R. Albert Mohler Jr.'s Blog, page 287

March 1, 2016

A Prayer for Primary Day

“Almighty Father, we do come before you aware of the fact that government is not an accident nor is it our invention, but rather it is your gift to us in the very structures of creation as you have given us — that which will lead to righteousness and justice and human flourishing. We understand that you have created government and given it to us, to your human creatures, in order to restrain evil and uphold that which is good. And Father, even as we recognize that here in our own state, with the caucus and around the country, with so many primaries and political events today, Father, we mean to pray in a way that is honoring to you. Father, you have set forth in Scripture a model of the kind of leaders we should aspire to have, and the kind of leadership that we should be—as a people aspiring to be—in order that leaders who uphold righteousness and justice would emerge from us. So we pray this day that you will bless this people. And with a horizon far beyond what takes place today, but with today very much on our minds, Father we pray that you will give us leaders, eventually a president of the United States, who will uphold righteousness and do justice, whose personal character will befit the office, and whose convictions and understanding will lead to flourishing amongst this people. Father, we pray for the sanctity of human life to be upheld. We pray for the dignity and sanctity of every single human life to be valued. Father, we pray for the goods you have given us to be honored. And Father, we pray for the least of these among us to be protected. And Father, we pray for a government that we acknowledge we do not deserve, but we pray this in confidence that it is not we who rule, but you, and we commit this to you as your thankful people. In Christ’s name we pray, Amen.”


A prayer by R. Albert Mohler, Jr., President, in the chapel service, The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Tuesday, March 1, 2016.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on March 01, 2016 13:03

February 29, 2016

February 28, 2016

Exodus 3:13-22

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 28, 2016 07:00

February 26, 2016

February 25, 2016

The Briefing 02-25-16

Commander in chief or entertainer in chief? Presidential candidate expectations have changed USA Today (Rick Hampson) — After Obama, the commander in chief will also be entertainer in chief

Literature's power to influence culture made clear in two prominent authors' obituariesNew York Times (William Grimes) — Harper Lee, Author of ‘To Kill a Mockingbird,’ Dies at 89New York Times (Jonathan Kandell) — Umberto Eco, 84, Best-Selling Academic Who Navigated Two Worlds, Dies

Nobel Peace Prize winner and ex-Polish President Lech Walesa denies charges of corruption New York Times (Associated Press) — Ex-Polish President Walesa Denies He Was a Paid Informant

Entrepreneurs seek to capitalize on cannabis by removing "stigma" around weed Financial Times (Gregory Meyer and Shannon Bond) — Cannabis advocates push for hemp exchange

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 25, 2016 02:00

February 24, 2016

The Briefing 02-24-16

Dismissing marriage as passé fails to recognize its central importance in healthy societiesWashington Post (Sarah Wright) — Opinion Why it’s time to stop glorifying marriage

Psychological, romantic, and moral views of marriage all fall short of the biblical viewNew York Times (David Brooks) — Three Views of Marriage

Biden's words from 1992 come back to bite, reminding us that our words are never forgotten New York Times (David M. Herszenhorn and Julie Hirschfeld Davis) — Joe Biden Speech From 1992 Gives G.O.P. Fodder in Court FightNew York Times (Carl Hulse) — 24 Years Later, Joe Biden’s Words Haunt Democrats

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 24, 2016 02:00

February 23, 2016

February 22, 2016

The Secularization of the West and the Rise of a New Morality

(This post is the second in a four part series on Secularization and the Sexual Revolution.)


The new sexual morality did not emerge from a vacuum. Massive intellectual changes at the worldview level over the last 200 years set the stage for the revolution in which we currently find ourselves. We are living in times rightly, if rather awkwardly, described as the Late Modern Age. Just a decade ago, we spoke of the Postmodern Age, as if modernity had given way to something fundamentally new. Like every new and self-declared epoch, the Postmodern Age was declared to be a form of liberation. Whereas the Modern Age announced itself as a secular liberation from a Christian authority that operated on claims of divine revelation, the Postmodern Age was proposed as a liberation from the great secular authorities of reason and rationality. The Postmodern Age, it was claimed, would liberate humanity by operating with an official “incredulity toward all metanarratives.” In other words, postmodernity denied all of the big narratives that had previously shaped the culture and specifically put an end to the Christian narrative.


And yet, postmodern thought eventuated, as all intellectual movements must, in its own metanarrative. Then it just passed away. We still speak of postmodern thinking, even as we speak rightly of postmodern architecture and postmodern art, but we are speaking, for the most part, of a movement that has given way and given up. In retrospect, the Postmodern Age was not a new age at all; it was only the alarm that announced the end of Modernity and the beginning of the Late Modern Age. Modernity has not disappeared. It has only grown stronger, if also more complex.


The claim that humanity can only come into its own and overcome various invidious forms of discrimination by secular liberation is not new, but it is now mainstream. It is now so common to the cultures of Western societies that it need not be announced, and often is not noticed. Those born into the cultures of late modernity simply breathe these assumptions as they breathe the atmosphere, and their worldviews are radically realigned, even if their language retains elements of the old worldview.


The background to this great intellectual shift is the secularization of Western societies. Modernity has brought many cultural goods, but it has also, as predicted, brought a radical change in the way citizens of Western societies think, feel, relate, and reason. The Enlightenment’s liberation of reason at the expense of revelation was followed by a radical anti-supernaturalism that can scarcely be exaggerated. Looking at Europe and Great Britain, it is clear that the Modern Age has alienated an entire civilization from its Christian roots, along with Christian moral and intellectual commitments. This did not happen all at once, of course, though the change came very quickly in nations such as France and Germany. Scandinavian nations now register almost imperceptible levels of Christian belief. Increasingly, the same is also true of Great Britain. Sociologists now speak openly of the death of Christian Britain—and the evidence of Christian decline is abundant.


Some prophetic voices recognized the scale and scope of the intellectual changes taking place in the West. Just over thirty years ago, Francis Schaeffer wrote of a shift in worldview away from one that was at least vaguely Christian in the memory of society towards a completely different way of looking at the world. This new worldview was based on the idea that final reality was impersonal matter or energy shaped into its present form by impersonal chance. Significantly, Schaeffer observed that Christians in his time did not see this new worldview as taking the place of the Christian worldview that had previously dominated northern European and American cultures, either by personal conviction or cultural impression. These two worldviews, one generally Christian and the other barely deistic stood in complete antithesis to each other in content and also in moral results. These contrary ways of seeing the world would lead to very different sociological and governmental results, including the conception and implementation of law.


In 1983, writing just a few years after Francis Schaeffer made that contribution, Carl F. H. Henry described the situation and future possibilities in terms of a strict dichotomy:


“If modern culture is to escape the oblivion that has engulfed the earlier civilizations of man, the recovery of the will of the self-revealed God in the realm of justice and law is crucially imperative. Return to pagan misconceptions of divinized rulers, or a divinized cosmos, or a quasi-Christian conception of natural law or natural justice will bring inevitable disillusionment. Not all pleas for transcendent authority will truly serve God or man. By aggrandizing law and human rights and welfare to their sovereignty, all manner of earthly leaders eagerly preempt the role of the divine and obscure the living God of Scriptural revelation. The alternatives are clear: we return to the God of the Bible or we perish in the pit of lawlessness.”


Writing even earlier, Carl Henry had already identified the single greatest intellectual obstacle to a cultural return to the God of the Bible. Released in 1976, Henry’s first volume of his six-volume magnum opus, God, Revelation, and Authority, began with this first line: “No fact of contemporary Western life is more evident than the growing distrust of final truth and its implacable questioning of any sure word.” This obstacle to the return to the authority of a Christian worldview is really part of a vicious circle that begins with the departure from at least a cultural impression of God’s revealed authority. Leaving a Christian worldview leads to a distrust of final truth and a rejection of universal authority, which then blockades the way back to the God of the Bible.


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 22, 2016 11:57

The Briefing 02-22-16

As presidential race continues, the field narrows and worldview divides become clearerChicago Tribune (Chirs Cillizza) — Winners and losers from the South Carolina primary, Nevada caucuses

Death of Antonin Scalia accentuates the importance of elections for American public and private lifeWashington Post (Charles Krauthammer) — Win one for NinoNew York Times (Adam Liptak) — Supreme Court Appointment Could Reshape American LifeNew York Times (Linda Greenhouse) — Resetting the Post-Scalia Supreme Court

Argument at Georgetown law school highlights just how liberal American higher ed isWashington Post (Susan Svrluga) — Georgetown law professors argue over how, and whether, to mourn Scalia

Creationists draw ire of media, labeled "evangelical extremists"Newsweek (Lindsay Tucker) — Noah's Ark Rises in Kentucky, Dinosaurs and All

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 22, 2016 02:00

R. Albert Mohler Jr.'s Blog

R. Albert Mohler Jr.
R. Albert Mohler Jr. isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow R. Albert Mohler Jr.'s blog with rss.