post Let Him Ask appeared first on REFORMATION & REVIVAL.

Table of Abundance

Jesus came so that we might have life, and have it more abundantly (John 10:10). This is contrasted with the theif who comes to steal, kill, and destroy. The theif would erase you. He would remove your being if he could. He would take away what makes you you and leave you but a shell of a man, on the border of being nothing. But the Second Adam came so that you would be truly human, so that ruined nature would be restored to the full.

So the life you live must be a life of addition. You must add to your faith virtue, and to virtue knowledge, and to knowledge temperence, and to temperence patience, and so on. Many have flamed out and locked up because they have pursued this life of addition apart from faith in Christ. They have experienced what every engine experiences which tries to run on no oil.

So don’t make that mistake. Christ gives Himself to you at this table. He does not merely give you the tools you need to succeed. This bread and wine does not simply enlarge your capacity to go and live life to the full. This bread and wine is fullness of life. Christ is the One who is fully alive. This bread is kindness. This wine is charity. You will add neither to your life if you go looking for them outside of this God man who was slain for us. So come in faith and welcome to Jesus Christ.

The post Table of Abundance appeared first on REFORMATION & REVIVAL.

The Naturalism ‘Hangover’

It comes partly from what we may call a ‘hangover’. We all have Naturalism in our bones and even conversion does not at once work the infection out of our system. Its assumptions rush back upon the mind the moment vigilance is relaxed. 

C. S. Lewis, Miracles

The post The Naturalism ‘Hangover’ appeared first on REFORMATION & REVIVAL.

Feeding Your Faith

The Roman Catholic doctrine of transubstatiation teaches that this bread transforms into the body of Christ. So the bread itself which you put into your mouth is the body of Christ. We reject this teaching and teach rather that the bread itself remains bread as you chew, and the body of Christ remains in heaven where He is sat down at the right hand of the Father. One objection that might come our way runs like this, “I, for one, don’t want to feed on a similtude. I don’t want to eat and drink that which has but a resemblance to the real thing. Unlike you Calvinistic Protestants, I want to taste the real thing.” 

How should we reply to such an objection?

The first thing to say is that while we do not believe that this physical bread is transformed into the body of Christ, we manifestly believe in the real body of Christ. His body is in heaven where it still bears the scars of our salvation.

Secondly, we do not feed upon the wind here at this table. By teeth, tongue, and jaws we feed upon the bread on the table. And by faith, we feed upon the body of Christ. 

Do not make the mistake of thinking your faith can be fed by faith, or that your faith can be feed my mere ideas, or concepts, or rituals and liturgies themselves. No, the food for your faith is the real body and blood of Jesus Christ. 

Yes, this is a mystery. You can know it to be the case. But you will never be able to get your mind all the way around it. The real Christ seated in heaven feeds your faith with Himself. Would you have greater faith? Would you have more abudant life? Then come in faith and welcome to Jesus Christ.

The post Feeding Your Faith appeared first on REFORMATION & REVIVAL.