Rachna Gilmore's Blog, page 4
November 12, 2010
Debunking Some Writing Myths 1
A writer starting out is often looking for a set of rules to follow -- ones that will teach him/her everything she/he has ever wanted or needed to know about writing, and that will guarantee success, fame and fortune.
And of course, there are courses and books a-plenty with lists of rules about writing.
Here's the rule with which I start all my creative writing workshops:
There are no Golden Rules.
Each writer must find and discover her/his own unique approach to writing, find out what works for her/him.
You can learn the craft of writing -- well, aspects of it, anyway -- but no one can teach you the art of writing. You learn that by writing, by trial and error and finding out what works for you.
And of course, there are courses and books a-plenty with lists of rules about writing.
Here's the rule with which I start all my creative writing workshops:
There are no Golden Rules.
Each writer must find and discover her/his own unique approach to writing, find out what works for her/him.
You can learn the craft of writing -- well, aspects of it, anyway -- but no one can teach you the art of writing. You learn that by writing, by trial and error and finding out what works for you.
Published on November 12, 2010 09:03
November 5, 2010
Finding the Right Voice -- Don't Show Off
Part of good story-telling is finding the right voice to fit the story. Here's something to bear in mind: please let the language and words serve the story, not the other way around. Don't slaughter story at the altar of your writerly ego. (Oh, I know, it's tempting!)
For me, the best books are where the writer is invisible. Where I'm caught in the story, where wonderful phrases, if there are any, are absolutely integral and true to the story. Where the author isn't pirouetting around with flash phrases that stick out like a sore thumb, shrieking, "Look at me, look at me!" Or leaping about with grandiose phrases, no matter how lovely, with a cheesy, "Look, aren't I clever?"
Beautiful language can only take you so far. After a while, the reader's admiration can ebb into frustration and even downright hostility because instead of engaging with the story, the language sticks out its knobbly feet and demands attention and homage to the author. Perhaps in an attempt to divert attention from the lack of story?
So, don't show off. Let the tale flow, let the tale do its part.
This is not to say that beautiful language is not appropriate at times. But it needs to serve the story, it always needs to serve the story, not the other way around.
So...
Desert the delectable phrases
Eschew the urge to pontificate, with or without marbles in your mouth, no matter how stunning the marbles.
Say it plain.
Say it clear.
For me, the best books are where the writer is invisible. Where I'm caught in the story, where wonderful phrases, if there are any, are absolutely integral and true to the story. Where the author isn't pirouetting around with flash phrases that stick out like a sore thumb, shrieking, "Look at me, look at me!" Or leaping about with grandiose phrases, no matter how lovely, with a cheesy, "Look, aren't I clever?"
Beautiful language can only take you so far. After a while, the reader's admiration can ebb into frustration and even downright hostility because instead of engaging with the story, the language sticks out its knobbly feet and demands attention and homage to the author. Perhaps in an attempt to divert attention from the lack of story?
So, don't show off. Let the tale flow, let the tale do its part.
This is not to say that beautiful language is not appropriate at times. But it needs to serve the story, it always needs to serve the story, not the other way around.
So...
Desert the delectable phrases
Eschew the urge to pontificate, with or without marbles in your mouth, no matter how stunning the marbles.
Say it plain.
Say it clear.
Published on November 05, 2010 13:32
October 30, 2010
Writing In The First Person -- Some Common Pitfalls
I've always loved writing in the first person because it forces me to get inside my character's heart, head and soul and to explore and delve into her/him and then become her/him.
But to write convincingly in the first person, you need to uncover and discover that character's voice -- come up with a voice that is fresh, distinctive and completely convincing.
Here are some common pitfalls I've noticed in books written in the first person:
-- having a generic voice. This might work in a third person narrative (well, only maybe, because let's face it, generic is blah, no matter what point of view you chose to write in) but it is particularly grating in a first person narrative. If it doesn't work and the voice is unconvincing, the book will fail to engage the reader even if the story is exciting.
-- tied to the generic voice is the lack of anything distinctive to make the character's voice singular. If you can't tell who is speaking without saying so, perhaps the voice isn't distinctive enough. And perhaps that points to a deeper problem -- maybe your character isn't distinctive enough. Maybe you don't know enough about your character to write convincingly from his/her point of view.
-- in writing for children, having a voice that is too old. Adults can often have trouble connecting with the child's inner vocabulary and intensity, and the rhythms of speech and thought.
-- using vocabulary that is too old for a child narrator.
-- using expressions that are too old for a child narrator. (Warning here: yes, kids today say "like" almost incessantly, but if you use it in a story the way a kid might in real life, it'll trip the reader and mask the story. The trick is to use it sufficiently to make the voice sound like a kid's voice, but not enough to annoy the reader.)
-- getting the rhythm and pacing wrong when writing from a child's point of view
-- getting the rhythm and pacing wrong for a first person narrative. A first person narrative has to sound like a person telling the story (aside: you can use a first person point of view to have the narrator tell someone else's story, not their own) and as such has to reflect the rhythms of that particular person's voice.
Sometimes it takes many rounds of edits to get that voice right. In the early drafts of my first children's novel, A FRIEND LIKE ZILLA I found myself writing in a voice that was distant -- it sounded like an adult looking back and remembering. I had a superb editor, Charis Wahl, who pointed this out. It took many re-writes to get that voice right, to make the voice of the main character, Nobby, ring true, and seem convincing and particular to her.
Some books are like that. Part of finding Nobby's voice and making it convincing, was getting to know Nobby and making her convincing.
And then there are books where the voice just comes to you. When that happens it's a gift. It happened with my picture book A Screaming Kind of Day. Scully was real to me from the get go. I had her voice clear in my head from the get go.
But regardless of whether the voice of your character is clear from the start or not, it's imperative, if writing in the first person, to make it convincing and unique and true to the character.
But to write convincingly in the first person, you need to uncover and discover that character's voice -- come up with a voice that is fresh, distinctive and completely convincing.
Here are some common pitfalls I've noticed in books written in the first person:
-- having a generic voice. This might work in a third person narrative (well, only maybe, because let's face it, generic is blah, no matter what point of view you chose to write in) but it is particularly grating in a first person narrative. If it doesn't work and the voice is unconvincing, the book will fail to engage the reader even if the story is exciting.
-- tied to the generic voice is the lack of anything distinctive to make the character's voice singular. If you can't tell who is speaking without saying so, perhaps the voice isn't distinctive enough. And perhaps that points to a deeper problem -- maybe your character isn't distinctive enough. Maybe you don't know enough about your character to write convincingly from his/her point of view.
-- in writing for children, having a voice that is too old. Adults can often have trouble connecting with the child's inner vocabulary and intensity, and the rhythms of speech and thought.
-- using vocabulary that is too old for a child narrator.
-- using expressions that are too old for a child narrator. (Warning here: yes, kids today say "like" almost incessantly, but if you use it in a story the way a kid might in real life, it'll trip the reader and mask the story. The trick is to use it sufficiently to make the voice sound like a kid's voice, but not enough to annoy the reader.)
-- getting the rhythm and pacing wrong when writing from a child's point of view
-- getting the rhythm and pacing wrong for a first person narrative. A first person narrative has to sound like a person telling the story (aside: you can use a first person point of view to have the narrator tell someone else's story, not their own) and as such has to reflect the rhythms of that particular person's voice.
Sometimes it takes many rounds of edits to get that voice right. In the early drafts of my first children's novel, A FRIEND LIKE ZILLA I found myself writing in a voice that was distant -- it sounded like an adult looking back and remembering. I had a superb editor, Charis Wahl, who pointed this out. It took many re-writes to get that voice right, to make the voice of the main character, Nobby, ring true, and seem convincing and particular to her.
Some books are like that. Part of finding Nobby's voice and making it convincing, was getting to know Nobby and making her convincing.
And then there are books where the voice just comes to you. When that happens it's a gift. It happened with my picture book A Screaming Kind of Day. Scully was real to me from the get go. I had her voice clear in my head from the get go.
But regardless of whether the voice of your character is clear from the start or not, it's imperative, if writing in the first person, to make it convincing and unique and true to the character.
Published on October 30, 2010 12:26
October 22, 2010
Creative Cross-Fertilization Part 2
Following on my previous post on creative cross fertilization and specifically, the inspiration of music, here are some thoughts for writers:
Try writing to music.
See what it does for you.
Try listening to a variety of music and see what best suits your story. Will your story change, or does your writing style change with different types of music? Is it different if you listen to classical as opposed to rock, or heavy metal, or folk, or blues, or blue grass?
Here's another thought:
What is your character's favourite music?
Figuring it out offers a sideways glimpse into your character to flesh him/her out in a way that perhaps mere biographical details can't. This might never show up in your writing, but you'll know that detail about your character, and it'll inform your writing. And what kind of music does your character hate? This too tells you something about her/him.
Oh, and try this – if your character were a piece of music, which one would it be?
When I started to ponder that, I decided that Dilly, in The Trouble With Dilly, would be Mozart's Eine Kleine Nachtmusik, or perhaps Bach's Third Brandenburg Concerto. Oh, both are my favourites!
Red – a character with whom I've spent a great deal of time lately, as I've re-worked THAT BOY RED – might, I think, be Beethoven's Pastoral. Or perhaps some East coast fiddle music.
What music best represents your character?
Try writing to music.
See what it does for you.
Try listening to a variety of music and see what best suits your story. Will your story change, or does your writing style change with different types of music? Is it different if you listen to classical as opposed to rock, or heavy metal, or folk, or blues, or blue grass?
Here's another thought:
What is your character's favourite music?
Figuring it out offers a sideways glimpse into your character to flesh him/her out in a way that perhaps mere biographical details can't. This might never show up in your writing, but you'll know that detail about your character, and it'll inform your writing. And what kind of music does your character hate? This too tells you something about her/him.
Oh, and try this – if your character were a piece of music, which one would it be?
When I started to ponder that, I decided that Dilly, in The Trouble With Dilly, would be Mozart's Eine Kleine Nachtmusik, or perhaps Bach's Third Brandenburg Concerto. Oh, both are my favourites!
Red – a character with whom I've spent a great deal of time lately, as I've re-worked THAT BOY RED – might, I think, be Beethoven's Pastoral. Or perhaps some East coast fiddle music.
What music best represents your character?
Published on October 22, 2010 12:17
October 15, 2010
Creative Cross-Fertilization
Recently, I attended a concert at the Shenkman Arts Centre in Orleans, performed by the chamber orchestra I Musici de Montreal, founded and conducted by Yuli Turovsky. They played some Mozart to start, and then the work of a composer I'd never heard of before – Modest Moussorgsky, called Pictures at an Exhibition, but with a twist. The screen above the musicians, showed an animated version of the art of Viktor Hartmann, a friend of the composer. It was Hartmann's art that inspired Moussorgsky to write the music he did.
In the performance I attended, the art and the music came together, with the art cleverly reinterpreted with surrealistic flow and movement (animated, if you like) by the composer's daughter.
I love the idea of art inspiring music which in turn inspired the flowing animation of the art we saw, all of which inspired me to write this entry in this blog.
It reminded me that any form of art inspires and stirs creativity. That exposure to other artistic mediums can enrich, inform, and enhance our own.
For example, when I was writing my picture book story, Roses for Gita, (a sequel to my picture book Lights for Gita) a crucial, and I think magical, scene in the story fell into place during a Suzuki violin concert in which my daughter was playing. The inward expressions of the kids as they made beautiful music together made me suddenly realize that music is a language of its own, and that a difficult character in the story Roses for Gita, Mr. Flinch, might just be reached through music. I had an image of him, this grumpy, cantankerous old man, playing the violin, his face inward and absorbed with the music, caught in its delight.
That image sent a chill through me and I knew it was right for the book.
In my next post on Oct 22th, I'll suggest some ways in which you can use music to enhance your writing as well as find out more about your characters.
In the performance I attended, the art and the music came together, with the art cleverly reinterpreted with surrealistic flow and movement (animated, if you like) by the composer's daughter.
I love the idea of art inspiring music which in turn inspired the flowing animation of the art we saw, all of which inspired me to write this entry in this blog.
It reminded me that any form of art inspires and stirs creativity. That exposure to other artistic mediums can enrich, inform, and enhance our own.
For example, when I was writing my picture book story, Roses for Gita, (a sequel to my picture book Lights for Gita) a crucial, and I think magical, scene in the story fell into place during a Suzuki violin concert in which my daughter was playing. The inward expressions of the kids as they made beautiful music together made me suddenly realize that music is a language of its own, and that a difficult character in the story Roses for Gita, Mr. Flinch, might just be reached through music. I had an image of him, this grumpy, cantankerous old man, playing the violin, his face inward and absorbed with the music, caught in its delight.
That image sent a chill through me and I knew it was right for the book.
In my next post on Oct 22th, I'll suggest some ways in which you can use music to enhance your writing as well as find out more about your characters.
Published on October 15, 2010 12:01
October 9, 2010
The New Grown Up -- Catching Time

Here it is, the cover of the newly arrived as a grown-up book, CATCHING TIME. Illustrated by the wonderful Kirsti Anne Wakelin. I've just figured out how to put pictures on this blog, and I had to show off Kirsti's fine work. I love the whimsy of Kirsti's art, the energy and movement.
It perfectly echoes the hurry and bustle of trying to catch time.
Published on October 09, 2010 14:10
October 7, 2010
A New Book Is Born -- Or Rather, Grown Up
I'm delighted to announce the birth of a new book. My picture book, CATCHING TIME illustrated by the wonderful Kirsti Anne Wakelin published by Red Deer Press/Fitzhenry & Whiteside.
The process of creation is an interesting and circuitous one -- there's the initial euphoria of creation, the doubt and loathing of the various and multitudinous stages of editing, the inevitable putting away...
This book was started in the nineties, fiddled with endlessly, forgotten, then rediscovered.
When I rediscovered it, I found that I loved the concept but that the story didn't work because the VOICE wasn't right. (I've posted before about the importance of voice.) It wasn't the voice of a child, and as such it didn't echo and resonate with the emotional core of a child.
Once I re-wrote the story in a real child's voice, it quickly found a home.
Perhaps it's curious -- or not -- that this story, about catching time, should have taken so much time to come to fruition. Time, that wily old trickster, at play again.
After the story was accepted by Red Deer Press, it still went through endless fiddling and editing, (I was fortunate to work with Peter Carver, a wonderful editor) repeated reading aloud to taste the ebb and flow of the words, before it was ready for print.
By that point, the book felt like a surly teenager I couldn't wait to see the last of.
And then...and then, the book comes back, all bound and printed, and suddenly it's like the surly teenager has grown up.
So a new book is born -- now as a grown up.
The process of creation is an interesting and circuitous one -- there's the initial euphoria of creation, the doubt and loathing of the various and multitudinous stages of editing, the inevitable putting away...
This book was started in the nineties, fiddled with endlessly, forgotten, then rediscovered.
When I rediscovered it, I found that I loved the concept but that the story didn't work because the VOICE wasn't right. (I've posted before about the importance of voice.) It wasn't the voice of a child, and as such it didn't echo and resonate with the emotional core of a child.
Once I re-wrote the story in a real child's voice, it quickly found a home.
Perhaps it's curious -- or not -- that this story, about catching time, should have taken so much time to come to fruition. Time, that wily old trickster, at play again.
After the story was accepted by Red Deer Press, it still went through endless fiddling and editing, (I was fortunate to work with Peter Carver, a wonderful editor) repeated reading aloud to taste the ebb and flow of the words, before it was ready for print.
By that point, the book felt like a surly teenager I couldn't wait to see the last of.
And then...and then, the book comes back, all bound and printed, and suddenly it's like the surly teenager has grown up.
So a new book is born -- now as a grown up.
Published on October 07, 2010 15:41
September 23, 2010
Brave Words To The New Writer
Steven Heighton's post, A FEW MEMOS TO MYSELF is filled with sage, insightful, and tough advice to a writer starting out. It's something to read through periodically if you're new to writing, or if you're established -- maybe even particularly so if you're established -- to avoid the pitfalls of becoming, as he puts it, a careerist writer. I particularly relate to his advice on embracing oblivion. It ties into my previous post on how to keep the joy of writing alive.
It's a hard-headed common sense list to help you keep it real. Be tough on yourself. Be willing to take chances. Insist on taking chances. It's the only way to grow with your writing, for your writing to grow, and to safeguard and nurture your internal creative fires.
It's a hard-headed common sense list to help you keep it real. Be tough on yourself. Be willing to take chances. Insist on taking chances. It's the only way to grow with your writing, for your writing to grow, and to safeguard and nurture your internal creative fires.
Published on September 23, 2010 09:52
September 20, 2010
More on Writing With Joy
When I first started writing, it was pure -- an acceptance of my lowly early apprenticeship status, an acceptance of how little I knew about writing, and a fluttering hope of being published but not expecting anything.
Now, twenty or more books later, in as many years -- oh, and a few awards and accolades too -- that pure state is harder to find.
My fault. It's when I get bogged down with outcomes, that the joy stalls. Bogged with thoughts of the publishing process (where to submit, etc), hopes for the success (big success -- hey, who dreams of failure, or even mediocre success?) of the novel or picture book, thoughts about the business side of writing and how to best get that book out there.
It's what I've heard the poet and author, Steven Heighton, refer to the secretarial side of writing, versus the sacramental side of writing.
There is a purity to the beginner mind -- it's more open to possibilities. It's less invested in measuring output against time, more open to exploration. That's where the joy is for me.
I need to periodically remind myself of that, even while I accept that the inevitable consequence of being an established author (ha! me established? I so don't feel it, even though that's how I'm regarded) is that the business side of things will keep intruding.
It's finding that balance. Not checking e-mail incessantly (who me?), not getting ensnared and entangled and lost in the countless distractions of the internet, or promotion.
Writing for the joy of it. Pure and simple. Sigh.
Now, twenty or more books later, in as many years -- oh, and a few awards and accolades too -- that pure state is harder to find.
My fault. It's when I get bogged down with outcomes, that the joy stalls. Bogged with thoughts of the publishing process (where to submit, etc), hopes for the success (big success -- hey, who dreams of failure, or even mediocre success?) of the novel or picture book, thoughts about the business side of writing and how to best get that book out there.
It's what I've heard the poet and author, Steven Heighton, refer to the secretarial side of writing, versus the sacramental side of writing.
There is a purity to the beginner mind -- it's more open to possibilities. It's less invested in measuring output against time, more open to exploration. That's where the joy is for me.
I need to periodically remind myself of that, even while I accept that the inevitable consequence of being an established author (ha! me established? I so don't feel it, even though that's how I'm regarded) is that the business side of things will keep intruding.
It's finding that balance. Not checking e-mail incessantly (who me?), not getting ensnared and entangled and lost in the countless distractions of the internet, or promotion.
Writing for the joy of it. Pure and simple. Sigh.
Published on September 20, 2010 09:15
September 17, 2010
Round and Round It Goes
Aaaaak! Round and round it goes, where it stops nobody knows. That's the process of writing. It's a long, slow spiral to the heart of the final draft and boy, it is painful at times. Right now I'm going through another draft -- umpteenth -- of THAT BOY RED my upcoming children's novel for ages 8 and up, due to be released by HarperCollins Canada in April 2011.
It's been a joy, mostly, discovering/uncovering Red's world and the people in it. I've enjoyed reading it as I re-worked it, enjoyed being in his world, which is rural PEI during the Depression. I've enjoyed researching, fine tuning, expanding on characters, inserting the kinds of details that make the story seem to grow and continue beyond the pages of the book.
All requiring focus but for the most part thoroughly satisfying.
But.
Now.
Oh, now, I'm doing what is absolutely essential -- I'm reading it out loud.
And aaaaak!!!!!
I can't believe how the flow stumbles and fumbles in places. This is the stage where I feel frustrated, embarrassed and convinced I'm a crappy, crappy writer. Surely if I could write better I wouldn't find so many places where the language stalls, where the music of the sentences jar and clash instead of flow. Where the cadence flops and drags instead of swooping with ease.
Aaaaaak!!!!!!
It is completely necessary, this stage, to fine tune any piece of writing, because the ear picks up what the eye doesn't.
It is time consuming.
Thoroughly humbling.
And completely necessary.
It's been a joy, mostly, discovering/uncovering Red's world and the people in it. I've enjoyed reading it as I re-worked it, enjoyed being in his world, which is rural PEI during the Depression. I've enjoyed researching, fine tuning, expanding on characters, inserting the kinds of details that make the story seem to grow and continue beyond the pages of the book.
All requiring focus but for the most part thoroughly satisfying.
But.
Now.
Oh, now, I'm doing what is absolutely essential -- I'm reading it out loud.
And aaaaak!!!!!
I can't believe how the flow stumbles and fumbles in places. This is the stage where I feel frustrated, embarrassed and convinced I'm a crappy, crappy writer. Surely if I could write better I wouldn't find so many places where the language stalls, where the music of the sentences jar and clash instead of flow. Where the cadence flops and drags instead of swooping with ease.
Aaaaaak!!!!!!
It is completely necessary, this stage, to fine tune any piece of writing, because the ear picks up what the eye doesn't.
It is time consuming.
Thoroughly humbling.
And completely necessary.
Published on September 17, 2010 20:14
Rachna Gilmore's Blog
- Rachna Gilmore's profile
- 18 followers
Rachna Gilmore isn't a Goodreads Author
(yet),
but they
do have a blog,
so here are some recent posts imported from
their feed.
